http://www.spiritdaily.com/cloningfeedback.htm



THE MAILBAG: AMONG DNA TRAVESTIES ARE MAN-ANIMAL HYBRIDS WITH 'MARK OF
BEAST'

By Margaret Schaut


I have been following the cloning issue for years. There are a few
extra points that are very important to consider and discuss.

For several years in India, they have been "removing" all the rat DNA
from rat sperm and inserting human DNA.

This is then used to impregnate a woman whose husband hasn't been able
to conceive with her because his sperm isn't as energetic as rat sperm.


In England, they have been extracting the ovaries from aborted baby
girls and developing them, for use in fertility experiments and to
provide eggs for infertile couples.

This means that an unborn girl could not only become a mother though
she herself never saw the light of day, but her eggs may be the
maternal medium to bring forth human/animal hybrids.

In Ann Arbor, Michigan, they have built the Life Sciences building
with, I kid you not, a stylized replica of Noah's Ark in front of the
building [above, left], that front being a waved wall of glass that
resembles a huge wave of water!

This building is dedicated to stem cell and DNA research and is less
than one block away from two huge DNA sources -- the Natural Science
Museum and University of Michigan Hospital with their donated cadavers
and abortion mills!

There is so much more that has been going on, but I want you to
consider these particular points:

1. We have been told that the mark of the beast is a computer chip.

I have long felt that the mark of the beast is introducing animal DNA
into human beings. Once those 'human' beings (conceived with rat sperm,
for example) become of reproductive age, people will find that they
don't know who is part rat, part cow, part spider, part snake (for
example). Parents won't know if their child is dating someone who is
part raptor, part monkey, part lion.

This is a literal 'mark of the beast' that, once it is released into
the general population and they begin to reproduce, will NEVER be able
to be removed. It will be introduced into the population without public
knowledge (and may have been already, due to medical privacy laws).
Even if scientists discover 'unintended consequences,' as these beings
develop and grow, it will be too late to remove it from the human race
except through extreme measures.

2. On recent talk shows about the subject, callers felt there was
nothing wrong with doing "interesting" things like "having feathers
instead of hair."

The scientists completely ignored the fact that a person can never make
his own hair into feathers instead. They never mentioned that things
like this must be done to another human being without their informed
consent -- the unborn.

3. On a spiritual level, only human beings were made in the image and
likeness of God (whatever that is, specifically), not apes,
chimpanzees, gorillas, no matter how "close" their DNA is to human
beings.

That being said, a person who is part rat can never image God. They
will be virtually "soulless" and the fact that they will have the
intellect of a human being and the instincts of, say, a snake, is
profoundly frightening.

One does not "convert" a snake from its behavior, whatever it is. One
will not "convert" a human/snake hybrid who will not have the soul to
receive the grace of conversion.

4. The intentional placement of the Life Sciences buildings at U of M
(and other institutes, may I add), is even more alarming in that they
have pre-historic DNA available for experimentation.

Frozen mammoths and other animals (who are showing up more and more now
that the ice caps are melting), and bugs and refuse in amber (not just
a stupid movie premise, by any means), mean that the ferocity of the
animal DNA that these scientists have access to is beyond our ability
to comprehend.

Utilizing the ovaries of the aborted females as vehicles for such
experiments is not only a possibility, but is, I believe, actually in
the plans of certain scientists and pro-abortion activists.

5. All of this is being sold to the public as an unmitigated good, with
only obtuse fundamentalist Christians being against it who should be
stopped. Who can argue with the ideas of prevention and cure of
virtually any disease humanity suffers, the improvement in human
performance (eagle eyes, leopard's prowess, a bull's strength)?

Well, I won't drag this out on you. I'm sure that this will give you
food for thought, and I have high hopes that you can bring these ideas
to the attention of God's children in a way that I never could.

Margaret Schaut,

Waterford, Michigan