| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"MsAnthrope" |
| Date: |
03 Feb 2005 08:41:57 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
In article <1107423912.431243.254020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Orion7
says...
Don't you know evolution is a farce? You are obviously a product of the
brain washing which goes on in our Schools, Colleges and Universities.
I have seen the desperate lengths these Professors and Scientists go to
make people believe in evolution, even fabricating evidence to support
their unsupportable theories.
1st Rule of Creationism: Ignored evidence will go away
2nd Rule of Creationism: Interpret any challenge as personal insult
3rd Rule of Creationism: Claim evidence then quietly slip away
4th Rule of Creationism: Don't be confused by facts
5th Rule of Creationism: Insist that science ignores your proof
6th Rule of Creationism: Claim superiority for Christian education.
7th Rule of Creationism: Always appear to know more than you do.
8th Rule of Creationism: Shift the burden of proof to your critics.
9th Rule of Creationism: Lying for the Lord is okay.
10th Rule of Creationism: Never acknowledge your demonstrated errors
--
MsAnthrope
http://web.newsguy.com/rubyred
.
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
22 Feb 2005 06:50:58 PM |
|
|
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that i agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this post). perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with somebody based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because you know what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've made that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently - you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of the messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact is you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you refused to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al. You just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i accepted any of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do would be to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail, 'tard-boy. Give it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
| User: "snex" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
22 Feb 2005 07:03:03 PM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that i agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because you know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently - you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact is you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you refused to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al. You just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i accepted any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do would be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail, 'tard-boy. Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you cannot
back it up.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 10:31:53 AM |
|
|
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that i agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because you know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently - you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact is you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you refused to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al. You just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i accepted any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do would be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail, 'tard-boy. Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously, because he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
| User: "snex" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 10:41:06 AM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because you know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact is you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al. You just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail, 'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously, because he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken seriously. i also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously until he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i was already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same cannot be said
about your claim.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 11:15:32 AM |
|
|
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because you know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact is you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al. You just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail, 'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously, because he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken seriously. i also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously until he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i was already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same cannot be said
about your claim.
You're not familiar with your own posts? Takes a real *man* to admit
something like that.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "snex" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 11:26:13 AM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with
somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've
made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the
difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that
way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact is
you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you
refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al. You
just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i
accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do
would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail, 'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference
it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to
look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously, because
he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken seriously. i
also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously until he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i was
already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same cannot be
said
about your claim.
You're not familiar with your own posts? Takes a real *man* to admit
something like that.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
your dishonest misrepresentations of what i say are no better than
those of andrew the fundy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 11:28:36 AM |
|
|
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109179573.750921.87220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with
somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've
made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the
difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that
way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact is
you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you
refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al. You
just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i
accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do
would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail, 'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference
it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to
look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously, because
he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken seriously. i
also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously until he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i was
already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same cannot be
said
about your claim.
You're not familiar with your own posts? Takes a real *man* to admit
something like that.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
your dishonest misrepresentations of what i say are no better than
those of andrew the fundy.
Your stupidity and inability to tell the truth are self evident.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
| User: "snex" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 11:38:48 AM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109179573.750921.87220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that
i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this
post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with
somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've
made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the
difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of
the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that
way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact
is
you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you
refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al.
You
just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i
accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do
would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail,
'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference
it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to
look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately
not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously,
because
he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken seriously.
i
also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously until
he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i was
already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same cannot
be
said
about your claim.
You're not familiar with your own posts? Takes a real *man* to
admit
something like that.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
your dishonest misrepresentations of what i say are no better than
those of andrew the fundy.
Your stupidity and inability to tell the truth are self evident.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
im sure the lurkers support you in email.
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 11:42:11 AM |
|
|
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109180328.709277.64180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109179573.750921.87220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim that
i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this
post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with
somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me. You've
made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the
difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now - conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of
the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it that
way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the fact
is
you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and you
refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al.
You
just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i
accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to do
would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail,
'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to reference
it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where to
look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are deliberately
not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously,
because
he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken seriously.
i
also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously until
he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i was
already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same cannot
be
said
about your claim.
You're not familiar with your own posts? Takes a real *man* to
admit
something like that.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
your dishonest misrepresentations of what i say are no better than
those of andrew the fundy.
Your stupidity and inability to tell the truth are self evident.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
im sure the lurkers support you in email.
I find it telling that you even brought that up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
| User: "snex" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 11:51:54 AM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109180328.709277.64180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109179573.750921.87220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim
that
i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain
person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this
post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with
somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it
yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according
to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me.
You've
made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the
difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now -
conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of
the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it
that
way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the
fact
is
you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and
you
refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about
the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al.
You
just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i
accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to
do
would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail,
'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to
reference
it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where
to
look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are
deliberately
not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since
you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously,
because
he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken
seriously.
i
also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously
until
he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i
was
already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same
cannot
be
said
about your claim.
You're not familiar with your own posts? Takes a real *man* to
admit
something like that.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
your dishonest misrepresentations of what i say are no better
than
those of andrew the fundy.
Your stupidity and inability to tell the truth are self evident.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
im sure the lurkers support you in email.
I find it telling that you even brought that up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you are the one shouting from the rooftops that the evidence of my
being a sycophant is painfully obvious, but you refuse to present it
explicitly. just who are you trying to impress here?
.
|
|
|
| User: "No 33 Secretary" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 11:55:30 AM |
|
|
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109181114.053957.100220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109180328.709277.64180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109179573.750921.87220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
provide evidence to back up your claim
that
i
agree
with
whatever
anyone says because it is a certain
person.
This thread, 'tard.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
this thread is 1468 posts long (as of this
post).
perhaps
you
could
show us a specific post where i agreed with
somebody
based
on
their
username.
Perhaps you're too stupid to spot it
yourself.
Or perhaps you're just being evasive, because
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
ah, the refusal to present evidence. according
to
secretary's
own
beliefs, i should not take him seriously.
You won't anyway, because you don't like me.
You've
made
that
abundantly
clear.
You also claimed, a few posts up, to know the
difference
between
the
message and the messenger, but now -
conveniently -
you've
forgotten
that,
and judge the message based on what you think of
the
messenger.
I suspect you're Al's love *****. And like it
that
way.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you could be my own mother for all i care, the
fact
is
you
claimed
that
i accept things based on who the poster is and
you
refused
to
back
this
claim up, and right after an entire tirade about
the
necessity
of
backing up one's claims!
And yet, you're not saying the same thing about Al.
You
just
accept
his
claims without support.
Do you get it yet?
Probably not. You being a 'tard, and all.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i assume that you can show us where specifically i
accepted
any
of
his
claims without support. if not, the honest thing to
do
would
be
to
retract your statement.
In this very thread. Duh.
You're running in circles, chasing your own tail,
'tard-boy.
Give
it
up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
if its in this very thread you should be able to
reference
it.
If you weren't deliberately avoiding it, you'd know where
to
look.
You're *so* close to a clue.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i cant be deliberately avoiding it when you are
deliberately
not
posting it. your claim is not to be taken seriously since
you
cannot
back it up.
So you agree, then, that Al is not to be taken seriously,
because
he
refuses to back up his claims.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
i hold that your claim against me is not to be taken
seriously.
i
also
hold that Al's claim should not have been taken seriously
until
he
provided evidence (which he did eventually). fortunately, i
was
already
familiar with the evidence from other sources. the same
cannot
be
said
about your claim.
You're not familiar with your own posts? Takes a real *man* to
admit
something like that.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
your dishonest misrepresentations of what i say are no better
than
those of andrew the fundy.
Your stupidity and inability to tell the truth are self evident.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
im sure the lurkers support you in email.
I find it telling that you even brought that up.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
you are the one shouting from the rooftops that the evidence of my
being a sycophant is painfully obvious, but you refuse to present it
explicitly. just who are you trying to impress here?
If it's obivious, I don't need to present it explicitly.
--
Terry Austin
www.hyperbooks.com
Campaign Cartographer now available
.
|
|
|
| User: "snex" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
23 Feb 2005 12:03:26 PM |
|
|
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109181114.053957.100220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109180328.709277.64180@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109179573.750921.87220@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109176866.634482.180470@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109120583.023462.299320@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109119692.684754.286940@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118991.962086.28140@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109118121.784109.315650@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109116796.965662.146610@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115848.645268.235190@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
No 33 Secretary wrote:
"snex" <snex@comcast.net> wrote in
news:1109115155.376570.94210@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
| | | | | | | | | | |
