"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> writes:
"Mark Sebree" <sebree@infionline.net> wrote in message
news:1147195722.927176.244540@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
G-Net wrote:
[...]
I just communicate it whenever it's applicable. Your problem is with God
Almighty not me.
No, our problem is with you. It is your opinion that you are
communicating after all. Trying to say that your opinion comes from
your diety does not make it any less your opinion, nor does it make it
immune to questioning. Nobody is required to acknowledge your beliefs
as valid for anyone else besides you, and you have no right to force
your beliefs onto other or force them to abide by those beliefs.
And my problem is with the atheist who think so highly of themselves that
they think they can demand proof, demand evidence, because they "don't
think" that there really is a God. No one is "required" to acknowledge that
they agree with my beliefs but that doesn't give them the right to attack me
for believing in God either.
You're the schmuck claiming there is one, and then refusing to back your
bombast up with proof. You're conceited *and* moronic if you really believe
that approach will do anything but convince bystanders that you need not be
taken seriously.
I am "immune" to questioning because you have no authority to question
anything I say. You are no one, you speak for no one but yourself.
The same applies to you, whether you understand it or not.
You are not acting in any sort of "official" capacity to "question" anyone
about anything. You can politely ask if the person would be willing to offer
any evidence, proof, whatever but in the end they can tell you go sit on it
and be justified in doing so.
....but, of course, it's okay for YOU to interrogate anyone you don't deem
"Christian" enough for your purposes?
People are "forced" to abide by other people's beliefs everyday we live in
society. A person who believes that nudism is their "religion" may not
excercise their religon in a public place (ie. public indecency). Someone
who believes that stealing is alright is "forced" to live as society thinks
they should (ie. theft being illegal). Kids whose religion involves praying
are generally discouraged from praying in public and thus "forced" to go
against their religious beliefs. There are many more examples where people
are "forced" to do or not do things.
You're forced to 1) tolerate us annoying dissenters, and 2) not force your
patent ***** on anyone who doesn't want it. Try ignoring that in real life
and see how fast your head gets tattooed, while I get to enjoy that spectacle
from 1200 miles away.
Making abortion illegal would not force someone to have a baby because it
doesn't "force" them to have sex in the first place.
Look how well it worked before 1973, numbnuts. You're old enough to remember
that far back.
If they have sex and don't want to get pregnant then they have a personal
responsibility to make sure that precautions are taken.
....and precautions will fail, sooner or later - and the woman can abort if she
so chooses, and there's nothing you can do about it but whine. It's her
choice, and not yours. (I wouldn't mind seeing the development of technology
to enable men to be impregnated...so the audience could watch you whine about
how it's *your* choice, in that situation.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 7, Houston 4 (May 7)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, May 9 vs. Milwaukee, 7:35 (Game 4)
.
