Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer



 Religions > Atheism > Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Bluejay"
Date: 27 Nov 2003 06:48:07 AM
Object: Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The only TOS rule I seemingly have come close to breaking is:
Q: Will we terminate an account for posting personal information
about another? A: Yes if our user continues to do it deliberately
to harass. While it is not illegal to post publicly available info,
if they are doing it as a means to harass and attack we will
terminate the account. Please note that personal info means name
and address or phone, not name alone. E-mail address does not count
as personal information.
Now, I could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons of
my past posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. As
I remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.
I did have the information for about a month or two previously, but
did not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the first
person posted it did I post a reply containing the original
material, which is rather standard procedure. As I said previously,
after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap, I figured
what the hell, why not?
Matter of fact, I did just look in my past posts and came up with
the first post regarding this matter.
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:20:45 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco <Use-
Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:


On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:50:24 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:


Frog-Admin is a bisexual named Patrick Paris.
He lives in a modest bungalo:

74 Rue de Malnoue
77340 Pontault Combault
FRANCE

You can phone him at 01 60 29 24 91


Now I am a believer.

The homosexual bit explains the incredibly obscene and

homosexually

oriented crap that Frog/troll has been posting all these years.

This is one sick mofo. He is truly diseased. I didn't realize how

fully

right I was in referring to AIDS and/or syphilis eating out his

brain.


He is truly a disgusting piece of crap. If we're lucky, he'll soon

die

of

the disease(s) that are eating out his diseased brain.
--
* Bluejay *

In essence, I added to the matter, but did not initiate it.
I remember some weeks before this discussing this information with
another apas user. One who is being constantly libeled by Frog.
I was wondering if he had not received the same e-mail. He hadn't.
Although, I did find that the same information had already been
posted to apas a week or two before. I hadn't been here at the time
and only discovered it while doing a Google search on the Paris
name. Try it. See for yourselves.
Anyway, that is the way this all came about.
Just thought I'd let everyone know the "inside" story.
As for the usual rebuttal that will now come from
eelbash/cheshire/bogg/congo, save it, idiot. Your version of
happenings are without any credibility.
I would like to add that I find it extraordinary that remops will
not afford apas the same courtesy they do for other groups, namely,
block apas from all remailer traffic. That would solve this entire
problem of Frog. Only Sassaman (randseed) has done so, so far.
- --
* Bluejay *
Read About The Frog Who Would Be King
http://www.cotse.net/users/bluejay/frog/declaration.html
http://www.cotse.net/users/bluejay/frog/the-frog-from-hell.html
Here is where to get help setting up QuickSilver
http://www.cotse.net/users/bluejay/qs/menu.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBP8Xyf70qIgPfZwtYEQI0tACZATGYJ7gqOVw0jtMDiso1k5JC0FsAnipn
sdUbbOBY1v6AiHFXKtZkrgiU
=ZIsd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.

User: "Stephen K. Gielda"

Title: Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer 27 Nov 2003 12:59:09 PM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.

It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?

Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve
- --
You simply cannot get more server side control of
your e-mail without running your own mail server and
knowing how to program.
http://www.cotse.net/privacyservice.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Security 7.0.3
iQA/AwUBP8ZJUq/Zpuf9zw+1EQJwRACcDmTAZ9G/PAZaJiQ16wJTX11ERUIAoMrs
R88V9W75756F0UGa1nngMSxA
=hKtf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer 27 Nov 2003 01:37:54 PM
In article <MPG.1a30138965682f8d989d9a@news.supernews.com>
Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com> wrote:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.

Your user just admitted posting personal information.
That's ok because he's paying you, right?
.

User: "Anonymous"

Title: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom dis 27 Nov 2003 04:30:13 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "starwars"

Title: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom dis 27 Nov 2003 02:39:36 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
.

User: "Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer"

Title: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom dis 27 Nov 2003 02:41:37 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
.

User: "Anonymous Sender"

Title: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom dis 27 Nov 2003 02:55:29 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
.
User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:24:41 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 05:03:52 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "lcs Mixmaster Remailer"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:00:02 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: "Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:00:11 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: "Anonymous Sender"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:02:18 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: "Nomen Nescio"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:30:04 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: "starwars"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:40:10 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: "edo"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:55:06 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 05:07:27 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: "George Orwell"

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 06:23:57 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:55:08 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 04:55:51 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 05:09:12 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 05:19:30 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 05:43:18 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 05:45:35 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom 27 Nov 2003 06:02:32 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve


LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!

Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!

BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.

Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!


For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue

Bluejay was available for a quick interview after he left the
hospital.
"Gielda was not equipped enough to hurt my bum, and actually I didn't
feel anything there.
But Frog broke my jaw and I lost a few teeth to the incident"
BlueJay wrote, a huge bandage still around his head.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.


User: "edo"

Title: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom dis 27 Nov 2003 04:24:43 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
.

User: ""

Title: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom dis 27 Nov 2003 03:48:50 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: ""

Title: Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION (Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom dis 27 Nov 2003 05:08:48 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAT IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
Disclaimer: BOTTOM INTRODUCTION, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
.

User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer 27 Nov 2003 02:51:26 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAY IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
BOTTOM disclaimer, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer 27 Nov 2003 02:56:35 PM
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm-no-spam.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article
<Ymx1ZWpheQ==.2b1ae889deacb78567eaa21ac60389d8@1069937287.cotse.net>,
Bluejay@All.Mail.Is.Trashed says...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----Hash: SHA1The only TOS rule I
seemingly have come close to breaking is:Q: Will we terminate an
account for posting personal informationabout another? A: Yes if
our user continues to do it deliberatelyto harass. While it is not
illegal to post publicly available info,if they are doing it as a
means to harass and attack we willterminate the account. Please
note that personal info means nameand address or phone, not name
alone. E-mail address does not countas personal information.Now, I
could be mistaken, and I don't wish to plow through tons ofmy past
posts, but I do believe I was not the first to out Frog. AsI
remember it, someone broke the info and I then replied to it.



It doesn't matter to us how it was done nor who did it first, as you
can tell we are firm on our ToS, that means both the sides of it that
shield user if they stay within it and teh side that terminates for
crossing it.

I did have the information for about a month or two previously,

butdid not know if I was being setup or not. Only after the
firstperson posted it did I post a reply containing the
originalmaterial, which is rather standard procedure. As I said
previously,after seeing enough Frog abuse with his homosexual crap,
I figuredwhat the hell, why not?



Seems to me that crap comes from both the pro-frog crowd and the
anti-frog crowd.
/steve

LET'S FILM THAY IN SLOW MOTION GUYS!!!
Starring Frog-Admin, Gielda and BlueJay!!!
BlueJay is getting ready to get it doggy-style from Gielda.
Gielda is kneeling to ***** BlueJay up the ***** while sucking
Frog-Admin.
Frog-Admin is arranging the keyboard so that both Gielda and BlueJay
can service him while he keeps flooding apas.
BOTTOM disclaimer, yeah!!!
For an additional $0.05, you can get your own tissue
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
.

User: "Anonymous"

Title: Re: [INFO] Frog introduces bottom disclaimer