Re: Moore Goes to Trial



 Religions > Atheism > Re: Moore Goes to Trial

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: ""
Date: 17 Nov 2003 01:23:37 PM
Object: Re: Moore Goes to Trial
"Jeff Strickland" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote:

:|> > Moore was hardly prostelytizing to children. It was a court house for
:|> > Christ's sake, he arguably was prostelytizing to other adults, they only
:|> > behave like children.
:|"Dave Thompson" <dav13795@wdmdx1.com> wrote in message
:|> Well, what do you know. You admit he was proselytizing. Is that a proper
:|> thing for a judge to be doing in court.
:|>
:|> Didn't think so.
:|Actually, I never admitted that he is/was proselytizing, I only recognized
:|that some were making that argument. What I admitted was that some adults
:|were acting like children.

Nice try but no cigar liar.
******************************************
[Jeffy had asked another]

Why do you feel the constant need to be nasty?

To you? Because you are an ignoramus who not only does not check his
facts, but posts endlessly repeating stuff that has been disproven
several times. You also seem to think that your unsupported opinion
is of interest to other people.
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier,
**********************************
[To that I add]
Jeff - I don't have a clue what I am talking about, but I am good at
pretending and making it up as I go along so don't confuse me with the
facts, my mind is made up. I stereotype and prejudge. It has always worked
well in the past, why change now - Strickland
Jeffy -- maybe, I heard, but didn't bother to do any independent research,
[ He says it gives him a headache] I like to believe things I want to hear.
I don't like knowing the facts if they aren't going to agree with what I
want to believe and I especially love passing along on the internet, as
facts, things I haven't a clue about their accuracy -- Strickland )
*******************************
[To Jeff Strickland]
I find it "interesting" that you are so incredibly stupid that you totally
missed the citation to the _New York Times_.
You seem to have remembered to take your one-a-day stupid pills.
Gray Shockley
*******************************
Jeff Strickland wrote:

I find it interesting that when Carol is unable to find the link, you ignore
the request for assistance. But, when I am unable to find the link (and
volunteer twice that I have looked), you jump in with a snide remark that
"the search was not too difficult," as though I am the idiot.

[Joni said]
I'm sorry. I didn't mean to imply you are an idiot. I meant to just
come right out and say you are an idiot.
**************************************
[another time Joni asked Jeffy]
Were you born this stupid or did you take a class?
**************************************
[jeffy had said]

It is the mother that has custodial and full guardianship
rights of the child. Newdow has no rights relative to this child and her
rearing.

YOU STUPID FUCKING ILLITERATE MORON, READ WHAT YOU AGREED
WITH EARLIER! THE COURTS HAVE RULED THAT NONCUSTODIAL
PARENTS **DO** HAVE RIGHTS TO THE RELIGIOUS UPBRINGING
OF THEIR CHILDREN, YOU BRAIN-DAMAGED TURD!
Merlyn LeRoy
========================================================
.

 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER