In a previous article "Bob White" <threeball@hotmail.com> writes:
:
;
:"Marc Fleury" <marcfleury@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
;news:h50ejvs5v5nokqdffnb2g4dg8ac5f45fo7@4ax.com...
:> Bob White wrote:
;> >In this thread you are trying to get away with shifting the burden of
:proof
;>
:>
;> Actually, in this thread I am trying to get you to explain precisely
:> why you disagree with Copi ...
;
:I do not disagree with Copi, knucklehead, you do. You are trying to get away
;with shifting the burden of proof to the denial. Copi says that is logical
:fallacy (argument _ad ignornantiam_), knucklehead.
Please show where Copi said anything about that.
[ Snipped the parts of Copi's text that is the prelude to Copi
showing how an argumentum ad ignorantiam is to be exposed. ]
.
|
