A.T. Tapman <s123@dellnet.com> wrote
news:<9ihuhvkn5bbnqt5pbmgbvlbr64qqa182tc@4ax.com>...
On 22 Jul 2003 22:45:21 -0700,
(Budikka) wrote:
Spelling of what? And what would be the point of explaining anything
to you? You already (think you) know it all. Entrenched as you are,
you are ineducable.
Can't answer the question can you?
I specifically *did* answer the question. Your inability to
comprehend the meaning of the answer is something you need to look
into. But of course, you will not. However, I shall explain it in
simple syllables so even *you* can grasp it: There is no point in
explaining the harm racism does to a racist.
You would have to be leeching. How else could you possibly feed such
a large and voracious pet hatred? And what use would an explanation
be? You could not grasp it.
Yet another unanswered question, I am beginning to see a pattern.
Doubtlessly the pattern that everyone sees when they close their eyes.
Meaningless flashing lights, every one of which is tripping your
trigger.
Are you sure that's your own ***** you have your head stuck up? Do you
claim the godlike ability to know where I live and what color my skin
is?
I would ask where I stated your skin color, but you would be unlikely to
answer.
The blind still cannot see. I never said you stated my skin color.
Once again you flimsy straw man collapses and your inability to grasp
the meaning of the answer is more than enough to explain your insane
bigotry and racism.
Even if you were 100% absolutely right from top to bottom and all the
way across, I would *still* rather live with these fictitious blacks
you have invented than with someone like you, who is nothing but a
fulminating, festering bag of disease.
Name calling is so cool. Was that a witty rejoinder?
No, a simple fact of life. No one likes to live with scum. Oh, so
sorry! Does my casting of aspersions offend you? Of course if it
did, one would have to wonder why you yourself indulge in it do freely
against those whose skin you perceive to be different from your own,
and then ask such idiotic questions as to what harm this could do, and
then when you have it explained to you, blind yourself to the answer
and lie about the question having been answered at all.
Obviously I don't. Please do list them for me in detail, so I, too,
can have this divine knowledge of who is clean and who is unclean.
Do you normally insult and childishly call names of those who disagree with
you? I responded to you in a civil manner and you act as a spoiled baby, and
now you ask me for information, what a cretin.
No - racists do that. I only do it with evasive racist bigots and
idiots. Now having accused me so freely of failing to answer your
quesitons, here you are hypocritically using the first excuse that
falls into your mind to avoid answering a question you obviously have
no answer to and are too dishonest to admit so.
Once again, since the specific instance you whine about and which I
have requoted just above contains no insult whatsoever and is a
perfectly straight forward question, perhaps you would care to answer
it. What are the genetic differences between whites and those with
darker skin which make the latter somehow inferior? I'm serious.
Please list them or list references to them that the layman can
readily access, and let's discuss them in detail. If you respond with
yet more evasion and no answer, the world will clearly see what you
are made of. Are you going to list them or make more excuses along
the lines of "Owie! The big bad boy said more nasty words in the
pwaygwound, Mommy!"?
The please do define these genetic differences that make us so much
more superior. Please do. I dare you. I double dare you. But of
course you won't. You can't. You'll whine. You'll blather. You'll
spew more hatred-derived lies and pretend you have made a case, when
in fact you are a case.
I easily could, but not for a spoiled brat like you.
Now we see the real pattern. All that *blather* about me not
answering your questions, but now that you quite clearly cannot answer
serious questions or support your position with *fact*, here you are,
throwing out the very insults you lamely whine about me using! What a
professional hypocrite you are - and not a shred of support for your
bigotry and racism. I rest my case.
Please do. I wait with baited breath for your proofs. Oh, never
mind, I see you listing some at the bottom, and these are your best
efforts. Why am I not surprised at how putridly ineffective these
shams are?
Such a dramatic little fellow.
And once again the pattern you claim existed in my responses is
starkly demonstrated in your own. Yet another serious challenge, yet
another cowardly excuse from you. Yet another answer avoided.
I looked at this and was shocked! How could I have been so blind? I
am now forced to agree with your overwhelming evidence! The
scum-sucking parasitic blacks represent a whopping average 38% of
AFDC/TANF Recipients over the period covered whereas the idyllic,
godlike whites are a meagre 36%. And that was just the first two
lines of the table!
Not very good at math either, why does this not surprise me?
Then please do demonstrate where my math fails, and let's discuss
that, since you apparently have failed on all other challenges.
Let me simplify it all for you.
On the URL in question:
http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/characteristics/fy99/analysis.htm
In the table: "EXHIBIT I"
In the section: "RACE (PERCENT OF ALL FAMILIES"
On the first two lines, where the left hand column says, "White" and
the cell below it says "Black": tell me are these, or are these not
the percentages:
WHITE
38.1
38.9
37.4
35.9
32.7
30.5
average: 35.58% Rounded: 36%
BLACK
39.7
37.2
36.4
36.9
39
38.3
average: 37.92% Rounded: 38%
Now please do enthrall me with your mathematical prowess and show me
where my math is wrong. Then explain how it is that this table, which
*you* referred me to, demonstrates your claim for the parasitical
nature of black families, when their percentage is only two points
above whites.
I'm waiting.
Just because you have few answers does automatically preclude having an
interesting and enlightening conversation with me, I am a patient man. On the
other hand I do not care to cast pearls before swine, your childish name
calling and inept insults paint you as the cretinous lout that you are.
Your pathetic and impotent whining at every opportunity where a
serious answer is required is noted, as are your hypocritical insults,
about which I am not whining.
You're the one making these claims. It is incumbent upon you to
support your case as I have repeatedly asked you to do and you have
demonstrably failed to do. I asked you for the facts. You have
failed to offer anything to support your position as I have
demonstrated and instead of trying to refute my rebuttal, you have
instead retreated into whining tearfully about the big bad atheist and
his bad words. Clearly you have no case, all you have is supercilious
*****, blather, bigotry and racism. QED
Budikka
.
