Religions > Atheism > Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Kurt Nicklas" |
| Date: |
20 Aug 2007 05:13:38 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth? |
On Aug 20, 2:04 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
So here is how liberals avoid debate on the war for those keeping
score:
* You've Never Served: You're a chickenhawk so they ignore the merits
of your argument.
* You Did Serve: You're still a chickenhawk for not serving now so
they ignore the merits of your argument.
* You Are Serving: It's illegal for you to speak about the war so
they
ignore the merits of your argument.
http://michellemalkin.com/
.
|
|
| User: "quibbler" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth? |
21 Aug 2007 05:58:20 AM |
|
|
In article <1187648018.663289.272150@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
nicklask@bellsouth.net says...
On Aug 20, 2:04 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
So here is how liberals avoid debate on the war for those keeping
score:
* You've Never Served: You're a chickenhawk so they ignore the merits
of your argument.
What argument. You have none now and you apparently never did. All you
ever did is claim that your opponents are traitors, despite the fact that
many of us served and you never did. When this was pointed out to you,
you then feigned outrage that somebody would disregard your blustering
***** on the basis of the fact that you're a hypocrite who can't back
up your big talk with action and prefers to risk the lives of other
people's kids.
* You Did Serve: You're still a chickenhawk for not serving now so
they ignore the merits of your argument.
Probably not in combat, so again, you want to bluster about how you were
a supply clerk in Guam, defending us from Pacific Islander menace.
Because you never saw combat, you feel demanding that others go do it.
* You Are Serving: It's illegal for you to speak about the war
That's a lie as usual. You're not forbidden to say that you're currently
serving or to say lots of things about the war. It's just that the
traitorous Bush adminstration will try to take vindictive actions against
you, if you manage to tell the truth about their incompetence.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ronald More-More Moshki" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth? |
20 Aug 2007 07:56:18 PM |
|
|
On Aug 20, 6:13 pm, Kurt Nicklas <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
On Aug 20, 2:04 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
So here is how liberals avoid debate on the war for those keeping
score:
* You've Never Served: You're a chickenhawk so they ignore the merits
of your argument.
* You Did Serve: You're still a chickenhawk for not serving now so
they ignore the merits of your argument.
* You Are Serving: It's illegal for you to speak about the war so
they
ignore the merits of your argument.
http://michellemalkin.com/
You are simply a war-yellow, along with Rush, Hannity, Prager, Paulie
W.
Rove,........ shall we continue?
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Morgan \MAMS" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth? |
20 Aug 2007 08:25:35 PM |
|
|
"Ronald 'More-More' Moshki" <sector_four@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
You are simply a war-yellow, along with Rush, Hannity, Prager, Paulie
W., Rove,........ shall we continue?
Who in current government served their nation in combat?
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
http://www.awolbush.com/
http://www.awolbush.com/cheney.html
http://www.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=165
http://www.rackjite.com/chawks.htm
http://www.houstonpress.com/issues/1999-01-07/columns2.html/1/index.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ronald More-More Moshki" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth? |
22 Aug 2007 01:31:07 AM |
|
|
On Aug 20, 9:25 pm, "David Morgan \(MAMS\)" <fin...@m-a-m-s.comC/Odm>
wrote:
"Ronald 'More-More' Moshki" <sector_f...@yahoo.com> wrote in message...
You are simply a war-yellow, along with Rush, Hannity, Prager, Paulie
W., Rove,........ shall we continue?
Who in current government served their nation in combat?
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
http://www.awolbush.com/
http://www.awolbush.com/cheney.html
http://www.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=165
http://www.rackjite.com/chawks.htm
http://www.houstonpress.com/issues/1999-01-07/columns2.html/1/index.html
LBJ and Ronnie got false papers printed up indicating they
served in WWII--------they've never been made available because
neither man did anything except get a phony medal or two.
Neither went thru any training, probably could not have done a
single pushup between them in the 1940s.
Now the Neocons are all gung-ho but they are hiding under
mattresses and in closets. They did the same thing 35-40 years ago.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how does KNICKLAS go "click"?? |
20 Aug 2007 07:56:41 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:13:38 -0700, Kurt Nicklas
<nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote:
* You've Never Served: You're a chickenhawk so they ignore the merits
of your argument.
Most everyone knows YOUR "arguments" aren't worth *****,
KNickkkers
Not after you got caught making late night, crank calls
Not after your silly "hate page" contained no vicious
rightwing hate
Not after you started p osting ***** coulter's spam as
"argument"
You're a fucking LOSER, Knickkkers
Worse than the PINEASSHOLE was
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Free Lunch" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth? |
20 Aug 2007 07:37:55 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:13:38 -0700, in alt.atheism
Kurt Nicklas <nicklask@bellsouth.net> wrote in
<1187648018.663289.272150@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com>:
On Aug 20, 2:04 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
So here is how liberals avoid debate on the war for those keeping
score:
* You've Never Served: You're a chickenhawk so they ignore the merits
of your argument.
* You Did Serve: You're still a chickenhawk for not serving now so
they ignore the merits of your argument.
* You Are Serving: It's illegal for you to speak about the war so
they
ignore the merits of your argument.
http://michellemalkin.com/
Yes, it's sad when the fake Michelle Malkin makes comments that find
there way onto alt.atheism and prove once again how completely vacuous
she is.
Once again, she is being dishonest, creating a parody of real arguments
because she cannot actually deal with the arguments that are made. Stop
wasting your time reading her rubbish.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "r wiley" |
|
| Title: Re: Hey, Chickenhawk, how many dead Americans did you say Saddam is worth? |
20 Aug 2007 07:36:27 PM |
|
|
Three times the Busheviks have blocked bills
to ban permanent U.S. bases in Iraq. That
exposes one of the real reaons for George W.
Bush's crusade in Iraq.
rw
"I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun in
order to get a deferment. Nor was I willing to go to Canada".
George W. Bush
"I had other priorities."
***** Cheney
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
