Here's a hint: "Tropical Tim" doesn't have 50 years of experience, either,
having posted last year that he was 50 years old.

He's just plain lying to you. What's better: he knows it, and knows we
know it, but he doesn't care and maintains the same lie.

You obviously have no idea how easy it is to recognize a homosexual in
todays society. Most of your friends probably considered the idea that
you were homosexual, they just didn't tell you. I don't walk up to
each person that I think is a homosexual and say *Hey, aren't you a
homosexual?*
If a person is looking for homosexual behavior, then it increases the
odds that a homosexual will be recognized. I don't say this in a
negitive way. Here is one example. Many homosexual men are much more
likly to show what the rednecks call *womenly type behavior*. Like
touching an infant and caressing it's face while cooing to the child.
I do that with my grandchildren and have seen many heterosexual men do
this, but I've seen many more homosexual men do this. You guys are
more inclined to drop the macho bearing. I've gotten very good at
spotting homosexuals. This allowed me to get to know and interview
many more than would happen by chance.

nelliganemile@hotmail.com (Brent Norman) wrote in message news:<a7ad4b4f.0404021912.7402395e@posting.google.com>...

Because of medical intervention, overpopulation is most certinly a
problem. Choosing to not procreate is an intelligent thing to do for
now.

The
need for KY jelly to lubricate the anal canal is obviously not
evolved.

Yet the lubricants are used for heterosexual contact in far greater
quantities than homosexual, as many women have problems with "natural"
lubrication, not to mention that homosexuality is not defined by any
specific sexual act.

Ok. You go and ask anyone you like:
What do lesbians do sexualy and what do men who are homosexual do
sexualy.

Most popular answers:
1. Women like to have oral sex with each other.
2. Men like to have anal sex with each other.

Now, I'm not saying that this is a fair statement, but it is true. Try
10 people of mixed gender and sexual preference. You'll see what I
mean.

Homosexuality is defined by specific sexual acts. Please don't be
naieve.

nelliganemile@hotmail.com (Brent Norman) wrote in message news:<a7ad4b4f.0404021912.7402395e@posting.google.com>...

nelliganemile@hotmail.com (Brent Norman) wrote in message news:<a7ad4b4f.0403181946.b1fc50@posting.google.com>...

Planet of the Normals <POTN> wrote in message news:<d1586d945b9fd0ea02981dadd00f9a9d@news.teranews.com>...

Yes, the majority of the world's population has a fear of those
people who practice Homosexuality. Rightly so.

People don't "practice" homosexuality. It's not a hobby, sport or
similar pastime... That is to say, it is not definied by one specific
set of actions or tasks. It simply implies the person with whom one
becomes romantically involved with.

Sexualy involved with. I'm not a expert with semantics. You must know
what I mean by Practicing.

If I was a single homosexual that is only into dating, but no sex
(perhaps waiting for the right person to come along), that would not
count as a practicing homosexual, correct?

Correct. I just spent the evening with another man. He came over to my
house to watch a TV show with me. I was entertaining another man. We
enjoyed each others company and had a great time. He is the best
friend I have at this time of my life.

Neither he nor I are practicing homosexuals. If you have sexual
desires for another man, then I would say you are looking for the
right man to be a practicing homosexual with.

Homosexuals are a very real danger to the human species. After more
than 50 years of personal research via interviews with practicing
Homosexuals,

I am curious about a few things you mentioned:

I'll answer briefly to each.

1) How did you arrive at the opportunity to interview "practicing"
homosexuals?

Most Homosexuals are easy to spot. Speach patterns, bearing, as well
as many other factors can be indicators. Notice I said *can*. Asking
or observing until confirmation has happened is a sure way.

For sure. Back in high school, my friends had no idea about me, but
over enough time they started to wonder, seeing as I wasn't regularly
dating like the rest of my friends, and I was very private about my
romantic feelings/crushes, etc. I eventually did "come out" to them
if it came up in discussion.

You obviously have no idea how easy it is to recognize a homosexual in
todays society. Most of your friends probably considered the idea that
you were homosexual, they just didn't tell you.

I don't walk up to
each person that I think is a homosexual and say *Hey, aren't you a
homosexual?*
If a person is looking for homosexual behavior, then it increases the
odds that a homosexual will be recognized. I don't say this in a
negitive way. Here is one example. Many homosexual men are much more
likly to show what the rednecks call *womenly type behavior*.

Like
touching an infant and caressing it's face while cooing to the child.
I do that with my grandchildren and have seen many heterosexual men do
this, but I've seen many more homosexual men do this. You guys are
more inclined to drop the macho bearing.

I've gotten very good at
spotting homosexuals. This allowed me to get to know and interview
many more than would happen by chance.

2) Where did you find them?

Too many instances to answer. They are intermixed with everyone else.

3) What questions did you ask them, and did you ask them all the same
questions?

Over the years, I've asked thousands of questions. I asked the same
questions until I was convinced that the answer was a standard I could
trust.

4) Were they open-ended or closed questions?

Explain further please.

Open ended questions demand "essay answers". They require thought and
yield much information.

Closed questions have short answers, usually "yes" or "no" and do not
yield as much information.

That's what I thought he meant, but now I will answer it as if that is
what he meant.

A very small percentile of the questions I've asked were *closed*
questions. Most people do not express thier most private thoughts to
someone easily. Sometimes, the necessary trust took quite some time to
develop.

I have not found a single case that was not caused by a
negative influence in the pre-choice life of any homosexual. These
influences have sometimes been discovered through interviews with
older persons who interacted with the individual who chose to continue
their life as a Homosexual.

I'd be interested to know more about your research.

Then email me. I'll answer as time permits.
Reference this posting so I'll know it's not spam.

Sexual abuse is by far the most prominent of the causes of Individual
Choice of Homosexuality, (ICH), second to juvenile experimentation.

Sexual abuse by a person of the same sex or opposite sex?

Mostly by same sex, but many instances of either or both.

Granted I haven't had 50 years of experience (I'm 26), but I find it
amazing that I have not encountered any homosexuals that I know
personally that have reported sexual abuse as a child/youth.

Perhaps you've never had another man trust you enough to tell you.
Having lived with homosexuals for quite a while gave me the chances to
develop trust among them that was far beyond the norm. Hell, we had
parties of 50+ where I was the only person not homosexual. I found
those moments kind of humorous in an odd way.

An almost unlimited list of causes can be attributed to ICH, none of
which include a predetermined physical disposition.

All homosexuals and heterosexuals I have ever known, knew from at
least adolescence that they were attracted to the same/opposite sex,
and this was confirmed by physical reactions, if you know what I
mean!!!

If you mean the stimulation of sexual feelings, than of course this
happens to everyone. I've never said different. However, to actively
participate in homosexual activity is not the same thing.

Having sexual feelings for the opposite sex versus actively
participating in sexual activity with the opposite sex=Having sexual
feelings for the same sex versus participating in sexual activity with
the same sex, n'est-ce pas?

Yes, I understand what you mean, but what does that have to do with
what I said?

In each case of ICH, a method of therapy should be discovered that
would allow the person to return to a sexual orientation that is that
of the evolved Heterosexual.

It is presumptuous to say such a thing.. "the evolved heterosexual" ..
I don't think heterosexuals ever evolved, they always were, just like
homosexuals.

I disaggree totaly. Just one example. When the fluids in a womens
vagina are excreted during sexual excitation, it is an evolved
reaction that enables the best chance for sucessful procreation.

True, but the percentage of times a woman's vagina is used for
successful procreation versus recreation makes that assumption seem a
little overkill. Sure it has procreative abilities, but that is not
its sole purpose, based on its use.

I imagine that male-female intercourse has always been more
entertainment than procreative. The evolution of the reproductive
system of the human does include feeling good as a cause to mate.
Nature sure wouldn't make a vagina feel like sandpaper. It would
really hinder procreation by making it less than enjoyable.

There could be an evolutionary advantage to having a certain
percentage of a population that will not procreate.

Because of medical intervention, overpopulation is most certinly a
problem. Choosing to not procreate is an intelligent thing to do for
now.

The
need for KY jelly to lubricate the anal canal is obviously not
evolved.

Yet the lubricants are used for heterosexual contact in far greater
quantities than homosexual, as many women have problems with "natural"
lubrication, not to mention that homosexuality is not defined by any
specific sexual act.

Ok. You go and ask anyone you like:
What do lesbians do sexualy and what do men who are homosexual do
sexualy.

Most popular answers:
1. Women like to have oral sex with each other.
2. Men like to have anal sex with each other.

Now, I'm not saying that this is a fair statement, but it is true. Try
10 people of mixed gender and sexual preference. You'll see what I
mean.

Homosexuality is defined by specific sexual acts. Please don't be
naieve.

The likelihood of this happening within the next decade or two is
slim. Much like the Roman Empire, today's societies are within a
trial period of allowance of ICH, and as it did in Roman times, ICH
will eventually cause the decay of successful interaction between the
sexes and cause a undesirable trend towards a non-reproductive
society.

The Roman empire most likely did not have many exclusive homosexuals.

You need to read more Roman history then.

Well it certainly wasn't the cause of its downfall, if that is your
implication.

It was part of the cause. It's usually refered to as *the weakening of
the moral structure of*...

Successful interation between the sexes? An interesting phrase...

The trend of low reproduction is noted in most "evolved" societies.
In my parents' generation, it was not unusual to have 7 or more
siblings. Nowadays, most couples stop at 2 kids, sometimes 3. This
is due to many factors. The rising cost of living; women are no
longer seen as chattels; access to birth control allows family
planning; couples putting off having children until their economic
futures are more securely known. Homosexuality has nothing to do with
any of that decline in birth rate. In third world countries, the
birth rate is markedly higher, for a variety of reasons, yet
homosexuality continues to exist in all of these places.

Yes, and so does other counter-evolutionary conditions. I didn't say
it was the only cause. Just one of the causes.

I try my best.

Combined with the increased possibility of disease that is inherent
with ICH, a very real danger to the evolvement and continuance of the
human species exists.

The fact that someone is homosexual doesn't mean they have an
increased possibility of disease.

Yes it does. Look at the studies. Do a google on it.

Heterosexuals and homosexuals alike
are struck with diseases all the time that have nothing to do with
their sexual orientation.

Of course they are. Your point?

So-called ICH has practically zero possiblity of(sexually transmitted)
diseases if it is within a committed exclusive relationship, just like
heterosexuals have in a commited exclusive relationship.

Monogamy is an almost sure way to prevent most STD's. The rampant
disregard of it is the cause of millions of cases.

You could say there is an increased possibility of disease in the
single-heterosexual as well, just like single homosexuals. Then
there's the lesbians, which are less vulnerable than heterosexual
females to STD threats.

I'm not sure that that is correct. Will you provide your source?