Religions > Atheism > Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Fredric L. Rice" |
| Date: |
11 Nov 2003 11:56:13 PM |
| Object: |
Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
"Bat Child (Sue M.)" <batchild1@cox.net> wrote:
Found at: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/51/letters.php
==================== [snip]
IN THE REALM OF THE APOCRYPHAL
Ah, this is wonderful. This is what the remaining followers are told to
believe and it's no doubt that many of them -- if not most -- do. The
logic faults and historical record which prove otherwise must be fully
ignored, of course. I mean, the guy _stole_ Parson's sex slave and
absconded with her and a sailboat Parsons owned. How do these people
think he got one of his second wives?
But even more: Hubbard mentions Parsons and the OTO favorably in some
of his writings, calling Parsons a "good friend." All that disgusting
homosex, after all, and they became good buddies.
Greg Bishop’s "Best of L.A."characterization, in his piece on Jack
Parsons, of L. Ron Hubbard as a tool of Aleister Crowley’s Ordo Templi
Orientalis is utterly false. Mr. Hubbard was sent in by U.S.
Intelligence to disband Parsons’ black-magic group. Those associated
with the OTO had become a serious security threat to the nation’s
atomic-research program, with suspected Nazi sympathizers among them
and scientists from Caltech and Los Alamos (Manhattan Project)
suspected of engaging in rituals involving sex and drugs. Clearly a
security nightmare.
Mr. Hubbard succeeded in his assignment. In 1946, Parsons’ lodge of
the OTO dispersed. Parsons lost his government security clearance in
1948, and other scientists involved in his group were among the 64
stripped of their security clearances after the war.
It really is time for the L.A. Weekly to reassess its perspective and
policy regarding such attempts to denigrate Scientology, the religion
of tens of thousands of people in your readership area.
--Lissa Uvizl
Manager, L. Ron Hubbard Life Exhibition
[snip]
====================
http://members.cox.net/batchild1
http://members.cox.net/scorseseinfo
---
Yes, George W. Bush is an unelected baby killing fascist dictator.
Also: Scientology's International President (Audio files of this
nutter available at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice )
.
|
|
| User: "Joe Cosby" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
12 Nov 2003 12:39:14 AM |
|
|
"Bat Child (Sue M.)" <batchild1@cox.net> wrote:
Found at: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/51/letters.php
==================== [snip]
IN THE REALM OF THE APOCRYPHAL
Greg Bishop’s "Best of L.A."characterization, in his piece on Jack
Parsons, of L. Ron Hubbard as a tool of Aleister Crowley’s Ordo Templi
Orientalis is utterly false. Mr. Hubbard was sent in by U.S.
Intelligence to disband Parsons’ black-magic group.
"Bat Child" huh?
Well, that speaks volumes for itself.
You are full of *****. You are living in a fantasy world. The only
"evidence" that Hubbard ever had anything to do with US intelligence
is Hubbard's own ***** fairy tale. Given the freedom of
information act, not only -are- the FBI reports on Hubbard and Parsons
freely available but they are plastered all over the internet for
anybody with even the tiny smear of brain material necessary to look
for them.
The only person who has ever even CLAIMED with a straight face that
ferret-boy Hubbard had anything to do with US intelligence beyond
THEIR investigation of HIM for being a predatory SOCIOPATH preying on
DISFUNCTIONAL FUCKWITS like YOU was FERRET-BOY HUBBARD himself who
proved himself repeatedly and ad nauseum to be a PSYCHOPATHIC LIAR to
ANYBODY stupid and UNFORTUNATE enough to have listened to him for
longer than it took to detect the STRONG FECAL ODOR on his BREATH.
IE, YOU.
That anybody would still in this day and age be deluded and
self-destructive enough to take ANY of Hubbard's fairy-tales seriously
without becoming locked away in a psychiatric institution for their
own protection is just a sign of how sad and uncharitable our society
has become.
Your head is so far up your own ***** that you are probably eligible for
mineral rights.
Those associated
with the OTO had become a serious security threat to the nation’s
atomic-research program, with suspected Nazi sympathizers among them
and scientists from Caltech and Los Alamos (Manhattan Project)
suspected of engaging in rituals involving sex and drugs. Clearly a
security nightmare.
BWAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHA
rotfl
The FBI investigated Parsons because he was a brilliant scientist but
he was GETTING HIGH AND GETTING LAID in a time when that was not yet
fashionable.
Hubbard FOLLOWED PARSONS ABJECTLY hoping to get his SECRET HOCUS POCUS
VOODOO TRICKS for himself then when he finally accepted that the HOCUS
POCUS peopel would never accept him, RIPPED PARSONS OFF AND RAN OFF
WITH HIS GIRLFRIEND.
NOBODY ever considered Parsons a serious security threat beyond
investigating him for GETTING HIGH AND GETTING LAID at a time when
that was unusual. NOBODY in "US intelligence" ever gave the OTO a
second thought. Nobody but Parsons and the OTO ever saw or gave a
***** about any connection between Parsons and the OTO, any more than
anybody gives a ***** about whether or not YOU belong to the reader's
digest book of the month club or not. Nobody CARES.
The idea that the OTO would be a source of "Nazi sympathizers" that
the government would be disturbed about only goes to show your
INCREDIBLE IGNORANCE AND UTTER NAIVETE. The US GOVERNMENT THEMSELVES
HIRED EX-NAZIS FOR THE MANHATTEN PROJECT BECAUSE THEY KNEW HOW TO DO
NUCLEAR PHYSICS.
The OTO had NOTHING THE ***** TO DO WITH IT AT ANY POINT IN TIME IN ANY
WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM.
SO, GO ON THEN. DO CONTINUE. LET'S SEE WHAT ELSE YOU ARE UTTERLY
IGNORANT BUT YET INCAPABLE OF SHUTTING THE ***** UP ABOUT.
I'm sure you are a bottomless well of NOT KNOWING WHAT THE ***** YOU'RE
TALKING ABOUT.
Mr. Hubbard succeeded in his assignment. In 1946, Parsons’ lodge of
the OTO dispersed.
Parson's didn't HAVE "a lodge of the OTO".
It really is time for the L.A. Weekly to reassess its perspective and
policy regarding such attempts to denigrate Scientology, the religion
of tens of thousands of people in your readership area.
I agree, if UNINFORMED DIPSHITS LIKE YOU represent the people who
would be offended by denigrating the CULT OF THE CLAM-EVOLVED, then
the LA weekly should definitely think twice about the GOLD MINE OF
MINDLESS DIPSHITS whose POCKETBOOKS they stand to rape by encouraging
you in their delusions.
That's just good business, PRAISE BOB.
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com
A jesus who won't put out is like a pig who won't sing the bacon song.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sue M." |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
12 Nov 2003 02:39:23 PM |
|
|
Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote in message news:<rak3rvo274iuvr08octjit2uklpa658aqd@4ax.com>...
"Bat Child (Sue M.)" <batchild1@cox.net> wrote:
Found at: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/51/letters.php
==================== [snip]
IN THE REALM OF THE APOCRYPHAL
Greg Bishop?s "Best of L.A."characterization, in his piece on Jack
Parsons, of L. Ron Hubbard as a tool of Aleister Crowley?s Ordo Templi
Orientalis is utterly false. Mr. Hubbard was sent in by U.S.
Intelligence to disband Parsons? black-magic group.
"Bat Child" huh?
Well, that speaks volumes for itself.
You are full of *****. You are living in a fantasy world. The only
"evidence" that Hubbard ever had anything to do with US intelligence
is Hubbard's own ***** fairy tale. Given the freedom of
information act, not only -are- the FBI reports on Hubbard and Parsons
freely available but they are plastered all over the internet for
anybody with even the tiny smear of brain material necessary to look
for them.
The only person who has ever even CLAIMED with a straight face that
ferret-boy Hubbard had anything to do with US intelligence beyond
THEIR investigation of HIM for being a predatory SOCIOPATH preying on
DISFUNCTIONAL FUCKWITS like YOU was FERRET-BOY HUBBARD himself who
proved himself repeatedly and ad nauseum to be a PSYCHOPATHIC LIAR to
ANYBODY stupid and UNFORTUNATE enough to have listened to him for
longer than it took to detect the STRONG FECAL ODOR on his BREATH.
IE, YOU.
That anybody would still in this day and age be deluded and
self-destructive enough to take ANY of Hubbard's fairy-tales seriously
without becoming locked away in a psychiatric institution for their
own protection is just a sign of how sad and uncharitable our society
has become.
Your head is so far up your own ***** that you are probably eligible for
mineral rights.
Those associated
with the OTO had become a serious security threat to the nation?s
atomic-research program, with suspected Nazi sympathizers among them
and scientists from Caltech and Los Alamos (Manhattan Project)
suspected of engaging in rituals involving sex and drugs. Clearly a
security nightmare.
BWAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHA
rotfl
The FBI investigated Parsons because he was a brilliant scientist but
he was GETTING HIGH AND GETTING LAID in a time when that was not yet
fashionable.
Hubbard FOLLOWED PARSONS ABJECTLY hoping to get his SECRET HOCUS POCUS
VOODOO TRICKS for himself then when he finally accepted that the HOCUS
POCUS peopel would never accept him, RIPPED PARSONS OFF AND RAN OFF
WITH HIS GIRLFRIEND.
NOBODY ever considered Parsons a serious security threat beyond
investigating him for GETTING HIGH AND GETTING LAID at a time when
that was unusual. NOBODY in "US intelligence" ever gave the OTO a
second thought. Nobody but Parsons and the OTO ever saw or gave a
***** about any connection between Parsons and the OTO, any more than
anybody gives a ***** about whether or not YOU belong to the reader's
digest book of the month club or not. Nobody CARES.
The idea that the OTO would be a source of "Nazi sympathizers" that
the government would be disturbed about only goes to show your
INCREDIBLE IGNORANCE AND UTTER NAIVETE. The US GOVERNMENT THEMSELVES
HIRED EX-NAZIS FOR THE MANHATTEN PROJECT BECAUSE THEY KNEW HOW TO DO
NUCLEAR PHYSICS.
The OTO had NOTHING THE ***** TO DO WITH IT AT ANY POINT IN TIME IN ANY
WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM.
SO, GO ON THEN. DO CONTINUE. LET'S SEE WHAT ELSE YOU ARE UTTERLY
IGNORANT BUT YET INCAPABLE OF SHUTTING THE ***** UP ABOUT.
I'm sure you are a bottomless well of NOT KNOWING WHAT THE ***** YOU'RE
TALKING ABOUT.
Mr. Hubbard succeeded in his assignment. In 1946, Parsons? lodge of
the OTO dispersed.
Parson's didn't HAVE "a lodge of the OTO".
It really is time for the L.A. Weekly to reassess its perspective and
policy regarding such attempts to denigrate Scientology, the religion
of tens of thousands of people in your readership area.
I agree, if UNINFORMED DIPSHITS LIKE YOU represent the people who
would be offended by denigrating the CULT OF THE CLAM-EVOLVED, then
the LA weekly should definitely think twice about the GOLD MINE OF
MINDLESS DIPSHITS whose POCKETBOOKS they stand to rape by encouraging
you in their delusions.
That's just good business, PRAISE BOB.
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor; I only
posted a article from the LA Weekly which featured a letter to the
editor written by a Scientologist, and I also posted the link to the
original on-line article at the beginning of my post. As Zinj has
said elsewhere in this thread (thanks, Zinj!) I've been a fairly
long-time regular ARS poster/critic of $cientology and, as Zinj also
said, you seem to be shooting the messenger here.
.
|
|
|
| User: "nenslo" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 03:16:52 PM |
|
|
"Sue M." wrote:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor; I only
posted a article from the LA Weekly which featured a letter to the
editor written by a Scientologist, and I also posted the link to the
original on-line article at the beginning of my post. As Zinj has
said elsewhere in this thread (thanks, Zinj!) I've been a fairly
long-time regular ARS poster/critic of $cientology and, as Zinj also
said, you seem to be shooting the messenger here.
YOU ARE ALL GUILTY OF PERPETUATING AND PUBLICIZING SCIENTOLOGY.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Cosby" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 08:24:17 PM |
|
|
ALSO SPRACH nenslo:
"Sue M." wrote:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor; I only
posted a article from the LA Weekly which featured a letter to the
editor written by a Scientologist, and I also posted the link to the
original on-line article at the beginning of my post. As Zinj has
said elsewhere in this thread (thanks, Zinj!) I've been a fairly
long-time regular ARS poster/critic of $cientology and, as Zinj also
said, you seem to be shooting the messenger here.
YOU ARE ALL GUILTY OF PERPETUATING AND PUBLICIZING SCIENTOLOGY.
alt.religion.scientology gets tens of thousands of posts each month,
nenslo, and not a single scientologist posts to it or reads it.
This thread, by itself, might be something like "preaching to the
choir", but there are TENS OF THOUSANDS of articles, it goes vastly
beyond "preaching to the choir" and becomes something like an
electronic Nuremberg rally of preaching to the choir.
I posted there under a false name, in hopes of drawing some ACTUAL
SCIENTOLOGISTS into a debate, thinking that if we were going to get
all this endless scientology ***** at least I could make it
interesting. TENS OF THOUSANDS of articles, and they are all from THE
SAME SIDE.
Obviously, it's a cult.
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com
"To live outside the law, you must be honest."
Bob Dylan said that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
14 Nov 2003 06:54:05 PM |
|
|
Joe Cosby wrote:
ALSO SPRACH nenslo:
"Sue M." wrote:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor; I only
posted a article from the LA Weekly which featured a letter to the
editor written by a Scientologist, and I also posted the link to the
original on-line article at the beginning of my post. As Zinj has
said elsewhere in this thread (thanks, Zinj!) I've been a fairly
long-time regular ARS poster/critic of $cientology and, as Zinj also
said, you seem to be shooting the messenger here.
YOU ARE ALL GUILTY OF PERPETUATING AND PUBLICIZING SCIENTOLOGY.
alt.religion.scientology gets tens of thousands of posts each month,
nenslo, and not a single scientologist posts to it or reads it.
Nenslo knows this. He is trolling. He's really not as stupid as he sounds.
Usually.
This thread, by itself, might be something like "preaching to the
choir", but there are TENS OF THOUSANDS of articles, it goes vastly
beyond "preaching to the choir" and becomes something like an
electronic Nuremberg rally of preaching to the choir.
I posted there under a false name, in hopes of drawing some ACTUAL
SCIENTOLOGISTS into a debate, thinking that if we were going to get
all this endless scientology ***** at least I could make it
interesting. TENS OF THOUSANDS of articles, and they are all from THE
SAME SIDE.
Obviously, it's a cult.
Eat more clams.
--
When I shake my killfile, I can hear them buzzing!
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 07:07:15 PM |
|
|
nenslo wrote:
"Sue M." wrote:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor; I only
posted a article from the LA Weekly which featured a letter to the
editor written by a Scientologist, and I also posted the link to the
original on-line article at the beginning of my post. As Zinj has
said elsewhere in this thread (thanks, Zinj!) I've been a fairly
long-time regular ARS poster/critic of $cientology and, as Zinj also
said, you seem to be shooting the messenger here.
YOU ARE ALL GUILTY OF PERPETUATING AND PUBLICIZING SCIENTOLOGY.
"Would you like to take our personality ... test....... Uhmmm..
Never mind!"
There are some things Scientology can't help you with.
--
When I shake my killfile, I can hear them buzzing!
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Cosby" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
12 Nov 2003 08:36:50 PM |
|
|
ALSO SPRACH Sue M.:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor
Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded to.
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com
You have to accept the possibility that God doesn't like you.
Tyler Durden, FIGHT CLUB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sue M." |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 01:00:05 AM |
|
|
Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote in message news:<fhr5rv8uqo302jmvv7bm1f2sm48kv0tj6b@4ax.com>...
ALSO SPRACH Sue M.:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor
Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded to.
Well, I figured that much as I read the rest of your post, but in the
beginning of your post, you specifically mentioned my nickname,
saying:
====================
"Bat Child" huh?
Well, that speaks volumes for itself.
====================
So I just wanted to make it clear to anyone else reading that I was
not the author of that letter.
By the way, I took my nickname from the famous (infamous?) character
from the "Weekly World News" tabloid (check out
http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/batboy/index.cfm for more info)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anonymous" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 01:21:10 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote:
ALSO SPRACH Sue M.:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor
Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded to.
Translation: I screwed up and misattributed, but I'm too much of a ***** to just
say "whoops," so instead I say "whatever" like a sullen teenager.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Cosby" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 02:27:01 AM |
|
|
ALSO SPRACH Anonymous:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote:
ALSO SPRACH Sue M.:
Um, pardon me, but I did not write that letter to the editor
Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded to.
Translation: I screwed up and misattributed, but I'm too much of a ***** to just
say "whoops," so instead I say "whatever" like a sullen teenager.
No, that isn't what I meant to say.
What I meant to say was "Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded
to."
If I see a post on usenet and respond to it, and it turns out the
person who posted it wasn't the person who wrote it, then consider
whatever I wrote directed to whoever wrote it. That didn't seem like
rocket science, but I apologize if it succeeded in confusing you
anyway.
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com
West Bank to be redeveloped as Palestinian Heritage Theme Park.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anonymous" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 12:17:43 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote:
ALSO SPRACH Anonymous:
Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded to.
Translation: I screwed up and misattributed, but I'm too much of a ***** to
just
say "whoops," so instead I say "whatever" like a sullen teenager.
No, that isn't what I meant to say.
What I meant to say was "Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded
to."
If I see a post on usenet and respond to it, and it turns out the
person who posted it wasn't the person who wrote it, then consider
whatever I wrote directed to whoever wrote it. That didn't seem like
rocket science, but I apologize if it succeeded in confusing you
anyway.
No worries. I understood perfectly. You're an *****. There's no
need for long-winded explanations. It's very easy to understand, "not
rocket science" as you say.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
12 Nov 2003 06:31:28 AM |
|
|
Joe Cosby wrote:
"Bat Child (Sue M.)" <batchild1@cox.net> wrote:
Found at: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/51/letters.php
==================== [snip]
IN THE REALM OF THE APOCRYPHAL
Greg Bishop’s "Best of L.A."characterization, in his piece on Jack
Parsons, of L. Ron Hubbard as a tool of Aleister Crowley’s Ordo Templi
Orientalis is utterly false. Mr. Hubbard was sent in by U.S.
Intelligence to disband Parsons’ black-magic group.
"Bat Child" huh?
Well, that speaks volumes for itself.
You are full of *****. You are living in a fantasy world. The only
"evidence" that Hubbard ever had anything to do with US intelligence
is Hubbard's own ***** fairy tale.
Hubbard was in Naval Inteligence. For a few weeks until relieved of that
post due to his utter incompetence.
His claim that he busted Parson's sex magic ring for Naval
Intelligence later changed, Hubbard busted Parson's black magic sex
operation for the LA Sherrif's Department.
Snigger....
Given the freedom of
information act, not only -are- the FBI reports on Hubbard and Parsons
freely available but they are plastered all over the internet for
anybody with even the tiny smear of brain material necessary to look
for them.
True.
The only person who has ever even CLAIMED with a straight face that
ferret-boy Hubbard had anything to do with US intelligence beyond
THEIR investigation of HIM for being a predatory SOCIOPATH preying on
DISFUNCTIONAL FUCKWITS like YOU was FERRET-BOY HUBBARD himself who
proved himself repeatedly and ad nauseum to be a PSYCHOPATHIC LIAR to
ANYBODY stupid and UNFORTUNATE enough to have listened to him for
longer than it took to detect the STRONG FECAL ODOR on his BREATH.
He's dead now. But we still have fecal-breathed morons running Hubbard's
cult. Do not taunt happy fun cult....
IE, YOU.
That anybody would still in this day and age be deluded and
self-destructive enough to take ANY of Hubbard's fairy-tales seriously
without becoming locked away in a psychiatric institution for their
own protection is just a sign of how sad and uncharitable our society
has become.
Your head is so far up your own ***** that you are probably eligible for
mineral rights.
Those associated
with the OTO had become a serious security threat to the nation’s
atomic-research program, with suspected Nazi sympathizers among them
and scientists from Caltech and Los Alamos (Manhattan Project)
suspected of engaging in rituals involving sex and drugs. Clearly a
security nightmare.
BWAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHA
rotfl
The FBI investigated Parsons because he was a brilliant scientist but
he was GETTING HIGH AND GETTING LAID in a time when that was not yet
fashionable.
Hubbard FOLLOWED PARSONS ABJECTLY hoping to get his SECRET HOCUS POCUS
VOODOO TRICKS for himself then when he finally accepted that the HOCUS
POCUS peopel would never accept him, RIPPED PARSONS OFF AND RAN OFF
WITH HIS GIRLFRIEND.
NOBODY ever considered Parsons a serious security threat beyond
investigating him for GETTING HIGH AND GETTING LAID at a time when
that was unusual. NOBODY in "US intelligence" ever gave the OTO a
second thought. Nobody but Parsons and the OTO ever saw or gave a
***** about any connection between Parsons and the OTO, any more than
anybody gives a ***** about whether or not YOU belong to the reader's
digest book of the month club or not. Nobody CARES.
The idea that the OTO would be a source of "Nazi sympathizers" that
the government would be disturbed about only goes to show your
INCREDIBLE IGNORANCE AND UTTER NAIVETE. The US GOVERNMENT THEMSELVES
HIRED EX-NAZIS FOR THE MANHATTEN PROJECT BECAUSE THEY KNEW HOW TO DO
NUCLEAR PHYSICS.
The OTO had NOTHING THE ***** TO DO WITH IT AT ANY POINT IN TIME IN ANY
WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM.
SO, GO ON THEN. DO CONTINUE. LET'S SEE WHAT ELSE YOU ARE UTTERLY
IGNORANT BUT YET INCAPABLE OF SHUTTING THE ***** UP ABOUT.
I'm sure you are a bottomless well of NOT KNOWING WHAT THE ***** YOU'RE
TALKING ABOUT.
Mr. Hubbard succeeded in his assignment. In 1946, Parsons’ lodge of
the OTO dispersed.
Parson's didn't HAVE "a lodge of the OTO".
It really is time for the L.A. Weekly to reassess its perspective and
policy regarding such attempts to denigrate Scientology, the religion
of tens of thousands of people in your readership area.
I agree, if UNINFORMED DIPSHITS LIKE YOU represent the people who
would be offended by denigrating the CULT OF THE CLAM-EVOLVED, then
the LA weekly should definitely think twice about the GOLD MINE OF
MINDLESS DIPSHITS whose POCKETBOOKS they stand to rape by encouraging
you in their delusions.
That's just good business, PRAISE BOB.
--
When I shake my killfile, I can hear them buzzing!
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "nenslo" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 02:49:57 PM |
|
|
Wbarwell wrote:
He's dead now. But we still have fecal-breathed morons running Hubbard's
cult. Do not taunt happy fun cult....
We still have fecal-breathed morons continuously babbling about
Hubbard's cult and trying to make their sole field of expertise seem
important so they don't have to face the fact that they themselves are
utterly worthless, a burden on the earth which should be cleared away
with the rest of the trash. Meaning YOU STILL SUCK, BARFWELL.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 08:27:54 PM |
|
|
nenslo <nenslo@yahooX.com> wrote:
Wbarwell wrote:
He's dead now. But we still have fecal-breathed morons running Hubbard's
cult. Do not taunt happy fun cult....
We still have fecal-breathed morons continuously babbling about
Hubbard's cult and trying to make their sole field of expertise seem
important so they don't have to face the fact that they themselves are
utterly worthless, a burden on the earth which should be cleared away
with the rest of the trash. Meaning YOU STILL SUCK, BARFWELL.
We still have a flying saucer cult that kills its followers in ones and
twos and maims them in batches. Until the deliberate murders and the
quack medical frauds are met with Federal indictments, it's up to civil
rights activists and consumers to keep exposing the homicides, frauds,
and swindles of the criminal enterprise.
No like? Sign up with them and go "clear" $360,000 later.
---
Yes, George W. Bush is an unelected baby killing fascist dictator.
Also: Scientology's International President (Audio files of this
nutter available at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice )
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Cosby" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 10:04:05 PM |
|
|
ALSO SPRACH Fredric L. Rice:
nenslo <nenslo@yahooX.com> wrote:
Wbarwell wrote:
He's dead now. But we still have fecal-breathed morons running Hubbard's
cult. Do not taunt happy fun cult....
We still have fecal-breathed morons continuously babbling about
Hubbard's cult and trying to make their sole field of expertise seem
important so they don't have to face the fact that they themselves are
utterly worthless, a burden on the earth which should be cleared away
with the rest of the trash. Meaning YOU STILL SUCK, BARFWELL.
We still have a flying saucer cult that kills its followers in ones and
twos and maims them in batches. Until the deliberate murders and the
quack medical frauds are met with Federal indictments, it's up to civil
rights activists and consumers to keep exposing the homicides, frauds,
and swindles of the criminal enterprise.
No like? Sign up with them and go "clear" $360,000 later.
We're either for you or against you, huh?
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com
Warning - this message is not FDA approved for use as a flotation
device.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
15 Nov 2003 11:20:39 AM |
|
|
Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote:
ALSO SPRACH Fredric L. Rice:
nenslo <nenslo@yahooX.com> wrote:
Wbarwell wrote:
He's dead now. But we still have fecal-breathed morons running Hubbard's
cult. Do not taunt happy fun cult....
We still have fecal-breathed morons continuously babbling about
Hubbard's cult and trying to make their sole field of expertise seem
important so they don't have to face the fact that they themselves are
utterly worthless, a burden on the earth which should be cleared away
with the rest of the trash. Meaning YOU STILL SUCK, BARFWELL.
We still have a flying saucer cult that kills its followers in ones and
twos and maims them in batches. Until the deliberate murders and the
quack medical frauds are met with Federal indictments, it's up to civil
rights activists and consumers to keep exposing the homicides, frauds,
and swindles of the criminal enterprise.
No like? Sign up with them and go "clear" $360,000 later.
We're either for you or against you, huh?
You're either for fraud and maimings or you're against them. Unless you're
one of the mentally discognitive who pick and choose which frauds and
which maimings you like and which you don't.
If Scientology didn't kill, racketeer, swindle, and maim, they would be
ignored just like all the other flying saucer cults out there.
---
Yes, George W. Bush is an unelected baby killing fascist dictator.
Also: Scientology's International President (Audio files of this
nutter available at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice )
.
|
|
|
| User: "nenslo" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
16 Nov 2003 12:07:11 AM |
|
|
"Fredric L. Rice" wrote:
You're either for fraud and maimings or you're against them.
FOR.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz Wuehler" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
16 Nov 2003 12:24:04 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
You're either for fraud and maimings or you're against them. Unless you're
one of the mentally discognitive who pick and choose which frauds and
which maimings you like and which you don't.
You're either for off-topic nut rants crossposted to a zillion newsgroups for
no reason or you're against them. Quite clearly you're for them, nut boy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
16 Nov 2003 10:40:22 AM |
|
|
Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-200311.rodent.frell.eu.org> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, (Fredric L. Rice) wrote:
You're either for fraud and maimings or you're against them. Unless you're
one of the mentally discognitive who pick and choose which frauds and
which maimings you like and which you don't.
You're either for off-topic nut rants crossposted to a zillion newsgroups for
no reason or you're against them. Quite clearly you're for them, nut boy.
Golly, another unsalted nut clocks in on the buttfuck port. Where's
the frocking ploink button? Ah, here it is.
* ploink! *
---
Yes, George W. Bush is an unelected baby killing fascist dictator.
Also: Scientology's International President (Audio files of this
nutter available at http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice )
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
13 Nov 2003 07:10:50 PM |
|
|
nenslo wrote:
Wbarwell wrote:
He's dead now. But we still have fecal-breathed morons running
Hubbard's
cult. Do not taunt happy fun cult....
We still have fecal-breathed morons continuously babbling about
Hubbard's cult and trying to make their sole field of expertise seem
important so they don't have to face the fact that they themselves are
utterly worthless, a burden on the earth which should be cleared away
with the rest of the trash. Meaning YOU STILL SUCK, BARFWELL.
Sole field? I am far more versatile and multifaceted than that.
You suck for failing to acknowledge my breadth and depth of interests and
my genius.
There is more to life than being negative and ransacking Salvation Army
shelves for obscure paper back books that can be had for a quarter.
--
When I shake my killfile, I can hear them buzzing!
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "nenslo" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
15 Nov 2003 12:13:07 AM |
|
|
Wbarwell wrote:
Sole field? I am far more versatile and multifaceted than that.
You suck for failing to acknowledge my breadth and depth of interests and
my genius.
Hammering down the hooch is not "genius."
There is more to life than being negative and ransacking Salvation Army
shelves for obscure paper back books that can be had for a quarter.
No there isn't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "HellPopeHuey" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
15 Nov 2003 12:20:01 PM |
|
|
nenslo <nenslo@yahooX.com> wrote in message news:<3FB5C3F3.BD448C02@yahooX.com>...
Wbarwell wrote:
There is more to life than being negative and ransacking Salvation Army
shelves for obscure paper back books that can be had for a quarter.
No there isn't.
And there you have the Zen of Nenslo. All you humans are STUPID.
--
HellPope Huey
What's on my mind? Earwigs.
And I think they're about to meet in the middle. Urgh.
Love goes out the door when money comes innuendo.
- Groucho Marx
"Are their legs atrophied? Every two-minute clip
has one of these bitches falling down
more than Christopher Reeve on a pogo stick.
If Julia Roberts or Sandra Bullock wants to make me laugh,
let 'em come to my house and tickle my balls
while I'm watchin' a Marx Brothers movie."
- Jim Norton
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anonymous" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
12 Nov 2003 11:04:07 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote:
"Bat Child (Sue M.)" <batchild1@cox.net> wrote:
Found at: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/51/letters.php
==================== [snip]
IN THE REALM OF THE APOCRYPHAL
Greg Bishop’s "Best of L.A."characterization, in his piece on Jack
Parsons, of L. Ron Hubbard as a tool of Aleister Crowley’s Ordo Templi
Orientalis is utterly false. Mr. Hubbard was sent in by U.S.
Intelligence to disband Parsons’ black-magic group.
"Bat Child" huh?
Well, that speaks volumes for itself.
You are full of *****. You are living in a fantasy world. The only
"evidence" that Hubbard ever had anything to do with US intelligence
is Hubbard's own ***** fairy tale. Given the freedom of
information act, not only -are- the FBI reports on Hubbard and Parsons
freely available but they are plastered all over the internet for
anybody with even the tiny smear of brain material necessary to look
for them.
As should have been obvious from the subject line, Bat Child was not the author of
the quoted text. The author of the quoted text was a Scientologist, which was quoted
from the LA Weekly, as clearly indicated in the subject line, the text of the article,
the URL cited at the top of the article in its first line.
Additionally, it is signed at the end by the actual author, Lissa Uvizl.
Catch the clue wave, dude.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joe Cosby" |
|
| Title: Re: LA Weekly, Nov. 7-13, 2003: Scieno's letter to the editor |
12 Nov 2003 08:36:19 PM |
|
|
ALSO SPRACH Anonymous:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Joe Cosby <joecosby@SPAMBLOCKmindspring.com> wrote:
"Bat Child (Sue M.)" <batchild1@cox.net> wrote:
Found at: http://www.laweekly.com/ink/03/51/letters.php
==================== [snip]
IN THE REALM OF THE APOCRYPHAL
Greg Bishop’s "Best of L.A."characterization, in his piece on Jack
Parsons, of L. Ron Hubbard as a tool of Aleister Crowley’s Ordo Templi
Orientalis is utterly false. Mr. Hubbard was sent in by U.S.
Intelligence to disband Parsons’ black-magic group.
"Bat Child" huh?
Well, that speaks volumes for itself.
You are full of *****. You are living in a fantasy world. The only
"evidence" that Hubbard ever had anything to do with US intelligence
is Hubbard's own ***** fairy tale. Given the freedom of
information act, not only -are- the FBI reports on Hubbard and Parsons
freely available but they are plastered all over the internet for
anybody with even the tiny smear of brain material necessary to look
for them.
As should have been obvious from the subject line, Bat Child was not the author of
the quoted text. The author of the quoted text was a Scientologist, which was quoted
from the LA Weekly, as clearly indicated in the subject line, the text of the article,
the URL cited at the top of the article in its first line.
Additionally, it is signed at the end by the actual author, Lissa Uvizl.
Catch the clue wave, dude.
Whatever. Whoever wrote the text I responded to.
--
Joe Cosby
http://joecosby.home.mindspring.com
You have to accept the possibility that God doesn't like you.
Tyler Durden, FIGHT CLUB
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
