On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:39:08 -0500, CrystalDragonClear
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:

Christopher A. Lee wrote:

You also give yourself away by calling him an evolutionist. This is a
dishonest label used by creationists to pretend that acceptance of
reality is only an -ism.

Of course please relay your definition to Princeton.

http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=evolutionist

S: (n) evolutionist (a person who believes in organic evolution)

Which is ***** - because evolution isn't an -ism and nobody has
needed to "believe in it" for more than 50 years. It is a scientific
fact not a belief. Deal with it and please try to be less dishonest
next time.

I'm not talking to Princeton but some in-yourface retard who imagines
reality is an -ism that competes with his own one.

============================================================
I am sure there is some sort of reward when those of higher education
makes this sort of grave mistake.

Thank you so much for cross posting this childish whining in
alt.atheism. Otherwise I would not have seen it and would not
have learned what a silly little ***** you are. Please keep up the good work.

I know it's not on-topic at alt.atheism, but I assure you that all
subscribers to alt.atheism are in your debt for making us aware of
these facts.

Please cross post to the rest of usenet where it will be just as welcome. I
know that the people at talk.origins may have missed it.

Follow-ups restored.