Religions > Atheism > Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians!
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Raymond" |
| Date: |
21 Jun 2005 08:26:17 PM |
| Object: |
Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
wrote:
http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=15255
With an attitude displayed in this article, it is no wonder why the GOP
would end up with mostly White Christians in it.
Clean your own house up and shut the L up until you do.
Thank you Horatio for bringing light of this article...
- Richard Hutnik
--------------------
"The GOP IS mostly white Christians!"
What did Howard Dean say that was so offensive? His most recent
effrontery: "It's pretty much a white, Christian party," referring to
the GOP.
Please. Anyone who's attended a Republican convention or sat through a
State of the Union address knows Dean's statement is factually
true-ish.
The Republican Party aspires to diversity, but a few mariachi bands at
elephant-hat parties do not a diverse party make.
Republicans in state legislatures are about 99 percent white, according
to "The Great Divide," a book that examined America's voting
demographics and assigned the names "Metro" and "Retro" to the U.S.
geographical/socio-economic distribution of political power.
Of that 99 percent, 82.2 percent are male. By comparison, Democratic
state legislators run about 80 percent white, 72.6 percent male.
Dean also wasn't precisely wrong about the Christian composition of the
GOP, especially if he intended to suggest the party's ideological tilt.
In any case, Jews made up only 7 percent of the Republican Party as of
2000. And 37 percent of Republicans identify themselves as white
evangelicals.
And though blacks and Latinos voted for Bush in increasing numbers in
2004, the party's complexion still needs sunscreen. (Eleven percent of
blacks voted for Bush in 2004, up from 9 percent in 2000; 44 percent of
Latinos voted for Bush, up from 35 in 2000.)
What Dean should have said was, "Not that there's anything wrong with
that. Why, I'm a white Christian myself. But ... " And made his point.
And smiled.
It's not the message, so much as the messenger. Dean has no feel, no
instinct for the light touch. If he has a sense of humor, it must be
keeping company with his religion -- off the sleeve and out of sight.
Put Dean's same words in the mouth of a Ronald Reagan, and no one would
blink. Like Dean, Reagan said what he thought, but he didn't give the
impression that he was about to pop his buttons.
Reagan's deft touch, sense of humor and natural timing protected him
from condemnation when he said far more inflammatory things than Dean
has thought of.
Dean's problem, alas, may be the Democratic Party's problem in general.
When you take yourself too seriously, no one else will.
Kathleen Parker
Dean's delivery, not his content, needs work
But his remark that GOP is mostly white, Christian is, well, right
KATHLEEN PARKER
Tribune Media Services
Kathleen Parker is an Orlando Sentinel columnist. Write her c/o Tribune
Media Services, 435 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611 or
by e-mail at kparker@kparker.com.
.
|
|
| User: "Ike" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
22 Jun 2005 10:24:06 PM |
|
|
"Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1119403577.678837.63700@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
richardhutnik@hotmail.com wrote:
http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=15255
I'm dreaming of some white Christians just like the ones I used to know.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
21 Jun 2005 11:10:29 PM |
|
|
"Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1119403577.678837.63700@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
richardhutnik@hotmail.com wrote:
http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=15255
With an attitude displayed in this article, it is no wonder why the GOP
would end up with mostly White Christians in it.
Clean your own house up and shut the L up until you do.
Thank you Horatio for bringing light of this article...
- Richard Hutnik
--------------------
"The GOP IS mostly white Christians!"
What did Howard Dean say that was so offensive? His most recent
effrontery: "It's pretty much a white, Christian party," referring to
the GOP.
Please. Anyone who's attended a Republican convention or sat through a
State of the Union address knows Dean's statement is factually
true-ish.
true-ish , as in maybe true, or just sounds good,
That word sums up the problem with liberals
Close enough for your purposes seems the likely definition.
A pack of socialist control freaks suffering from national rejection. Those
libs just don't seem to understand "Go Away".
Maybe a few more elections and they will catch on.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
22 Jun 2005 01:04:27 AM |
|
|
Jim E, what percentage of the GOP is white Christians?
- Richard Hutnik
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
22 Jun 2005 09:54:39 AM |
|
|
<richardhutnik@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1119420267.573005.225990@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Jim E, what percentage of the GOP is white Christians?
Don't know, don't care.
I only know I'm not.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "duke" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 11:52:06 AM |
|
|
On 21 Jun 2005 23:04:27 -0700, wrote:
Jim E, what percentage of the GOP is white Christians?
What is important is what a high percentage of the 'rat party that is not -
consisting mostly of minorities, abortion queens, queers, lesbians, gay marriage
supporters, and other assorted left wing fringe element types.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
| User: "George" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 06:34:26 PM |
|
|
Another display of "Christian love"?
"duke" <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote in message
news:t1qlb1t05cmcle0e15iho5opsrulm3ei3n@4ax.com...
On 21 Jun 2005 23:04:27 -0700, wrote:
Jim E, what percentage of the GOP is white Christians?
What is important is what a high percentage of the 'rat party that is
not -
consisting mostly of minorities, abortion queens, queers, lesbians, gay
marriage
supporters, and other assorted left wing fringe element types.
duke
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tak" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 04:00:30 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:52:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 23:04:27 -0700, wrote:
a high percentage of the 'rat party that is not -
consisting mostly of minorities, abortion queens, queers, lesbians, gay marriage
supporters, and other assorted left wing fringe element types.
Ah, the god O love......... ;)
Tak
a#344
.
|
|
|
| User: "Native American" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 04:04:08 PM |
|
|
"Tak" <null@null.com> wrote in message
news:jl8mb1pf6rce5a73fmv526i6kap0k643mk@4ax.com...
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:52:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 23:04:27 -0700, wrote:
a high percentage of the 'rat party that is not -
consisting mostly of minorities, abortion queens, queers, lesbians, gay
marriage
supporters, and other assorted left wing fringe element types.
Ah, the god O love......... ;)
Plus, the Democrats have no viable plan for winning back any political
power....
So yeah, the Democrats can HAVE their "minorities", and they can REMAIN the
minority party! LOL!
Maybe the Defeated Democrats can hold hands and sing "Kum Bye Yah" with
their homosexuals, perverts, and other assorted sexual and societal perverts
and fringe types. Maybe it will make them FEEL better......
--
The Democrats, in their desperate search for an alchemist who can turn
Iraq into Vietnam, stumble into one soft cowpie after another.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Clarissa" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 06:34:43 PM |
|
|
"Native American" <NativeAmerican@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ctFue.10235$pa3.4657@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Tak" <null@null.com> wrote in message
news:jl8mb1pf6rce5a73fmv526i6kap0k643mk@4ax.com...
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:52:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 23:04:27 -0700, wrote:
a high percentage of the 'rat party that is not -
consisting mostly of minorities, abortion queens, queers, lesbians, gay
marriage
supporters, and other assorted left wing fringe element types.
Ah, the god O love......... ;)
Plus, the Democrats have no viable plan for winning back any political
power....
So yeah, the Democrats can HAVE their "minorities", and they can REMAIN
the minority party! LOL!
Maybe the Defeated Democrats can hold hands and sing "Kum Bye Yah" with
their homosexuals, perverts, and other assorted sexual and societal
perverts and fringe types. Maybe it will make them FEEL better......
--
The Democrats, in their desperate search for an alchemist who can turn
Iraq into Vietnam, stumble into one soft cowpie after another.
"Kum By Yah" Means "Come By Here" and when the Lord
does ;"Come by Here" , The BUSH GANG WILL BE SORRY;
that; BU$H LIED AND PEOPLE DIED.
ON THAT DAY--BUSH GANG WILL PAY.
Gee; Bush pretends to be a Christian.
Another lie. (Thou Shalt not Kill).
.
|
|
|
| User: "James" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
24 Jun 2005 02:29:37 PM |
|
|
"Clarissa" <cfowler@revealed.net> wrote in message
news:d9fguo01jdd@enews4.newsguy.com...
"Native American" <NativeAmerican@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:ctFue.10235$pa3.4657@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Tak" <null@null.com> wrote in message
news:jl8mb1pf6rce5a73fmv526i6kap0k643mk@4ax.com...
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:52:06 -0500, duke <duckgumbo32@cox.net> wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 23:04:27 -0700, wrote:
a high percentage of the 'rat party that is not -
consisting mostly of minorities, abortion queens, queers, lesbians, gay
marriage
supporters, and other assorted left wing fringe element types.
Ah, the god O love......... ;)
Plus, the Democrats have no viable plan for winning back any political
power....
So yeah, the Democrats can HAVE their "minorities", and they can REMAIN
the minority party! LOL!
Maybe the Defeated Democrats can hold hands and sing "Kum Bye Yah" with
their homosexuals, perverts, and other assorted sexual and societal
perverts and fringe types. Maybe it will make them FEEL better......
--
The Democrats, in their desperate search for an alchemist who can turn
Iraq into Vietnam, stumble into one soft cowpie after another.
"Kum By Yah" Means "Come By Here" and when the Lord
does ;"Come by Here" , The BUSH GANG WILL BE SORRY;
that; BU$H LIED AND PEOPLE DIED.
ON THAT DAY--BUSH GANG WILL PAY.
Gee; Bush pretends to be a Christian.
Another lie. (Thou Shalt not Kill).
--
"Sometimes it makes you feel better to make someone else feel bad" Homer
Simpson
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tak" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 07:09:37 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:04:08 GMT, "Native American"
<NativeAmerican@earthlink.net> wrote:
Like you rate a real answer. ;)
tak
a#344
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "DanielSan" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 04:31:01 PM |
|
|
duke wrote:
On 21 Jun 2005 23:04:27 -0700, wrote:
Jim E, what percentage of the GOP is white Christians?
What is important is what a high percentage of the 'rat party that is not -
consisting mostly of minorities, abortion queens, queers, lesbians, gay marriage
supporters, and other assorted left wing fringe element types.
I'd rather be associated with minorities, abortion queens, queers,
lesbians, gay marriage supports and other assorted left wing fringe
element types than "white Christians."
:-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
22 Jun 2005 03:59:05 PM |
|
|
On 21 Jun 2005 18:26:17 -0700, "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote:
--------------------
"The GOP IS mostly white Christians!"
GOP is for the Jews.
by Kevin Alfred Strom
....The May 18th meeting of the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (or AIPAC for short) in
Washington, DC... AIPAC is the most
influential lobby in Washington, and is totally focused on
maintaining and increasing American taxpayer support for Israel,
both financial and military, and in destroying all critics of
Israel or of Jewish supremacism...
When Bush ascended to the AIPAC podium, flanked by leading Jewish
supremacists on both sides, behind him was a huge new flag
design, probably 50 feet long, consisting of American stars and
stripes interspersed with huge Stars of David. Bush, interrupted
by wild applause and several standing ovations from the Zionist
audience which included Ariel Sharon, referred to the leading
Jewish supremacists on the platform by their first names:
"I'm honored to be here at AIPAC, thank you for such a warm
welcome. It's good to be with so many friends -- friends of mine
and friends of Israel. ...I want to thank Amy for her leadership.
I appreciate you taking time to serve a cause that -- in which
you believe deeply. I want to thank Bernice for her willingness
to serve, as well. I've known Howard for a long time. He's
effective. I want to thank the AIPAC board -- AIPAC board members
for their friendship and leadership. I'm honored to be in the
presence of my friend, the Ambassador from Israel, Danny Ayalon.
I appreciate you being here, Danny."
How cozy. The president went on in this vein for about forty
minutes, acting more like an Israeli cabinet minister than an
American president. He congratulated himself for his unwavering
support for Zionism, justified the horrible terror-war being
waged on Israel's behalf in Iraq, and engaged in some
saber-rattling against other Muslim states that don't want to
have a government supervised by Jews.
Bush also repeated the catch-phrase that has a hidden meaning to
Jewish supremacists, the phrase I've spoken about before on
American Dissident Voices -- "committed to the security of Israel
as a Jewish state," which is repeated almost word-for-word again
and again by Israel's sycophants and Capitol Hill puppets. and
which means much more than seems. [
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=1282 ] The words 'as
a Jewish state' are crucial: they mean support for Israel as a
racial state for one people alone, something that the Jewish
power structure denies to every White nation -- yet White
politicians must express their "commitment" to Israel. Bush
stated:
"The United States is strongly committed, and I am strongly
committed, to the security of Israel as a vibrant Jewish state."
Identical to the catch-phrase, with only the addition of the word
'vibrant.' Bush is not committed to America as an American state
-- in fact, he supports amnesty for illegal invaders.
All that is to be expected from Bush, considering his dependence
on Jewish favor, Jewish money, and Jewish media for his election.
But what I found most chilling about Bush's groveling speech
before his masters was this section, in which he makes reference
to a recent meeting of the so-called Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which is working with American
and European governments to outlaw free speech by "monitoring"
and outlawing criticism of Jews [
http://www.natvan.com/pub/2003/053103.txt
http://www.natvan.com/pub/2003/062803.txt ]:
"The Jewish people have seen, over the years and over the
centuries, that hate prepares the way for violence. The refusal
to expose and confront intolerance can lead to crimes beyond
imagining. So we have a duty to expose and confront
anti-Semitism, wherever it is found. Some of you attended a very
important event in Berlin last month, the International
Conference on Anti-Semitism. You understand that anti-Semitism is
not a problem of the past; the hatred of Jews did not die in a
Berlin bunker. In its cruder forms, it can be found in some Arab
media, and this government will continue to call upon Arab
governments to end libels and incitements. Such hatred can also
take subtler forms. The demonization of Israel, the most extreme
anti-Zionist rhetoric can be a flimsy cover for anti-Semitism,
and contribute to an atmosphere of fear in which synagogues are
desecrated, people are slandered, folks are threatened. I will
continue to call upon our friends in Europe to renounce and fight
any sign of anti-Semitism in their midst."
[ http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/05/20040518-1.html
]
You'll notice two things here: 1) Bush is conflating negative
feelings about Jews, and 'rhetoric,' with actual violent acts and
a supposed 'atmosphere' that 'creates' them, thus setting the
stage for the legally-required 'monitoring' of all critics of
Jewish power and the criminalization of the free speech of these
critics, and 2) the redefinition of criticism of Israel or
Zionism, making them into just another form of so-called
"anti-Semitism," so they, too, can be 'monitored' and eventually
criminalized. Both of these are something that Jewish pressure
groups worldwide have been pushing hard for recently, and Bush
promised to give them exactly what they want.
Meanwhile, at yet another meeting, John Kerry, who is actually of
Jewish ancestry himself, tried to out-promise Bush with his
protestations of love for Zionism and hatred of any who would
criticize Jewish supremacism. At a meeting last month of the
crime-linked Jewish spying operation and pressure group, the
'Anti-Defamation League' (ADL) in Washington, Kerry said the
following:
"...what ADL stands for is what I would like to fight for. ...And
after last week's [OSCE] conference in Berlin, we celebrate 55
countries that came together who have pledged to intensify their
efforts to combat anti-Semitism and to spread tolerance. ...And
we still know that anti-Semitism, notwithstanding the meeting of
55 countries, has been growing, and demands global leadership in
order to stand up against it. ...Across the Atlantic we've seen a
new wave of anti-Semitism, masking as anti-Israel sentiment, and
it's creeping its way across Europe and the Middle East. ...The
people of Israel should also know that for the entire 20 years
that I have been in the United States Senate, I'm proud that my
commitment to a secure Jewish state has been unwavering; not even
by one vote or one letter or one resolution has it wavered. And
as president, I can guarantee you that that support and that
effort for our ally, a vibrant democracy, will continue. ...The
security of Israel is paramount."
[ http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/kerryadl.html ]
Ladies and gentlemen, you cannot have more than one paramount
value. If a certain thing is your highest value, that means that
all other things are of lesser or no value. Kerry says "The
security of Israel is paramount." Not the security of the United
States. Not the security of our children's future. Not the
security of Western civilization or its founding race. None of
these are paramount to Kerry, or for that matter Bush or any of
the bought politicians. The Jewish state alone is paramount. (In
one of those coincidences that is simply too funny to have been
made up, I note that Kerry's 'liaison with the Jewish community'
is a person named Jay Footlik.)
As for Ralph Nader, he himself, like Kerry, is not entirely White
(though he's not Jewish) and he cannot be expected to articulate
the interests of White Americans. He has approached Middle
Eastern issues with more objectivity than Kerry or Bush -- he
recently referred to Kerry as "part of the Washington puppet show
on the Israeli/Palestinian matter" -- and he would restrict some
of the worst abuses of the open-border maniacs for rational
economic reasons...
[ http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/US-Israel/kerry.html ]
And what of that OSCE conference on 'anti-Semitism' to which both
Kerry and Bush referred in such glowing terms? Attended by
representatives of 55 nations, many of them dependent on
US/Zionist favor for their economic survival, it marked the
agreement of those governments to 'root out' all criticism of
Jews, continue their efforts to criminalize such criticism, and
begin the most extensive internal surveillance and spying
operation ever known, to be directed against their own citizens
suspected of being aware of the issue of Jewish supremacism.
According to the New Jersey Jewish News, at the conference
"European governments acknowledged that much of the current
anti-Semitism revival hides behind criticism of Israel.
....Several congressional participants praised the work of the
conference, but warned that the meeting is only the first step in
combating a problem that continues to grow."
One of those US Congressmen attending the event was New Jersey's
Republican Representative Chris Smith, who said "When national
leaders fail to denounce anti-Semitic violence and slurs, the
void is not only demoralizing to the victims, but silence
actually enables the wrongdoing. Silence by elected officials in
particular conveys approval - or at least acquiescence - and can
contribute to a climate of fear and a sense of vulnerability.
....we hope the results of this conference will serve as a
blueprint for serious and hopefully bold action. Our words here
in Berlin, however, must be repeated at home with frequency,
passion, and tenacity and matched - and even exceeded - by
deeds."
Laszlo Kovacs, the foreign minister of Hungary, told the OSCE
meeting "There can be no tolerance of extremist hate speech. We
will not tolerate it in parliament, in meetings, on the streets,
squares or football stadiums." By "extremist hate speech" they
now mean criticism of Israel, Zionism, or Jewish power. They do
not mean and will not punish Jewish supremacists when they
declare their hatred of White people or others, nor will they
punish the Jewish funding and promotion of policies which are
leading directly to genocide of the European race.
Another attendee was Democratic Congressman from Maryland Ben
Cardin, who declared "We ended up with a document that
acknowledges the importance of national leadership in fighting
anti-Semitism, and which commits nations not just to gather
information about the problem but to take action based on that."
The article continues: "As a result, OSCE members will share
information on the spread of anti-Semitism and 'best practices'
for combating it. Member nations agreed to invest in educational
and law enforcement programs aimed at reducing hate crimes and to
appoint a roving OSCE envoy to help members 'develop specific
strategies.'"
Jewish spokesman Mark Levin said of the OSCE meeting "The bottom
line is that members states of the OSCE are now committed to
monitoring and hopefully implementing programs to counter
increasing anti-Semitism..." Levin also said that America must
also monitor and 'combat' critics of Jewish power: "It was clear
we have a lot to look at in our own backyard, including using
education, law enforcement, and the Internet to combat new forms
of hatred." With every questioner of Jewish policy now put in the
'anti-Semite' category if Jewish groups so declare, Levin and
Foxman are going to be very very busy in the near future.
[ http://www.njjewishnews.com/njjn.com/50604/wldadl.html ]
[ http://www.eubusiness.com/afp/040523124619.zfxkfwap ]
They may have to 'monitor' the halls of Congress. In the U.S.
Senate, Senator Ernest Hollings is about to retire -- and from
the secure position of never having to worry about reelection
again, Mr. Hollings has decided to come clean, at least
partially, on the nature of Jewish power in Washington. (By the
way, Hollings' designated successor has been chosen by the
Democratic Party: Inez Tenenbaum, the Democratic state education
superintendent. No more worries about South Carolina Senators
spilling the beans for a while, anyway. [
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/GuestColumns/printLondon20040525.shtml
] )
Hollings' remarks included the following: "They [the Israeli
military] are coming in there [Palestinian refugee camps] with
U.S. equipment, U.S. gun helicopters, U.S. tanks that are
bulldozing. That is our policy. That is the reason for 9/11. ...I
think, frankly, we have caused more terrorism than we have gotten
rid of. ...I can tell you no President takes office--I don't care
whether it is a Republican or a Democrat--that all of a sudden
AIPAC will tell him exactly what the policy is... I don't
apologize for this column. I want them to apologize to me for
talking about anti-Semitism. They are not getting by with it.
....Now we have killed almost 800, maimed for life thousands of
others. Are we going to just continue on?"
[ http://hollings.senate.gov/~hollings/statements/2004521A35.html
]
Good question, Senator Hollings. My question is: Why did it take
you dozens of years to tell us the truth about Jewish domination
of Washington? Other establishment figures have, perhaps
reluctantly and hesitantly, revealed the truth about who has led
us into the war: Middle East expert General Anthony Zinni has now
stated that the purpose of the war was Israel's security, and
that Jewish neocons -- naming Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz,
Lewis Libby, Richard Perle, and Elliot Abrams -- were the ones
pushing for war from the beginning.
[ http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13549 ]
In parallel with the OSCE efforts in Europe, Jewish efforts to
suppress criticism are right now on track to be made into law in
the US Congress: H.R.4230 is a bill to "To authorize the
establishment within the Department of State of an Office to
Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, to require inclusion in annual
Department of State reports of information concerning acts of
anti-Semitism around the world, and for other purposes."
The bill states that "It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) the
United States should continue to vigorously support efforts to
combat anti-Semitism worldwide through bilateral relationships
and interaction with international organizations such as the
Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE); (2)
the United States delegation to the OSCE conference in Berlin
should advocate for the appointment of a High Commissioner on
anti-Semitism; (3) the President should direct the United States
Ambassador to the United Nations to introduce in the most
appropriate forum in the United Nations a measure condemning
anti-Semitism; (4) the Secretary of State should establish a
permanent office in the Department of State to monitor and combat
anti-Semitism; and (5) the Department of State should thoroughly
document acts of anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic incitement that
occur around the world."
[ http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:HR04230:@@@P ]
It does indeed seem that there are meetings, meetings everywhere
-- in Berlin, in Washington, in the halls of Congress itself. For
the most part, these are meetings of liars and faceless
bureaucrats eager to accept Jewish money and keep their jobs by
doing what they are told.
Meanwhile, we're having some meetings of our own. Last month,
National Alliance members participated in the Institute for
Historical Review revisionist conference in Sacramento, which we
helped rescue from cowardice and Jewish censorship efforts. Just
one week earlier, we held the largest-ever National Alliance
Leadership Conference in the newly-constructed William Pierce
Memorial Hall in the beautiful mountains of West Virginia. And
just a few days ago, the New Orleans European-American Conference
gathered together Alliance members and supporters, members of
other groups, and individual activists from around the world to
meet in cooperation in setting lofty goals, putting in place a
'zero tolerance' policy on violence or lawlessness often
instigated by provocateurs, and distancing ourselves from
irresponsible elements by setting a high moral tone in our
efforts to secure a future for White children. The ideas in the
New Orleans Protocol, as it is called, are those that the
National Alliance has been promoting for years. The New Orleans
Protocol will have historic significance as we advance toward our
vision: a nation for White people, where the government is
responsible to us alone, where our interests -- and not the
interests of a foreign nation like Israel -- come first.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of
ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-request@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
23 Jun 2005 10:58:33 AM |
|
|
Wow, thank you for identifying the other 7% of the GOP. Let's see,
over 85% of the GOP is white Christians. 7% is Jews. That leaves
about another 8% or less something else. If lucky, maybe 1% of the GOP
is Muslim or some other religion. But, based on the original article I
referred to, which branded Islam as evil, it would be no wonder why
nearly no Muslims would be part of the GOP.
- Richard Hutnik
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: My Gosh, Dean is correct. The GOP is mostly white Christians! |
24 Jun 2005 07:52:48 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jun 2005 08:58:33 -0700, wrote:
Wow, thank you for identifying the other 7% of the GOP. Let's see,
over 85% of the GOP is white Christians. 7% is Jews. That leaves
about another 8% or less something else. If lucky, maybe 1% of the GOP
is Muslim or some other religion. But, based on the original article I
referred to, which branded Islam as evil, it would be no wonder why
nearly no Muslims would be part of the GOP.
By Dr. William Pierce
"Last week I gave an interview to an English-language radio station in
Teheran. The program was "The Islamic Voice of Iran." We talked about
a
number of things, including Ariel Sharon's visit to the White House,
which was taking place at the time, and about President Bush's
popularity ratings. The Iranian interviewer asked me whether Bush
would
take a more sensible, pro-American policy in the Middle East or would
continue taking orders from Israel, to the detriment of American
interests, the way the Clinton administration had.
Of course, I explained to him that there was really no difference
between Republicans and Democrats in that regard. They both dance to
whatever tune the Jews are playing at the moment, and that George Bush
would no more dare to disobey the Jews than Bill Clinton would. I told
the Iranian interviewer that there are minor differences between the
Republican Party and the Democratic Party, with the Democrats
pandering
a bit more to the welfare class and the Republicans paying a bit more
lip service to things such as military preparedness and energy
production, but that on the really essential issues -- immigration,
racial policy, media control, foreign policy -- both parties do what
they're told and don't give the Jews any back talk.
The Iranian had a hard time understanding this. If one party -- the
Democrats, say -- were controlled by Jews and supported Jewish
interests, then surely there would be another party -- presumably the
Republicans -- representing the interests of the American people. He
couldn't understand how the Jews, making up only 2.5 per cent of the
U.S. population, could have the whole political process under their
control and in particular could dictate U.S. foreign policy in the
Middle East, regardless of who is in the White House and which party
controls the Congress. What about the other 97.5 per cent of the
population? They also have interests, and they can vote. Why aren't
their interests supported by some political party?
The difficulty my Iranian interviewer had in understanding how
politics
works in America has two facets. One of these is the dominant
influence
the mass media of news and entertainment, which are largely in the
hands
of the country's very small Jewish minority, have on public opinion
and
attitudes, on the mass culture, and on the political process. In Iran
tradition is much more important in determining public opinion. And
Iran
is a much more homogeneous country, at least in a cultural and
religious
sense, than is the United States. In America the media have to a large
extent weaned the people away from their traditions and from their
cultural and religious roots and substituted a made-in-Hollywood
trash-culture with ersatz traditions in their place. The media are
increasingly important in influencing public opinion everywhere in the
developed countries -- even in Iran, no doubt -- but nowhere has the
process been as thorough and as destructive as it has been in the
United
States.
A second barrier to understanding is the subtlety and indirection
which
is used by the media bosses in achieving their aims. They almost never
make a head-on attack against the traditions or values of the host
population. They look for conflict, for inconsistency, for vice or
hypocrisy or weakness, and they exploit it to gain a foothold. Then
they
use one facet of popular belief or tradition to undermine another. For
example, they will proclaim themselves champions of "fair play," and
then they will persuade the public that fair play requires that no
distinction be made between Asians and Europeans in setting
immigration
policy. If we let Englishmen and Germans and Swedes into America, then
it wouldn't be fair to keep out Vietnamese and Chinese and Pakistanis,
they tell us.
Or they will play on the average American's resentment of governmental
interference in his private affairs to promote the idea that
homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality and that neither
the
government nor individuals should make a distinction between the two.
What people do in the privacy of their bedrooms is no one else's
business, therefore the government should require landlords,
employers,
Boy Scout troops, and everyone else to treat homosexuals just like
heterosexuals: a bit of a non sequitur, but the media have been
remarkably successful at using such illogical arguments to shift
public
opinion on a number of issues.
And because the media are able to influence public opinion so
strongly,
all the politicians, Republicans as well as Democrats, dance to their
tune. The politicians understand that the tiny Jewish minority, only
2.5
per cent of the population, through their control of the media are the
single most important influence on the public's perception of issues,
of
government policies, and of the politicians themselves -- and
consequently are the single most important influence on the outcome of
elections. And it is for this reason that everyone can safely count on
George Bush's policy toward Israel being whatever the Jews want it to
be.
Anyway, although I explained this as clearly as I could to my Iranian
interrogator, I think he didn't really believe me. He was ready to
accept the fact that the Jews are a very bad influence on American
policy in the Middle East, but he couldn't accept the fact that
through
their control of the mass media of news and entertainment they have
made
irrelevant and meaningless the whole idea of mass democracy. He
couldn't
assimilate the idea that party politics in America has become just a
shell game to keep the rubes confused about what's really happening
and
who's running the country. He knew that Jews are bad news, but he
couldn't grasp the fact that the most powerful country in the world,
economically and militarily, is so totally in their malign grip.
And really, when I try to put myself in the Iranian's shoes, it's hard
for me to believe it myself: a mere 2.5 per cent of the population, a
historically despised and hated group who have been kicked out of
every
country in Europe, and there's not a single mainstream American
politician brave enough to defy them; a tiny, clannish group who have
a
stranglehold on the mighty American nation; a case of the tail wagging
the dog. How do they do it? It doesn't seem possible.
Well, of course, it is possible, and I'll tell you how they do it:
they
do it with images and myths. They do it by controlling the perceptions
that most people have of the world around themselves. The Jews create
myths about what the world is like and then generate false images to
match the myths. And they project these myths and false images of the
world into the minds of their hosts.
I'll give you a specific example of this. There is a new film out by
Universal Pictures. It's called The Fast and the Furious. It's a film
directed at White teenagers, a film designed to give them a particular
image of the world and instill in them a myth about the way the world
works. It's a film about modern, urban teenagers -- specifically
street
gangs in Los Angeles -- and cars and street racing. That might seem
harmless enough, but the street racing is just a gimmick on which to
hang the message, and that message is that the world is multicultural,
and it's good that it's multicultural. It's good not to live in a
White
world, with White friends and White role models and White values and
White standards and traditions. That's boring. That's not cool.
The message is that there's nothing special about being White. The
message is that if one is White, then one should hang out with Blacks
and Asians and mestizos. One should behave like non-Whites, talk like
them, dress like them, be like them. That's what's cool. That's what's
sexy. That's what everybody who's really cool is doing. And when you
feel like having some sex, you just reach for whoever is nearest. It
doesn't matter at all what race the other person is. If you're a White
girl, it's especially cool to have sex with a Black or Asian or
mestizo
male.
That's the most obvious message of the film, but actually it's more
than
that. It's not really that the film says race doesn't matter, that
we're
really all the same; that culture doesn't matter, that all cultures
are
equivalent. The film says that Whites should become non-White, because
non-White is better. The cultural milieu of the film is not raceless
or
a little of this and a little of that. The cultural milieu is Black.
The
culture is hip-hop. The music is hip-hop. The clothing style, with the
baggy shorts and the rest, is hip-hop. It's Black. That is the world
into which White teenagers should blend, the world to which they
should
subordinate themselves.
Surely, White teenagers aren't actually absorbing that message. Are
they? Yes, unfortunately, many of them are. The Fast and the Furious
is
drawing bigger crowds than any other film produced by Hollywood this
season. It grossed $78 million in its first ten days. White teenagers
are flocking to it more than to any other movie. The attraction, of
course, is the action, the street racing, the exciting car stunts.
That's the gimmick that pulls them in. But that's not the message. The
message -- which of course, is subliminal: that is, which is intended
to
change the kids' perception of the world at a subconscious level -- is
exactly what I just described: it's cool to be part of the hip-hop
culture; it's cool to be multicultural; it's cool not to act White,
think White, or be White.
That's the message, and it's a Jewish message: Jewish in its
conception,
Jewish in its promotion, Jewish in its genocidal intent.
You think I'm imagining things? I'll read to you from a story about
the
film in last Saturday's edition of the Los Angeles Times. I quote:
"Hollywood was stunned when the youth-oriented action film The Fast
and
the Furious streaked past the competition to become the number-one
movie
.. . . With its relatively unknown cast of Latinos, Asians, and
African-Americans, heavy doses of high-speed chases, and a driving
hip-hop soundtrack, the movie defied expectations . . . . But the
teen-oriented movie's success isn't so surprising when one glimpses
the
youthful crowds flocking to theaters . . . . With their ultra-baggy
cargo shorts, doo-rags wrapped around their heads, and bodies
festooned
with tattoos and piercings, the look of these young moviegoers mirrors
the multiethnic melange of actors on the screen. . . .
"Hollywood likes to pride itself on being ahead of the cultural curve,
but with last summer's sassy white-versus-black cheerleading comedy
Bring It On grossing $68.4 million domestically and this winter's Save
the Last Dance, with its once-taboo interracial dating, raking in more
than $90 million in North America alone, the studios have only begun
to
catch up with the colorblind nature of today's MTV generation.
"Rob Cohen, who directed The Fast and the Furious, said the film not
only reflects today's "multiculti" youth culture without purposely
drawing attention to it, but depicts what is really going on. When the
movie opened, it drew a cross-section of races, Cohen said. Surveys
taken at theaters where The Fast and the Furious played showed that 50
per cent of moviegoers were white, 24 per cent were Hispanic, 10 per
cent were black, and 11 per cent were Asian. "I look at this and go,
'This is exactly what I'm talking about,'" Cohen said. . . .
Attracting
a young audience across the country -- a mainstay of big summer
popcorn
hits -- The Fast and the Furious has grossed an estimated $78 million
in
less than two weeks and is on track to make well over $100 million."
--
end of quote --
I want to emphasize a couple of things in what I just read to you,
besides the fact that the director of the film is the Jew Rob Cohen
and
the studio is Universal Pictures, owned by the Jew Edgar Bronfman.
First, note that Mr. Cohen is very much aware of the racial angle in
his
film. That's all he talks about, not the racing stunts. And note that
he
says he put the racial propaganda into his film in way that would not
"draw attention to it": that is, he put it in as subliminal
propaganda.
One other thing: the story in the Los Angeles Times implies that this
film and other films like it are imitating society, not the other way
around. But that's not true. These Jewish films are propaganda
deliberately designed to move society in the direction the Jews want
it
to go. White kids didn't start wearing baggy shorts and backward
baseball caps and listening to rap music and using jive talk just
because that's what young Blacks were doing: it was Jewish films and
Jewish television and Jewish advertising that pushed them in this
direction, that persuaded them it is cool to imitate Blacks.
The Times story refers to the studios catching up with "today's MTV
generation." But really, how did it become the "MTV generation"? That
name is appropriate just because it is MTV which has been the single
largest influence on White teenagers in moving them away from their
roots in their own race and making rootless cosmopolitans out of them.
MTV has been the foremost promoter of the hip-hop lifestyle among
young
Whites. And I hardly need to remind you that it is the very Jewish
Sumner Redstone, originally known as Murray Rothstein to his parents,
who owns MTV. Redstone's MTV and his Paramount Pictures studio may be
a
little ahead of the other Hollywood studios, but they're all pushing
in
the same direction as hard as they can.
This is an essential point: namely, that the Jewish media are pushing
our society, and not the other way around, and the Jews are
understandably reluctant to admit that. Last Saturday's Los Angeles
Times story interviewed another Jewish film producer in this regard,
and
I quote from the story: "Marc Abraham, one of the producers of Bring
It
On, noted: 'There is a much more interracial aspect in today's culture
than the way this country used to be. Any movie that reflects that --
and it doesn't mean they'll all be hits like The Fast and the Furious
--
will ring true with the audience.'" -- end of quote --
As I indicated, that is deliberate misdirection. And there's more
misdirection in the Times story. It also interviews the Black director
of Sumner Redstone's racemixing film Save the Last Dance, and I quote:
"'The movie business is certainly catching up with what's happening in
society,' said Thomas Carter, who directed Save the Last Dance. 'Youth
culture has been shifting a long time . . . . Places like MTV are
right
on the edge and totally involved in the change. In filmmaking we lag
behind.'" -- end of quote -- But of course, Redstone's MTV, which as
Carter notes is "totally involved in the change," is into filmmaking
too. Anyway, it's really an artificial distinction to contrast Jewish
television with Jewish cinema. Redsone isn't the only Jewish media
boss
who is deeply involved in both media.
One of Bronfman's subordinates, the Jew Marc Shmuger, says it a little
more plainly, and again I quote from last Saturday's Los Angeles Times
story: "'I think the segregated groupings are breaking down in today's
America, and I think today's movie audience is a complex mix,' said
Marc
Shmuger, vice chairman of Universal Pictures, which released The Fast
and the Furious. But Shmuger warned that if the movie industry starts
making multiethnic movies 'in a calculating and cynical fashion,' the
audience will sense that and stay away." -- end of quote -- In other
words, keep the propaganda subtle, keep it subliminal, so that we
don't
tip off the goyim that it's really propaganda.
I'll read one more section from the Los Angeles Times story. I quote:
"Just as The Fast and the Furious shows young people of all races
gathered in large groups unmindful of their racial differences and not
hung up on sex, Gary Scott Thompson, one of the film's writers, said
today's young movie audiences also are that way. 'It used to be that a
boy and a girl would go on a date,' he said. 'Now what's happening is
groups of kids who are friends -- multiracial boys and girls -- all
move
in date packs together. It's like a date, but they don't consider it
dating. Some of them might neck; some of them might not. None of them
think anything much about it. They are much more open when talking
about
sex . . . . They've broken down the cultural barriers.' . . . Rob
Friedman, vice chairman of Paramount Pictures Motion Picture Group,
said
the studio began noticing the colorblind nature of young audiences
with
its 1999 high school pigskin drama Varsity Blues. 'It's really about
their peers, regardless of race, and to a certain extent gender as
well,' Friedman said. 'When it came to Save the Last Dance, it became
more and more apparent young people don't care whether the
relationship
is interracial. The music is great, the story is great.'" -- end of
quote --
As I've already mentioned, Paramount Pictures belongs to Sumner
Redstone, and I hardly need to tell you that his employee Rob Friedman
is a Jew, like nearly all the other executives at Paramount Pictures.
This new development of White teenagers running in "date packs," as
the
scriptwriter put it, with Blacks, Asians, and mestizos and having very
casual and very interracial sex did not evolve spontaneously, as the
media bosses and their employees would have us believe. It has been
promoted deliberately by Hollywood and by television and by Madison
Avenue. Sumner Redstone's MTV may be a bit bolder in this regard than
the other Jewish media, but all of them have been working together for
decades toward the same goal, and that goal is the annihilation of our
people. They say, "Oh, we're just reflecting with our films and our TV
shows and our magazine ads what your society has become all by
itself,"
but that is a conscious, calculated lie. They know exactly what they
have done and are doing, and one can easily sense them gloating over
it
when one reads their remarks in the Los Angeles Times.
I've said this a thousand times already in different words, but when
we
permitted the Jews to come into our society and take over our mass
media
of news and entertainment -- our newspapers and our radio broadcasting
networks and our motion picture and advertising industries and then
television broadcasting -- we handed them the weapons with which they
intended from the beginning to destroy us and now are destroying us.
This program of theirs to corrupt and destroy us didn't begin with the
Second World War and the so-called "Holocaust." It is a consequence of
their nature. The "Holocaust" was not the cause of their destructive
behavior, but rather a consequence.
If you believe that I am hallucinating when I say that, see for
yourself
what Jews such as Edgar Bronfman and Sumner Redstone are producing for
the entertainment of our children, and you try to explain it in any
other way. I know that the majority of our own people, lemmings that
they are, are dancing to the Jews' tune now, along with the
politicians.
That is a shame, but it in no way excuses us from our task. Many of
those who have become blinded by the Jews and have become
collaborators
of the Jews will unavoidably become "collateral damage" in the
struggle
and the chaos which lie ahead, but we must do whatever is necessary to
free our people from the spell cast over them by the Jews. To that
task
I have consecrated my life, and I invite each of you to do likewise.
www.spearhead-uk.com http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
