| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"MsAnthrope" |
| Date: |
03 Feb 2005 08:41:57 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
In article <1107423912.431243.254020@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Orion7
says...
Don't you know evolution is a farce? You are obviously a product of the
brain washing which goes on in our Schools, Colleges and Universities.
I have seen the desperate lengths these Professors and Scientists go to
make people believe in evolution, even fabricating evidence to support
their unsupportable theories.
1st Rule of Creationism: Ignored evidence will go away
2nd Rule of Creationism: Interpret any challenge as personal insult
3rd Rule of Creationism: Claim evidence then quietly slip away
4th Rule of Creationism: Don't be confused by facts
5th Rule of Creationism: Insist that science ignores your proof
6th Rule of Creationism: Claim superiority for Christian education.
7th Rule of Creationism: Always appear to know more than you do.
8th Rule of Creationism: Shift the burden of proof to your critics.
9th Rule of Creationism: Lying for the Lord is okay.
10th Rule of Creationism: Never acknowledge your demonstrated errors
--
MsAnthrope
http://web.newsguy.com/rubyred
.
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: There Are No Transitional Fossil Men |
06 Feb 2005 03:01:05 AM |
|
|
In article <36hprmF4sm61gU1@individual.net>,
"Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote:
"Dubh Ghall" wrote in message
news:emm6015o0bi8ud21prff4ol30vkaj28vnv@4ax.com...
"Andrew" wrote:
Hey Brian - There are NO transitional fossil men!
That's it, you just shut your eyes tight, put your fingers in your ears,
and
keep telling your self that.
--
Puck Greenman
I understand it is difficult to hear that much that you have been taught - is
false.
That's precisely what we have been trying to tell you. There is no
evidence for your myth.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
Intelligent Design has as much to do with science as reality
television has to do with reality. - Barry Lynn on CNN 12/25/04
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: There Are No Transitional Fossil Men |
07 Feb 2005 04:55:25 PM |
|
|
In article <36hprmF4sm61gU1@individual.net>, Andrew said...
I understand it is difficult to hear that much that
you have been taught - is false.
It might be difficult, if you ever got around to providing good
reasons to think your contrary position should be accepted. It's
easy enough to say, "Darwin was mistaken," or "Einstein
goofed." It's much harder to prove them wrong.
--
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew" |
|
| Title: Re: There Are No Transitional Fossil Men |
08 Feb 2005 01:08:57 AM |
|
|
"Brian E. Clark" wrote in message news:MPG.1c71bbe92d1d7177989770@news.comcast.giganews.com...
Andrew said...
I understand it is difficult to hear that much that
you have been taught - is false.
It might be difficult, if you ever got around to providing good
reasons to think your contrary position should be accepted. It's
easy enough to say, "Darwin was mistaken," or "Einstein
goofed." It's much harder to prove them wrong.
--
Brian E. Clark
I'm still waiting for you to prove Louis Pasteur wrong.
"Life comes ONLY from preexisting life."
Andrew
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kresch" |
|
| Title: Re: There Are No Transitional Fossil Men |
08 Feb 2005 07:11:17 AM |
|
|
In alt.atheism on Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:08:57 -0800, "Andrew"
<andrew.321remov@usa.net> let us all know that:
"Brian E. Clark" wrote in message news:MPG.1c71bbe92d1d7177989770@news.comcast.giganews.com...
Andrew said...
I understand it is difficult to hear that much that
you have been taught - is false.
It might be difficult, if you ever got around to providing good
reasons to think your contrary position should be accepted. It's
easy enough to say, "Darwin was mistaken," or "Einstein
goofed." It's much harder to prove them wrong.
--
Brian E. Clark
I'm still waiting for you to prove Louis Pasteur wrong.
"Life comes ONLY from preexisting life."
Then where did god come from? You prove Pasteur wrong every time
you put forth your god-hoax!
Don
---
aa #51, Knight of BAAWA, DNRC o-, Member of the [H]orde
Atheist Minister for St. Dogbert.
"No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another"
Picard to Data/Graves "The Schizoid Man"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brian E. Clark" |
|
| Title: Re: There Are No Transitional Fossil Men |
08 Feb 2005 01:41:24 PM |
|
|
In article <36r6s9F55p97mU1@individual.net>, Andrew said...
I'm still waiting for you to prove Louis Pasteur wrong.
"Life comes ONLY from preexisting life."
There is nothing to disprove. Pasteur's "Law of Biogenesis" was
aimed at the earlier (now utterly obsolete) belief in
spontaneous generation, which held that microbes, mice, larvae
and other highly developed (and relatively large) forms of life
can appear fully formed. Pasteur never addressed the modern
notion of abiogenesis: life arising from an increasingly complex
self-assemblage of molecules.
Thus your challenge is anachronistic and meaningless, as if
you'd sidestepped explaining why the Big Bang model should be
rejected by shouting, "Oh yeah, prove that Copernicus was
wrong!"
Also, I note your continued chickenhearted habit of refusing to
provide any arguments in support of your opinions.
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: There Are No Transitional Fossil Men |
08 Feb 2005 03:17:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:41:24 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote:
In article <36r6s9F55p97mU1@individual.net>, Andrew said...
I'm still waiting for you to prove Louis Pasteur wrong.
"Life comes ONLY from preexisting life."
There is nothing to disprove. Pasteur's "Law of Biogenesis" was
aimed at the earlier (now utterly obsolete) belief in
spontaneous generation, which held that microbes, mice, larvae
and other highly developed (and relatively large) forms of life
can appear fully formed. Pasteur never addressed the modern
notion of abiogenesis: life arising from an increasingly complex
self-assemblage of molecules.
Thus your challenge is anachronistic and meaningless, as if
you'd sidestepped explaining why the Big Bang model should be
rejected by shouting, "Oh yeah, prove that Copernicus was
wrong!"
He knows that - he's just being stupid.
Also, I note your continued chickenhearted habit of refusing to
provide any arguments in support of your opinions.
-----------
Brian E. Clark
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dubh Ghall" |
|
| Title: Re: There Are No Transitional Fossil Men |
04 Feb 2005 03:38:04 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:31:37 -0800, "Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote:
"Dubh Ghall" wrote in message news:emm6015o0bi8ud21prff4ol30vkaj28vnv@4ax.com...
"Andrew" wrote:
Hey Brian - There are NO transitional fossil men!
That's it, you just shut your eyes tight, put your fingers in your ears, and
keep telling your self that.
--
Puck Greenman
I understand it is difficult to hear that much that you have been taught - is false.
It was, the first time, and I fought long and hard against it.
However, after many years of inner struggle, the evidence was so overwhelming
that my faith finally dissolved, and I became an atheist.
Now, when those who believe as I once did, make such assertions, I smile
condescendingly, and sometimes, such as now, I try to advise them as to how they
might avoid the headaches that rational thought can cause the truly faithful.
--
Puck Greenman
The spelling Like any opinion stated here
purely my own
#162 BAAWA Knight.
Plonked by Rob Duncan
January 27th
Na bister 500,000
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 07:48:54 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> said in
alt.atheism:
1. Heidelberg Man - Built from a jaw bone that was conceded by many to
be quite human.
He was an early human, so of course he was human.
2. Nebraska Man - Scientifically built up from one tooth and later
found to be the tooth of an extinct pig.
Osborn (a devout Christian, btw) never claimed the tooth belonged to a
man:
"The Hesperopithecus molar cannot be said to resemble any known type
of human molar very closely. It is certainly not closely related to
Pithecanthropus [now Homo] erectus in the structure of the molar
crown….It is therefore a new and independent type of Primate, and we
must seek more material before we can determine its relationships."
Oh, and it was Osborn, not some creationist, who determined that it
was a pig's tooth. (Pig teeth and anthropoid teeth are quite
similar.)
3. Piltdown Man - The jawbone turned out to belong to a modern ape.
A hoax perpetrated by an amateur, and discovered by an evolutionist.
4. Peking Man - 500,000 years old. All evidence has disappeared.
All evidence of Homo erectus has disappeared? That'll come as quite a
shock to all the museums that have Homo erectus fossils.
5. Neanderthal Man - At the Int'l Congress of Zoology (1958) Dr. A. J.
E. Cave Said his examination showed that the famous Neanderthal
skeleton found in France over 50 years ago is that of an old man who
suffered from arthritis.
1) Found in 1856 - QUITE a while over 50 years ago.
2) Even the Neanderthal children? (There are Neanderthal fossils of
both sexes and all ages.)
6. Cro-Magnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is
at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man...so what's
the difference?
None - Cro Magnon man is modern man - us.
7. Modern Man - This genius thinks we came from a monkey.
No, only creationists make that claim.
8. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools - Romans 1:22
And you think you're quite wise, don't you? But your post DOES prove
that you're a fool.
BTW, you forgot to include "Stolen from
http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=4&t=60&m=106"
Why didn't you copy the rest of G. I. Jane's posts? Did the stuff
about electrons seem a little too stupid even for you?
--
"I don't try to imagine a God; it suffices to stand in awe of the structure of the world
insofar as it allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it."
- Letter to S. Flesch, April 16, 1954; Einstein Archive 30-1154
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MsAnthrope" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 07:22:54 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
5. Neanderthal Man - At the Int'l Congress of Zoology (1958) Dr. A. J.
E. Cave Said his examination showed that the famous Neanderthal
skeleton found in France over 50 years ago is that of an old man who
suffered from arthritis.
What, Neanderthals didn't live to be 50? They didn't have joint
problems?
--
MsAnthrope
http://web.newsguy.com/rubyred
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MsAnthrope" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 07:24:00 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
6. Cro-Magnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is
at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man...so what's
the difference?
Poor Orion7: A Neanderthal brain in a Cro-Magnon body!
--
MsAnthrope
http://web.newsguy.com/rubyred
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
04 Feb 2005 12:14:17 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:24:00 -0800, MsAnthrope <ms@nthr.ope> said in
alt.atheism:
On 3 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
6. Cro-Magnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is
at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man...so what's
the difference?
Poor Orion7: A Neanderthal brain in a Cro-Magnon body!
You just insulted Neanderthal Man. Shame on you. :)
--
The most curious social convention of the great age in which we live is the
one to the effect that religious opinions should be respected.
-- H. L. Mencken
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
05 Feb 2005 10:44:32 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:24:00 -0800, MsAnthrope <ms@nthr.ope> wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
6. Cro-Magnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is
at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man...so what's
the difference?
Poor Orion7: A Neanderthal brain in a Cro-Magnon body!
You meant 'Turing Test failure.'
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
06 Feb 2005 11:49:40 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 20:44:32 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> said in
alt.atheism:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:24:00 -0800, MsAnthrope <ms@nthr.ope> wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
6. Cro-Magnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is
at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man...so what's
the difference?
Poor Orion7: A Neanderthal brain in a Cro-Magnon body!
You meant 'Turing Test failure.'
AND she insulted our larger brained cousins.
--
"A truly unselfish act would be a Christian volunteering to have his soul take your
soul's place in hell, so yours could go to Heaven. Don't hold your breath."
- John Popelish
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
08 Feb 2005 03:37:00 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 05:49:40 GMT, Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid>
wrote:
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 20:44:32 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> said in
alt.atheism:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:24:00 -0800, MsAnthrope <ms@nthr.ope> wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005 07:06:50 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
6. Cro-Magnon Man - One of the earliest and best established fossils is
at least equal in physique and brain capacity to modern man...so what's
the difference?
Poor Orion7: A Neanderthal brain in a Cro-Magnon body!
You meant 'Turing Test failure.'
AND she insulted our larger brained cousins.
I'm sure it was unintentional.
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Orion7" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 09:08:19 AM |
|
|
EVOLUTIONISTS EXPLAIN THEIR OBJECTIVE
There are reasons why evolutionists are so concerned to hold on to a
theory that has no evidence to support it, one which has been
repeatedly disproved. These are important reasons. This section
explains why these men cling so fanatically to a falsehood.
Objective: Men do not want to be responsible to anyone for their
actions. Men do not want to be responsible to anyone for their actions.
"[Man] stands alone in the universe, a unique product of a long,
unconscious, impersonal, material process with unique understanding and
potentialities. These he owes to no one but himself and it is to
himself that he is responsible. He is not the creature of
uncontrollable and undeterminable forces, but he is his own master. He
can and must decide and make his own destiny."-*George G. Simpson,
"The World into which Darwin Led Us," in Science, 131 (1980), p. 968.
Objective: Separation from God and identification with the brute.
"The real issue is whether man must think God's thought after him in
order to understand the world correctly or whether man's mind is the
ultimate assigner of meaning to brute and orderless facts . .
Evolutionary thought is popular because it is a world view which
facilitates man's attempt to rid himself of all knowledge of the
transcendent Creator and promises to secure man's autonomy."-G.L.
Bahnsen, "On Worshipping the Creature Rather Than the Creator," in
Journal of Christian Reconstruction, 1 (1974), p. 89.
Objective: Sexual freedom.
"I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning; consequently
assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find
satisfying reasons for this assumption . . The philosopher who finds no
meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in
pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid
reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do . . For
myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of
meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The
liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain
political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of
morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our
sexual freedom."-*Aldous Huxley, "Confessions of a Professed
Atheist," Report: Perspective on the News, Vol. 3, June, 1966, p. 19.
[Grandson of evolutionist *Thomas Huxley and brother of evolutionist
*Julian Huxley, *Aldous Huxley was one of the most influential writers
and philosophers of the 20th century.]
Objective: A way to hide from God.
"Darwinism removed the whole idea of God as the creator of organisms
from the sphere of rational discussion. Darwin pointed out that no
supernatural designer was needed; since natural selection could account
for any new form of life, there is no room for a supernatural agency in
its evolution."-*Julian Huxley, "At Random, A Television Preview," in
Evolution after Darwin (1960), p. 41.
Objective: We can choose to live like animals and not mind it.
"In the world of Darwin man has no special status other than his
definition as a distinct species of animal. He is in the fullest sense
a part of nature and not apart from it. He is akin, not figuratively
but literally, to every living thing, be it an ameba, a tapeworm, a
flea, a seaweed, an oak tree, or a monkey-even though the degrees of
relationship are different and we may feel less empathy for
forty-second cousins like the tapeworms than for, comparatively
speaking, brothers like the monkeys."-*George Gaylord Simpson, "The
World into Which Darwin Led Us," Science 131 (1960), p. 970.
Objective: Men would rather have the forbidden tree than the presence
of God.
"With this single argument the mystery of the universe is explained,
the deity annulled, and a new era of infinite knowledge ushered
in."-*Ernst Haeckel, The Riddle of the Universe (189
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 06:29:38 PM |
|
|
In article <1107443299.191751.120530@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> writes:
EVOLUTIONISTS EXPLAIN THEIR OBJECTIVE
There are reasons why evolutionists are so concerned to hold on to a
theory that has no evidence to support it, one which has been
repeatedly disproved. These are important reasons. This section
explains why these men cling so fanatically to a falsehood.
Oh, I think I can help you here... You know, trim a bit here,
tighten up a little prose there, make the whole thing
more readable.
How's this for a more succinct version: most people who believe
in evolution do so because an overwhelming percent of practicing
biologists believe in evolution. And an overwhelming percent
of biologists -- roughly half of whom are Christian, in this
country at least -- believe in evolution because they are impressed
by the efficiency with which one simple principle which makes an otherwise
unrelated mountain of facts fall into neat patterns.
See? Much snappier.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "sanguinevikings" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 10:56:27 AM |
|
|
Orion7 wrote:
EVOLUTIONISTS EXPLAIN THEIR OBJECTIVE
You got the bit right, we do, you dont.
<arrogant bigoted hate-filled drivel snipped>
You'll be pleased to know that God doesn't exist, neither does Satan, so
you won't be going to hell for bearing false witness.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Orion7" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 11:12:46 AM |
|
|
You'll be pleased to know that God doesn't exist, neither do=ADes
Satan, so
you won't be going to hell for bearing false witness.
I'm pleased to know God does exist... I have had to much personal
evidence to prove he does.
I don't have to worry about going to hell... you on the other hand had
better start worrying.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt,
they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. (Psa
14:1)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 11:17:06 AM |
|
|
"Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107450765.985735.209390@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
You'll be pleased to know that God doesn't exist, neither does
Satan, so
you won't be going to hell for bearing false witness.
I'm pleased to know God does exist... I have had to much personal
evidence to prove he does.
Such as?
I don't have to worry about going to hell... you on the other hand had
better start worrying.
Prove hell exists and I'll think about it.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt,
they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. (Psa
14:1)
Blah, blah, blah. Meaningless babble.
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Orion7" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 11:19:40 AM |
|
|
Blah, blah, blah. Meaningless babble.
LOL thats what I was thinking about your post
.
|
|
|
| User: "stoney" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
05 Feb 2005 10:45:37 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2005 09:19:40 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
Blah, blah, blah. Meaningless babble.
LOL thats what I was thinking about your post
You've never had a thought in your putrid existance.
Now, FOAD!
--
Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale.
Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme
Court who will ensure church and state are joined
at the hip like clergy and altar boys.
America 1776-Jan 2001 RIP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "sanguinevikings" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 12:29:52 PM |
|
|
Orion7 wrote:
Blah, blah, blah. Meaningless babble.
LOL thats what I was thinking about your post
I know of your 'evidence'. It is either your delusions or other peoples
lies. Either way, it's false witness.
You arrive in alt.atheism determined to offload your twisted hate filled
personal hangups and expect not to get shat on. If you do you'll shout
persecution despite being the provocateur.
GOD DOES NOT EXIST and in a few year's time YOU won't either. That's the
truth and YOU are the one that can't handle it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 07:23:28 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2005 09:12:46 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> said in
alt.atheism:
I don't have to worry about going to hell... you on the other hand had
better start worrying.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt,
they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good. (Psa
14:1)
Matthew 5:22 says you DO have to worry about going to hell.
--
"religion did for *****, what Stonehenge did for rocks"
- The World Famous Tink
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JPG" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 03:42:29 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2005 09:12:46 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote:
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.
If even the fool is right, what's your excuse?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Orion7" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 03:52:26 PM |
|
|
If even the fool is right, what's your excuse?
The fool is wrong. God is real... and He is Coming Soon!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 03:54:20 PM |
|
|
"Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1107467546.074033.325530@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
If even the fool is right, what's your excuse?
The fool is wrong. God is real... and He is Coming Soon!
Yeah, any day now, right?
--
---------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Is Anyone Here an ADVENTIST?! |
03 Feb 2005 07:49:14 PM |
|
|
On 3 Feb 2005 13:52:26 -0800, "Orion7" <gary.zw@gmail.com> said in
alt.atheism:
If even the fool is right, what's your excuse?
The fool is wrong. God is real.
Objective evidence?
--
"Atheism is the world of reality, it is reason, it is freedom. Atheism is human
concern, and intellectual honesty to a degree that the religious mind cannot
begin to understand. And yet it is more than this. Atheism is not an old
religion, it is not a new and coming religion, in fact it is not, and never has
been, a religion at all. The definition of Atheism is magnificent in its
simplicity: Atheism is merely the bed-rock of sanity in a world of madness."
[Atheism: An Affirmative View, by Emmett F. Fields]
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at verizon dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew" |
|
| Title: Objective Evidence |
03 Feb 2005 10:34:55 PM |
|
|
"Al Klein" wrote in message news:d4l501lrudpteub8rbhovgag8gp19v06c9@4ax.com...
"Orion7" said in alt.atheism:
The fool is wrong. God is real.
Objective evidence?
--
Tell me Al....where is the *objective evidence* that life came from nonliving
chemicals which came from a primeval explosion which came from nothing.
Andrew
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle Malkin" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
04 Feb 2005 12:55:48 AM |
|
|
"Andrew" <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote in message
news:36gcbdF4vu100U1@individual.net...
"Al Klein" wrote in message
news:d4l501lrudpteub8rbhovgag8gp19v06c9@4ax.com...
"Orion7" said in alt.atheism:
The fool is wrong. God is real.
Objective evidence?
--
Tell me Al....where is the *objective evidence* that life came from
nonliving
chemicals which came from a primeval explosion which came from nothing.
Andrew
Atta boy, Andy, avoid answering the question. It's what we've learned
to expect from fundies like you. If you want to ask questions, too,
that's fine. But, please have the courtesy to answer what you were asked
first.
--
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
Michelle Malkin (Mickey) aa list#1
alt.atheism atheist/agnostic list name collector
BAAWA Knight & EAC Bible thumper thumper
http://questioner.www2.50megs.com
^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "sAnToLiNa" |
|
| Title: Re: Objective Evidence |
03 Feb 2005 10:52:45 PM |
|
|
Andrew <andrew.321remov@usa.net> wrote in message
news:36gcbdF4vu100U1@individual.net...
"Al Klein" wrote in message
news:d4l501lrudpteub8rbhovgag8gp19v06c9@4ax.com...
"Orion7" said in alt.atheism:
The fool is wrong. God is real.
Objective evidence?
--
Tell me Al....where is the *objective evidence* that life came from
nonliving
chemicals which came from a primeval explosion which came from nothing.
Non-responsive.
What is the objective evidence for the existence of God?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
