| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Cliff" |
| Date: |
22 Jul 2006 09:04:36 PM |
| Object: |
Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only four words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
.
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
22 Jul 2006 10:11:58 PM |
|
|
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cliff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
23 Jul 2006 03:45:46 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
23 Jul 2006 04:53:10 PM |
|
|
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories? What
are the left afraid of?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
24 Jul 2006 12:49:11 AM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
24 Jul 2006 10:48:41 PM |
|
|
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools anyway. I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being dumbed-down on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies" for that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
25 Jul 2006 07:50:38 PM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:twgxg.11958$2v.6893@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach
fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools anyway.
I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being dumbed-down
on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies" for
that.
That leaves business.
Hawke
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
25 Jul 2006 08:41:20 PM |
|
|
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdf2m5d3cnee1@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:twgxg.11958$2v.6893@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care,
science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach
fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools anyway.
I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being dumbed-down
on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies" for
that.
That leaves business.
Hawke
No, I don't think so. During the industrial boom, maybe...but we don't need
a labor force now or in the near future.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
25 Jul 2006 09:28:34 PM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:4Lzxg.56452$VE1.50174@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdf2m5d3cnee1@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:twgxg.11958$2v.6893@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the
only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government
from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care,
science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as
theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach
fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or
even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools anyway.
I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being
dumbed-down
on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies" for
that.
That leaves business.
Hawke
No, I don't think so. During the industrial boom, maybe...but we don't
need
a labor force now or in the near future.
Then who will do the work?
Hawke
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
25 Jul 2006 10:39:10 PM |
|
|
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdkq8fmej74d@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:4Lzxg.56452$VE1.50174@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdf2m5d3cnee1@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:twgxg.11958$2v.6893@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the
only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government
from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care,
science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as
theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach
fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or
even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools anyway.
I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being
dumbed-down
on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies" for
that.
That leaves business.
Hawke
No, I don't think so. During the industrial boom, maybe...but we don't
need
a labor force now or in the near future.
Then who will do the work?
Hawke
What work? Burger flipping? Who can afford burgers? "Somebody" wants the
masses relying on a Gov. check, watching TV and digesting just what they're
fed, and voting for the check providers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
27 Jul 2006 04:57:15 PM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:ytBxg.137977$H71.87507@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdkq8fmej74d@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:4Lzxg.56452$VE1.50174@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdf2m5d3cnee1@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:twgxg.11958$2v.6893@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the
only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government
from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care,
science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as
theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach
fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or
even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools
anyway.
I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being
dumbed-down
on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies"
for
that.
That leaves business.
Hawke
No, I don't think so. During the industrial boom, maybe...but we don't
need
a labor force now or in the near future.
Then who will do the work?
Hawke
What work? Burger flipping? Who can afford burgers? "Somebody" wants
the
masses relying on a Gov. check, watching TV and digesting just what
they're
fed, and voting for the check providers.
Since over 95% of the population is employed how can you claim the masses
want to rely on a government check? What are you saying, that the masses
"want" a government check but can't get one and have to work? If not you are
perpetuating the myth the large segments of our people are lazy shiftless
bums that live off government subsidies. The only trouble with that claim is
that it is totally bogus. Like I said, 95% of the people are working so
obviously there are not many people, relatively speaking, who are collecting
checks from the government. If you knew how many of the ones that do are
actually prosperous business people I think you would have a different
opinion.
Hawke
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
27 Jul 2006 11:31:48 PM |
|
|
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cidlim50m99b4@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:ytBxg.137977$H71.87507@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdkq8fmej74d@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:4Lzxg.56452$VE1.50174@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdf2m5d3cnee1@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:twgxg.11958$2v.6893@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the
only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove
government
from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care,
science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as
theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't
teach
fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or
even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools
anyway.
I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being
dumbed-down
on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies"
for
that.
That leaves business.
Hawke
No, I don't think so. During the industrial boom, maybe...but we
don't
need
a labor force now or in the near future.
Then who will do the work?
Hawke
What work? Burger flipping? Who can afford burgers? "Somebody" wants
the
masses relying on a Gov. check, watching TV and digesting just what
they're
fed, and voting for the check providers.
Since over 95% of the population is employed how can you claim the masses
want to rely on a government check? What are you saying, that the masses
"want" a government check but can't get one and have to work? If not you
are
perpetuating the myth the large segments of our people are lazy shiftless
bums that live off government subsidies. The only trouble with that claim
is
that it is totally bogus. Like I said, 95% of the people are working so
obviously there are not many people, relatively speaking, who are
collecting
checks from the government. If you knew how many of the ones that do are
actually prosperous business people I think you would have a different
opinion.
Hawke
Don't forget that over 30% of the jobs are Gov. jobs. Actually, the
percentage of the budget for welfare is almost insignificant. I guess my
point is that only 3% of the people working in the US are in the "Wealth
Creation" business. The rest are support and entertainment and a large
percentage have just managed to tap into a revenue stream and really do
nothing, no added value.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
29 Jul 2006 12:38:19 PM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:Uqgyg.58092$VE1.47271@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cidlim50m99b4@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:ytBxg.137977$H71.87507@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdkq8fmej74d@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:4Lzxg.56452$VE1.50174@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdf2m5d3cnee1@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:twgxg.11958$2v.6893@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found
the
only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove
government
from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care,
science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever
veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as
theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't
teach
fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught
or
even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools
anyway.
I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being
dumbed-down
on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies"
for
that.
That leaves business.
Hawke
No, I don't think so. During the industrial boom, maybe...but we
don't
need
a labor force now or in the near future.
Then who will do the work?
Hawke
What work? Burger flipping? Who can afford burgers? "Somebody" wants
the
masses relying on a Gov. check, watching TV and digesting just what
they're
fed, and voting for the check providers.
Since over 95% of the population is employed how can you claim the
masses
want to rely on a government check? What are you saying, that the masses
"want" a government check but can't get one and have to work? If not you
are
perpetuating the myth the large segments of our people are lazy
shiftless
bums that live off government subsidies. The only trouble with that
claim
is
that it is totally bogus. Like I said, 95% of the people are working so
obviously there are not many people, relatively speaking, who are
collecting
checks from the government. If you knew how many of the ones that do are
actually prosperous business people I think you would have a different
opinion.
Hawke
Don't forget that over 30% of the jobs are Gov. jobs. Actually, the
percentage of the budget for welfare is almost insignificant. I guess my
point is that only 3% of the people working in the US are in the "Wealth
Creation" business. The rest are support and entertainment and a large
percentage have just managed to tap into a revenue stream and really do
nothing, no added value.
"Wealth creation" is just one area of specialization in the work force. It's
no different than agriculture or mining or manufacturing. It's a small
segment because that is all that is needed. Most labor is ordinary. Even so,
it's necessary. Everyone can't be a chief. We need mainly Indians to do the
mundane tasks that are required by our society. You are under rating
everybody else so you can elevate the importance of those who create wealth.
Truth is they are no more important than any other segment of society. Lose
any segment and everyone is affected negatively. The same is true for those
who "create wealth", a term that I don't like, by the way. Sounds arrogant
to me.
Hawke
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cliff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
28 Jul 2006 08:53:17 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:31:48 GMT, "Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
Actually, the
percentage of the budget for welfare is almost insignificant.
Don't confuse State funds with federal.
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cliff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
28 Jul 2006 08:55:15 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 04:31:48 GMT, "Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
I guess my
point is that only 3% of the people working in the US are in the "Wealth
Creation" business. The rest are support and entertainment and a large
percentage have just managed to tap into a revenue stream and really do
nothing, no added value.
They just inherited the money? Went to Yale & Harvard
as a legacy?
BTW, Did they find those "WMDs" yet?
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
29 Jul 2006 02:56:50 PM |
|
|
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote:
Since over 95% of the population is employed
Unemployment in the United States is around 11%. Maybe you're
talking about a different country.
Both are meaningless but the first is just flat wrong.
More or less, 40 percent of the population is employed at any given time.
Sheesh.
We're talking about the percentage of people who _want_ to work
and yet can not fid employment. That's around 11%.
---
"So, Mister Horse, how well do you think Custer
performed in this fine sporting event this evening?"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Gwinn" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
29 Jul 2006 08:34:36 AM |
|
|
In article <YMzyg.183360$F_3.152182@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote:
Since over 95% of the population is employed
Unemployment in the United States is around 11%. Maybe you're
talking about a different country.
Both are meaningless but the first is just flat wrong.
More or less, 40 percent of the population is employed at any given time.
Sheesh,,,,
The official June 2006 US unemployment rate was 4.6%.
Ref: <http://www.bls.gov/>, in the center of the page.
Joe Gwinn
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
29 Jul 2006 02:57:56 PM |
|
|
Joseph Gwinn <JoeGwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
The official June 2006 US unemployment rate was 4.6%.
Which doesn't include those who fell off of the dole because their
time expired. The Los Angeles Times covered the actual unemployment
rate as being around 11% -- the LATimes publishes actual unemployment
as opposed to what the government propaganda sells to the rubes.
---
"So, Mister Horse, how well do you think Custer
performed in this fine sporting event this evening?"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John R. Carroll" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
29 Jul 2006 08:43:55 AM |
|
|
Joseph Gwinn wrote:
In article <YMzyg.183360$F_3.152182@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote:
Since over 95% of the population is employed
Unemployment in the United States is around 11%. Maybe you're
talking about a different country.
Both are meaningless but the first is just flat wrong.
More or less, 40 percent of the population is employed at any given
time. Sheesh,,,,
The official June 2006 US unemployment rate was 4.6%.
Ref: <http://www.bls.gov/>, in the center of the page.
Joe,
The work force in the US is 135 million more or less. The population, as
n - "Since over 95% of the population is employed" -
is about 310 million. Do the math.......
Were " 95% of the population is employed" true, the average burger flipper
would be serving you in diapers.
Such a condition would explain America's mistake in electing Goober, and
then reelecting the chump. It's about what you'd expect in the way of good
judgement from a five year old.
--
John R. Carroll
Machining Solution Software, Inc.
Los Angeles San Francisco
www.machiningsolution.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
29 Jul 2006 01:02:38 PM |
|
|
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote:
Since over 95% of the population is employed
Unemployment in the United States is around 11%. Maybe you're
talking about a different country.
Both are meaningless but the first is just flat wrong.
More or less, 40 percent of the population is employed at any given
time. Sheesh,,,,
The official June 2006 US unemployment rate was 4.6%.
Ref: <http://www.bls.gov/>, in the center of the page.
Joe,
The work force in the US is 135 million more or less. The population, as
n - "Since over 95% of the population is employed" -
is about 310 million. Do the math.......
Were " 95% of the population is employed" true, the average burger flipper
would be serving you in diapers.
Such a condition would explain America's mistake in electing Goober, and
then reelecting the chump. It's about what you'd expect in the way of good
judgement from a five year old.
Sorry about my assumption, when I said the unemployment rate was around 95%
I was referring to the work force in general not the general population. I
meant that the 95% rate, which is from government figures, shows that nearly
everyone wanting to work is working. Most of us know that this figure isn't
accurate. First of all it includes people in the military in the figure, and
second it doesn't take into account the people who have given up looking for
work. In reality there is a lot more than 5% of the work force that are not
employed and there are a lot that are underemployed or are working at jobs
far beneath their training and educational levels.
The main point was that if one used the government's own numbers on
employment it would be impossible for there to be anything but a very small
segment of the population that is "on the public dole". The myth that many
Americans receive "free" money from the government while sitting at home
eating Bon Bons and watching TV is still widely accepted. The good thing is
that at this point it's only accepted by conservatives and other ignorant
folk.
Hawke
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Gwinn" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
29 Jul 2006 10:14:44 AM |
|
|
In article <vCJyg.183432$F_3.179242@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote:
Joseph Gwinn wrote:
In article <YMzyg.183360$F_3.152182@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"John R. Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote:
Fredric L. Rice wrote:
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote:
Since over 95% of the population is employed
Unemployment in the United States is around 11%. Maybe you're
talking about a different country.
Both are meaningless but the first is just flat wrong.
More or less, 40 percent of the population is employed at any given
time. Sheesh,,,,
The official June 2006 US unemployment rate was 4.6%.
Ref: <http://www.bls.gov/>, in the center of the page.
Joe,
The work force in the US is 135 million more or less. The population, as
n - "Since over 95% of the population is employed" -
is about 310 million. Do the math.......
Were " 95% of the population is employed" true, the average burger flipper
would be serving you in diapers.
Such a condition would explain America's mistake in electing Goober, and
then reelecting the chump. It's about what you'd expect in the way of good
judgement from a five year old.
Oh come now. And relax. When people say something "over 95% employed",
they know full well that at least half the population isn't involved,
for one good reason or another: too young, too old, housewife,
househusband, etc. The relevant subpopulation, the base for the 95%,
consists of those who wish to work.
A more cogent argument is to accuse the government of excluding people
who are too discouraged to look anymore from unemployment statistics.
The problem with this argument is that it has been around for many
decades, and nobody has come up with a better statistic, and people have
got the current one calibrated politically: ~3% means that the economy
is so good that employers are begging for people, ~5% is good (and
mostly represents people changing jobs for personal reasons), ~7% is
trouble, and ~9% is time for revolution.
Well, at least talk of revolution. Some European countries report ~25%
unemployment, and this is alleged to be a politically-motivated
underestimate.
One can argue that 5% is the optimum level of unemployment.
The other big mystery is to try to reconcile the unemployment statistics
(count of unsuccessful jobseekers) with the employment statistics (count
of people who are employed). They don't quite tie off, and nobody
really knows why, although theories abound. And life goes on.
Joe Gwinn
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cliff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
28 Jul 2006 08:49:09 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:57:15 -0700, "Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote:
If not you are
perpetuating the myth the large segments of our people are lazy shiftless
bums that live off government subsidies.
IIRC Many full timers at Walmart are entered into such.
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cliff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
28 Jul 2006 08:48:04 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:57:15 -0700, "Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote:
Since over 95% of the population is employed
And, in the US, more productive than ever per the neocons.
Hence the falling real after tax incomes, the lack of federal
deficits and the fairly ner 70 to 80 hour work weeks for salaried
employees (they don't seem to get paid any ore though than
when they were productive at 40 hours).
Bombs are not all that productive IMHO, no matter
what neocns say. Would you want one to marry your daughter?
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gunner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
24 Jul 2006 11:08:58 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:48:41 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote:
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12c8nqdl0tqtud2@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
Evolution is science and creationism is mythology. You don't teach fiction
as a science. That's why.
Hawke
Actually, I've changed my mind. Creationism shouldn't be taught or even
mentioned in public schools. I've given up on public schools anyway. I've
seen some of the text books and they suck! America is being dumbed-down on
somebody's agenda and you can't blame the "Wingers" and "Fundies" for that.
Wingers..yes. Leftwingers.
Gunner
"I think this is because of your belief in biological Marxism.
As a genetic communist you feel that noticing behavioural
patterns relating to race would cause a conflict with your belief
in biological Marxism." Big Pete, famous Usenet Racist
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cliff" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
25 Jul 2006 12:55:03 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:48:41 GMT, "Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
America is being dumbed-down
Voting for THE WAR party again?
--
Cliff
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
23 Jul 2006 10:11:04 PM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
The fact that you even ask that question is what is wrong. If they want to
teach creationism in a religion class, fine, but to represent it as science
is flawed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
23 Jul 2006 10:53:10 PM |
|
|
"Roy Blankenship" <biasbros@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:cTWwg.134158$dW3.108179@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
The fact that you even ask that question is what is wrong. If they want to
teach creationism in a religion class, fine, but to represent it as
science
is flawed.
I agree, don't represent it as science, represent it as an alternate that is
part of the belief system of a large portion of society. And science isn't
a religion? Secularism, atheism and science...the new PC relegion!
Anything else is blasphomy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
23 Jul 2006 11:07:24 PM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:GuXwg.71706$fb2.12676@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
"Roy Blankenship" <biasbros@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:cTWwg.134158$dW3.108179@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:adSwg.55366$VE1.29065@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:frn7c2ldns59qqb6ujd08s73botsam4ofe@4ax.com...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:11:58 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
"Cliff" <Clhuprich@aol.com> wrote in message
news:m6m5c2p89bm7fe3gkl8si7lk9di71ejtl7@4ax.com...
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:14:03 GMT, "Tom Gardner"
<tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com>
wrote:
<rexy@ij.net> wrote in message
news:1153552235.913363.218230@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
remove schools from government.
<snip>
I sniped out all the eyeball glazing verbosity and found the only
four
words
of importance. However, to say it right: "remove government from
schools"
Stuff them full of churches & superstitions?
The shrubbie used veto #1 ..... so much for health care, science,
leadership, products to sell, .....
No, just have the states run the schools.
Kansas, Georgia, etc. .... full of "creationists".
And we know what happened in Texas under the shrubbie.
But what has that to do with the shrubbie's first-ever veto?
--
Cliff
What's wrong with teaching creationism and evolution both as theories?
What
are the left afraid of?
The fact that you even ask that question is what is wrong. If they want
to
teach creationism in a religion class, fine, but to represent it as
science
is flawed.
I agree, don't represent it as science, represent it as an alternate that
is
part of the belief system of a large portion of society. And science
isn't
a religion? Secularism, atheism and science...the new PC relegion!
Anything else is blasphomy?
Ok, first off, turn on your spellchecker. It is hard to take you seriously
if you have misspelled words in your posts. Science is NOT a religion.
Religions are based on faith, science is based on trials and proofs.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
24 Jul 2006 10:13:53 PM |
|
|
Ok, first off, turn on your spellchecker. It is hard to take you seriously
if you have misspelled words in your posts. Science is NOT a religion.
Religions are based on faith, science is based on trials and proofs.
Spelling flames are old hat. It's my screwed-up keyboard...really! Science
is immature at best but has gathered a "flock" of believers that take it as
"religion".
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hawke" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
25 Jul 2006 07:30:07 PM |
|
|
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:R%fxg.72206$fb2.53813@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Ok, first off, turn on your spellchecker. It is hard to take you
seriously
if you have misspelled words in your posts. Science is NOT a religion.
Religions are based on faith, science is based on trials and proofs.
Spelling flames are old hat. It's my screwed-up keyboard...really!
Science
is immature at best but has gathered a "flock" of believers that take it
as
"religion".
To even assert such a thing is a clear admission of your ignorance of
science. Believing in science is not the same as following a religion.
Doesn't everyone know that?
Hawke
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Gardner" |
|
| Title: Re: OT-A Conservative looks at Liberals |
25 Jul 2006 08:17:55 PM |
|
|
"Hawke" <desmithe@c-zone.net> wrote in message
news:12cdds7bam91f04@corp.supernews.com...
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:R%fxg.72206$fb2.53813@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Ok, first off, turn on your spellchecker. It is hard to take you
seriously
if you have misspelled words in your posts. Science is NOT a religion.
Religions are based on faith, science is based on trials and proofs.
Spelling flames are old hat. It's my screwed-up keyboard...really!
Science
is immature at best but has gathered a "flock" of believers that take it
as
"religion".
To even assert such a thing is a clear admission of your ignorance of
science. Believing in science is not the same as following a religion.
Doesn't everyone know that?
Hawke
Heard a fascinating interview with a Dr. Collins, head of the human Genome
project...does he qualify as a "Scientist" If so, we can continue this
discussion.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
