$ Dear YAB-a-dab-a-dooOP..
"Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws
of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special
and General Coordinate Transformations?" doesn't include
..within it, "The Laws of Nature" alluded-to, dimwit.?!
You DiD NOT SHOW "The Laws of NATURE" ..in iNTEGRAL FORM, idiot.!!
brian a m stuckless
<> >><> >><> >><> >><>
Jay R. Yablon wrote: > > Hello to all: >
As I mentioned previously, DRL earlier pointed out some problems
endemic to general relativity with respect to volume integrations
of energy / momentum in spacetime, and Igor had some comments
regarding connections I was attempting to make between general
relativity and quantum mechanics, on SPR.
As a consequence of these extremely helpful comments, I have
prepared a draft paper which I believe begins to address these
issues. It is posted on my web site at > http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm, the title is:
"Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of
Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General
Coordinate Transformations?" A direct link is below:
http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/Papers/Uncertainty%20and%20GR.pdf
I would appreciate any comments you may have on this draft paper.
Very truly yours,
Jay R. Yablon
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon@nycap.rr.com.
Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring
The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and
General Coordinate Transformations?
.
|
