| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Desertphile" |
| Date: |
19 Dec 2006 01:21:49 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Jesus born anew |
Gerard wrote:
Once again, for approximately the 2007th time, Jesus our creator and
saviour
Sorry, but there's no evidence for that claim.
will be born into this world. Oh, he may have physically been
born one time in history,
Sorry, but there is no evidence Jesus ever existed and excellent
evidence he did not.
but it was for all generatons all peoples. He
lived and died inside time to cover all of time and history.
Sorry, but there is no evidence Jesus ever existed and excellent
evidence he did not.
When he
sweated drops of blood in the garden he was seeing every sin that would
ever be committed, every sin that must be covered and atoned for.
Sorry, but there is no evidence Jesus ever existed and excellent
evidence he did not.
So, what does that leave you with? Oh, yes: jack *****. Golly, it must
really suck to be you.
.
|
|
| User: "Desertphile" |
|
| Title: Re: Jesus born anew |
22 Dec 2006 09:25:44 AM |
|
|
Gerard wrote:
On Dec 21, 9:41?pm, "Desertphile" <desertph...@hotmail.com> wrote:
I'm sorry, but it's best you know the truth than to continue to live a
lie. >
Did you even read what I just wrote? Geesh! I guess once someone has
their mind made up that's the end of the discussion.
Yes, and I'm very sorry for you--- but you can probably still lead a
happy, useful life. Your "made-up mind" may blind you to more than just
the inability to learn where the myths about Jesus came from and when
and why.
Trace the
verifiable Christian migration over time and you will see that it
wasn't even possible for Christianity to be influenced by Asian myths.
Why does every theologian and Bible scholar on the planet dissagree
with you? Is it some kind of secret cabal?
You will find, if you look, that Jesus was created out of several
"Asian" gods. More specifically, he was made out of several Greek and
several Indian gods. Two of the authors of "Matthew" took Krishna myths
and added them to Jesus; the last author of "Matthew" appended Greek
gods to Jesus; there is also a big Persian contribution to Jesus, and
Christianity.
When Saul of Tarsus created Christianity it started as a Jewish cult;
it was rejected by the Jews, so Saul took his cult to the Greeks, and
modified it to appeal to the Greeks (adding an anti-goddess message,
often preaching it on the steps of temples to Aphrodite and Diana,
among other Goddesses).
If Saul's cult had appealed to the Jews, the cult would probably have
lasted a few dozen years before fading away. Unfortunately it also
appealed to the Roman military, since pieces of Mithraism were also
added.
You can read all about it in "Isaac Asimov's Guide to the Bible,"
"Forgeries in Christianity," "Why Wrote the Gospels?," "The
Encyclopedia of Biblical Errancy," "The Making of the Messiah," and
"Bible Prophesy," to name a few of hundreds of books on the subject.
By the way: this topic is not appropreate for talk.origins. Shall we
take it elsewhere?
Mithraism too, has clearly been shown to be the culprit of borrowing
beliefs from Christianity, not vice versa as suggested by agnostics and
atheists. They are simply ignoring historical and archaeological
evidence to build their biased cases.
A Side Note. If you people, that's unbelievers who adhere to a natural
evolution scenario so easily miss the obvious and traceable history of
the recent two thousand years, how much moreso do you misinterpret
evidences which go way beyond that period? Say 4 thousand, 8 thousand
years? And you dare make claims about million year evolution. Get real!
I mean it. Get Real!
I challenge each and every evolutionist, atheist, agnostic and skeptic
to start to take time, some quiet time to sit back and reflect on what
drives their way of discerning, of thinking, their entire world view
and how it affects their outlook and their criteria of learning about
our real origins, our real purpose, our real reality in this world and
Gods.
Peace
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
