| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Mike Fairmount" |
| Date: |
18 May 2004 10:26:32 AM |
| Object: |
Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
NY POST = Murdoch *****
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:%Rpqc.42721$kc2.639786@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NEW '9/11' FLICK HAS FAR 'MOORE' FIZZLE THAN SIZZLE
By LOU LUMENICK
-------------------------
May 18, 2004 -- CANNES, France - President Bush need not lose any sleep
over Michael Moore's much-hyped "Fahrenheit 9/11," which turns out to be a
wet firecracker. Moore's virulent feature-length attack on Bush, which
premiered yesterday to a 20-minute standing ovation at the Cannes Film
Festival, falls far short of delivering on the filmmaker's extravagant
promises of election-swinging revelations.
"You will see things you haven't seen before and learn things you have not
learned before," he vowed on Sunday.
Well, maybe if you spent the last three years hiding in a cave in
Afghanistan.
Sure, there's some media-grabbing footage - apparently shot by one of the
camera crews Moore claims to have smuggled in with embedded troops - of
American soldiers laughing as they place hoods over Iraqi prisoners, and
one GI touching a detainee's genitals through a blanket.
But that footage actually conflicts with one of Moore's main arguments -
that GIs have been victimized by being forced to participate in what he
considers to be the unnecessary and immoral invasion of Iraq.
Moore's big stop-the-presses revelation is that the name of an old pal of
the president who works for the bin Laden family was excised from 1972
National Guard records released by the White House in 2002. Yawn.
Mostly Moore dusts off a litany of old accusations against the president -
whom he portrays as both a buffoon and a world-class conspirator - and
lands few solid blows as he takes on targets like the Patriot Act and
supposed war profiteering by the politically connected Halliburton Corp.
The sheer scope of the material he's trying to cover in a two-hour
documentary - the Sept. 11 attacks rate maybe five minutes - leads to
incredibly superficial and misleading treatment at times.
As a critic who awarded Moore's Oscar-winning "Bowling for Columbine" four
stars, I was particularly disappointed with "Fahrenheit 9/11."
In "Columbine," Moore had something new to say about the gun-control
debate and did so in a refreshingly entertaining manner.
"9/11" does not lend itself to such a glib approach, and while Moore may
get laughs by presenting Bush and his staff in a brief "Bonanza" spoof
titled "Afghanistan," the humor often seems much more forced here.
By far the best sequence features Lila Lipscomb, a woman from Moore's
hometown of Flint, Mich., who lost her Marine son in Vietnam.
But when she tries to go to the White House to express her antiwar
feelings, Moore ends up delivering a pallid echo of the high point of
"Columbine," where victims of that high school massacre descend on Kmart
headquarters to demand that the chain stop selling ammunition.
Far from the political hot potato Moore has been tub-thumping to secure a
rich U.S. distribution deal and the July opening he lusts after - after
Miramax was forced to sell it at the insistence of its corporate parent,
Disney - "Fahrenheit 9/11" is more like a lot of hot air.
.
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 11:17:00 AM |
|
|
"Mike Fairmount" <mfaie@socal.rr.com> wrote in
news:IWpqc.995$a14.843@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com:
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. N" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 12:16:03 PM |
|
|
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
That must really ***** you off.
--
-Mr. N
-------------------------------------------
The Bush administration is a national disgrace.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 01:53:33 PM |
|
|
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John LaVoy" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 02:45:27 PM |
|
|
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
Oh My God! Really? What a shock? Someone like:
Rush Limbaugh
Mike Savage
John Stossel
Mike Medved
Ollie North
Jeff Katz
G. Gordon Liddy
Glenn Beck
Dom Giordano
Mike Smerconish
Sean Hannity
Bill O'Reilly or
the Entire Fox "News" Network?
Really?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. N" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 02:16:01 PM |
|
|
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
What lies has he told?
And is "deliberately telling only one side of an issue" a sin now?
I dare you to answer.
--
-Mr. N
-------------------------------------------
The Bush administration is a national disgrace.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 02:17:57 PM |
|
|
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10ako7lkrgl5l7c@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
What lies has he told?
And is "deliberately telling only one side of an issue" a sin now?
It is if you distort the truth like Michael Moore does.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. N" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 02:30:38 PM |
|
|
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:Fjtqc.42781$kc2.641500@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
What lies has he told?
Not answering this? Big surprise.
And is "deliberately telling only one side of an issue" a sin now?
It is if you distort the truth like Michael Moore does.
Where's your long-running diatribe against Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill
O'Reilly, et. al.?
Ignorant right-wing sack of *****.
--
-Mr. N
-------------------------------------------
The Bush administration is a national disgrace.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mike" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 09:34:12 PM |
|
|
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<10ako7lkrgl5l7c@news.supernews.com>...
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
What lies has he told?
Here's a sample:
http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html
http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20031016b.html
http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20031016.html
even the liberal salon.com sees thru Moore:
http://www.salon.com/june97/media/media970606.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Relaxification" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 02:10:59 PM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
Ok, so have we established that you are against liars and people who
only tell one side of an issue?
How do you feel about Bush, then?
(mission accomplished!)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diogenes" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 02:06:21 PM |
|
|
Relaxification wrote:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an
issue.
Ok, so have we established that you are against liars and people who
only tell one side of an issue?
Moore actually doesn't tell one side, he fabricates one side.
How do you feel about Bush, then?
(mission accomplished!)
You wish. Try again, you might get it right before you die.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 06:39:51 PM |
|
|
"Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
news:bbddb1cf85b353b2660d3e63280aedc2@news.teranews.com:
Relaxification wrote:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an
issue.
Ok, so have we established that you are against liars and people who
only tell one side of an issue?
Moore actually doesn't tell one side, he fabricates one side.
I especially likes how he interviews a few US soldiers who don't agree
with the war and makes it out like they represent the opinion of the whole
military.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stephen Thompson" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 07:00:25 PM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
I especially likes how he interviews a few US soldiers who don't agree
with the war and makes it out like they represent the opinion of the
whole military.
How do you know he does that? Perhaps he only "makes it out like" they
have opinions and experience worth hearing?
=========================================================================
"If you don't disagree with me, how will I know I'm right?" - Sam Goldwyn
My opinions are my own, and not those of my employer.
The weird part is... I'm self-employed.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bloom,Leopold" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 05:57:43 PM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
Well, we can't have liars about, now can we. Rush Limpballs never
lies. He truly believes Hillary Clinton murdered her lover Vince
Foster in her Georgetown apartment and had the Secret Service move the
body to Forty Marcy Park. Except sometimes Rush says Bill did it.
But how can you not believe the word of a man who proclaimed just last
week that "I don't quote out of context, I ADD context." Or who
proved global warming was a "scam" on the grounds that "there aren't
any aerosol spray cans in Africa".
And President Cheney and VP Lay never lie. There are lots of nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, they're just invisible. And
there are surely ties between the Hussein regime and Al Qaida, and
involvement in the events of 9/11, it's just that they took place in
fairy land and weren't visible to the rest of us.
And O'Lielly never lies. He would have won that pulitzer it's just
those damned elitists (read: someone with an education or some
expertise) denied it to him.
Actually, come to think of it, YOU GUYS LIE ALL THE TIME ON EVERY
TOPIC ON EVERY OCCASION AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IN EVERY POSSIBLE MANNER.
Even if you contradict yourself, as Rush does all the time, even that
won't stop the constant stream of lies and abuse from your ugly and
filthy mouth.
Now, guess how much I care what your opinion, or the opinion of a
reviewer in the pay of Rupert (the War Criminal) Murdoch is in regard
to Mr. Moore. Go ahead and guess!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 06:04:38 PM |
|
|
(Bloom,Leopold) wrote in
news:8ebf5caf.0405181457.3313f082@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
Well, we can't have liars about, now can we. Rush Limpballs never
lies. He truly believes Hillary Clinton murdered her lover Vince
Foster in her Georgetown apartment and had the Secret Service move the
body to Forty Marcy Park. Except sometimes Rush says Bill did it.
But how can you not believe the word of a man who proclaimed just last
week that "I don't quote out of context, I ADD context." Or who
proved global warming was a "scam" on the grounds that "there aren't
any aerosol spray cans in Africa".
And President Cheney and VP Lay never lie. There are lots of nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, they're just invisible. And
there are surely ties between the Hussein regime and Al Qaida, and
involvement in the events of 9/11, it's just that they took place in
fairy land and weren't visible to the rest of us.
And O'Lielly never lies. He would have won that pulitzer it's just
those damned elitists (read: someone with an education or some
expertise) denied it to him.
Actually, come to think of it, YOU GUYS LIE ALL THE TIME ON EVERY
TOPIC ON EVERY OCCASION AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IN EVERY POSSIBLE MANNER.
Even if you contradict yourself, as Rush does all the time, even that
won't stop the constant stream of lies and abuse from your ugly and
filthy mouth.
Now, guess how much I care what your opinion, or the opinion of a
reviewer in the pay of Rupert (the War Criminal) Murdoch is in regard
to Mr. Moore. Go ahead and guess!
Nice strawman. Come back when you come up with some real points.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 08:51:08 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 18 May 2004 23:04:38 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
bloomleo1@aol.com (Bloom,Leopold) wrote in
news:8ebf5caf.0405181457.3313f082@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
Well, we can't have liars about, now can we. Rush Limpballs never
lies. He truly believes Hillary Clinton murdered her lover Vince
Foster in her Georgetown apartment and had the Secret Service move the
body to Forty Marcy Park. Except sometimes Rush says Bill did it.
But how can you not believe the word of a man who proclaimed just last
week that "I don't quote out of context, I ADD context." Or who
proved global warming was a "scam" on the grounds that "there aren't
any aerosol spray cans in Africa".
And President Cheney and VP Lay never lie. There are lots of nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, they're just invisible. And
there are surely ties between the Hussein regime and Al Qaida, and
involvement in the events of 9/11, it's just that they took place in
fairy land and weren't visible to the rest of us.
And O'Lielly never lies. He would have won that pulitzer it's just
those damned elitists (read: someone with an education or some
expertise) denied it to him.
Actually, come to think of it, YOU GUYS LIE ALL THE TIME ON EVERY
TOPIC ON EVERY OCCASION AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IN EVERY POSSIBLE MANNER.
Even if you contradict yourself, as Rush does all the time, even that
won't stop the constant stream of lies and abuse from your ugly and
filthy mouth.
Now, guess how much I care what your opinion, or the opinion of a
reviewer in the pay of Rupert (the War Criminal) Murdoch is in regard
to Mr. Moore. Go ahead and guess!
Nice strawman. Come back when you come up with some real points.
Pathetic come back, Xomicron.
LOL
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Relaxification" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 02:15:11 PM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<aEwqc.42900$kc2.643044@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
bloomleo1@aol.com (Bloom,Leopold) wrote in
news:8ebf5caf.0405181457.3313f082@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an issue.
Well, we can't have liars about, now can we. Rush Limpballs never
lies. He truly believes Hillary Clinton murdered her lover Vince
Foster in her Georgetown apartment and had the Secret Service move the
body to Forty Marcy Park. Except sometimes Rush says Bill did it.
But how can you not believe the word of a man who proclaimed just last
week that "I don't quote out of context, I ADD context." Or who
proved global warming was a "scam" on the grounds that "there aren't
any aerosol spray cans in Africa".
And President Cheney and VP Lay never lie. There are lots of nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, they're just invisible. And
there are surely ties between the Hussein regime and Al Qaida, and
involvement in the events of 9/11, it's just that they took place in
fairy land and weren't visible to the rest of us.
And O'Lielly never lies. He would have won that pulitzer it's just
those damned elitists (read: someone with an education or some
expertise) denied it to him.
Actually, come to think of it, YOU GUYS LIE ALL THE TIME ON EVERY
TOPIC ON EVERY OCCASION AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IN EVERY POSSIBLE MANNER.
Even if you contradict yourself, as Rush does all the time, even that
won't stop the constant stream of lies and abuse from your ugly and
filthy mouth.
Now, guess how much I care what your opinion, or the opinion of a
reviewer in the pay of Rupert (the War Criminal) Murdoch is in regard
to Mr. Moore. Go ahead and guess!
Nice strawman. Come back when you come up with some real points.
That's not a strawman argument, dude. He's pointing out other
documented liars that you seem to support. He's pointing out a flaw
in your argument. YOU brought up lying as being a bad thing, not him.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob SD" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 11:05:08 AM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in news:aEwqc.42900$kc2.643044
@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
bloomleo1@aol.com (Bloom,Leopold) wrote in
news:8ebf5caf.0405181457.3313f082@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an
issue.
Well, we can't have liars about, now can we. Rush Limpballs never
lies. He truly believes Hillary Clinton murdered her lover Vince
Foster in her Georgetown apartment and had the Secret Service move the
body to Forty Marcy Park. Except sometimes Rush says Bill did it.
But how can you not believe the word of a man who proclaimed just last
week that "I don't quote out of context, I ADD context." Or who
proved global warming was a "scam" on the grounds that "there aren't
any aerosol spray cans in Africa".
And President Cheney and VP Lay never lie. There are lots of nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, they're just invisible. And
there are surely ties between the Hussein regime and Al Qaida, and
involvement in the events of 9/11, it's just that they took place in
fairy land and weren't visible to the rest of us.
And O'Lielly never lies. He would have won that pulitzer it's just
those damned elitists (read: someone with an education or some
expertise) denied it to him.
Actually, come to think of it, YOU GUYS LIE ALL THE TIME ON EVERY
TOPIC ON EVERY OCCASION AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IN EVERY POSSIBLE MANNER.
Even if you contradict yourself, as Rush does all the time, even that
won't stop the constant stream of lies and abuse from your ugly and
filthy mouth.
Now, guess how much I care what your opinion, or the opinion of a
reviewer in the pay of Rupert (the War Criminal) Murdoch is in regard
to Mr. Moore. Go ahead and guess!
Nice strawman. Come back when you come up with some real points.
Sound like Leopold was right on target to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "me tew!" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
09 Jun 2004 11:47:49 PM |
|
|
Bob wrote:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in news:aEwqc.42900$kc2.643044
@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
bloomleo1@aol.com (Bloom,Leopold) wrote in
news:8ebf5caf.0405181457.3313f082@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
HEY GET THIS THRU YOUR SMALL MIND --
HE IS ***NOT*** REPEAT ***NOT*** AMERICAN.
HE IS CANADIAN! (and probably a frenchie)
Actually, he's a liar and deliberately tells only one side of an
issue.
Well, we can't have liars about, now can we. Rush Limpballs never
lies. He truly believes Hillary Clinton murdered her lover Vince
Foster in her Georgetown apartment and had the Secret Service move the
body to Forty Marcy Park. Except sometimes Rush says Bill did it.
But how can you not believe the word of a man who proclaimed just last
week that "I don't quote out of context, I ADD context." Or who
proved global warming was a "scam" on the grounds that "there aren't
any aerosol spray cans in Africa".
sounds plausible. ;-)
And President Cheney and VP Lay never lie. There are lots of nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons in Iraq, they're just invisible. And
there are surely ties between the Hussein regime and Al Qaida, and
involvement in the events of 9/11, it's just that they took place in
fairy land and weren't visible to the rest of us.
no just buried in millions of acre's of dessert.
they won't find them unless they know where to look.
it took months just to find so-damm-insane.
it will be years to find any other caches.
And O'Lielly never lies. He would have won that pulitzer it's just
those damned elitists (read: someone with an education or some
expertise) denied it to him.
envious?!? like what reporter doesn't?
just look to the new york times if you're looking for liars.
there's loads of them there!
Actually, come to think of it, YOU GUYS LIE ALL THE TIME ON EVERY
TOPIC ON EVERY OCCASION AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IN EVERY POSSIBLE MANNER.
Even if you contradict yourself, as Rush does all the time, even that
won't stop the constant stream of lies and abuse from your ugly and
filthy mouth.
true hurts huh?
time for your medication. ;-)
Now, guess how much I care what your opinion, or the opinion of a
reviewer in the pay of Rupert (the War Criminal) Murdoch is in regard
to Mr. Moore. Go ahead and guess!
Nice strawman. Come back when you come up with some real points.
i agree. his points are tame and lame.
Sound like Leopold was right on target to me.
you're not listening. - hey pay attention!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Phillip Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
10 Jun 2004 12:45:09 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 04:47:49 +0000, me tew! wrote:
Bob wrote:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in news:aEwqc.42900$kc2.643044
@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
bloomleo1@aol.com (Bloom,Leopold) wrote in
news:8ebf5caf.0405181457.3313f082@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
HEY GET THIS THRU YOUR SMALL MIND --
HE IS ***NOT*** REPEAT ***NOT*** AMERICAN.
HE IS CANADIAN! (and probably a frenchie)
So Michigan is now part of Canada?
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/faq/
Q: My wife is convinced you're Canadian. I say you're American. Which is
it?
A: People often think I'm Canadian, probably because of Canadian
Bacon. Lots of people also seem to think my name is Roger Moore. Well, I'm
not Canadian, and, sadly, I'm not James Bond either. I'm just an
all-American Michigan kid, and proud of it. Sure, Canada has a lot to
teach us--universal health care, lower crime, funny accents--and Canadians
are great to work with, but the nearly deceased Bald Eagle on the American
quarter is always going to be cooler than the beaver on the Canadian
nickel.
.
|
|
|
| User: "grant kinsley" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
21 Jun 2004 11:42:51 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:45:09 +1000, Phillip Brown
<phillipbrownau@netscape.net> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 04:47:49 +0000, me tew! wrote:
Bob wrote:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in news:aEwqc.42900$kc2.643044
@nnrp1.uunet.ca:
bloomleo1@aol.com (Bloom,Leopold) wrote in
news:8ebf5caf.0405181457.3313f082@posting.google.com:
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:<NYsqc.42766$kc2.640768@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com:
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
HEY GET THIS THRU YOUR SMALL MIND --
HE IS ***NOT*** REPEAT ***NOT*** AMERICAN.
HE IS CANADIAN! (and probably a frenchie)
So Michigan is now part of Canada?
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/faq/
Q: My wife is convinced you're Canadian. I say you're American. Which is
it?
A: People often think I'm Canadian, probably because of Canadian
Bacon. Lots of people also seem to think my name is Roger Moore. Well, I'm
not Canadian, and, sadly, I'm not James Bond either. I'm just an
all-American Michigan kid, and proud of it. Sure, Canada has a lot to
teach us--universal health care, lower crime, funny accents--and Canadians
are great to work with, but the nearly deceased Bald Eagle on the American
quarter is always going to be cooler than the beaver on the Canadian
nickel.
yeah, but you know what you are doing when you rub the beaver on that
nickel?
Making the Queen happy.
GK
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
22 Jun 2004 11:15:02 AM |
|
|
http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=1c73f143-d2ec-46b5-8d46-ff3bc2e80dae
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "EB" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
18 May 2004 07:48:57 PM |
|
|
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com...
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 12:16:38 AM |
|
|
EB <fenderblender@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
Last I checked it was the neocons and the capitalists who are getting
fat and rich.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 12:57:52 AM |
|
|
(Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:c8eqjl$tfi$1@bolt.sonic.net:
EB <fenderblender@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
Last I checked it was the neocons and the capitalists who are getting
fat and rich.
Michael Moore is fat. He's also rich and hates America.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kate " |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 08:55:08 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 05:57:52 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:c8eqjl$tfi$1@bolt.sonic.net:
EB <fenderblender@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
Last I checked it was the neocons and the capitalists who are getting
fat and rich.
Michael Moore is fat. He's also rich and hates America.
Ah yes, the old disfunctional argument strawman. I can't answer any
of your valid points, so I must turn it around and try to make the
argument something els. The criticizer must hate America.
How obvious. So answer the question - How has he lied. And tell us
after that why you feel it is important to the question of lying that
he is fat, has a few more bucks than you (and a pittance compared to
Cheney and Rush) and actually bravely stands up and criticizes the Neo
Con party line?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Russell Stewart" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
23 May 2004 10:51:02 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 05:57:52 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:c8eqjl$tfi$1@bolt.sonic.net:
EB <fenderblender@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
Last I checked it was the neocons and the capitalists who are getting
fat and rich.
Michael Moore is fat. He's also rich and hates America.
Please, elaborate.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ray Fischer" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 10:25:37 AM |
|
|
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:c8eqjl$tfi$1@bolt.sonic.net:
EB <fenderblender@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
Last I checked it was the neocons and the capitalists who are getting
fat and rich.
Michael Moore is fat. He's also rich and hates America.
Whereas you hate America but you're just fat and poor?
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Loose Cannon" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
19 May 2004 02:49:38 PM |
|
|
<flame groups trimmed>
"Ray Fischer" <rfischer@bolt.sonic.net> wrote in message
news:c8fu9g$tfh$1@bolt.sonic.net...
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
rfischer@bolt.sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote in
news:c8eqjl$tfi$1@bolt.sonic.net:
EB <fenderblender@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
Last I checked it was the neocons and the capitalists who are getting
fat and rich.
Michael Moore is fat. He's also rich and hates America.
Whereas you hate America but you're just fat and poor?
Don't sell him short, Ray. He's also a racist, a bigot, and a seriously
'snupid' troll.
LC~ And I support that message.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Russell Stewart" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
23 May 2004 10:50:42 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:48:57 GMT, "EB" <fenderblender@earthlink.net>
wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com...
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
I don't know, but if you take out the "socialist" part, you
can call them "neo-cons".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Xomicron" |
|
| Title: Re: New Michael Moore film sucks according to critics |
23 May 2004 12:02:33 PM |
|
|
Russell Stewart <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in
news:k1i1b0dc32vr1r21ivdofvu38btfhkr5bh@4ax.com:
On Wed, 19 May 2004 00:48:57 GMT, "EB" <fenderblender@earthlink.net>
wrote:
"Mr. N" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10akh6l9k58c3f6@news.supernews.com...
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:0Gqqc.42726$kc2.640388@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
NY POST = Murdoch *****
Doesn't change the fact that Moore sucks.
He doesn't. He's brilliant, funny, and a true American patriot.
"Patriot"? Is that what they're calling rich, fat, American-hating
socialists now?
I don't know, but if you take out the "socialist" part, you
can call them "neo-cons".
Spoken like a true ignoramous.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
