CB wrote:

ERR that doesn't back up your augment in anyway???

The question was why is it not mentioned in the bible,

Oh, OK. That's easy. The bible is false. It starts as a document
written by jealous little men infuriated by the fact that the nations
next to them got rich, even though those nations were tolerant of
somone else's religion. It ends as an odd myth about a god-man, largly
copied from Babalonian, Egyptian, and other major cultures of the
ancient Mid-East. To think that the bible has *anything* important to
say about history or science is laughable.

http://www.amazon.com/Bible-Unearthed-Archaeologys-Vision-Ancient/dp/0684869128
http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_arhs.htm
http://home1.gte.net/deleyd/religion/appendixd.html
http://members.cox.net/deleyd/religion/appendixd4a.html
http://freethought.mbdojo.com/josephus.html
http://home.ca.inter.net/~oblio/home.htm
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theism/christianity/historicity.html
http://mama.indstate.edu/users/nizrael/jesusrefutation.html
http://jesusneverexisted.com/

maybe I should help
you this seems to be a little difficult for you. I

The only reason it's difficult for me is that you cannot fucking WRITE.

ts because they had no
idea.

*Who* had no idea of *what*, you top-posting shitstain? What, did you
find a computer in a cereal box or something?

-Panama Floyd, Atl.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
EAC Martian Commander
Plonked by Kadaitcha Man Sept 06
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://moses.creighton.edu/JRS/2005/2005-11.html

CB wrote:

ERR that doesn't back up your augment in anyway???

The question was why is it not mentioned in the bible, maybe I should help
you this seems to be a little difficult for you. Its because they had no
idea.

Good grief, you're going in circles. Panama Floyd, an atheist,
hasn't made an argument. He responded to a message by another poster
called CB (country2000@hotmail.com), a theist, who specifically pointed
out he's not the one who posted about the Dawkins book.

After deciphering your bizarre statements, you seem to be saying that
Adam and Eve were fictional, that the bible is nonsense and that it
doesn't mention dinosaurs because the people who wrote it were unaware
of them. Well, Panama Floyd agrees with you, as does everyone else in
alt.atheism. And I feel confident in saying that you plan to argue with
theists about the bizarre beliefs they hold, it will help if you learn
proper English, if you can manage to write complete sentences, and if
you quit top posting. Your failure to master those three skills really
makes you, and by extension your position, look bad.

CB wrote:
=20

ERR that doesn't back up your augment in anyway???
=20
The question was why is it not mentioned in the bible, maybe I should =

you this seems to be a little difficult for you. Its because they had =

idea.

=20
Good grief, you're going in circles. Panama Floyd, an atheist,
hasn't made an argument. He responded to a message by another poster
called CB (country2000@hotmail.com), a theist, who specifically =

out he's not the one who posted about the Dawkins book.
=20
After deciphering your bizarre statements, you seem to be saying that
Adam and Eve were fictional, that the bible is nonsense and that it
doesn't mention dinosaurs because the people who wrote it were unaware
of them. Well, Panama Floyd agrees with you, as does everyone else in
alt.atheism. And I feel confident in saying that you plan to argue =

theists about the bizarre beliefs they hold, it will help if you learn
proper English, if you can manage to write complete sentences, and if
you quit top posting. Your failure to master those three skills =

makes you, and by extension your position, look bad.
=20
=20
--=20

Please remember
that the vast majority of Jews of Jesus' time rejected the claims that
Christians made about Jesus being the fulfillment of the apparent
prophecies.

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:13:46 -0500, in alt.atheism
CB <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in
<f50mi2pth1ak664o1krrqqbjvcpnhqqren@4ax.com>:

On 5 Oct 2006 20:49:32 -0700,

CB wrote:

On 2 Oct 2006 21:47:06 -0700,

CB wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:51:35 GMT, "CB" <ellisa2079@yahoo.com> wrote:

Free your mind and the rest will follow.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/God-Delusion-Richard-Dawkins/dp/0593055489/ref=pd_ts_c_th_1/202-8283383-8398244?ie=UTF8

Just so people won't think the above post is from me.
Another moron trying to prove God doesn't exist.
I'm still waiting for one of those educated morons to tell me if the chicken
or the egg came first.

Eggs did, dumbass. Reptiles and insects laid eggs for millions of years
before chickens ever existed. Why don't you try reading a real book
before asking such a stupid question?

Real book?
I do.
It's called the Bible.

The bible is not "a" book. It is a collection of books.

You're right.
It took several men over thousands of years to write the Bible.

Thousands? Really?

Very few of them had any knowledge of the others but all wrote about the same
thing: Jesus Christ.

You haven't read the Old Testament, have you?

Even the most Christian-centric reading of it shows that hardly any of
it has to do with Jesus.

Matthew 13:14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith,
By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see,
and shall not perceive:
15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of
hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see
with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their
heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.




Acts 26:8 "Why is it considered incredible among you
people if God does raise the dead?

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:08:35 -0500, in alt.atheism
CB <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in
<k30mi258qnc0e4s0f6m1hvskr7dvpa6nq8@4ax.com>:

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:37:49 -0500, Free Lunch <lunch@nofreelunch.us> wrote:

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:23:04 -0500, in alt.atheism
CB <country2000@hotmail.com> wrote in
<quibi25thsl3lbdpt906vrhgeqqsaa3f1g@4ax.com>:

On 2 Oct 2006 21:47:06 -0700,

CB wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:51:35 GMT, "CB" <ellisa2079@yahoo.com> wrote:

Free your mind and the rest will follow.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/God-Delusion-Richard-Dawkins/dp/0593055489/ref=pd_ts_c_th_1/202-8283383-8398244?ie=UTF8

Just so people won't think the above post is from me.
Another moron trying to prove God doesn't exist.
I'm still waiting for one of those educated morons to tell me if the chicken
or the egg came first.

Eggs did, dumbass. Reptiles and insects laid eggs for millions of years
before chickens ever existed. Why don't you try reading a real book
before asking such a stupid question?

Real book?
I do.
It's called the Bible.

It's really a book, but it was written by people who were profoundly
ignorant of natural history.

Actually, you are the ignorant one.

And if you think the egg came first you're dumber than I thought.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Sure I do.
You're just too stupid to understand.

So, we should believe your claims, just because you say so, even though
they are proven wrong by the scientific evidence.