Re: Michael Jackson is innocent


 Religions > Atheism > Re: Michael Jackson is innocent

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1
 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "R.G. Conken"
Date: 20 Nov 2003 04:18:10 PM
Object: Re: Michael Jackson is innocent
(Kenpangborn) wrote in message news:<20031120101508.08188.00000209@mb-m03.aol.com>...

From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer



(David Dennis Moore said:)


"The outrageous allegations against Michael Jackson are false. Michael would
never harm a child in any way. These scurrilous and totally unfounded
allegations
will be proven false in a courtroom ... " Ken Pangborn


One for FORGED LIE fon David, the Moron, Moore!

Pangborn, isn't it dangerous to use 3/4 of one's entire vocabulary
in a single sentence like that?
.

User: "Al Klein"

Title: Re: Michael Jackson is innocent 23 Nov 2003 06:48:28 PM
On 20 Nov 2003 14:18:10 -0800,
(R.G. Conken)
posted in alt.atheism:

Pangborn, isn't it dangerous to use 3/4 of one's entire vocabulary
in a single sentence like that?

Pangborn uses 3/4 of his entire vocabulary in single words.
--
"I see only with deep regret that God punishes so many of His children for their
numerous stupidities, for which only He Himself can be held responsible; in my opinion,
only His nonexistence could excuse Him."
-A. Einstein (Letter to Edgar Meyer, Jan. 2, 1915)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.


  Page 1 of 1

1
 


Related Articles
 

NEWER
pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER