Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged)



 Religions > Atheism > Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 15 Sep 2003 11:32:30 PM
Object: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged)
Addressed to: Distribution list (see below)
** Reply to note from John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> 15 Sep 2003 23:44:15 GMT


On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:05:30 -0500, John Hattan <john@thecodezone.com>
wrote:

John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:23:05 -0500, John Hattan <john@thecodezone.com>
wrote:

John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:13:17 +0700, Jos Flachs
<'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote:
And the demons have reduced Jos to a one-word vocabulary.

And this is different from what you post to the news groups in
what manner? You populate the post with inane comments and presume
you actually have said something when in fact all
you have done is gotten your name back on google again.

Read this and tell me who has demons.

You don't get irony? Perhaps you should get out and find a life.

I see the irony quite well. You're accusing other people of having
demons, but you're such a lowlife that you're trying to pick up women
who fear that they're sexually disfunctional in newsgroups.


And you are such a pitiful excuse for a person that you must look for
others to put down to make yourself feel superior. Aim your Alpha male
somewhere else, little boy.

You can put that paint brush back in your honey bucket jezebeth, you are
the one who is famous or attempting to bludgeon people in to blindly accepting
what you say. You have attempted to intimidate and raw or people in these
news groups since shortly after your arrival. You are the first to wine when you
receive anything but the utmost of respect and yet you have earned none to date.
You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service. You are the first one I have seen lie about the existence of churches by
Saul with a corner stone using a method of dating that did not even exist. In other
words you are a prolific liar.
It must naturally chap your ***** that people see right through you and recognize
you for the phony you are.

My comments to the lady were joking, as she took them. And if you
butted into THAT one, you were in someone else's conversation.

Your comments to the lady were nasty & vindictive, a trade mark of yours.
As to butting into conversations, you are also famous for that. Especially
if you know nothing about the subject such as theology and xianity. You can
add to that decency & humanity.

When you interrupt other people's conversations, you misunderstand,
and you assume, making an ***** of your self.

Then maybe you should start following your own claim and quit butting
into conversations that you lack knowledge about, such as every one I
have seen you in to date. That includes the nasty ones where you were
seeking porn & attempting to manipulate another human for your own
carnal desires.
Have you managed to remove all of those post from google yet?

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1sbp0vst904akgtjrblasv2snt3ejvb6ut%404ax.com

Oh look who's now taken to removing his posts from the google archive.
Think that'll improve your case, pretending that these things never
happened?

Does this really surprise you John, after all, the demon jezebeth is the demon of
fraudulent lies. & john w is its biggest fan & emulator.
walksalone who has finally accepted that jezebeth is really the nasty piece of
work it portrays itself to be.
.

User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 17 Sep 2003 02:58:15 AM
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:32:30 ,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.cheap.llc wrote:
[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]

You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.

John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!
My ironymeter nearly exploded. Coffee al over my desk.
.
User: "Therion Ware"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 17 Sep 2003 04:00:47 AM
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700 in alt.atheism, Jos Flachs (Jos
Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:32:30 ,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.cheap.llc wrote:

[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]

You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.

John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!

My ironymeter nearly exploded. Coffee al over my desk.

Moral: Abandon sugar in coffee. It's safer. And easier to clean up
afterwards. Actually, come to that, abandon milk too.
Mind you, Walk's hit the nail right on the head. I think the first
time I came across Weatherly, he was holding forth on papal
infallibility, and reading his posts I thought to myself "the Pope may
not be infallible, but John certainly reckons he is....": a prime
example of the RCC jibe to Protestants of what happens when "each man
is his own Pope".
But I think the bottom line is his evident lack of empathy. He expects
sympathy and understanding, expects his (for example) porno foibles to
pass unremarked, and yet isn't prepared to give an inch to other
people.
As has been said: a mind like a steel trap. Ever tried to reason with
one?
--
"Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You."
- Attrib: Pauline Reage.
Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion?
See: <http://www.Video2CD.com>. 35.00 gets your video on DVD.
all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read.
** atheist poster child #1 **
.
User: "John W"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 20 Sep 2003 11:04:31 PM
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:00:47 +0100, Therion Ware
<autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:



On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700 in alt.atheism, Jos Flachs (Jos
Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism



On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:32:30 ,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.cheap.llc wrote:

[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]

I didn't lie about my credentials, which should be public record for
those intelligent enough to look up my credentials. One already has,
and had the gall to post some of it w/o my permission. He will get his
reward when we meet.
I didn't lie about my war record, and those who assumed I was in
combat assumed that.
John W


You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.

John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!

I also have stated OPENLY for anyone who can READ that I served in the
US Air Force as a jet aircraft mechanic.
John W


My ironymeter nearly exploded. Coffee al over my desk.


Moral: Abandon sugar in coffee. It's safer. And easier to clean up
afterwards. Actually, come to that, abandon milk too.

Mind you, Walk's hit the nail right on the head. I think the first
time I came across Weatherly, he was holding forth on papal
infallibility, and reading his posts I thought to myself "the Pope may
not be infallible, but John certainly reckons he is....": a prime
example of the RCC jibe to Protestants of what happens when "each man
is his own Pope".

But I think the bottom line is his evident lack of empathy. He expects
sympathy and understanding, expects his (for example) porno foibles to
pass unremarked, and yet isn't prepared to give an inch to other
people.

As has been said: a mind like a steel trap. Ever tried to reason with
one?

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - FAST UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

.
User: "Charles P"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 12:35:07 AM
"John W" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message

I didn't lie about my credentials, which should be public record for
those intelligent enough to look up my credentials. One already has,
and had the gall to post some of it w/o my permission. He will get his
reward when we meet.

You're a pathological liar, Johnny. That's why nobody's afraid of
you. Apparently you're on one of your mood swings, you really
ought to see a doctor, medication might do you good during
these periods when your religion is failing.
.

User: ""

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 02:11:32 PM
In <6b9qmv43n4aff8lu7ck37g3kjd109c5dgj@4ax.com>, on 09/21/2003
at 04:04 AM, John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> said:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:00:47 +0100, Therion Ware
<autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:

A moment Therion, many thanks

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700 in alt.atheism, Jos Flachs (Jos
Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>) said, directing the reply to
alt.atheism

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:32:30 ,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.cheap.llc wrote:
[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]

I didn't lie about my credentials, which should be public record for

You are lying again when you imply you have a war record, to have one of
those means that you did not by your party just ribbons in the base
exchange but earned them in a combat zone. As to your record being public
information, know it is not. This is especially true as concerns military
service. I will leave it up to you to figure out what would be required
for someone to gain access to information about your military service.
Subtle hint, it can not be done by simply walking into the records centers
and requesting your file.

those intelligent enough to look up my credentials. One already has, and
had the gall to post some of it w/o my permission. He will get his reward
when we meet.

& just what are you going to do now that you have made yet another threat
against another person? Are you going to talk him to death or simply
breath on him and let the corrosive fumes of your personality simply
dissolve him in place.

I didn't lie about my war record, and those who assumed I was in combat
assumed that.

They presumed that based on your implications that you were in the Vietnam
War, not a Vietnam War era veteran. Due to the fact you claim education in
journalism, the implications had to be deliberate on your part. Unless of
course, you are one of those that would rather climb a four hundred foot
tall willow tree to tell a lie rather than stand on the ground and tell
the truth.

John W


You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.

John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!

I also have stated OPENLY for anyone who can READ that I served in the US
Air Force as a jet aircraft mechanic.

Only after you were forced to admit you never War in Vietnam or in direct
support of the Vietnam war. Even then, you attempted to inflate your worth
to the war effort & claimed secret knowledge you were not even supposed to
have and would not have had if it were truly secret. What this really
means as far as the majority of readers are concerned is simply you are a
copper clad oak bound iron bottom liar and not willing to even attempt to
tell the thruth when it does not glorify you. And it is so unnecessary,
unless of course that is the only way you can give meaning to your life.
snip unresponded to information
walksalone who has long since came to the conclusion that jezebeth would
rather lie than tell the truth under any given circumstances.
.

User: " *Phar Lap*"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 05:00:43 PM
In article <6b9qmv43n4aff8lu7ck37g3kjd109c5dgj@4ax.com>, John W
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:

I didn't lie about my war record, and those who assumed I was in
combat assumed that.

John W

You are lying here unless you actually have been in war. The statement "I
didn't lie about my war record" clearly implies that you were in a war,
and since you make claim to literary ability and education you can hardly
be unaware that this is so
Countering the implied claim with the statement :"those who assumed I was
in combat assumed that". does not remove the original implied falsehood
.
User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 08:33:02 PM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:00:43 +1100,
(
*Phar Lap*) wrote:

In article <6b9qmv43n4aff8lu7ck37g3kjd109c5dgj@4ax.com>, John W
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:


I didn't lie about my war record, and those who assumed I was in
combat assumed that.

John W


You are lying here unless you actually have been in war.

No, I think poor Johnny was a bit [bap-]pissed when he wrote that. He
of course meant his CRIMINAL record.
.


User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 02:20:27 AM
On 21 Sep 2003 04:04:31 GMT, John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com>
posted his scary words in
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism:

[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]


I didn't lie about my credentials, which should be public record for
those intelligent enough to look up my credentials. One already has,
and had the gall to post some of it w/o my permission. He will get his
reward when we meet.

We are supposed to be scared now? I really am. (not)

I didn't lie about my war record, and those who assumed I was in
combat assumed that.

I don't assume anything. You are living proof the air force is big on
air and little on force.


You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.

John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!


I also have stated OPENLY for anyone who can READ that I served in the
US Air Force as a jet aircraft mechanic.

Only if potato peelers are considered jet mechanics. I doubt if you
can hold a screw driver correctly.
I wasn't aware recruiting for enlisted personnel was so desperate in
the USAF. Or they needed a professional text writer, to prevent the
men humping the camels?
.
User: "ujb"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 03:01:23 PM
Jos Flachs wrote:


On 21 Sep 2003 04:04:31 GMT, John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com>
posted his scary words in
alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.christian.baptist,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.atheism:

[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]


I didn't lie about my credentials, which should be public record for
those intelligent enough to look up my credentials. One already has,
and had the gall to post some of it w/o my permission. He will get his
reward when we meet.

We are supposed to be scared now? I really am. (not)

I didn't lie about my war record, and those who assumed I was in
combat assumed that.

I don't assume anything. You are living proof the air force is big on
air and little on force.


You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.

John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!


I also have stated OPENLY for anyone who can READ that I served in the
US Air Force as a jet aircraft mechanic.

Only if potato peelers are considered jet mechanics. I doubt if you
can hold a screw driver correctly.

I wasn't aware recruiting for enlisted personnel was so desperate in
the USAF. Or they needed a professional text writer, to prevent the
men humping the camels?

He was able to get all the way up to an apprentice mechanic,
which means he was allowed to clean the windows and empty the
honey bucket with only minimal supervision. Poor Johnny wasn't
even allowed to air up the tires or pump fuel alone. What was it
'scrambled one', I think I remember the code 43111 or 43131? Wall
of shame level...
John Weatherly, buffoon. :)
ujb
.


User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 09:24:38 AM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:04:31 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:00:47 +0100, Therion Ware
<autodelete@city-of-dis.com> wrote:



On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700 in alt.atheism, Jos Flachs (Jos
Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>) said, directing the reply to alt.atheism



On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:32:30 ,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.cheap.llc wrote:

[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]


I didn't lie about my credentials, which should be public record for those

Well, yeah, your claims about doing good incest porn *are archived...
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.



User: "John W"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 20 Sep 2003 11:02:06 PM
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs
<'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote:
not read.

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:32:30 ,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.cheap.llc wrote:

[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]

You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.

John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!

My ironymeter nearly exploded. Coffee al over my desk.

______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - FAST UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>

.
User: "Charles P"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 12:36:06 AM
"John W" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message

not read.

*****!
I'll bet you read that!
.

User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 AM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.

Not responded to!
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.
User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 08:32:54 PM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!

Ignored!
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 08:02:17 AM
In article <bbismvs7ecvkdf2ab01ikvh38m4p7mfkam@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...


On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!

Ignored!

Bored!
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
User: "John Hattan"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 10:25:42 AM
Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <bbismvs7ecvkdf2ab01ikvh38m4p7mfkam@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!


Ignored!


Bored!

Implored!
---
John Hattan Grand High UberPope - First Church of Shatnerology
john@thecodezone.com http://www.shatnerology.com
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 10:40:33 AM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:25:42 -0500, John Hattan wrote:

Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <bbismvs7ecvkdf2ab01ikvh38m4p7mfkam@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!


Ignored!


Bored!


Implored!

Snored!
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.
User: "John Hattan"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 10:58:48 AM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:25:42 -0500, John Hattan wrote:

Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <bbismvs7ecvkdf2ab01ikvh38m4p7mfkam@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!


Ignored!


Bored!


Implored!


Snored!

Whored!
---
John Hattan Grand High UberPope - First Church of Shatnerology
john@thecodezone.com http://www.shatnerology.com
.

User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 11:14:05 AM
In article <pan.2003.09.22.15.40.33.128411@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo says...


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:25:42 -0500, John Hattan wrote:

Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <bbismvs7ecvkdf2ab01ikvh38m4p7mfkam@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!


Ignored!


Bored!


Implored!


Snored!

Floored!
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 03:07:09 PM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:14:05 +0000, Robibnikoff wrote:

In article <pan.2003.09.22.15.40.33.128411@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo says...


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:25:42 -0500, John Hattan wrote:

Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <bbismvs7ecvkdf2ab01ikvh38m4p7mfkam@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!


Ignored!


Bored!


Implored!


Snored!


Floored!

Hoard!
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.
User: "John Hattan"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 03:47:48 PM
"Mark K. Bilbo" <iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:14:05 +0000, Robibnikoff wrote:

In article <pan.2003.09.22.15.40.33.128411@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo says...


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:25:42 -0500, John Hattan wrote:

Robibnikoff <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

In article <bbismvs7ecvkdf2ab01ikvh38m4p7mfkam@4ax.com>, Jos Flachs says...

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!


Ignored!


Bored!


Implored!


Snored!


Floored!


Hoard!

Whored?
---
John Hattan Grand High UberPope - First Church of Shatnerology
john@thecodezone.com http://www.shatnerology.com
.






User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 21 Sep 2003 10:12:32 PM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:32:54 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!

Ignored!

I can't hear you!
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.
User: "Jos Flachs"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 04:21:47 AM
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:12:32 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:32:54 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!

Ignored!


I can't hear you!

watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon

Never read it.
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged) 22 Sep 2003 10:31:32 AM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:21:47 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:12:32 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:32:54 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!

Ignored!


I can't hear you!

watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon

Never read it.

Huh?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.
User: "Robibnikoff"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged 22 Sep 2003 11:42:24 AM
In article <pan.2003.09.22.15.31.32.119015@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo says...


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:21:47 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:12:32 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:32:54 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!

Ignored!


I can't hear you!

watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon

Never read it.


Huh?

What?
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & EAC Spellcaster
#1557
.
User: "Mark K. Bilbo"

Title: Re: "John W" (was Re: Republicans Outraged 22 Sep 2003 03:07:25 PM
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:42:24 +0000, Robibnikoff wrote:

In article <pan.2003.09.22.15.31.32.119015@eac.org>, Mark K. Bilbo says...


On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:21:47 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:12:32 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:32:54 +0700, Jos Flachs wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:24:59 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
<iskanipa-y@hoo.com> wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 04:02:06 +0000, John W wrote:

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15 +0700, Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com>
wrote:

not read.


Not responded to!

Ignored!


I can't hear you!

watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon
watermelonwatermelonwatermelonwatermelon

Never read it.


Huh?


What?

Eh?
--
Mark K. Bilbo
.










  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER