| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
| Date: |
26 Nov 2005 11:37:41 PM |
| Object: |
Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Paul Schilter wrote:
Pramesh,
He laughed! You heard "Him"? How the come I never get to hear these
things? Too obtuse probably. :-) In all seriousness, isn't God just
someone whom other men have told us about? If God wanted to instruct us,
couldn't he just come down and do it His/Her self. Why is God always a
male.
Religious fanatics always speak in the name of some god(s) telling others
what to do. If you claim to also heard the words of God(s) then they
attack you. The reality is they speak out of their own desire to exercise
power over others.
As to god(s) gender, that depends on the god and the patriarchal/matriarchal
leanings of the culture in which that/those god(s) was/were created. The
trintatarian-polytheistic god has at least two penises, God the father
fucked a 13 year old Mary and the ***** child that ostensibly resulted
ran around with a bevy of prostitutes. Mythology has a lot of weird twists
and turns that way.
"A truthful witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out
lies." (Proverbs 14:5)
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 05:57:00 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", *****?
Why are you so stupid? I'd have have to believe in it to be angry at
it.
And my parents created me, not some figment of your deluded
imagination.
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
You don't love me, sanctimonious liar.
And it takes a particularly nasty believer to tell somebody he knows
is an atheist, that he will pray for him.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
His mouth or his *****?
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:08 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:43 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
Are you really so stupid you can't grasp that it's merely a
demographic label for what we're not? And that it is no different than
not believing in pixies?
If the latter were true, there would be such a thing as apixism.
If assholes like you shoved their pixie belief doen our throats there
would be, liar.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
***** and die, liar.
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
Don't be so stupid, liar.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
His mouth or his *****?
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 08:04:03 AM |
|
|
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
The question is a simple one without any attached delusions.
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
This truly is a simple question.
Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", *****?
No.
Why are you so stupid?
We all fall short of the glory of the Creator.
I'd have have to believe in it to be angry at
it.
Your forced errors and your language betrays what is in your heart.
And my parents created me, not some figment of your deluded
imagination.
In truth, the Creator picked your parents as the source of raw materials
to make you.
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
You don't love me, sanctimonious liar.
In truth, as much as I love myself.
And it takes a particularly nasty believer to tell somebody he knows
is an atheist, that he will pray for him.
It remains my choice not to be hypocritical.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
His mouth or his *****?
Neither. His heart (Yes, I am a heart specialist :-)
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 09:49:00 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:04:03 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
The question is a simple one without any attached delusions.
Pretends the liar who knows its premises are deliberate personally
nasty falsehoods.
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
This truly is a simple question.
Pretends the liar who knows that it is loaded with a lie as its
premise.
Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", *****?
No.
Yes you do, liar - because the only one I could be angry with is you.
As it is, it's not anger but contempt and disgust with a sociopathic
liar who sees nothing wrong with his bigoted slanders.
Why are you so stupid?
We all fall short of the glory of the Creator.
I didn't ask for a demonstration, moron, just why you were so stupid.
I'd have have to believe in it to be angry at
it.
Your forced errors and your language betrays what is in your heart.
What "forced errors", liar?
The liar amateur-psychologised yet another of his lies to come up with
even more slander.
And my parents created me, not some figment of your deluded
imagination.
In truth, the Creator picked your parents as the source of raw materials
to make you.
Pretends the stupid, in-your-face lyibg Christian.
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
You don't love me, sanctimonious liar.
In truth, as much as I love myself.
You wouldn't know truth if it hit you over the head with a
lump-hammer, liar.
And it takes a particularly nasty believer to tell somebody he knows
is an atheist, that he will pray for him.
It remains my choice not to be hypocritical.
Yet another lie from the deliberately nasty, sanctimonious hypocrite.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
Liar.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
His mouth or his *****?
Neither. His heart (Yes, I am a heart specialist :-)
Liar. If you were, you would not behave in a way meant to cause
cardiac arrest.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
Liar.
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
Liar.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Do you wear a condom when you're buggering a 2000 year old rotting
corpse?
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 06:39:46 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:57:00 -0500, in alt.atheism
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in
<636no19oue3vrupfirp7q6sr1nrmk5f2uu@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", *****?
He's a surgeon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 10:12:54 AM |
|
|
David Jensen wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:57:00 -0500, in alt.atheism
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in
<636no19oue3vrupfirp7q6sr1nrmk5f2uu@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", *****?
He's a surgeon.
I am not a surgeon.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 06:42:15 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:39:46 -0600, David Jensen
<david@dajensen-family.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:57:00 -0500, in alt.atheism
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in
<636no19oue3vrupfirp7q6sr1nrmk5f2uu@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", *****?
He's a surgeon.
He's not fit to be one. His "bedside manner" will exacerbate the
problems of his oatients.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 06:47:30 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:42:15 -0500, in alt.atheism
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in
<gt8no1lbuddjnfrh9is6198pbie1na7gjl@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:39:46 -0600, David Jensen
<david@dajensen-family.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:57:00 -0500, in alt.atheism
Christopher A. Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote in
<636no19oue3vrupfirp7q6sr1nrmk5f2uu@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", *****?
He's a surgeon.
He's not fit to be one. His "bedside manner" will exacerbate the
problems of his oatients.
My mistake anyway, he's a cardiologist, but not a surgeon. Georgia
thoughtfully provides a bit of information about him at
<https://www.gaphysicianprofile.org/profile.ShowProfileAction.action?lic_nbr=040347>,
though this is basically self-reported.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 06:38:59 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in
<438B971E.F47641@heartmdphd.com>:
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
I wasn't aware that you were God.
I suppose I should have been, most surgeons think they are.
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 10:12:57 AM |
|
|
David Jensen wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in
<438B971E.F47641@heartmdphd.com>:
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
I wasn't aware that you were God.
I am not.
I suppose I should have been, most surgeons think they are.
I am not a surgeon.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 10:40:59 AM |
|
|
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Andrew B. Chung wrote:
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
So Chung thinks he God!
Hardly.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 11:12:15 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:40:59 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Andrew B. Chung wrote:
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
So Chung thinks he God!
Hardly.
So why tell him he was angry at "the LORD Almighty"?
If he's angry at anybody, it's you. And you know that, so stop
pretending, dishonest Christian.
We know you by your fruits.
So stop lying, and stop pretending.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pramesh Rutajit" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 09:06:32 PM |
|
|
The Egomaniac yet ignorant Andrew B. Chung wrote:
Dear Chris,
Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
So Chung thinks he God!
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:08 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:43 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on
behalf of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their
faith in the LORD.
Are you really so stupid you can't grasp that it's merely a
demographic label for what we're not? And that it is no different than
not believing in pixies?
If the latter were true, there would be such a thing as apixism.
If assholes like you shoved their pixie belief doen our throats there
would be, liar.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
***** and die, liar.
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
Don't be so stupid, liar.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
His mouth or his *****?
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
--
Pramesh Rutajit - - remove tongue to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hannele Huigens" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 04:06:44 PM |
|
|
Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:43 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:
"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote:
"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
Run and hide from the truth.
That is how I would describe what you just did.
This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
What utter and total nonsense, we're atheists concerning any and all gods,
not just the one you believe in. Do you really expect us to take you
seriously?
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou
hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Yours was, liar.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
So you're a sucker for punishment? That figures.
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how
the LORD has reshaped me:
If you were truly sorry you should omit the sig. And if you're proud of
your reshaped life, don't apologise.
In your dreams, moron.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
That glowing looks dangerous. Have you seen a doctor about it?
--
Hannele
aa #2221
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 05:32:30 PM |
|
|
Hannele Huigens wrote:
Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:43 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:
<snip>
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
What utter and total nonsense, we're atheists concerning any and all gods,
not just the one you believe in.
There is only one GOD... the LORD Almighty and He predates my existence.
Do you really expect us to take you
seriously?
The LORD's purpose for me here is to inform.
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou
hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Yours was, liar.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
So you're a sucker for punishment? That figures.
It remains my choice to continue walking with the LORD, Whom I love with
all my heart, soul, mind and strength :-)
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian also bothers you so terribly.
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how
the LORD has reshaped me:
If you were truly sorry you should omit the sig.
As if a leopard can change his/her spots.
And if you're proud of
your reshaped life, don't apologise.
There is no shame is asking for forgiveness for ones trespasses.
In your dreams, moron.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
See above.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
That glowing looks dangerous.
It is not.
Have you seen a doctor about it?
Doctors that heal have the same "glow."
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
28 Nov 2005 06:37:21 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:30 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in
<438B938E.E3327F8E@heartmdphd.com>:
Hannele Huigens wrote:
Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:43 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:
<snip>
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
What utter and total nonsense, we're atheists concerning any and all gods,
not just the one you believe in.
There is only one GOD... the LORD Almighty and He predates my existence.
Which god is that? There are many gods claimed to have been mighty. How
do you determine that your god is the right one and that it exists?
Do you really expect us to take you
seriously?
The LORD's purpose for me here is to inform.
Who about what? This is posted to sci.med.cardiology,
alt.christnet.public, rec.food.cooking, alt.atheism. I suppose that the
christnet folks expect this, but your claims are certainly inappropriate
for a cooking newsgroup and by posting to an atheism group, you assure
yourself of a lot of annoyed respondents. I have no idea why you would
post to cardiology so I've cut out the food and the heart for followups.
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou
hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Yours was, liar.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
So you're a sucker for punishment? That figures.
It remains my choice to continue walking with the LORD, Whom I love with
all my heart, soul, mind and strength :-)
You think you are, but have no way of showing this.
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian also bothers you so terribly.
It really wasn't clear that you were Christian. The teachings of how
Christians should behave don't include your behavior here.
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how
the LORD has reshaped me:
If you were truly sorry you should omit the sig.
As if a leopard can change his/her spots.
And if you're proud of
your reshaped life, don't apologise.
There is no shame is asking for forgiveness for ones trespasses.
Then please do so.
In your dreams, moron.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
See above.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
That glowing looks dangerous.
It is not.
Have you seen a doctor about it?
Doctors that heal have the same "glow."
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
I guess you're just here to advertise.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 10:12:59 AM |
|
|
David Jensen wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:30 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in
<438B938E.E3327F8E@heartmdphd.com>:
Hannele Huigens wrote:
Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:43 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<andrew@heartmdphd.com>:
<snip>
In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.
What utter and total nonsense, we're atheists concerning any and all gods,
not just the one you believe in.
There is only one GOD... the LORD Almighty and He predates my existence.
Which god is that?
This One:
http://tinyurl.com/9cgmq
There are many gods claimed to have been mighty. How
do you determine that your god is the right one and that it exists?
By using the ability to discern the truth.
Do you really expect us to take you
seriously?
The LORD's purpose for me here is to inform.
Who about what?
All participants in this thread about whatever interests them.
This is posted to sci.med.cardiology,
alt.christnet.public, rec.food.cooking, alt.atheism.
Correct.
I suppose that the
christnet folks expect this, but your claims are certainly inappropriate
for a cooking newsgroup
Chats are not claims.
and by posting to an atheism group, you assure
yourself of a lot of annoyed respondents.
My apologies for annoying anyone with these chats.
I have no idea why you would
post to cardiology
The LORD has shaped me as a cardiologist.
so I've cut out the food and the heart for followups.
These chats remain on-topic because their participants have interest in
what is being discussed.
Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou
hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
A signature is not a prayer.
Yours was, liar.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
So you're a sucker for punishment? That figures.
It remains my choice to continue walking with the LORD, Whom I love with
all my heart, soul, mind and strength :-)
You think you are, but have no way of showing this.
Simply Google me if you wish proof.
In Christ's love always,
Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
Sorry my choice to be openly Christian also bothers you so terribly.
It really wasn't clear that you were Christian. The teachings of how
Christians should behave don't include your behavior here.
LORD Jesus Christ issued two commandments to those who choose to follow
Him saying that all the laws of the prophets hang on these two
commandments:
(1) Love GOD with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength.
(2) Love all others as you would love yourself.
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
how
the LORD has reshaped me:
If you were truly sorry you should omit the sig.
As if a leopard can change his/her spots.
And if you're proud of
your reshaped life, don't apologise.
There is no shame is asking for forgiveness for ones trespasses.
Then please do so.
I have.
In your dreams, moron.
Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.
It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.
See above.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
That glowing looks dangerous.
It is not.
Have you seen a doctor about it?
Doctors that heal have the same "glow."
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
I guess you're just here to advertise.
Again, the LORD's purpose for me is to inform.
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Kirkman" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
29 Nov 2005 06:22:21 PM |
|
|
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article <438C7E0B.35C1032@heartmdphd.com>:
Chats are not claims.
My apologies for annoying anyone with these chats.
These chats remain on-topic because their participants have interest in
what is being discussed.
I recently posted the official definitions of "chats" and "newsgroups",
which you apparently never received or have chosen to ignore. You are
NOT chatting here because this is a newsgroup. This is the same
flummery that you chose to use on your Web site when you described
Google-archived posts from these newsgroups as samples of your chat
machine. Prevarication in action.
--
Don Kirkman
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
30 Nov 2005 03:08:47 AM |
|
|
Don Kirkman wrote:
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article <438C7E0B.35C1032@heartmdphd.com>:
Chats are not claims.
My apologies for annoying anyone with these chats.
These chats remain on-topic because their participants have interest in
what is being discussed.
I recently posted the official definitions of "chats" and "newsgroups",
which you apparently never received or have chosen to ignore.
The latter would be my choice. Sorry my choice bothers you.
You are
NOT chatting here because this is a newsgroup.
Actually, near real-time discussions are chats.
This is the same
flummery that you chose to use on your Web site when you described
Google-archived posts from these newsgroups as samples of your chat
machine. Prevarication in action.
As you have been oft-reminded...
"Your words are not sacred."
Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:
http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
In Christ's love always,
Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pramesh Rutajit" |
|
| Title: Re: On-line Chat with HeartDoc (12/08/05) |
27 Nov 2005 08:56:26 PM |
|
|
Andrew B. Chung wrote:
<snip>
Followup made to the appropriate newsgroup(s).
--
Pramesh Rutajit - - remove tongue to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
