Religions > Atheism > Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT)
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andres64" |
| Date: |
12 Jan 2004 01:23:44 PM |
| Object: |
Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
John M Price PhD wrote:
In alt.radio.talk.dr-laura article <20040111200023.01860.00002761@mb-m18.aol.com> Charles Nemo <chasnemo@aol.comnojunk> wrote:
: noted:
: >The Very Reverend Pat Robertson does not need a shell.
: >Haley
: Indeed he doesn't. No one else could possibly sink that low.
Falwel?
BTW, anyone remember when Robertson was asked about his attempt to raise
the dead and control a hurricane?
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 03:33:32 PM |
|
|
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 04:10:06 PM |
|
|
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 05:10:26 PM |
|
|
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 08:07:51 PM |
|
|
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 08:36:01 PM |
|
|
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I was answering your question. It seems like you should laugh at prayer
more readily when it obviously fails.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 09:01:53 PM |
|
|
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I was answering your question. It seems like you should laugh at prayer
more readily when it obviously fails.
Nice dodge, but that's not at all what you wrote. Care to try again?
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 09:53:15 PM |
|
|
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I was answering your question. It seems like you should laugh at prayer
more readily when it obviously fails.
Nice dodge, but that's not at all what you wrote. Care to try again?
I said:
#begin quote
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
#end quote
and then:
#begin quote
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
#end quote
What's not true about those comments?
1) The hurricane did change course after Robertson prayed.
2) It seems like even though what he prayed for happened as he pray for
it to happen, you still attack him, apparently just for praying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 10:22:33 PM |
|
|
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I was answering your question. It seems like you should laugh at prayer
more readily when it obviously fails.
Nice dodge, but that's not at all what you wrote. Care to try again?
I said:
#begin quote
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
#end quote
And I asked: "Your point is...?"
<still waiting for an answer>
....snip...
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John M Price PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 07:53:31 PM |
|
|
In alt.radio.talk.dr-laura article <40036BAB.C5CFCE2E@backpacker.com> "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )" <stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
: >
: I said:
: #begin quote
: The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
: correct?
: #end quote
: and then:
: #begin quote
: So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
: happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
: at them for just praying?
: #end quote
: What's not true about those comments?
: 1) The hurricane did change course after Robertson prayed.
: 2) It seems like even though what he prayed for happened as he pray for
: it to happen, you still attack him, apparently just for praying.
Yep. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. A logical error.
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
--
John M. Price, PhD
Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP!
Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion.
Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683
I think the sky is blue because it's a shift from black through purple
to blue, and it has to do with where the light is. You know, the
farther we get into darkness, and there's a shifting of color of light
into the blueness, and I think as you go farther and farther away from
the reflected light we have from the sun or the light that's bouncing
off this earth, uh, the darker it gets ... I think if you look at the
color scale, you start at black, move it through purple, move it on
out, it's the shifting of color. We mentioned before about the stars
singing, and that's one of the effects of the shifting of colors.
- Pat Robertson, The 700 Club
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 11:42:23 PM |
|
|
John M Price PhD wrote:
In alt.radio.talk.dr-laura article <40036BAB.C5CFCE2E@backpacker.com> "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )" <stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
: >
: I said:
: #begin quote
: The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
: correct?
: #end quote
: and then:
: #begin quote
: So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
: happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
: at them for just praying?
: #end quote
: What's not true about those comments?
: 1) The hurricane did change course after Robertson prayed.
: 2) It seems like even though what he prayed for happened as he pray for
: it to happen, you still attack him, apparently just for praying.
Yep. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. A logical error.
The logical error is to say that you've scientifically proven that
Robertson can steer cyclones with the power of his prayer. There is no
logical error in saying that you believe that Robertson can do that,
have faith in the power of prayer even to turn typhoons.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 08:12:04 PM |
|
|
John M Price PhD wrote:
In alt.radio.talk.dr-laura article <40036BAB.C5CFCE2E@backpacker.com> "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )" <stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
: >
: I said:
: #begin quote
: The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
: correct?
: #end quote
: and then:
: #begin quote
: So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
: happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
: at them for just praying?
: #end quote
: What's not true about those comments?
: 1) The hurricane did change course after Robertson prayed.
: 2) It seems like even though what he prayed for happened as he pray for
: it to happen, you still attack him, apparently just for praying.
Yep. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. A logical error.
It's just his usual dribble a lot and say nothing.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
-- Pogo
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andres64" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 10:11:59 PM |
|
|
Andres64 wrote:
John M Price PhD wrote:
In alt.radio.talk.dr-laura article <40036BAB.C5CFCE2E@backpacker.com>
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
<stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
: > : I said:
: #begin quote
: The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
: correct?
: #end quote
: and then:
: #begin quote
: So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
: happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to
laugh
: at them for just praying?
: #end quote
: What's not true about those comments?
: 1) The hurricane did change course after Robertson prayed.
: 2) It seems like even though what he prayed for happened as he pray for
: it to happen, you still attack him, apparently just for praying.
Yep. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. A logical error.
It's just his usual dribble a lot and say nothing.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
-- Pogo
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. FairnBalanced Red " |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 09:00:03 PM |
|
|
In article <40035991.D396D2FC@backpacker.com>, "Bill Bonde ( the oblique
allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )" <stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the
university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia
Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You
don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I was answering your question. It seems like you should laugh at prayer
more readily when it obviously fails.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
Hey, Bonde...
Did Limbaugh tell you that?
Cheers,
Mr. Red
--
"I know how hard it is for you to put food on your families."
--GeeDubya Bush
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 09:50:20 PM |
|
|
"Mr. (Fair'n'Balanced) Red" wrote:
In article <40035991.D396D2FC@backpacker.com>, "Bill Bonde ( the oblique
allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )" <stderr2@backpacker.com> wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the
university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia
Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You
don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
I don't remember, but just for the sake of discussion, let's say that it
did. Your point is...?
So let me get what you are saying: If someone prays for something to
happen and what they pray for happens, then you are still going to laugh
at them for just praying?
Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I was answering your question. It seems like you should laugh at prayer
more readily when it obviously fails.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
Hey, Bonde...
Did Limbaugh tell you that?
Tell me what? As I keep telling you, I do not listen to Limbaugh.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 05:51:47 PM |
|
|
It did not hit the University nor the Robertson compound nor his
airfield with his two jets which were parked there at the time.
Haley
Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack ) wrote:
Andres64 wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
You need not attack Reverend Robertson. He along with the university
students did stop the hurricane in its tracks and Virginia Beach was
spared any damage through his intercession.
Haley
LOL (seriously). You're just fucking with us, rught? You don't really
believe that, do you?
The hurricane did change course and not hit the Robertson abode,
correct?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary DeWaay" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook (Was: CREATIONIST BULL$HIT) |
12 Jan 2004 06:16:18 PM |
|
|
bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
It did not hit the University nor the Robertson compound nor his
airfield with his two jets which were parked there at the time.
Haley
Why did your opinions change with your name you sign under?
"Bistoury" has an exact opposite viewpoint than
"bistoury@earthlink.net".
Here's an example:
..................
From: Bistoury
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, rec.scouting.issues,
alt.politics.bush, ne.general, alt.radio.talk.dr-laura
D. James Kennedy is an old dried up dance teacher who found a better way
to rip off people.
He is a fraud nearly the stature of Fallwell and Robertson.
...........................
Hmmm.. interesting. You used to think Robertson was a "fraud" on
12/26/03 at 12:15 PM.
Methinks you are the fraud.
Gary
.
|
|
|
| User: "John M Price PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
12 Jan 2004 08:06:50 PM |
|
|
On top.
thanks!
In alt.radio.talk.dr-laura article <MPG.1a6cf4d027d1224d989d28@news.midco.net> Gary DeWaay <dewaay2spikeNOT@sio.midco.net> wrote:
: bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
: >
: > It did not hit the University nor the Robertson compound nor his
: > airfield with his two jets which were parked there at the time.
: > Haley
: >
: Why did your opinions change with your name you sign under?
: "Bistoury" has an exact opposite viewpoint than
: "bistoury@earthlink.net".
: Here's an example:
: .................
: From: Bistoury
: Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, rec.scouting.issues,
: alt.politics.bush, ne.general, alt.radio.talk.dr-laura
: D. James Kennedy is an old dried up dance teacher who found a better way
: to rip off people.
: He is a fraud nearly the stature of Fallwell and Robertson.
: ..........................
: Hmmm.. interesting. You used to think Robertson was a "fraud" on
: 12/26/03 at 12:15 PM.
: Methinks you are the fraud.
: Gary
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
--
John M. Price, PhD
Life: Chemistry, but with feeling! | PGP Key on request or FTP!
Email responses to my Usenet articles will be posted at my discretion.
Comoderator: sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated Atheist# 683
Just as most issues are seldom black or white, so are most good
solutions seldom black or white. Beware of the solution that requires
one side to be totally the loser and the other side to be totally the
winner. The reason there are two sides to begin with usually is
because neither side has all the facts. Therefore, when the wise
mediator effects a compromise, he is not acting from political
motivation. Rather, he is acting from a deep sense of respect for the
whole truth.
-- Stephen R. Schwambach
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 12:54:30 PM |
|
|
No, methinks I have a very stupid husband who also uses this computer
and he will soon be going away as soon as the papers are filed.
He is an unbeliever and an atheist. But then, what could one expect
from a person who graduated from Princeton University a well known
school of atheists.
Haley
John M Price PhD wrote:
On top.
thanks!
In alt.radio.talk.dr-laura article <MPG.1a6cf4d027d1224d989d28@news.midco.net> Gary DeWaay <dewaay2spikeNOT@sio.midco.net> wrote:
: bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
: >
: > It did not hit the University nor the Robertson compound nor his
: > airfield with his two jets which were parked there at the time.
: > Haley
: >
: Why did your opinions change with your name you sign under?
: "Bistoury" has an exact opposite viewpoint than
: "bistoury@earthlink.net".
: Here's an example:
: .................
: From: Bistoury
: Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, rec.scouting.issues,
: alt.politics.bush, ne.general, alt.radio.talk.dr-laura
: D. James Kennedy is an old dried up dance teacher who found a better way
: to rip off people.
: He is a fraud nearly the stature of Fallwell and Robertson.
: ..........................
: Hmmm.. interesting. You used to think Robertson was a "fraud" on
: 12/26/03 at 12:15 PM.
: Methinks you are the fraud.
: Gary
(c) 2004. Copyright, John M. Price, PhD. All Rights Reserved.
Contents may not be republished in any form or medium without prior
written consent of the author with the express and only exception of
followup postings limited to and within usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary DeWaay" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 06:35:07 PM |
|
|
bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
No, methinks I have a very stupid husband who also uses this computer
and he will soon be going away as soon as the papers are filed.
He is an unbeliever and an atheist. But then, what could one expect
from a person who graduated from Princeton University a well known
school of atheists.
So you ACTUALLY have these wacko beliefs ("The earth is only around 5700
years old and the Grand Canyon is only about 4000 years old",) and are
not a fraud?
I respected you more when I thought you were just a clever fraud.
Gary
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 06:58:56 PM |
|
|
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs. You can not prove the
earth is anything more but a very young earth. You need to contact
Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
Haley
Gary DeWaay wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
No, methinks I have a very stupid husband who also uses this computer
and he will soon be going away as soon as the papers are filed.
He is an unbeliever and an atheist. But then, what could one expect
from a person who graduated from Princeton University a well known
school of atheists.
So you ACTUALLY have these wacko beliefs ("The earth is only around 5700
years old and the Grand Canyon is only about 4000 years old",) and are
not a fraud?
I respected you more when I thought you were just a clever fraud.
Gary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary DeWaay" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 01:37:57 AM |
|
|
bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs.
Doesn't mean I have to believe your beliefs.
You can not prove the
earth is anything more but a very young earth.
If you ignore science... true.
You need to contact
Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
You need a beer... maybe lots of them.
Gary
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 01:01:16 PM |
|
|
Thank you but I don't drink and it is obvious you need prayer.
Haley
Gary DeWaay wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs.
Doesn't mean I have to believe your beliefs.
You can not prove the
earth is anything more but a very young earth.
If you ignore science... true.
You need to contact
Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
You need a beer... maybe lots of them.
Gary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gary DeWaay" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 07:35:50 PM |
|
|
bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
Thank you but I don't drink and it is obvious you need prayer.
Why?
BTW, please stop top posting. In case you haven't noticed, you are the
only person doing this. The English language is composed in a
sequential manner from top to bottom, not bottom to top.
Gary
.
|
|
|
| User: "dk" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 09:25:27 PM |
|
|
"Gary DeWaay" <dewaay2spikeNOT@sio.midco.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1a6faa74fb0ddf0c989d39@news.midco.net...
bistoury@earthlink.net, typed...
Thank you but I don't drink and it is obvious you need prayer.
Why?
BTW, please stop top posting. In case you haven't noticed, you are the
only person doing this. The English language is composed in a
sequential manner from top to bottom, not bottom to top.
Gary
Now Gary, you know she's just following God's rules regarding posting to
Usenet.
Lord dk
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
14 Jan 2004 10:42:01 PM |
|
|
wrote:
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs. You can not prove the
earth is anything more but a very young earth. You need to contact
Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
Haley
You really aren't very good at this although you are being amazingly
effective.
Gary DeWaay wrote:
, typed...
No, methinks I have a very stupid husband who also uses this computer
and he will soon be going away as soon as the papers are filed.
He is an unbeliever and an atheist. But then, what could one expect
from a person who graduated from Princeton University a well known
school of atheists.
So you ACTUALLY have these wacko beliefs ("The earth is only around 5700
years old and the Grand Canyon is only about 4000 years old",) and are
not a fraud?
I respected you more when I thought you were just a clever fraud.
Gary
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 07:08:26 PM |
|
|
wrote:
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs.
Yes there is.
You can not prove the
earth is anything more but a very young earth.
Yes, we can.
You need to contact
Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
Haley
Why would a bunch of wackos make us believe that you're not a wacko?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 07:14:37 PM |
|
|
Because, it is God's truth and those truths are irrevocable.
Haley
Fred Stone wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs.
Yes there is.
You can not prove the earth is anything more but a very young earth.
Yes, we can.
You need to contact Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
Haley
Why would a bunch of wackos make us believe that you're not a wacko?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 08:01:39 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
wrote:
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs.
Yes there is.
You can not prove the earth is anything more but a very young earth.
Yes, we can.
You need to contact Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
Haley
Why would a bunch of wackos make us believe that you're not a wacko?
Because, it is God's truth and those truths are irrevocable.
Haley
Because you say so?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 08:05:50 PM |
|
|
YES!
Fred Stone wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
bistoury@earthlink.net wrote:
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs.
Yes there is.
You can not prove the earth is anything more but a very young earth.
Yes, we can.
You need to contact Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
Haley
Why would a bunch of wackos make us believe that you're not a wacko?
Because, it is God's truth and those truths are irrevocable.
Haley
Because you say so?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: New contender for kookiest kook |
13 Jan 2004 08:12:31 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
wrote:
Fred Stone wrote:
wrote:
There is no reason not to respect my beliefs.
Yes there is.
You can not prove the earth is anything more but a very young earth.
Yes, we can.
You need to contact Creation Science Labs is San Diego.
Haley
Why would a bunch of wackos make us believe that you're not a wacko?
Because, it is God's truth and those truths are irrevocable.
Haley
Because you say so?
YES!
That's nice. When you have some evidence to prove it, let me know.
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
