(Ken Denny) wrote in message news:<ba944bc3.0409220908.493471b6@posting.google.com>...
This site http://www.realjourney.com/about/au_evolution.asp quotes
Francis Crick as stating "Evolution is mathematically impossible." I'm
pretty damn sure that Crick never said that. Can someone find the
source this was mined from?
From
http://www.realjourney.com/about/au_evolution.asp
"The deeper you dig, the more you learn how little scientific evidence
evolutionists have on which to base thier claims about evolution. This
became evident at a worldwide meeting of evolutionists at the Field
Museum in Chicago. At this meeting, Dr. Gould of Harvard University
and Dr. Nils [i.e. Niles] Eldridge of the American Museum of Natural
History-- both outspoken evolutionists-- said to this group, 'It has
long been a trade secret of paleontologists that transitional forms do
not exist, that missing links do not exist.'"
Some extracts about the 1980 conference appear within Rensberger and
Lewin:
1980 Rensberger, 1980 Alberch
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8bepfm%24h45%241%40nnrp1.deja.com
1970 Mayr, 1980 Gorman, 1982 and 1980 Rensberger, 1980
Lewin, 1981 Ruse, 1981 Jastrow, 1976 Bethell, 1982
Hitching
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.4.21L.01.0009120411410.1773811-100000%40irix2.gl.umbc.edu
"A few years ago a group of 52 leading evolutionists and
mathematicians from MIT gathered to deal with the mathematical
probability of evolution. After applying mathematical models and
computer technology,...."
Schutzenberger's 1966 Wistar symposium paper
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.3.96.980504231554.22521A-100000%40umbc10.umbc.edu
1966 (not '67) Wistar Symposium
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.3.95.970812001743.19938D-100000%40umbc8.umbc.edu
Schutzenberger wasn't a creationist; options for the
blindwatchmakingist
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.3.96.980527000035.6222A-100000%40umbc8.umbc.edu
.
|
