Sockpuppet Flying Rat Convict #42 <me@privacy.net> wrote:

In article <1173270541.236795.298810@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, love4
@thetruth.com says...

friend SameAsB4 wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Dang! Well, I'm sure that the Society of Cryptozoology,
which has
its headquarters locally, will be bitterly disappointed not
to see
either the Beast of the Earth or the Beast of the Sea.

The "beast of the earth" is technology.

Yep.

Founded on earth sciences.

Or else it's worldly financial power, false religions,
the anti-Christ, false prophets, THE False Prophet, the
New World Order, the Catholic ecclesiastical heirarchy,
drunkards, false philosophy, or the United States of America.

No.

The "beast of the sea" is Darwin's theory of evolution.

Or else it's poltical power, anti-Christian persecution,
secular governments, the United States Nayv, tha
anti-Christ(again),
the Roman civil powers, the Catholic Church, Prince Charles,
or Papal persecution.

No. With the exception of the United States Navy, your guesses

have

nothing to do with the sea. Nothing blasphemous about the

American

Navy.

Oh, not my guesses at all. Rather, various interpretations
put forth by good Christians everywhere, which I merely retrieved
via
Google.

They remain your guesses sans citations.

Nope. You lie.

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

Truthfulness to you might be misguided to a dispassionate observor.

One of us is untruthful.

Which explains.

Those who are logically adept will be able to easily figure this out.

Only scientific methods will prevail.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

May be to you. Jesus never loved me.

Suggested readings:

"I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren, like unto
thee; and I will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak unto them
all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever
will not hearken unto My words which he shall speak in My name, I will
require it of him. But the prophet, that shall speak a word
presumptuously in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or
that shall speak in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall
die.' And if thou say in thy heart: 'How shall we know the word which
the Lord hath not spoken?' When a prophet speaketh in the name of the
Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which
the Lord hath not spoken; the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously,
thou shalt not be afraid of him."

Deuteronomy 18:18-22

No matter how much Chung wriggles, edits or ignores, the coward is a
false prophet by the definition of his own precious scripture and bible.

As well as a hypocrite, possibly the biggest hypocrite I've personally
witnessed on usenet.

ibvp.207.17.1@news.alt.net> <1173270541.236795.298810@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <MPG.2058fc414048cd3b98997b@news.readfreenews.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.2 (Carbon/OS X)
X-Face: $0`~>:Rs1EQXhUQD4EGt:-COgL2Yy0O>a*LX04;mO;(Mg$rU,4wT^6?VJ*wO$
pR9MNF=QZrhF"$HA44sG?n(RnC{0!e>5EKJK{?&5QI$HfYWdP*z"NGgP79xb%0Sch26o
G8|k?UC[~)lu]"WnopcGdzz"VoCsDY?/{M"gR9eDs>Y~X},^2Ay|9n9~~1&UUCoDQ|O|
eYokL{N-%%x6C_4lKt2,LOOY#A6rAjZ5~[1-s,It[DT\BZa1v_2D7;0Yq1rQ{LcW@J2*
)f
X-Hammer-of-Thor: September 2005
X-Diamond-Hammer-of-Thor: March 2007 [as part of the AFA-B Bullies]
X-Outer-Filth: Follows
X-FO-Bowturd: Yes
X-FO-Radavich: Yes
X-FO-Bwuthie: Yes
X-FO-Clockbrain: Yes
X-FO-mop-jockey: Yes
X-FO-Perplexa: Yes
X-FO-Kazoo: Yes
Lines: 101
Organization: Octanews
NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Mar 2007 12:10:56 CST
X-Complaints-To:

In article <1173270541.236795.298810@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, love4
@thetruth.com says...

friend SameAsB4 wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Dang! Well, I'm sure that the Society of Cryptozoology,
which has
its headquarters locally, will be bitterly disappointed not
to see
either the Beast of the Earth or the Beast of the Sea.

The "beast of the earth" is technology.

Yep.

Founded on earth sciences.

Or else it's worldly financial power, false religions,
the anti-Christ, false prophets, THE False Prophet, the
New World Order, the Catholic ecclesiastical heirarchy,
drunkards, false philosophy, or the United States of America.

No.

The "beast of the sea" is Darwin's theory of evolution.

Or else it's poltical power, anti-Christian persecution,
secular governments, the United States Nayv, tha
anti-Christ(again),
the Roman civil powers, the Catholic Church, Prince Charles,
or Papal persecution.

No. With the exception of the United States Navy, your guesses

have

nothing to do with the sea. Nothing blasphemous about the

American

Navy.

Oh, not my guesses at all. Rather, various interpretations
put forth by good Christians everywhere, which I merely retrieved
via
Google.

They remain your guesses sans citations.

Nope. You lie.

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

Truthfulness to you might be misguided to a dispassionate observor.

One of us is untruthful.

Which explains.

Those who are logically adept will be able to easily figure this out.

Only scientific methods will prevail.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

May be to you. Jesus never loved me.

Suggested readings:

"I will raise them up a prophet from among their brethren, like unto
thee; and I will put My words in his mouth, and he shall speak unto them
all that I shall command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever
will not hearken unto My words which he shall speak in My name, I will
require it of him. But the prophet, that shall speak a word
presumptuously in My name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or
that shall speak in the name of other gods, that same prophet shall
die.' And if thou say in thy heart: 'How shall we know the word which
the Lord hath not spoken?' When a prophet speaketh in the name of the
Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which
the Lord hath not spoken; the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously,
thou shalt not be afraid of him."

Deuteronomy 18:18-22

No matter how much Chung wriggles, edits or ignores, the coward is a
false prophet by the definition of his own precious scripture and bible.

As well as a hypocrite, possibly the biggest hypocrite I've personally
witnessed on usenet.

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:

Dang! Well, I'm sure that the Society of Cryptozoology, which has
its headquarters locally, will be bitterly disappointed not to see
either the Beast of the Earth or the Beast of the Sea.

The "beast of the earth" is technology.

Yep.

Founded on earth sciences.

Or else it's worldly financial power, false religions,
the anti-Christ, false prophets, THE False Prophet, the
New World Order, the Catholic ecclesiastical heirarchy,
drunkards, false philosophy, or the United States of America.

No.

The "beast of the sea" is Darwin's theory of evolution.

Or else it's poltical power, anti-Christian persecution,
secular governments, the United States Nayv, tha anti-Christ(again),
the Roman civil powers, the Catholic Church, Prince Charles,
or Papal persecution.

No. With the exception of the United States Navy, your guesses have
nothing to do with the sea. Nothing blasphemous about the American
Navy.

Oh, not my guesses at all. Rather, various interpretations
put forth by good Christians everywhere, which I merely retrieved via
Google.

They remain your guesses sans citations.

Nope. You lie.

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

Not in this instance.

See below.

You at first assumed that all the interpretations of the Beast
of the Sea and the Beast of the Earth listed above were
somehow my "guesses". A reasonable assumption, as I did
not indicate otherwise

"Just as stolen goods are in the possession of a thief, stolen ideas
are in the possession of a plagiarist." -- Holy Spirit.

Amen.

Ah. So NOW you admit that those weren't my "guesses" after
all.

The ideas remain in your possession therefore they are yours as the
Holy Spirit has guided me to write.