Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate



 Religions > Atheism > Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "david ford"
Date: 10 Nov 2006 07:29:03 AM
Object: Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate
Grandbank wrote:

david ford wrote:

(snip)

As far as you know, are atheist scientists "biased"?


What would they be biased toward?

Atheism, perhaps.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
1988 Crick: "Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they
see was not designed, but rather evolved."
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b1c67abe.0407251846.6acacaef%40posting.google.com
1992 Antony Flew
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.3.96A.990311073639.27782B-100000%40umbc9.umbc.edu
.

User: "Neil H."

Title: Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate 11 Nov 2006 09:35:18 PM
"david ford" <dford3@gl.umbc.edu> wrote in message
news:dford3-1163165343.584251.87250@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

Grandbank wrote:

david ford wrote:

(snip)

As far as you know, are atheist scientists "biased"?


What would they be biased toward?


Atheism, perhaps.

How can anyone be "biased toward" atheism? That's like saying someone is
biased toward skepticism. It's meaningless.



///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

1988 Crick: "Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they
see was not designed, but rather evolved."

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b1c67abe.0407251846.6acacaef%40posting.google.com


1992 Antony Flew

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Pine.SGI.3.96A.990311073639.27782B-100000%40umbc9.umbc.edu


.

User: "Ghod"

Title: Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate 10 Nov 2006 10:47:59 AM
"david ford" <dford3@gl.umbc.edu> wrote in message
news:dford3-1163165343.584251.87250@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

Grandbank wrote:

david ford wrote:

(snip)

As far as you know, are atheist scientists "biased"?


What would they be biased toward?


Atheism, perhaps.

and your point? Besides the one on your head.
.
User: "david ford"

Title: Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate 10 Nov 2006 06:49:03 PM
Ghod wrote:

"david ford" <dford3@gl.umbc.edu> wrote in message
news:dford3-1163165343.584251.87250@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

Grandbank wrote:

david ford wrote:

(snip)

As far as you know, are atheist scientists "biased"?


What would they be biased toward?


Atheism, perhaps.


and your point? Besides the one on your head.

I have many points on my head.
.


User: "Grandbank"

Title: Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate 10 Nov 2006 09:31:06 AM
david ford wrote:

Grandbank wrote:

david ford wrote:

(snip)

As far as you know, are atheist scientists "biased"?


What would they be biased toward?


Atheism, perhaps.

Are theistic scientists biased toward all the non-existent Gods they
don't believe in?
KP
.
User: "david ford"

Title: Re: New to the Creation/Evolution Debate 10 Nov 2006 06:52:10 PM
Grandbank wrote:

david ford wrote:

Grandbank wrote:

david ford wrote:

(snip)

As far as you know, are atheist scientists "biased"?


What would they be biased toward?


Atheism, perhaps.


Are theistic scientists biased toward all the non-existent Gods they
don't believe in?

No.
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER