** Reply to note from Jos Flachs <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:58:15
+0700
Morning Jos, morning here anyway
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 06:32:30 ,
walksalone@dastardly.dirty.deeds.done.cheap.llc wrote:
[Walkalone posting a very accurate describtion of John W, snipped for
brievety]
You are the first to lie about your credentials in an attempt to puff up your over inflated
sense of adequacy. You are the First to lie about your professional training and combat
service.
John W. .... combat service?????? WAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
Golly, is the US Army THAT desperate? Unbefuckinglievable!
I see I should have expanded on his claims and noted that they were implied.
His claim basically runs as follows, step one received draft notification approximately
1968, step two, went to Navy but they did not accept him, Step 3 went to Air Force
where he was greeted with open arms.
After basic training and individual training as a maintenance person [which branch
and field is not specified but worked on the F-4 aircraft] following which he was
assigned to a base in England where he was personally informed of the top secret
mission by an A. P. who was his room mate, the Air Force like the Army does
not mix units at the individual level, and supposedly by implication he served in
the gulf war where supposedly by implication he helped the Air Force re-write a thirty
thousand page manual for an aircraft, implied a C & C aircraft.
While in England he attended a Baptist Church with a cornerstone of 525 CE
[Gregorian] & it was after much digging that the fact came out the never served
in Viet Nam but simply implied that he had. A fact that seemed to surprise no one
My ironymeter nearly exploded. Coffee al over my desk.
Opps, sorry about that. & for the coffee here is a paper towel.
Walksalone who often fails to remember not everyone has observed
John W. as long as he has, the lucky dogs .
.
|
