(K C) wrote:
:|And here we finally get.
:|
:|For the past few weeks, I've been posting posts of victimization,
:|claiming I was being victimized by others on this group. I've pointed
:|out that my views were in the minority, and I felt that I was being
:|attacked for holding a different views.
Gee, though it appears that I missed many of your posts or threads you
began, I don't recall any so called victim posts or threads by you. What I
basically have seen is pretty much your usual standard type posting you
have been doing for probably a year or more going back as far as when you
were posting as
(K C)
and using the following signature: KC (author and internet missionary)
1,340 posts for author: (K C)
594 posts for author: for (K C
Most of what you been called on has been the flaws in your posts, at least
that has what I have called you on going back to last summer. Historical
and legal inaccuracies.
The flaws in your posts and the repeating of those same flaws even when it
has been pointed out to you with documented evidence that the things you
had said were factually flawed, were incorrect.
In my mind when people do that they are being propagandists and trolls.
It is one thing to post something that is incorrect. That can be explained
or excused the first time. But it is an entirely different colored horse
when one posts that same material again, and again after it has been shown
to be incorrect. flawed, out of context etc.
The second, third and more times are on purpose and are done for a reason.
That reason being to mislead, to deceive, misinform, misrepresent, etc.
.
|
