Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
<

Andrew, how many lumens do you give off when glowing?

Maybe we could use you
at our next evening lawn party. There could be a good rental business
here.....

Andrew B. Chung wrote:

"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:

If he really were a doctor

In truth, I am a doctor.

Invalid.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Hannele Huigens wrote:

Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:41 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:

Robibnikoff wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438B70A6.3D735BA@heartmdphd.com...

"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Run and hide from the truth.

That is how I would describe what you just did.

This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.

As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism

It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and you'll see.

Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for alt.atheism?

It's our group, we decide what is and isn't appropiate here.

In truth, there is no moderator for an unmoderated USENET group.

Really.

Yes.

I see sarcasm is another concept foreign to you.

So in any unmoderated forum, it's okay to be rude?

No.

And yet, you persist in being rude.

You're just a guest, behave like one.

It remains my choice to be openly Christian. Sorry if my choice bothers you.

Again, it isn't your "christianity."

My choice to be openly Christian is not christianity.

Don't be coy.

It's your "bad manners."

In your opinion.

No, in actuality. You've been repeatedly informed by several people
that your proselytizing is unwelcome in alt.atheism. That you insist
on continuing to do so is bad manners.

Tell
you what; go on over to a Muslim group and see if they like your
shennanigans any better.

You may certainly cross post your messages to a Muslim group and find
out. Should be very enlightening for you.

But I wouldn't do that. My manners are better than yours.

Hint: The LORD gave the Quran by way of the Angel Gabriel to His
messenger, who proceeded to form the Muslim nation with the LORD's
guidance thereby fulfilling His promise to not forsake Hagar's people.

I don't care about that myth any more than I care about your little
fairy tale.

Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?

Your current participation would be one clue :-)

Us being pissed at your behaviour equals interest in your religion?

It is one form of interest.

No, it isn't.

It truth it is.

Please stop lying.

If someone insisted on urinating on you until you
believed in their religion, would your response be an expression of
your interest in their religion, or would it be because you don't want
to be pissed on?

The truth remains.

The truth being that the expression of religion would have nothing to
do with the outrage one would rightly feel at being urinated on.

Why
do you pretend otherwise?

Dream on.

Truth is not a dream.

Maybe.

Absolutely.

No, not absolutely. There is no such thing as absolute truth.

You have yet to demonstrate you've got a lock on anything like "The Truth."

Discerning the truth is not possessing it.

And playing word games isn't "spreading 'The Truth.'" It's "trolling."

Think about it.

What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.

So isn't it obvious yet we don't like your sanctimonious behaviour here?

The LORD's purpose for me here is not to seek popularity but to inform.

Even though in his little book he said to not bother people who don't
want to be bothered.

In truth, the LORD issued two commandments for His followers and they
are:

It issued lots of commands you refuse to follow.

Do you stone people
to death for working on the sabbath?

(1) Love GOD with all your heart, soul, mind and strength.

(2) Love others as you would love yourself.

Deuteronomy 13:6-10
6 If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter,
or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, which is as thine own soul,
entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which
thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers;
7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh
unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even
unto the other end of the earth;
8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall
thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou
conceal him:
9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to
put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath
sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee
out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.

Good to see you were paying attention.

All the time :-))

Still not getting that sarcasm, I see.

Op Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:32:18 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:

Hannele Huigens wrote:

Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:41 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:

Robibnikoff wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438B70A6.3D735BA@heartmdphd.com...

"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Pramesh Rutajit wrote:

Run and hide from the truth.

That is how I would describe what you just did.

This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.

As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism

It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ

and

you'll see.

Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
alt.atheism?

It's our group, we decide what is and isn't appropiate here.

In truth, there is no moderator for an unmoderated USENET group.

So if you are a visitor in my house I can't tell you off unless there's a
policeman present?

What kind of nonsense is this?

As Robyn told you: read
the FAQ and come back to us when you know how to follow it.

You're just a
guest, behave like one.

It remains my choice to be openly Christian. Sorry if my choice bothers
you.

Be as openly Christian as you like, that doesn't bother me at all.

It's
just that you might give the good and honest Christians I know a bad name
by your rude behaviour.

Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?

Your current participation would be one clue :-)

Us being pissed at your behaviour equals interest in your religion?

It is one form of interest.

Not in your religion, just in your rude behaviour. Stop lying about us to
us, it's not nice (and very un-Christian, according to the good and honest
Christians I know in real life).

Dream
on.

Truth is not a dream.

Think about it.

What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.

So isn't it obvious yet we don't like your sanctimonious behaviour here?

The LORD's purpose for me here is not to seek popularity but to inform.

You will be in my prayers, dear Hannele whom I love, in LORD Jesus' most
precious and holy name.

You know what you can do with your love, but tell you what: I'll be sure
to let you know if I suddenly convert due to your prayers.

You're welcome
to hold your breath.

BTW: why do you spell the title lord all in capitals?