| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
| Date: |
26 Nov 2005 11:37:41 PM |
| Object: |
Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Paul Schilter wrote:
Pramesh,
He laughed! You heard "Him"? How the come I never get to hear these
things? Too obtuse probably. :-) In all seriousness, isn't God just
someone whom other men have told us about? If God wanted to instruct us,
couldn't he just come down and do it His/Her self. Why is God always a
male.
Religious fanatics always speak in the name of some god(s) telling others
what to do. If you claim to also heard the words of God(s) then they
attack you. The reality is they speak out of their own desire to exercise
power over others.
As to god(s) gender, that depends on the god and the patriarchal/matriarchal
leanings of the culture in which that/those god(s) was/were created. The
trintatarian-polytheistic god has at least two penises, God the father
fucked a 13 year old Mary and the ***** child that ostensibly resulted
ran around with a bevy of prostitutes. Mythology has a lot of weird twists
and turns that way.
"A truthful witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out
lies." (Proverbs 14:5)
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 07:52:23 AM |
|
|
"Orbe" <orbe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1133216115.2dc1fef9c1fda9f2db49f72fa5e2be0b@fe5.teranews.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438B70A6.3D735BA@heartmdphd.com...
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
you'll see.
Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
Think about it.
If you think by engaging him you will be rid of him, forget it.
LOL, I know, I know. I'll be stuffing him in my killfile along side the
other loonies shortly ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrichs effort" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 02:16:27 PM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
Ask around. See if I'm lying. There used to be a website specifically
stating what is and is not welcome in alt.atheism, but I can't find it
at the moment.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Jesus appreciates how you follow the letter but not the spirit of his
teachings.
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
Again, Jesus appreciates how you follow the letter but not the spirit
of his teachings. I'm sure atheists would be equally welcome to shout
about non-belief in a church, hmm?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 05:27:49 PM |
|
|
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
Ask around. See if I'm lying. There used to be a website specifically
stating what is and is not welcome in alt.atheism, but I can't find it
at the moment.
It is unlikely that discussing atheism would be stated as unwelcome.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Jesus appreciates how you follow the letter but not the spirit of his
teachings.
The LORD knows what is in my heart :-)
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
Again, Jesus appreciates how you follow the letter but not the spirit
of his teachings.
The LORD knows what is in my heart :-)
I'm sure atheists would be equally welcome to shout
about non-belief in a church, hmm?
Who's shouting?
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 05:32:22 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:27:49 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
Ask around. See if I'm lying. There used to be a website specifically
stating what is and is not welcome in alt.atheism, but I can't find it
at the moment.
It is unlikely that discussing atheism would be stated as unwelcome.
Somebody tell this psychopath that lying about us, to us is not
"discussing atheism".
We get to tell him what it is when he gets it wrong. And he has to
accept that even if he doesn't understand it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 03:09:29 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Yours was, liar.
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
In your dreams, moron.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 03:40:43 PM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Yours was, liar.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
In your dreams, moron.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 04:12:36 PM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
snip
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
So fucking what? Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
on people that aren't interested?
snip
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested in
your delusions.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 05:32:12 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
snip
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
So fucking what?
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
on people that aren't interested?
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
snip
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested in
your delusions.
That is not what I discern.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
You will remain in my prayers, dear Robyn whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 08:05:31 AM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438B937C.E1D4AEFA@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
snip
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their
faith
in the LORD.
So fucking what?
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Not for alt.atheism.
Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
on people that aren't interested?
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
What? Are you deluded? I didn't visit any links in yours posts. What makes
you think I did?
snip
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested
in
your delusions.
That is not what I discern.
See my remark about about your delusions.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 12:15:35 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438B937C.E1D4AEFA@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
snip
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their
faith
in the LORD.
So fucking what?
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Not for alt.atheism.
Is it your claim that discussing atheism is not on-topic for
alt.atheism?
Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
on people that aren't interested?
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
What?
Yes.
Are you deluded?
No.
I didn't visit any links in yours posts.
That is not what I discern.
What makes
you think I did?
Your reference to religious material. Perhaps, atheism is a religion to
you?
snip
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested
in
your delusions.
That is not what I discern.
See my remark about about your delusions.
Already seen.
See above.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
You remain in my prayers, dear Robyn whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name :-))
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 02:27:10 PM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438C9AC7.B332B3A4@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
snip
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Not for alt.atheism.
Is it your claim that discussing atheism is not on-topic for
alt.atheism?
You're not discussing atheism - You're preaching. Can't you see the
difference?
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
I didn't visit any links in yours posts.
That is not what I discern.
I don't really give a ***** what you "discern". I know what I've looked at
and what I have not and I have not looked at any of your links as I am not
interested in doing so.
What makes
you think I did?
Your reference to religious material.
How does a reference to "religious material" imply that I looked at any of
your links?
Perhaps, atheism is a religion to
you?
Of course not; don't be stupid.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 05:27:36 PM |
|
|
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438C9AC7.B332B3A4@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
snip
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Not for alt.atheism.
Is it your claim that discussing atheism is not on-topic for
alt.atheism?
You're not discussing atheism
In your opinion.
- You're preaching.
More opinion.
Can't you see the
difference?
I do not see religious content in the body of these posts.
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
I didn't visit any links in yours posts.
That is not what I discern.
I don't really give a ***** what you "discern". I know what I've looked at
and what I have not and I have not looked at any of your links as I am not
interested in doing so.
Then what religious content were you referring to?
What makes
you think I did?
Your reference to religious material.
How does a reference to "religious material" imply that I looked at any of
your links?
Because there is otherwise no religious material in the body of this
post.
Perhaps, atheism is a religion to
you?
Of course not; don't be stupid.
Then you will remain conflicted.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Will continue to pray for you, dear Robyn whom I love, in Jesus' holy
name.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 08:48:44 PM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438CE3E8.879C344A@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438C9AC7.B332B3A4@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
snip
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Not for alt.atheism.
Is it your claim that discussing atheism is not on-topic for
alt.atheism?
You're not discussing atheism
In your opinion.
Hardly, I've read your posts.
- You're preaching.
More opinion.
You're delusional.
Can't you see the
difference?
I do not see religious content in the body of these posts.
That's because you're a lunatic, apparently.
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
I didn't visit any links in yours posts.
That is not what I discern.
I don't really give a ***** what you "discern". I know what I've looked
at
and what I have not and I have not looked at any of your links as I am
not
interested in doing so.
Then what religious content were you referring to?
Are you kidding me? You don't think all your references to "the LORD"
aren't religious? Give me a break.
What makes
you think I did?
Your reference to religious material.
How does a reference to "religious material" imply that I looked at any
of
your links?
Because there is otherwise no religious material in the body of this
post.
See above. You're wrong. Or just insane.
Perhaps, atheism is a religion to
you?
Of course not; don't be stupid.
Then you will remain conflicted.
Not conflicted, sorry.
--
------
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Science doesn't burn people at the stake for disagreeing - Vic Sagerquist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 11:59:32 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:48:44 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438CE3E8.879C344A@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438C9AC7.B332B3A4@heartmdphd.com...
Robibnikoff wrote:
snip
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Not for alt.atheism.
Is it your claim that discussing atheism is not on-topic for
alt.atheism?
You're not discussing atheism
In your opinion.
Hardly, I've read your posts.
- You're preaching.
More opinion.
You're delusional.
Can't you see the
difference?
I do not see religious content in the body of these posts.
That's because you're a lunatic, apparently.
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
I didn't visit any links in yours posts.
That is not what I discern.
I don't really give a ***** what you "discern". I know what I've looked
at
and what I have not and I have not looked at any of your links as I am
not
interested in doing so.
Then what religious content were you referring to?
Are you kidding me? You don't think all your references to "the LORD"
aren't religious? Give me a break.
What makes
you think I did?
Your reference to religious material.
How does a reference to "religious material" imply that I looked at any
of
your links?
Because there is otherwise no religious material in the body of this
post.
See above. You're wrong. Or just insane.
Your diagnosis of insanity is more likely to be correct than any of
his, and that is a fact.
It glares out from his posts, whether or not one happens to be
religious.
This "doctor" is a total nut-case, from end to end.
He deperately needs to consult his colleages on a professional basis,
before he does somebopdy some real damage, assuming that has not
happened already.
This is one loon who is not benign.
Perhaps, atheism is a religion to
you?
Of course not; don't be stupid.
Then you will remain conflicted.
Not conflicted, sorry.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 08:09:50 AM |
|
|
"Michael Gray" <fleetg@newsguy.spam.com> wrote in message
news:6ofqo1p888kug7gjiia30fl62hrrnsmhg8@4ax.com...
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:48:44 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
snip
See above. You're wrong. Or just insane.
Your diagnosis of insanity is more likely to be correct than any of
his, and that is a fact.
I agree. He's totally off his nut :P
It glares out from his posts, whether or not one happens to be
religious.
This "doctor" is a total nut-case, from end to end.
He deperately needs to consult his colleages on a professional basis,
before he does somebopdy some real damage, assuming that has not
happened already.
This is one loon who is not benign.
And he has peoples' lives in his hands <shudder>
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 06:53:27 PM |
|
|
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Robibnikoff wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
snip
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
So fucking what?
So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.
Not, as has been pointed out to you by more than one person, in
alt.atheism.
Truth trumps opinion.
Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
on people that aren't interested?
It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.
Even if that were the case, does that make it okay for you to be rude?
In truth, I have not been rude.
snip
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested in
your delusions.
That is not what I discern.
Even though that's exactly what we keep telling you.
Your responding to these posts indicates something other than
disinterest.
There's a word
for people who reject reality: "deluded."
Actually, someone suffering from delusions does not know that they have
lost touch with reality. Iow, no choice to reject reality is made by a
deluded person.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrichs effort" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 02:02:02 PM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
Your analogy doesn't work. Darkness is the default; one must have a
light source for there to be "day." Similarly, atheism is the default;
everyone would be atheist if there were no theists, there just likely
wouldn't be a name for it. Atheism isn't dependent upon theism to
exist, but it is pretty much dependent on theism to be persecuted.
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
It isn't your chrisitianity that's offensive, it's your bad manners.
Although the two frequently seem to go hand in hand, which is funny, in
light of what your mascot is supposed to have said.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 04:52:47 PM |
|
|
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
Your analogy doesn't work. Darkness is the default; one must have a
light source for there to be "day."
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Similarly, atheism is the default;
If that were true, the word atheism would not literally mean "without
GOD."
everyone would be atheist if there were no theists,
Everyone would be theists if there were no atheists.
there just likely
wouldn't be a name for it.
See above.
Atheism isn't dependent upon theism to
exist, but it is pretty much dependent on theism to be persecuted.
The language indicates otherwise.
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
It isn't your chrisitianity that's offensive, it's your bad manners.
Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.
Although the two frequently seem to go hand in hand, which is funny, in
light of what your mascot is supposed to have said.
The LORD is not a mascot. As to what He has said to His followers
regarding their interactions with non-believers:
"You are the salt of the earth. But if salt loses its saltiness, how
can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except
to be thrown out and trampled by men." (Matthew 5:13)
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 05:16:29 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:52:47 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
Your analogy doesn't work. Darkness is the default; one must have a
light source for there to be "day."
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Did this certifiable lunatic ever have a functioning mind?
Does he imagine a closed box would have light inside it,but is kept
dark by some darkener?
Similarly, atheism is the default;
If that were true, the word atheism would not literally mean "without
GOD."
Somebody remind this certifiable lunatic that it literally means not
being theist, and that his theism is merely one of hundreds.
Somebody remind this certifiable lunatic that theism has to be taught.
If it isn't, the kid remains atheist.
everyone would be atheist if there were no theists,
Everyone would be theists if there were no atheists.
Is this lunatic for real? There is no symmetry.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 08:02:34 AM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4gnpo19jg7rrv7d5kti46f7c1l5i52u1vb@4ax.com...
snip
Did this certifiable lunatic ever have a functioning mind?
Does he imagine a closed box would have light inside it,but is kept
dark by some darkener?
<snicker> He sounds a lot like Eric Brze. Maybe it's an Asian thing ;)
At least Eric has the excuse that he suffered brain damage when he was hit
by a bus ;)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 07:04:05 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:02:34 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4gnpo19jg7rrv7d5kti46f7c1l5i52u1vb@4ax.com...
snip
Did this certifiable lunatic ever have a functioning mind?
Does he imagine a closed box would have light inside it,but is kept
dark by some darkener?
<snicker> He sounds a lot like Eric Brze. Maybe it's an Asian thing ;)
At least Eric has the excuse that he suffered brain damage when he was hit
by a bus ;)
I have previously come to the conclusion that a severe infection by a
theism mind-virus can, and does, cause severe organic brain damage; at
least as profound as the brain trauma that results from physical
injury.
(rec.food.cooking snipped out of deference to those who may want to
keep their appetite)
It would go toward explaining an awful lot of otherwise bizarre
behaviour.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 08:11:03 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:02:34 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4gnpo19jg7rrv7d5kti46f7c1l5i52u1vb@4ax.com...
snip
Did this certifiable lunatic ever have a functioning mind?
Does he imagine a closed box would have light inside it,but is kept
dark by some darkener?
<snicker> He sounds a lot like Eric Brze. Maybe it's an Asian thing ;)
At least Eric has the excuse that he suffered brain damage when he was hit
by a bus ;)
The thought of this certifiable lunatic as a cardiologist scares the
***** out of me.
Heart patients are the last people who need the kind of stress his
sociopathy causes and is incable of understanding.
According to another poster, he lasted 88 days in Florida before he
was fired for lack of care for his patients. I wonder how many he
killed.
And whether he lost his certification.
I certainly wouldn't want him within a thousand miles of my loved
ones.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 11:30:20 AM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:egcro1546904vdv3t3mmojmls7efjvkmvp@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:02:34 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
<witchypoo@broomstick.com> wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4gnpo19jg7rrv7d5kti46f7c1l5i52u1vb@4ax.com...
snip
Did this certifiable lunatic ever have a functioning mind?
Does he imagine a closed box would have light inside it,but is kept
dark by some darkener?
<snicker> He sounds a lot like Eric Brze. Maybe it's an Asian thing ;)
At least Eric has the excuse that he suffered brain damage when he was hit
by a bus ;)
The thought of this certifiable lunatic as a cardiologist scares the
***** out of me.
Heart patients are the last people who need the kind of stress his
sociopathy causes and is incable of understanding.
According to another poster, he lasted 88 days in Florida before he
was fired for lack of care for his patients. I wonder how many he
killed.
Wow, that is scary. I wonder if he's working now?
And whether he lost his certification.
He should, that's for sure :P
I certainly wouldn't want him within a thousand miles of my loved
ones.
Agreed - and I have two family members with heart conditions.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hannele Huigens" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 05:02:59 PM |
|
|
Op Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:52:47 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on
behalf
of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their
faith
in the LORD.
Your analogy doesn't work. Darkness is the default; one must have a
light source for there to be "day."
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Similarly, atheism is the default;
If that were true, the word atheism would not literally mean "without
GOD."
Which it doesn't, actually, it means "without godbelief".
But even it it really meant "without god", how does that prove your deity
exists?
everyone would be atheist if there were no theists,
Everyone would be theists if there were no atheists.
there just likely
wouldn't be a name for it.
See above.
Atheism isn't dependent upon theism to
exist, but it is pretty much dependent on theism to be persecuted.
The language indicates otherwise.
What language indicates what?
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your
feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
It isn't your chrisitianity that's offensive, it's your bad manners.
Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.
Although the two frequently seem to go hand in hand, which is funny, in
light of what your mascot is supposed to have said.
The LORD is not a mascot. As to what He has said to His followers
regarding their interactions with non-believers:
"You are the salt of the earth. But if salt loses its saltiness, how
can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except
to be thrown out and trampled by men." (Matthew 5:13)
--
Hannele
aa #2221
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 07:11:09 PM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Tue, 29 Nov 2005
17:52:47 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Of course it is! "Light" as we percieve it, it caused by p[hotons
hitting the backs of our eyes (other frequencies along the
electromagnetic spectrum can be perceived in different ways.. for
example, I am realy enjoying the long IR blasts from my space heater
right now.
No photons, no light. Hence, darkness is the default.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 04:41:46 AM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Tue, 29 Nov 2005
17:52:47 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Of course it is! "Light" as we percieve it, it caused by p[hotons
hitting the backs of our eyes (other frequencies along the
electromagnetic spectrum can be perceived in different ways.. for
example, I am realy enjoying the long IR blasts from my space heater
right now.
No photons, no light. Hence, darkness is the default.
There is perpetual darkness for the blind. This is not by default.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robibnikoff" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 08:03:04 AM |
|
|
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438D81EA.A1CD164A@heartmdphd.com...
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Tue, 29 Nov 2005
17:52:47 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Of course it is! "Light" as we percieve it, it caused by p[hotons
hitting the backs of our eyes (other frequencies along the
electromagnetic spectrum can be perceived in different ways.. for
example, I am realy enjoying the long IR blasts from my space heater
right now.
No photons, no light. Hence, darkness is the default.
There is perpetual darkness for the blind. This is not by default.
WTF?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Berry" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 08:18:09 PM |
|
|
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Wed, 30 Nov 2005
05:41:46 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Tue, 29 Nov 2005
17:52:47 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Of course it is! "Light" as we percieve it, it caused by p[hotons
hitting the backs of our eyes (other frequencies along the
electromagnetic spectrum can be perceived in different ways.. for
example, I am realy enjoying the long IR blasts from my space heater
right now.
No photons, no light. Hence, darkness is the default.
There is perpetual darkness for the blind. This is not by default.
The blind can perceive heat, which is just another part of the EM
spectrum.
And you completely ignored my refutation of you.
--
Douglas E. Berry Do the OBVIOUS thing to send e-mail
Atheist #2147, Atheist Vet #5
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), Pense'es, #894.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 11:51:34 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Wed, 30 Nov 2005
05:41:46 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Tue, 29 Nov 2005
17:52:47 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Of course it is! "Light" as we percieve it, it caused by p[hotons
hitting the backs of our eyes (other frequencies along the
electromagnetic spectrum can be perceived in different ways.. for
example, I am realy enjoying the long IR blasts from my space heater
right now.
No photons, no light. Hence, darkness is the default.
There is perpetual darkness for the blind. This is not by default.
The blind can perceive heat, which is just another part of the EM
spectrum.
This does not bring them out of the darkness.
And you completely ignored my refutation of you.
See above.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob this one" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 09:09:36 PM |
|
|
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Wed, 30 Nov 2005
05:41:46 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Douglas Berry wrote:
What's so funny about peace, love and "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> posting the following on Tue, 29 Nov 2005
17:52:47 -0500 iin alt.atheism?
Darkness is not night nor is it the default.
Of course it is! "Light" as we percieve it, it caused by photons
hitting the backs of our eyes (other frequencies along the
electromagnetic spectrum can be perceived in different ways.. for
example, I am realy enjoying the long IR blasts from my space heater
right now.
No photons, no light. Hence, darkness is the default.
There is perpetual darkness for the blind. This is not by default.
The blind can perceive heat, which is just another part of the EM
spectrum.
And you completely ignored my refutation of you.
One of his greater, more finely honed skills; ignoring that which
doesn't please him. Along with lying. And replying to refutation with
non sequiturs. And devising his own "facts" to bolster his shaky
intellectual house of cards - like an omer is a unit of weight. <LOL>
Otherwise, I'm sure he's a wonderful, um, quack and charlatan.
And I mean that in the nicest possible way. Er, place.
No, seriously...
Pastorio
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
