Religions > Atheism > Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"mr" |
| Date: |
18 May 2005 05:30:30 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
On 17 May 2005 17:24:08 -0700, "The Anti-Mexican"
<theantimexican@hotmail.com> wrote:
A state of war exists between Mexico and the people of the US.
1 - Mexican nationals coming to the US in waves of millions imbalance
US local economies, increase crime rates and threaten damage to the
society and laws of the US.
Villaraigosa, 52, positioned himself as a unity candidate who would
bridge racial and ethnic groups in a city that is 48 percent Hispanic,
31 percent white, 11 percent Asian and 10 percent black. The Democrat
lined up marquee endorsements from John Kerry
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7888173/
Better learn Spanish fucktards, America as we know it done.
.
|
|
| User: "Mattinglyfan deez nuts" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
18 May 2005 06:37:16 PM |
|
|
"mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu" <mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:jb6m81hu10ukfk71oha84fohujl11t13i8@4ax.com...
On 17 May 2005 17:24:08 -0700, "The Anti-Mexican"
<theantimexican@hotmail.com> wrote:
A state of war exists between Mexico and the people of the US.
1 - Mexican nationals coming to the US in waves of millions imbalance
US local economies, increase crime rates and threaten damage to the
society and laws of the US.
Villaraigosa, 52, positioned himself as a unity candidate who would
bridge racial and ethnic groups in a city that is 48 percent Hispanic,
31 percent white, 11 percent Asian and 10 percent black. The Democrat
lined up marquee endorsements from John Kerry
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7888173/
Better learn Spanish fucktards, America as we know it done.
Coma mierda y muera, puto.
Sweet, I have got a head start.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
18 May 2005 06:56:08 PM |
|
|
In article <79CdnQBs7fEwTBbfRVn-og@comcast.com> "Mattinglyfan" <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> writes:
"mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu" <mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:jb6m81hu10ukfk71oha84fohujl11t13i8@4ax.com...
On 17 May 2005 17:24:08 -0700, "The Anti-Mexican"
<theantimexican@hotmail.com> wrote:
A state of war exists between Mexico and the people of the US.
1 - Mexican nationals coming to the US in waves of millions imbalance
US local economies, increase crime rates and threaten damage to the
society and laws of the US.
Villaraigosa, 52, positioned himself as a unity candidate who would
bridge racial and ethnic groups in a city that is 48 percent Hispanic,
31 percent white, 11 percent Asian and 10 percent black. The Democrat
lined up marquee endorsements from John Kerry
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7888173/
Better learn Spanish fucktards, America as we know it done.
Coma mierda y muera, puto.
Sweet, I have got a head start.
Whoa, I didn't think I did, in spite of decades in
Tucson ... until I realized I could easily read your
little beginner's example there.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mattinglyfan deez nuts" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
18 May 2005 11:17:34 PM |
|
|
"Cary Kittrell" <cary@afone.as.arizona.edu> wrote in message
news:d6gkmo$f0m$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
In article <79CdnQBs7fEwTBbfRVn-og@comcast.com> "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> writes:
"mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu" <mange@merde.com> wrote in message
news:jb6m81hu10ukfk71oha84fohujl11t13i8@4ax.com...
On 17 May 2005 17:24:08 -0700, "The Anti-Mexican"
<theantimexican@hotmail.com> wrote:
A state of war exists between Mexico and the people of the US.
1 - Mexican nationals coming to the US in waves of millions imbalance
US local economies, increase crime rates and threaten damage to the
society and laws of the US.
Villaraigosa, 52, positioned himself as a unity candidate who would
bridge racial and ethnic groups in a city that is 48 percent Hispanic,
31 percent white, 11 percent Asian and 10 percent black. The Democrat
lined up marquee endorsements from John Kerry
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7888173/
Better learn Spanish fucktards, America as we know it done.
Coma mierda y muera, puto.
Sweet, I have got a head start.
Whoa, I didn't think I did, in spite of decades in
Tucson ... until I realized I could easily read your
little beginner's example there.
-- cary
See, we all know quite a bit more than we realize.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ryan" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and actor war |
20 May 2005 04:17:57 PM |
|
|
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Strabo" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
21 May 2005 01:21:22 AM |
|
|
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
But everyone here has a personal interest in their
property and staying alive.
Over to you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mattinglyfan deez nuts" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
21 May 2005 05:32:56 AM |
|
|
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Strabo" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
26 May 2005 07:37:33 PM |
|
|
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, by "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)>, we read:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Almost missed your response.
The illegal aliens at issue are predominantly
from Mexico and are of Indian heritage.
Many of their ancestors were related to the
Southwestern and Southern Indian groups.
It is acceptable to refer to them as Indians
when they place themselves in that cultural
context.
I didn't use the term "fair and square" in regards to
American Indians because I believe it was not. I am a
major critic of antebellum federal policies and military
activities.
However, from the earliest times, the colonial, and later
American governments, made agreements with the Indians in
regards to land that they used.
That some, though not all, treaties were broken, was the
responsibility of those who broke them, and
of course, pertinent government servants and agents.
To my knowledge none of these people are alive. If
you have evidence to the contrary, please forward it
to the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Hence, my comment in the present tense, "No one in the
US has taken anything..."
I so hope this eliminates your confusion.
BTW, all the ex-slaves and ex-slave owners are also
dead. We are not responsible for their deeds either.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Ascher" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and actor war |
26 May 2005 08:49:58 PM |
|
|
Strabo wrote:
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, by "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)>, we read:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Almost missed your response.
The illegal aliens at issue are predominantly
from Mexico and are of Indian heritage.
Many of their ancestors were related to the
Southwestern and Southern Indian groups.
It is acceptable to refer to them as Indians
when they place themselves in that cultural
context.
I didn't use the term "fair and square" in regards to
American Indians because I believe it was not. I am a
major critic of antebellum federal policies and military
activities.
However, from the earliest times, the colonial, and later
American governments, made agreements with the Indians in
regards to land that they used.
That some, though not all, treaties were broken, was the
responsibility of those who broke them, and
of course, pertinent government servants and agents.
To my knowledge none of these people are alive. If
you have evidence to the contrary, please forward it
to the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Hence, my comment in the present tense, "No one in the
US has taken anything..."
The phrase "has taken" is in the present perfect tense, not the present
tense. The main verb would be "takes" in the present (simple present) tense.
The present perfect indicates some action started in the past and
continues. While I don't have time here to point out how the government
continues to take from the native peoples, suffice it to say that as
recently as the 70s government agents attacked innocent natives on
trumped up charges.
Every time the government forbids tribes from opening casinos and other
economic stimuli, it takes away from their livelihoods.
James
.
|
|
|
| User: "MZ" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
26 May 2005 09:41:30 PM |
|
|
Hence, my comment in the present tense, "No one in the
US has taken anything..."
The phrase "has taken" is in the present perfect tense, not the present
tense. The main verb would be "takes" in the present (simple present)
tense.
The present perfect indicates some action started in the past and
continues. While I don't have time here to point out how the government
continues to take from the native peoples, suffice it to say that as
recently as the 70s government agents attacked innocent natives on
trumped up charges.
A person must be alive to take something from someone else. If you haven't
been born yet, then you can't be guilty of much wrongdoing.
Every time the government forbids tribes from opening casinos and other
economic stimuli, it takes away from their livelihoods.
....which is why the government shouldn't be in the morality business.
Having to grant permission to open a casino is archaic.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mattinglyfan deez nuts" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
26 May 2005 09:59:33 PM |
|
|
"MZ" <zarellam@removetwcny.rr.comspam> wrote in message
news:JaadnR_6nMnaFwvfRVn-uw@giganews.com...
Hence, my comment in the present tense, "No one in the
US has taken anything..."
The phrase "has taken" is in the present perfect tense, not the present
tense. The main verb would be "takes" in the present (simple present)
tense.
The present perfect indicates some action started in the past and
continues. While I don't have time here to point out how the government
continues to take from the native peoples, suffice it to say that as
recently as the 70s government agents attacked innocent natives on
trumped up charges.
A person must be alive to take something from someone else. If you
haven't
been born yet, then you can't be guilty of much wrongdoing.
Every time the government forbids tribes from opening casinos and other
economic stimuli, it takes away from their livelihoods.
...which is why the government shouldn't be in the morality business.
Having to grant permission to open a casino is archaic.
Or they probably just realized that someone was too stupid back then to do
what was right in the case of internment, slavery, et al.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Ascher" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and actor war |
27 May 2005 06:32:23 AM |
|
|
MZ wrote:
Hence, my comment in the present tense, "No one in the
US has taken anything..."
The phrase "has taken" is in the present perfect tense, not the present
tense. The main verb would be "takes" in the present (simple present)
tense.
The present perfect indicates some action started in the past and
continues. While I don't have time here to point out how the government
continues to take from the native peoples, suffice it to say that as
recently as the 70s government agents attacked innocent natives on
trumped up charges.
A person must be alive to take something from someone else. If you haven't
been born yet, then you can't be guilty of much wrongdoing.
If the process is ongoing, as it is in this case, then whoever is alive
at the time of the taking, they are responsible.
James
.
|
|
|
| User: "MZ" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
27 May 2005 10:44:59 AM |
|
|
A person must be alive to take something from someone else. If you
haven't
been born yet, then you can't be guilty of much wrongdoing.
If the process is ongoing, as it is in this case, then whoever is alive at
the time of the taking, they are responsible.
If by "process" you mean the act of taking is still ongoing, then yes that's
true. But how is this process still ongoing?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Strabo" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
31 May 2005 03:11:41 PM |
|
|
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 27 May 2005 11:44:59 -0400, by MZ, we read:
A person must be alive to take something from someone else. If you
haven't
been born yet, then you can't be guilty of much wrongdoing.
If the process is ongoing, as it is in this case, then whoever is alive at
the time of the taking, they are responsible.
If by "process" you mean the act of taking is still ongoing, then yes that's
true. But how is this process still ongoing?
The only way it can be ongoing is through group-think.
Government has defined groups of people by sex and race
and continues to play the privilege-punishment game
with them. There are many willing players.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Graphic Queen" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
21 May 2005 08:16:15 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking that of you actually.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mattinglyfan deez nuts" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
21 May 2005 03:50:19 PM |
|
|
"Graphic Queen" <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com> wrote in message
news:f5du815r2ctreq3j8nao8uinq738bqalo0@4ax.com...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies
your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking that of you actually.
Of course you were. Birds of a feather burn crosses together, dumb *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Graphic Queen" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
21 May 2005 06:33:23 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:50:19 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Graphic Queen" <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com> wrote in message
news:f5du815r2ctreq3j8nao8uinq738bqalo0@4ax.com...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies
your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking that of you actually.
Of course you were. Birds of a feather burn crosses together, dumb *****.
I was wondering how long it would take to get you to kill file bn. You
made it.
PLONK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sue" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
21 May 2005 07:37:34 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 21 May 2005 23:33:23 GMT, Graphic Queen <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:50:19 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Graphic Queen" <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com> wrote in message
news:f5du815r2ctreq3j8nao8uinq738bqalo0@4ax.com...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies
your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking that of you actually.
Of course you were. Birds of a feather burn crosses together, dumb *****.
I was wondering how long it would take to get you to kill file bn. You
made it.
PLONK
Dear Mattinglyfan:
Welcome to Madam's killfile. We're all getting along just fine in
here. You will find, however, that when she just can't contain
herself any longer that you will have magically slipped out of said
killfile.
Sue - from Madam Queen's killfile
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mattinglyfan deez nuts" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
22 May 2005 12:20:30 AM |
|
|
"Sue" <sebrady@thegrid.net> wrote in message
news:k0lv81ddf2isb37kivnrj9ghoui06q31at@4ax.com...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 23:33:23 GMT, Graphic Queen <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:50:19 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Graphic Queen" <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com> wrote in message
news:f5du815r2ctreq3j8nao8uinq738bqalo0@4ax.com...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with
native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies
your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking that of you actually.
Of course you were. Birds of a feather burn crosses together, dumb *****.
I was wondering how long it would take to get you to kill file bn. You
made it.
PLONK
Dear Mattinglyfan:
Welcome to Madam's killfile. We're all getting along just fine in
here. You will find, however, that when she just can't contain
herself any longer that you will have magically slipped out of said
killfile.
Sue - from Madam Queen's killfile
Thanks Sue. This is my first encounter with this particular dumb ***** so I
am quite honored to have such a status bestowed upon me so early in my
career. Wow, its pretty cool in here.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "myal" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and actor war |
22 May 2005 02:37:51 AM |
|
|
Sue wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 23:33:23 GMT, Graphic Queen <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:50:19 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Graphic Queen" <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com> wrote in message
news:f5du815r2ctreq3j8nao8uinq738bqalo0@4ax.com...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies
your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking that of you actually.
Of course you were. Birds of a feather burn crosses together, dumb *****.
I was wondering how long it would take to get you to kill file bn. You
made it.
PLONK
Dear Mattinglyfan:
Welcome to Madam's killfile. We're all getting along just fine in
here. You will find, however, that when she just can't contain
herself any longer that you will have magically slipped out of said
killfile.
Sue - from Madam Queen's killfile
Yeah , she convieniently 'cleans her killfile" when someone gets up her
nose to much to resist taking a shot at them .
Funny how its Sue and me who are continualy being rekillfiled , when out
of the whole group we are among the only sensible people here .
--
Help feed a hungry child
http://tinyurl.com/df2cu
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mattinglyfan deez nuts" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
22 May 2005 02:28:53 PM |
|
|
"myal" <dumaree@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:429039ef_4@news.chariot.net.au...
Sue wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 23:33:23 GMT, Graphic Queen <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:50:19 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Graphic Queen" <xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.com> wrote in message
news:f5du815r2ctreq3j8nao8uinq738bqalo0@4ax.com...
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to
was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with
native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies
your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking that of you actually.
Of course you were. Birds of a feather burn crosses together, dumb *****.
I was wondering how long it would take to get you to kill file bn. You
made it.
PLONK
Dear Mattinglyfan:
Welcome to Madam's killfile. We're all getting along just fine in
here. You will find, however, that when she just can't contain
herself any longer that you will have magically slipped out of said
killfile.
Sue - from Madam Queen's killfile
Yeah , she convieniently 'cleans her killfile" when someone gets up her
nose to much to resist taking a shot at them .
Funny how its Sue and me who are continualy being rekillfiled , when out
of the whole group we are among the only sensible people here .
You seem pretty normal so far, don't mess it up. :)
--
Help feed a hungry child
http://tinyurl.com/df2cu
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "myal" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and actor war |
21 May 2005 08:57:01 AM |
|
|
Graphic Queen wrote:
On Sat, 21 May 2005 04:32:56 -0600, "Mattinglyfan"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net (deez nuts)> wrote:
"Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:5rkt811gs3ng68r3ukk0on4febhnmg4rdl@4ax.com...
In Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and
act or war on Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, by Ryan, we read:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
No one in the US has taken anything from "native peoples" or
Mexicans (usually, "native people").
Wow, each of these comments goes a long way towards showing what a
tremendous dumb ***** you are. While I think the post you replied to was
stupid, your implication that everything was "fair and square" with native
Americans or that Mexicans are the same as Native Americans solidifies your
stupidity in this battle of no wits.
Over to you.
Over to a library and do some research so you don't sound like such an
idiot.
I was thinking
Now thats not true and you know it .
--
Feed an underprivilaged American child
http://tinyurl.com/df2cu
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Graphic Queen" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
20 May 2005 06:26:03 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 May 2005 17:17:57 -0400, Ryan <r701e@rogers.com> wrote:
By your definition, America should belong to the native peoples.
If you have the right to take over them, then the Mexicans should
a right to dissect your country.
Sheesh, we get all of the idiot ignorant nuts in here.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: Mexican immigration legally counts as foreign invasion and act or war |
18 May 2005 09:54:00 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 18 May 2005 10:30:30 GMT, "mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu"
<mange@merde.com> drained his beer, leaned back in the alt.atheism
beanbag and drunkenly proclaimed the following
Better learn Spanish fucktards, America as we know it done.
No, América está creciendo. Cambie es constante.
alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots, rec.arts.movies.current-films,
and alt.games.video.xbox todos quitados para ser de asunto.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
