Re: Misplaced deities



 Religions > Atheism > Re: Misplaced deities

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "Guillermo Sánchez"
Date: 13 Aug 2003 09:00:42 AM
Object: Re: Misplaced deities
Considering that ONLY religion deals with morality, or ethics, is so stupid,
since many moral and ethics treatsies that modern religions have adopted
existed before the religions themselves. Morality and religion are two
separate things, and if you ask me, religion is as immoral as lying,
murdering, adultery, stealing, and hypocracy.
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1030812165654.16639B-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...


On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 02:27:01 -0700, polar bear <bear@pole.com> wrote:


<< So, would an atheist consider adultery to be immoral?>>

Would a religionist consider it to be immoral? If so, why are there so
many famous religious adulterers?

<< For that matter, do atheists even concern themselves with this level of
detail, or is it strictly an abstract debate on the existence or
non-existence of a diety?>>

Are you suggesting that only religion confers morality? Likewise ethics?

.

 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER