| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"J Young" |
| Date: |
23 May 2007 11:40:57 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Help Wanted |
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
--
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
.
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 10:25:44 PM |
|
|
J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> wrote:
Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights.
I did not, pro-liar.
My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited,
You tell us where you have the right to force anybody's obedience.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 12:17:30 PM |
|
|
On 23 May 2007 09:40:57 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
As I said, go read the actual decision and you'll see the Court's
exact reasoning and citations. The 14th Amendment was their primary
source, but not the only one.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "John D. Wentzky" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 12:20:20 PM |
|
|
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8nt8535ljali48o0p2s3kspeh0h1vghb14@4ax.com...
On 23 May 2007 09:40:57 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
As I said, go read the actual decision and you'll see the Court's
exact reasoning and citations. The 14th Amendment was their primary
source, but not the only one.
You hinge on that one aspect, huh?
Why is it you can not read the Supreme Court Justices writings who votged
against roevwade and understand it all rather than grasping for a straw
that can't be justified by the Constitution itself?
RoevWade is criminal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 01:56:40 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8nt8535ljali48o0p2s3kspeh0h1vghb14@4ax.com...
On 23 May 2007 09:40:57 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
As I said, go read the actual decision and you'll see the Court's
exact reasoning and citations. The 14th Amendment was their primary
source, but not the only one.
You hinge on that one aspect, huh?
Why is it you can not read the Supreme Court Justices writings who votged
against roevwade and understand it all rather than grasping for a straw
that can't be justified by the Constitution itself?
RoevWade is criminal.
That's pretty funny, coming from a criminal who's already been convicted once
- and will very likely be going to prison for his latest run-in with the
Anderson County police.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Chief Instigator" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 03:03:00 PM |
|
|
"John D. Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"The Chief Instigator" <patrick@eris.io.com> wrote in message
news:szkirajid1z.fsf@eris.io.com...
"John D. Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
"Douglas Berry" <penguin_boy@mindOBVIOUSspring.com> wrote in message
news:8nt8535ljali48o0p2s3kspeh0h1vghb14@4ax.com...
On 23 May 2007 09:40:57 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopinions@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
As I said, go read the actual decision and you'll see the Court's
exact reasoning and citations. The 14th Amendment was their primary
source, but not the only one.
You hinge on that one aspect, huh?
Why is it you can not read the Supreme Court Justices writings who votged
against roevwade and understand it all rather than grasping for a straw
that can't be justified by the Constitution itself?
RoevWade is criminal.
That's pretty funny, coming from a criminal who's already been convicted
once - and will very likely be going to prison for his latest run-in with
the Anderson County police.
Me being attacked by cops on January 8 of this year is a latest run-in?
What a joke.
You are indeed a joke, Convict of Anderson County.
And, you are reaching out to feminists to protect yourself?
LOL!
What feminists?
What a wimp you really are.
Are you sure you are a man?
More of one than you've ever been, but then, I'm not the one who did time for
exposing himself. (That's all yours.)
Seems to me the term 'mouse' is more appropriate in your case.
Seems to me I'm a bit more observant of the law than you ever have been.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 06:20:27 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 13:20:20 -0400 there was an Ancient "John D.
Wentzky" <johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> who stoppeth one in
alt.atheism
As I said, go read the actual decision and you'll see the Court's
exact reasoning and citations. The 14th Amendment was their primary
source, but not the only one.
You hinge on that one aspect, huh?
It is the basis of the decision.
Why is it you can not read the Supreme Court Justices writings who votged
against roevwade and understand it all rather than grasping for a straw
that can't be justified by the Constitution itself?
I've read the dissenting opinions. Have you? The right of privacy is
implied by the 4th, 10th, and 14th Amendments. Many courts have ruled
on this subject, using the same test.
RoevWade is criminal.
No, Roe v. Wade is the decision of the Supreme Court of the United
States; and as such, is the final word on the subject until a
constitutional amendment is passed or the ruling is overturned.
--
Douglas Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
Jason Gastrich is praying for me on 8 January 2011
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the
source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a
stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 03:29:10 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 13:20:20 -0400, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> in alt.abortion with message-id
<oJ_4i.850$%T3.265@bignews8.bellsouth.net> wrote:
RoevWade is criminal.
R v W is legal.
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty under any name.
Deportation only, not work permit or citizenship.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
25 May 2007 08:37:13 AM |
|
|
Attila < wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 13:20:20 -0400, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> in alt.abortion with message-id
<oJ_4i.850$%T3.265@bignews8.bellsouth.net> wrote:
RoevWade is criminal.
R v W is legal.
This is disjoint, roe-vs-wade is a supreme court decision. It is
not a right as the SC does not have the power to create a right.
It can fall to another SC decision or congress.
Cheers,
Rich
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty under any name.
Deportation only, not work permit or citizenship.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
25 May 2007 04:14:34 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 25 May 2007 06:37:13 -0700, Rich <someone@someplace.not> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<8sGdnW957sLme8vbnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@comcast.com> wrote:
Attila < wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 13:20:20 -0400, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> in alt.abortion with message-id
<oJ_4i.850$%T3.265@bignews8.bellsouth.net> wrote:
RoevWade is criminal.
R v W is legal.
This is disjoint, roe-vs-wade is a supreme court decision.
And as such it is the law. By definition. And therefore cannot be
criminal.
Unless you can explain how a legal activity can be illegal.
It is
not a right as the SC does not have the power to create a right.
Since the only rights that exist are those that are defined and
protected by law SCOUS has a direct bearing on what is or is not a
right. I agree it cannot create a law or a right but it can recognize
an existing but previously unrecognized law or right.
It can fall to another SC decision or congress.
As can anything else, including any law you can name.
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty under any name or for any reason.
Deportation upon identification, not work permit or citizenship.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 10:24:12 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 13:20:20 -0400, "John D. Wentzky"
<johndwentzky@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
RoevWade is criminal.
If a majority decision of the USSC is criminal, we have a criminal
serving in the oval office.
Thanks for saving us the cost of an impeachment and the subsequent
trial.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 03:28:25 PM |
|
|
On 23 May 2007 09:40:57 -0700, J Young <youngopinions@aol.com> in
alt.abortion with message-id
<1179938457.205685.23010@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> wrote:
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
--
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
The opinions presented here really don't matter since only the
opinions of nine people count.
--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom
Every illegal alien is a criminal.
No amnesty under any name.
Deportation only, not work permit or citizenship.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kelsey Bjarnason" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
23 May 2007 12:47:22 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:40:57 -0700, J Young wrote:
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
--
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
Has it not occurred to you that there could, in fact, be several correct
answers, any one of which is sufficient on its own?
--
Yes, that's radiant heat. What does that have to do
with infrared? - ARTEMIS
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
24 May 2007 01:58:05 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 23 May 2007 10:47:22 -0700, Kelsey Bjarnason
<kbjarnason@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:40:57 -0700, J Young wrote:
On May 23, 10:10?am, Douglas Berry <penguin_...@mindOBVIOUSspring.com>
wrote:
On 22 May 2007 21:52:45 -0700 there was an Ancient J Young
<youngopini...@aol.com> who stoppeth one in alt.atheism
Can anyone please tell me which amendment of the U.S. Constitution
specifically guarantees a woman's 'right to abortion'?
Go read the Roe v. Wade decision, and you'll see that the Justices
decided that anti-abortion laws violate the 14th Amendment.
--
You say the 14th, someone else said the 10th, and of course Ray
Fischer cited the entire Bill of Rights. My point is that if the
people who are pro-abortion can't agree exactly where this "right" is
cited, then how are we who are pro-life ( that includes sitting
Justices of the SCOTUS )supposed to agree with you?
Has it not occurred to you that there could, in fact, be several correct
answers, any one of which is sufficient on its own?
Well if this dumbass asked why don't we send a mission to land on the
sun and the answers given were: 'cos it's hot, it's far away, it's
expensive, it's pointless and there's nothing to really land on...IBen
would say since no one can agree on an answer...we should do it!
Fine, "J Young" you go first...and if you don't believe in
abortion...don't have one.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
24 May 2007 11:00:11 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 24 May 2007 01:58:05 -0500,
wrote:
Fine, "J Young" you go first...and if you don't believe in
abortion...don't have one.
Actually he should have one ... soon. He can correct his mother's
mistake in not having one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kelsey Bjarnason" |
|
| Title: Re: Help Wanted |
24 May 2007 01:02:32 PM |
|
|
[snips]
On Thu, 24 May 2007 01:58:05 -0500, zamboni30000 wrote:
Has it not occurred to you that there could, in fact, be several correct
answers, any one of which is sufficient on its own?
Well if this dumbass asked why don't we send a mission to land on the
sun and the answers given were: 'cos it's hot, it's far away, it's
expensive, it's pointless and there's nothing to really land on...IBen
would say since no one can agree on an answer...we should do it!
I'm game. We'll send him on ahead. When he reports back, we'll know we
haven't overlooked the real reason - that the sun has been overrun by
giant spiders. ;)
--
Pickup line: You're under arrest! Place your ankles behind your ears.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
