On Mon, 06 Sep 04 10:44:20 GMT, (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
In article <Xns955C63E738C10fstone69@207.69.154.202>,
Fred Stone <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote:
johac <jhachm@ixpresremove.com> wrote in news:jhachm-
We had Saddam contained. He was no threat to us.
We did *not* have Saddam contained.
Huh? We had sanctions, we had no-fly zones, we had trade restrictions.
What more would you want? A moat around the country?
We had him waiting us out and
refusing to cooperate with even the "see no evil" UN inspectors,
No, they were there, doing their jobs.
with
France and Russia begging us to withdraw our objections to lifting the
sanctions on him.
Starving children will do that to some people.
Once we mobilized on his borders, he had no choice but
to pretend to cooperate, hoping again that his pets in the UN "oil for
food" program could stall us long enough that we'd have to withdraw
again. If THAT scenario had played, he'd have been able to have gone
right for the WMD which he had the capability to procure.
And where are those WMD?
Those see-no-evil Marines keep covering them up.
--
/Apostate
atheist #1931 I've found it!
BAAWA Knife AND SMASHer
EAC Supernumerary Deputy Director, Department of Redundancy Department
plonked by Lani_girl, first post; Billions Served!
I doubt, therefore I might be.
.
