Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned



 Religions > Atheism > Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 07 Nov 2003 01:55:41 PM
Object: Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned
(M. Clark) wrote:

:|> http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/410/billofrights.htm
:|> *************************************************************
:|
:|This is not the 14th Amendment but somebody's interpretation of the 14th
:|Amendment. This is a good example of how atheists strain the meanings
:|of the amendments.

Just a tad bit dingy aren't you?
BTW do you happen to know what an annotation is?
Had you bothered to look at this you would have found the exact wording of
the 14th Amendment at one place in it.
Fourteenth Amendment

http://candst.tripod.com/14thamend.htm
:|As I've said elsewhere,

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[as Gray Shockley said:]
(Your "opinion" is not an adequate citation.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

:|> ****************************************************************
:|> TENTH AMENDMENT:
:|>
:|> Article the twelfth [Amendment X] [10]
:|>
:|> The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,
:|> nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States
:|> respectively, or to the people.
:|> -----------------------------------------
:|> (1)
:|> Amendment X: RIGHTS RESERVED BY THE STATES - The usual interpretation of
:|> this amendment is that it a declaratory statement or truism (all in
:|> retained which has not been surrendered) and not an expression of any
:|> implied or inherent rights. Its purpose was political, to allay fears that
:|> the new federal government might exercise powers not granted and that the
:|> states might not be able to exercise their powers. Madison and Hamilton
:|> both agreed that there was enough elasticity elsewhere in the Constitution
:|> on federal powers that this statement of reserved state police powers could
:|> be added. Other than with a few tax cases, there has been little judicial
:|> holding on this amendment.
:|> http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/410/billofrights.htm
:|>
:|> (2)
:|> To Understand the Tenth Amendment, it is important to know that the
:|> constitution delegates, or gives, certain powers to the federal government.
:|> Most of these powers are actually enumerated, or named. . .
:|> The federal government has other powers besides those clearly
:|> listed in the Constitution. These are implied, or unstated, powers. of
:|> They cover a variety of matters. The Constitutions states that Congress
:|> shall "make all Laws which shall be necessary proper for carrying into
:|> Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this
:|> Constitution in the Government of the United states." This "'necessary and
:|> proper"clause (or elastic clause) gives the federal government the legal
:|> right to exercise the implied power that is connected to its clearly listed
:|> powers. For example, the federal government has the enumerated power to
:|> make laws concerning trade between states. That power has been stretched
:|> to include things not specifically listed in the Constitution such as
:|> regulating air, bus, train, and truck transportation between states. The
:|> federal government also regulates TV and radio. The issue of implied
:|> powers was first raised by Chief Justice John Marshall
:|> The Constitution also gives part of the federal government
:|> Congress-the power "to provide for the ... general welfare of the United
:|> States." Under this power, the federal government has done many things not
:|> listed in the Constitution. For example, the federal government has built
:|> dams and flood control projects. It has set up national parks. It has
:|> established a billion dollar system of social security benefits for older
:|> citizens and for the disabled and poor.
:|> The federal government also shares certain powers with the states.
:|> These concurrent, or shared, powers include setting and collecting taxes,
:|> passing criminal laws on the same matter, and spending money for-the good
:|> of the public.
:|> The Constitution also names particular things that the states may
:|> not do. For instance, states may not enter into treaties with countries.
:|> Nor may states make laws that interfere with contracts or give people
:|> titles of nobility (such as "count" or "duchess"). States are also
:|> prohibited from coining money.
:|> The states have thousands of powers. Every state creates and
:|> controls its own government and sets voting requirements for its citizens.
:|> The state controls local business, labor, and professions, as well as the
:|> ownership, use, and sale of property. The state has tremendous
:|> responsibility for looking after its citizens' health and welfare. It has
:|> the power to set and collect taxes for these purposes. Looking out for its
:|> citizens means controlling schools, hospitals, roads, and other public
:|> services. It means making laws that require vaccinations and limiting
:|> automobile exhaust fumes. It means outlawing forms of gambling and
:|> forbidding ownership of dangerous weapons. It means establishing highway
:|> speed limits and controlling the sale and use of alcoholic beverages. It
:|> can also mean forbidding the sale of soft drinks if they are in bottles or
:|> cans that aren't accepted for return.
:|> From the beginning, the states kept some of these important powers
:|> for themselves. After all, the Tenth Amendment says that all powers not
:|> given to the federal government or forbidden to the states are reserved
:|> to-that is, belong to-either the states or the people.
:|>
:|> The Preamble, or first part, of the Constitution begins with the phrase,
:|> "We the People. . ." and ends with". . . do ordain and establish this
:|> Constitution for the United States of America.," All the powers that the
:|> Constitution of the United States gives, both to the states and to the
:|> federal government, flow directly from the people.
:|> Now think about what the Tenth Amendment is really saying:
:|> All powers that are not given to the federal government or forbidden to the
:|> states belong-- either to the states or to the people. The Tenth Amendment
:|> really seems to be setting limits on the power of the federal government.
:|> Yet this is exactly what the main part of the Constitution itself does. In
:|> fact, many scholars believe that the Tenth Amendment only repeats what is
:|> said in the Constitution. If this is true, then why has the Tenth
:|> Amendment been interpreted--its meaning studied and debated--over and over
:|> again?
:|> To answer this question, compare the wording of the Tenth Amendment
:|> with these travel directions: , 'Drive 14.2 miles. Turn left just before
:|> the bridge. Continue for two blocks. Stop at the bank on your right." How
:|> detailed is the amendment compared with the travel directions? Does the
:|> amendment give an exact road map for the constitutional traveler? The
:|> answer is clearly no.
:|> Some scholars believe that those who wrote the Tenth Amendment
:|> purposely made it vague, or fuzzy. Why would they want to do that?
:|> Article 11 of the Articles of Confederation (ratified in 1781) will help
:|> to explain this. Article 11, like the Tenth Amendment that came after it,
:|> deals with the power of state governments and the federal government. But
:|> Article 11 includes a key word that is not found in the Tenth Amendment.
:|> Pay special attention -to the underlined [capitalized] word as you read the
:|> Article:
:|>
:|> Each State retains its sovereignty [power not controlled by any other
:|> power], freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right,
:|> which is not by this confederation EXPRESSLY delegated to the United
:|> States, in Congress assembled. [underlining-capitalized- added]
:|>
:|> The word expressly means " directly " or " specifically. " A sign in a
:|> restaurant that sets aside one area expressly for nonsmokers means "Keep
:|> out of this area if you wish to smoke!" A Congress that has only those
:|> powers expressly delegated to itself is also limited. It may do only those
:|> things that the Constitution actually names as its fight. It may not do
:|> anything more. The U.S. government under the Articles of Confederation was
:|> called a body without a head. It was the word expressly that had chopped
:|> the head off that national body.
:|> Those who were present at the 1787 Constitutional Convention knew
:|> how Article II of the Articles of Confederation had weakened the federal
:|> government earlier. Delegates who attended the state conventions to ratify
:|> the Constitution probably knew it, too. The word expressly didn't bother
:|> the Anti-Federalists. In fact, they pressed hard to have the word
:|> expressly included in any amendment about the "reserved powers" of the
:|> states.
:|> After the Constitutional Convention had approved the Constitution,
:|> the states held their own conventions to make decisions about ratifying it.
:|> The Federalists had tried hard to persuade state delegates to vote for the
:|> Constitution. They convinced the delegates that amendments should be
:|> decided on separately from the Constitution itself. The states therefore
:|> came up with various ideas for amendments. Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
:|> New York, South Carolina, and Virginia all wrote amendments that reserved
:|> to the states those powers not delegated to the central government. Except
:|> for Virginia, all of these states wanted the new amendment to keep for the
:|> states all powers ,"expressly " or "clearly," delegated to the federal
:|> government.
:|> On June 8, 1789, James Madison introduced the various state
:|> amendments to Congress. His wording for the "reserved powers" amendment
:|> stated: "The powers not delegated to this constitution, nor prohibited by
:|> it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively." When the Senate
:|> approved the amendment on September 7, 1789, it included the words "or to
:|> the people." Both the Senate and the House of Representatives accepted the
:|> amendment as the twelfth and last one. Then, after two other amendments
:|> were rejected, the "reserved powers" amendment moved up two places and
:|> became the tenth amendment in the list. After Congress voted to propose
:|> the ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights, it was up to the states to
:|> ratify these amendments. In 1791 the Tenth Amendment and the other nine
:|> amendments were finally ratified.
:|> Remember, the Tenth Amendment did not include the word expressly.
:|> What effect would this have on the way in which the amendment was received?
:|> As you may have guessed, it left the door wide open for different
:|> interpretations of federal powers.
:|> SOURCE OF INFORMATION: The American Heritage History of the Bill of Rights,
:|> The Tenth Amendment, Judith Adams, Silver Burdett Press. (1991) pp 31-36
:|> *******************************************************************
:|> "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
:|> prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or
:|> to the people."
:|>
:|> That's the Tenth Amendment. It's a cut-and-paste job of a part of the
:|> Articles of Confederation that limited the Confederation government to
:|> powers not EXPRESSLY delegated to it by the Articles. James Madison
:|> carefully knocked the word "expressly" out of the text of the amendment so
:|> that it would not prevent the federal government from exercising powers not
:|> expressly provided by the Constitution but implied by its provisions and
:|> not specifically barred.
:|> **************************************************************
:|> THE BILL OF RIGHTS & THE TENTH AMENDMENT
:|>
:|> . . . The great national debate continued unabated as the
:|> confederationalist school caused another kind of impasse, as many States
:|> made their demands for a Bill of Rights known. Many agreed to ratify the
:|> Constitution with the provision that a Bill of Rights would be attached
:|> with all due haste after its ratification. There was some that insisted
:|> that it not be ratified without it, but those who had toiled over its
:|> drafting were convincing in their protests that they were not optimistic
:|> about a second convention being successful. The first had barely escaped an
:|> impasse. So the Constitution was ratified with the understanding that a
:|> Bill of Rights would be submitted for ratification immediately afterwards.
:|> The Preamble to the Bill of Rights reflects this demand, in much softer
:|> language:
:|>
:|> "The conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their
:|> adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent
:|> misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and
:|> restrictive clauses should be added..."
:|>
:|> Some States even went so far as to include their right to secede from the
:|> Union in their ratifying documents. This could not be easily denied,
:|> especially at the time, and it sent a clear message to the new Congress - a
:|> Bill of Rights or face the secession of States from the "more perfect
:|> union", the shortest lived union of its kind in all time. Some were opposed
:|> to creating such a Bill, but political expediency won the day and a Bill of
:|> Rights was produced that satisfied many of the demands of the
:|> confederationalist school. Of particular note was the Tenth Amendment that
:|> many States had specifically demanded:
:|>
:|> "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
:|> prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or
:|> to the people."
:|>
:|> The Tenth Amendment is a more generally worded version of reserved rights
:|> of the State governments that is found in Article II of the Articles of
:|> Confederation. What was not included in Article II are any references to
:|> the people, which reflects what the ratifiers of the Constitution had come
:|> to believe was the nature of the new Constitutional Federalism.
:|> http://www.ktas.org/confed2.htm
:|> **********************************************************
:|> >:|You assertion doesn't make any sense at all with respect to certain
:|> >:|Jefferson writings. Jefferson clearly reflected in his writings that
:|> >:|the 1st and 10th Amendments were meant to work together to give the
:|> >:|States the power to address religious issues. Here they are again so
:|> >:|you can ignore them again:
:|>
:|> Only certain Jefferson writings?
:|> I will broaden that a bit for you
:|>
:|> JUST A TINY PORTION OF WHAT IS OUT THERE
:|> Thomas Jefferson on Separation of Church and State
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/qjeffson.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson on Religion Flourishing on its Own Merits
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/merits.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson wrote in his Notes on the State of Virginia: "Instead therefore
:|> of putting the Bible and Testament into the hands of the children, at an
:|> age when their judgments are not sufficiently matured for religious
:|> enquiries, their memories may here be stored with the most useful facts
:|> from Grecian, Roman, European and American history."
:|> [DID] Thomas Jefferson supported Bible reading in school; this is proven by
:|> his service as the first president of the Washington, D.C. public schools,
:|> which used the Bible and Watt's Hymns as textbooks for reading.
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/arg6.htm
:|>
:|> Another Jefferson Quote Debunked
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/jefschl1.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson, Religion, and the Public Schools.
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/jeffschl.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson's Declaration of Independence did not use the word "Creator"
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/doitj.htm
:|>
:|> Joseph Story's ongoing war with Thomas Jefferson
:|> http://candst.tripod.com/joestor3.htm
:|>
:|> 79. A Bill for the More General Diffusion of Knowledge (1778)
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/jefflaw1.htm
:|>
:|> 80. A Bill for Amending the Constitution of the College of William and
:|> Mary, and Substituting More Certain Revenues for Its Support (1779)
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/jefflaw2.htm
:|>
:|> 81. A Bill for Establishing a Public Library (1779)
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/jefflaw3.htm
:|>
:|> [DID] Thomas Jefferson actually said that the wall of separation between
:|> church and state was "one directional."
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/arg3.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson's Danbury letter was written merely to assure Connecticut
:|> Baptists that the Constitution did not permit the establishment of a
:|> national denomination.
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/arg12.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson's Danbury letter was written to address the Danbury Baptists'
:|> fears that the First Amendment might be misinterpreted.
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/arg13.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson's letter to Benjamin Rush shows that Jefferson was a
:|> non-preferentialist.
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/tnppage/arg14.htm
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson on Religious Freedom
:|> Jefferson's Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom in the
:|> State of Virginia
:|> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7842/rfindex.htm
:|> http://members.tripod.com/~candst/statute.htm
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson on Politics & Government
:|> 52. Freedom of Religion
:|> http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1650.htm
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson on Religion
:|> http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1777/jefferson.html
:|>
:|> THOMAS JEFFERSON ON CHRISTIANITY & RELIGION
:|> Compiled by Jim Walker
:|> http://www.nobeliefs.com/jefferson.htm
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson on Religion
:|> http://www.mikehersh.com/article_30.shtml
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson on religion
:|> http://www.worldpolicy.org/globalrights/religion/jefferson-religion.html
:|>
:|> Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom (1786)
:|> Thomas Jefferson
:|> http://www.worldpolicy.org/globalrights/religion/va-religiousfreedom.html
:|>
:|> The Real Jefferson on Religion by Robert S. Alley
:|> http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/alley_18_4.html
:|>
:|> The Letters of Thomas Jefferson: 1743-1826
:|> RELIGION AND THE UNIVERSITY
:|> To Dr. Thomas Cooper Monticello, November 2, 1822
:|> DEAR SIR,
:|> http://grid.let.rug.nl/~usa/P/tj3/writings/brf/jefl270.htm
:|>
:|> The Letters of Thomas Jefferson: 1743-1826
:|> RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
:|> To Rev. Samuel Miller Washington, Jan. 23, 1808
:|> http://grid.let.rug.nl/~usa/P/tj3/writings/brf/jefl183.htm
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson's Letters on Liberty and Religion
:|> http://www.sullivan-county.com/identity/jeff_letters.htm
:|>
:|> Jefferson's Note on Virginia (religion)
:|> http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/JEFFERSON/ch17.html
:|>
:|> THE Jefferson Bible
:|> The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth
:|> Extracted Textually from the Gospels
:|> Compiled by Thomas Jefferson
:|> Edited by Eyler Robert Coates, Sr.
:|> [a decent version, not the most accurate ]
:|> http://www.angelfire.com/co/JeffersonBible/
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson
:|> http://www.uua.org/uuhs/duub/articles/thomasjefferson.html
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson: A UU Perspective
:|> Was Jefferson a Unitarian?
:|> http://www.2think.org/tj.shtml
:|>
:|> Thomas Jefferson: The Sphere of Religion
:|> http://search.eb.com/elections/pri/Q00074.html
:|>
:|> Jefferson and Religion--Google search
:|> http://snurl.com/2pse

.

User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned 07 Nov 2003 02:40:18 PM
In article <t3unqvkirfpiddojc8h7h40f5nk29nhoe3@4ax.com>
writes:
<
<idontreply@toemail.com (M. Clark) wrote:
<
<
<>:|> http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/410/billofrights.htm
<>:|> *************************************************************
<>:|
<>:|This is not the 14th Amendment but somebody's interpretation of the 14th
<>:|Amendment. This is a good example of how atheists strain the meanings
<>:|of the amendments.
<
<
<Just a tad bit dingy aren't you?
<BTW do you happen to know what an annotation is?
<
<Had you bothered to look at this you would have found the exact wording of
<the 14th Amendment at one place in it.
<
< Fourteenth Amendment
<> http://candst.tripod.com/14thamend.htm
Uh oh...However DID we atheists overlook that one in our relentless
campaign aimed out "keeping people ignorant of their constitutional rights"?
Carol, was this one of yours?...
-- cary
.
User: "Carol Lee Smith"

Title: Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned 07 Nov 2003 03:31:30 PM
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Cary Kittrell wrote:

<idontreply@toemail.com (M. Clark) wrote:
<>:|> http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/410/billofrights.htm
<>:|This is not the 14th Amendment but somebody's interpretation of the 14th
<>:|Amendment. This is a good example of how atheists strain the meanings
<>:|of the amendments.
<Just a tad bit dingy aren't you?
<BTW do you happen to know what an annotation is?
<Had you bothered to look at this you would have found the exact wording of
<the 14th Amendment at one place in it.
< Fourteenth Amendment
<> http://candst.tripod.com/14thamend.htm
Uh oh...However DID we atheists overlook that one in our relentless
campaign aimed out "keeping people ignorant of their constitutional rights"?
Carol, was this one of yours?...

Me?
Of course not.
You know how conscientiously, tirelessly, scrupulously and energetically I
work to keep people as ignorant about their constitutional rights as
possible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
User: "Cary Kittrell"

Title: Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned 07 Nov 2003 04:01:08 PM
In article <Pine.OSF.3.96.1031107152755.26702N-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu> Carol Lee Smith <human@csd.uwm.edu> writes:
<On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Cary Kittrell wrote:
<
<> <idontreply@toemail.com (M. Clark) wrote:
<
<> <>:|> http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/410/billofrights.htm
<
<> <>:|This is not the 14th Amendment but somebody's interpretation of the 14th
<> <>:|Amendment. This is a good example of how atheists strain the meanings
<> <>:|of the amendments.
<
<> <Just a tad bit dingy aren't you?
<> <BTW do you happen to know what an annotation is?
<
<> <Had you bothered to look at this you would have found the exact wording of
<> <the 14th Amendment at one place in it.
<
<> < Fourteenth Amendment
<> <> http://candst.tripod.com/14thamend.htm
<
<> Uh oh...However DID we atheists overlook that one in our relentless
<> campaign aimed out "keeping people ignorant of their constitutional rights"?
<
<> Carol, was this one of yours?...
<
<Me?
<
<Of course not.
<
<You know how conscientiously, tirelessly, scrupulously and energetically I
<work to keep people as ignorant about their constitutional rights as
<possible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Their what "rights"? (Ssshhhhhhh...)
-- cary
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Atheism is hate crime; was: Government schools should be constitutionally banned
Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned
Atheist cheerleaders responsible; was: Government schools should be constitutionally banned
Re: Government schools should be constitutionally banned
Gov't endorses atheism; was: Government schools should be constitutionally banned
talk.origins banned content thread : are JW's creationists?
Re: Talk.Origins Banned Subject: Humans are half Banana, a Budikka Hole
Re: Talk.Origins Banned Subject: Humans are half Banana, a Budi
Subject: Re: Talk.origins banned subject: Creative day IV
Re: Talk.Origin banned subject: Molecular biologist view Darwinian evolution with doubts
Talk.Origin banned Subject: Does Mathamitcs prove a Universal designer?
talk.origins banned subject: Dinosaur planet\ real scientist..scott sampsom comments
Ex-Arms Hunter Says Iraq Had No Banned Stockpiles - 3 hours ago
OT: Foul-mouthed parrot banned for Queen’s visit
VMI prayers banned; supreme court won't hear appeal
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER