"Briar Rabbit" <Briar@Rabbit.net> wrote in message
news:q7CdnbbL0_oV7h_enZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@is.co.za...

What do you know about vaginas, gay boy? Have you ever been up close and
personal? The problem with your responses is that you pull the stuff off a
skin freak website and because it suits your peculiar interest in
foreskins you regurgitate it all over then Internet. Sad but true you are
he stereo typical example of a skin freak, being male, gay and on serious
medication for a range of mental problems. Why in the name of God do they
allow you creeps loose on the Internet?

OK, so here's a reply from a non-gay non-boy.

All of your hysterical complaints about uncircumcized males -- "foreskin
fetish", "smell", "anteater", "lack of hygiene", blah blah blah are
completely unfounded. How do I know this? Because I can tell you,
first-hand, that all those claims are utterly bogus. My "signifcant other"
is not circumcized. And nope, he doesn't smell. And nope, *it* isn't gross
in the slightest. And yes, "relations" are great. And yes, it is erotic. And
nope, there are no accumulated gooey atrocities in that "excess skin" (which
isn't *excess at all, by the by).

You can ramble on about "gay boys" all you like and try to dismiss this as a
fetish or gross, but I'm beginning to wonder why you are so utterly obsessed
with and fascinated by those who were not circumcized. If you're truly that
superior and happy about it, why not just bask in the glory of your
surgically altered member? Let those unfortunate *intact* types wallow in
their smelly misery.

Except that it's not misery, and it's not smelly. I take it you wash daily
or after heavy exertion, right? Well, so do *they*. That's all it takes.

As for those unpleasant vagina analogies, they're somewhat "à propos." Due
to the nature of the beast, they do require some attention, hygiene-wise, in
order not to be offensive. This does not mean manic douching or hourly
scouring, just a little common sense. If you've run 7 miles or haven't
bathed in a day, for heaven's sake, that's what soap'n water are for.

And I will also add that I have nothing against circumcized penises. My son
has one (though, if I could revisit this, I might consider otherwise). But
his father had it done, my brother had it done, and hey, the doctor
suggested it. It seemed to be the right decision at the time, even though
that time was 6 years ago. But much of the civilized Western world (USA
notwithstanding) does not circumcize by default. Enjoy your pristine,
rolled-back appendage, but you really are protesting a little too much about
those who go about their lives very happily -- and eminenly satisfied on a
sexual front-- without having been surgically...errr..."perfected."