| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"krp" |
| Date: |
11 Jun 2004 08:09:01 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040610154656.19196K-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
Carol I am drawn back to your claims about Washington long ago and how
you morphed THAT topic. Now you suggest that Ronald Reagan is an Atheist
like you. ***** Carol.
Oh next you will ANGRILY deny you said that. Right you did not SAY that
Ronald Reagan is an Atheist. You didn't even say he was a "Free Thinker!"
You just quoted somebody else you said so................................
The purpose IS??????
Carol you know that Reagan was a man if faith. He was a very devout man
all his life. He rarely went to church as president after he was shot. But
to suggest that he was a fellow Atheist is the height of deceit. Something I
have come to associate with you.
I didn't respond yesterday to this claim of yours because I was ready to
explode. Now I just sit her and am laughing at how PATHETIC you are!
.
|
|
| User: "MrPepper11" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
11 Jun 2004 04:56:46 PM |
|
|
"Why should we subsidize intellectual curiosity?" -- Reagan, '80
"Facts are stupid things." -- Reagan, '88
"If there has to be a bloodbath, then let's get it over with." --
Reagan, '69, prior to having national guard soldiers break up a
peaceful protest on the UC Berkeley campus. The protesters were
teargassed and fired upon with buckshot, killing one protester and
wounding at least 128 others.
"Maybe the Lord brought down this plague [because] illicit sex is
against the Ten Commandments." - Reagan, '89. Reagan didn't even
mention AIDS until 1987, by which time it had spread into the
heterosexual population and over 25,000 Americans had died.
"For the first time ever, everything is in place for the battle of
Armageddon and the Second Coming of Christ. It can't be too long
now. Ezekiel says that fire and brimstone will be rained upon the
enemies of God's people. That must mean that they will be destroyed
by nuclear weapons." -- Reagan, '71
"There have been times in the past when people thought the end of
the world was coming, and so forth, but never anything like this."
-- Reagan, '83
"We may be the generation that sees Armageddon." -- Reagan, '85
.
|
|
|
| User: " jls" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
11 Jun 2004 06:36:52 PM |
|
|
"MrPepper11" <MrPepper11@go.com> wrote in message
news:57cfd534.0406111356.103bf1fb@posting.google.com...
[...]
"We may be the generation that sees Armageddon." -- Reagan, '85
In the meantime, may the old infidel astrologist sizzle in peace.
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 08:04:21 AM |
|
|
" jls" <jls1016ns@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:g1Dyc.6233$X92.3489@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"MrPepper11" <MrPepper11@go.com> wrote in message
news:57cfd534.0406111356.103bf1fb@posting.google.com...
[...]
"We may be the generation that sees Armageddon." -- Reagan, '85
In the meantime, may the old infidel astrologist sizzle in peace.
WHen we look back on another election LOST.... Try to understand it is
SHRILL crap like that that will forever cost us elecctions because the
American people are sick to death of that hate filled *****! But you guys
will NEVER figure out that you are a tiny minority within a minotity within
a minority.
.
|
|
|
| User: " jls" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 08:46:13 AM |
|
|
"KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:pbDyc.13735$tA6.4801@nwrddc03.gnilink.net...
" jls" <jls1016ns@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:g1Dyc.6233$X92.3489@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
"MrPepper11" <MrPepper11@go.com> wrote in message
news:57cfd534.0406111356.103bf1fb@posting.google.com...
[...]
"We may be the generation that sees Armageddon." -- Reagan, '85
In the meantime, may the old infidel astrologist sizzle in peace.
WHen we look back on another election LOST.... Try to understand it is
SHRILL crap like that that will forever cost us elecctions because the
American people are sick to death of that hate filled *****! But you guys
will NEVER figure out that you are a tiny minority within a minotity
within
a minority.
What, a little humor for a weeklong funeral on the death of a mediocrity?
Hateful? Here's some more reading for you:
The answer to the laughable fiction that Reagan ended the cold war:
http://www.nynewsday.com/news/local/newyork/columnists/ny-nybres113845462jun
11,0,5005058,print.column?coll=ny-ny-columnists
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 09:58:23 AM |
|
|
" jls" <jls1016ns@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:EWDyc.6271$X92.3048@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
What, a little humor for a weeklong funeral on the death of a mediocrity?
Hateful? Here's some more reading for you:
The answer to the laughable fiction that Reagan ended the cold war:
Hey weenie even GORBACHOV believe he did. I think he knows a LITTLE more
than some internet BLOWHARD!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "p_j" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 10:34:06 PM |
|
|
KRP <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
WHen we look back on another election LOST....
WE YOU OLD PERVERTED FASCIST? WE??????
you are a tiny minority within a minotity within
a minority.
How many shills for Bush are both pedophiles and rapists?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
11 Jun 2004 10:34:06 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, krp wrote:
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040610154656.19196K-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
Carol I am drawn back to your claims about Washington long ago and how
you morphed THAT topic.
The archives are there to show how you made sweeping generalizations which
could not be supported. Anyone may read them.
Now you suggest that Ronald Reagan is an Atheist
like you. ***** Carol.
How funny.
YOu know the drill, Kenny. Anytime you make false allegations and are
asked for proof, you don't seem to be able to do so, but anyway:
The proof that I suggested Ronald Reagan is an atheist
goes here----->
Oh next you will ANGRILY deny you said that. Right you did not SAY that
Ronald Reagan is an Atheist.
Well. Glad to know you at least recognize that I was only reporting what
someone else said. And the reason I was reporting it was that I was
astonished that anyone would use "freethinker" in such a way.
You didn't even say he was a "Free Thinker!"
Right. So where's the beef.
You just quoted somebody else you said so................................
"Who" said so?
The purpose IS??????
It apparently escapes you. So you choices are to ask or to attack. You
chose the latter. No surprise.
Carol you know that Reagan was a man if faith. He was a very devout man
all his life. He rarely went to church as president after he was shot. But
to suggest that he was a fellow Atheist is the height of deceit. Something I
have come to associate with you.
I never suggested that Reagan was an atheist.
That is your strawman.
Why is it you need a strawman in order to have a conversation?
I didn't respond yesterday to this claim of yours because I was ready to
explode. Now I just sit her and am laughing at how PATHETIC you are!
The dear reader is welcome to decide just who is pathetic, Kenny.
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "krp" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
11 Jun 2004 05:11:19 PM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611102651.16618E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
Carol I am drawn back to your claims about Washington long ago and how
you morphed THAT topic.
The archives are there to show how you made sweeping generalizations which
could not be supported. Anyone may read them.
Now you suggest that Ronald Reagan is an Atheist
like you. ***** Carol.
How funny.
YOu know the drill, Kenny. Anytime you make false allegations and are
asked for proof, you don't seem to be able to do so, but anyway:
The proof that I suggested Ronald Reagan is an atheist
goes here----->
WHO began the thread CAROL? Lie your way out of this hole!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Robert Gautier" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
11 Jun 2004 09:56:02 PM |
|
|
"krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<b6qyc.9956$tA6.8211@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>...
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611102651.16618E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
Carol I am drawn back to your claims about Washington long ago and how
you morphed THAT topic.
The archives are there to show how you made sweeping generalizations which
could not be supported. Anyone may read them.
Now you suggest that Ronald Reagan is an Atheist
like you. ***** Carol.
How funny.
YOu know the drill, Kenny. Anytime you make false allegations and are
asked for proof, you don't seem to be able to do so, but anyway:
The proof that I suggested Ronald Reagan is an atheist
goes here----->
WHO began the thread CAROL? Lie your way out of this hole!!!
Pangborn will dodge the direct question when he is caught in a
lie. This is a good example of it. Carol Smith asked for proof of
Pangborn's false accusation and he dodged production of proof by
asking who began the thread. http://www.aboutkenpangborn. has other
examples of Pangborn lies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
11 Jun 2004 10:10:06 PM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2004, Robert Gautier wrote:
How funny.
YOu know the drill, Kenny. Anytime you make false allegations and are
asked for proof, you don't seem to be able to do so, but anyway:
The proof that I suggested Ronald Reagan is an atheist
goes here----->
WHO began the thread CAROL? Lie your way out of this hole!!!
Pangborn will dodge the direct question when he is caught in a
lie. This is a good example of it.
And imagine the chutzpah of asking "WHO began the thread?"
"Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! " is a thread of
Pangborn's making.
The thread I began was "Re: Reagan a freethinker" and within my first post
I included the following:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
I this program may be heard via the archives
at:
http://www.wpr.org/merens/index.cfm?strDirection=Prev&dteShowDate=2004%2D06%2D10%2016%3A00%3A00
The comment maya be heard at about 40 minutes into the archived program.
<<For Program On: Thursday, June 10, 2004 at 3:00 PM
After three, Ben Meren's guest wants to honor Ronald Reagan by putting the
former president on the ten-dollar bill. Guest: Chris Butler, executive
director, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project. www.reaganlegacy.org >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notice I never stated that I considered Reagan a freethinker or an
atheist.
Carol Smith asked for proof of Pangborn's false accusation
and he dodged production of proof by asking who began the thread.
Never noticing he had begun "Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! "
That is a riot.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn. has other examples of Pangborn lies.
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 08:02:18 AM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611220349.6513I-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Pangborn will dodge the direct question when he is caught in a
lie. This is a good example of it.
And imagine the chutzpah of asking "WHO began the thread?"
"Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! " is a thread of
Pangborn's making.
The thread I began was "Re: Reagan a freethinker" and within my first post
I included the following:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
Carol you are DIVERTING and tap dancing again. First you DENY that you
started the thread and than claimed that I did! That was a straight out BALD
FACED LIE! Now you are weaseling because I ADDED the SO SAYETH CAROL SMITH!
I added it because your initial claim was a LIE!
You were repeating a claim and in doing so you ENDORSED that FALSE CLAIM!
EAT IT CAROL!
TAP DANCE LITTLE GIRL DO THE TANGO FOR US..............
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 10:14:08 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, KRP wrote:
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611220349.6513I-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Robert Gautier (rbgautier@dcemail.com) wrote:
Pangborn will dodge the direct question when he is caught in a
lie. This is a good example of it.
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611220349.6513I-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
cs:> > And imagine the chutzpah of asking "WHO began the thread?"
"Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! " is a thread of
Pangborn's making.
That was true when I wrote it, and it is true now.
The thread I began was "Re: Reagan a freethinker" and within my first post
I included the following:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
Also true when I wrote it and true now.
Carol you are DIVERTING and tap dancing again.
How so?
First you DENY that you
started the thread and than claimed that I did!
You did start this thread. Look at the subject heading. You created it
and you wrote the first message in this thread.
That was a straight out BALD FACED LIE!
Sorry. I provide evidence for what I claim, and I have done that several
tiems.
Now you are weaseling because I ADDED the SO SAYETH CAROL SMITH!
That created a new subject heading, which is an indication of a new
thread.
It also represents a lie because I never "SAYETHED" such a thing.
I added it because your initial claim was a LIE!
My first message made no claim. It was an announcement of something
Chris Butler said with regard to Reagan and how people could hear the
program in which the claim was made by Chris Butler.
You were repeating a claim and in doing so you ENDORSED that FALSE CLAIM!
EAT IT CAROL!
Sorry. If you will check usenet, you will see that subject headings often
announce concepts which are not endorsed by whomever is initiating the
thread. What will be an exercise in entertainment will be to research the
subject headings you have introduced, initiated, created to see just
exactly what you have claimed, endorsed and championed. That would be a
hoot.
TAP DANCE LITTLE GIRL DO THE TANGO FOR US.............. >
Sorry. I prefer the Valdresspringar.
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 10:16:26 AM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040612100530.26438H-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Joe spends 1 day a year cleaning a chimney.
Joe works 60 hours a week 6 days a week as an electrician. In carol's world
Joe is MORE of a Chimney sweep than an electrician!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 10:28:50 AM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040612100530.26438H-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Carol Smith wrote absolutely nothing which appears within the text of this
message; nor did she create the subject heading or ever say that Reagan
was a freethinker.
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, KRP wrote:
Joe spends 1 day a year cleaning a chimney.
Joe works 60 hours a week 6 days a week as an electrician. In carol's world
Joe is MORE of a Chimney sweep than an electrician!
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 01:32:56 PM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040612102630.26438J-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Carol Smith wrote absolutely nothing which appears within the text of this
message; nor did she create the subject heading or ever say that Reagan
was a freethinker.
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, KRP wrote:
Joe spends 1 day a year cleaning a chimney.
Joe works 60 hours a week 6 days a week as an electrician. In carol's
world
Joe is MORE of a Chimney sweep than an electrician!
MUCH MUCH MUCH More right Carol?
You vehement deny that just because Washington spent 3 days a week as a
Mason attending activities that he is MUCH MORE of an Episcopalian than a
Mason...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 02:05:26 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, KRP wrote of Carol:
You vehement deny that just because Washington spent 3 days a week as a
Mason attending activities that he is MUCH MORE of an Episcopalian than a
Mason...
As to being a Mason or an Episcopalian, I never made any claim about
whether Washington was mor of one than another.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The PANGBORN (*****) CHALLENGE 2004
cs> > Separation cases have been brought by Catholics, Unitarians,
cs> > Jews, and other assorted folks of faith, more than by atheists.
PANGBORN CHALLENGE: > *****.
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
11 Jun 2004 07:59:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, krp wrote:
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611102651.16618E-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
Carol I am drawn back to your claims about Washington long ago and how
you morphed THAT topic.
The archives are there to show how you made sweeping generalizations which
could not be supported. Anyone may read them.
Those sweeping generalizations included a claim that George Washington was
more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian.
You have yet to prove that one.
Now you suggest that Ronald Reagan is an Atheist
like you. ***** Carol.
How funny.
It was funny because I never claimed that Ronald Reagan was an atheist or
a freethinker.
YOu know the drill, Kenny. Anytime you make false allegations and are
asked for proof, you don't seem to be able to do so, but anyway:
The proof that I suggested Ronald Reagan is an atheist
goes here----->
WHO began the thread CAROL?
This one? You named it. And in doing so lied. "so sayeth" is a claim I
said something which I did not say.
Lie your way out of this hole!!!
No need for me to lie. The archives are open to anyone.
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 07:57:58 AM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611195619.6513B-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Those sweeping generalizations included a claim that George Washington was
more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian.
You have yet to prove that one.
In your most PERVERTED dreams Carol I didn't. Youjr assw was french fried on
THAT one. Of copurse we can recall how THAT thread started troo wqhen you
claimed that Washington was "NOT" a theist! You made MANY MANY claims re;
Washington NONE if which panned out into anything but your hysterical
drivel.
Here it is Carol, once again, Washington attended Episcopalian activities
once a week most weeks but not EVERY week. Washington partyicipated in
Masonic activities at least THREE times a week EVERY WEEK (that he was not
ill or ar war) Carol. To most people with functioning brain cells, one would
say that when you do something more frequently that makes you more of that
than something that you participate in less frequently.
AN ABSURD SMITHISM EXAMPLE:
Joe has two jobs. Once a year he cleans the chimney for someobody.
Joe's second job has him work 60 hours a week 6 days a week for the part 45
years as an electrician.
Joe is MORE of an electrician than he is a chimney sweep EXCEPT in Carol
Smith's world!!!
It was funny because I never claimed that Ronald Reagan was an atheist or
a freethinker.
Oh BULLSHI Carol. WHO started this thread? WHO named it? YOU! ANd now you
are doing your TYPICAL trying to LIE you way out of it!
The proof that I suggested Ronald Reagan is an atheist
goes here----->
WHO began the thread CAROL?
This one? You named it. And in doing so lied. "so sayeth" is a claim I
said something which I did not say.
Carol you are pond scum! YOU started the thread claiming Reagan was a
Freethinker (ATheist),.
Lie your way out of this hole!!!
No need for me to lie. The archives are open to anyone.
And they show that YOU and NOT I started it Carol! YOU started "Reagan a
freethinker!!!!!!!
A deliberate calculated LIE!
.
|
|
|
| User: "p_j" |
|
| Title: Pangborn melting - hide your children |
12 Jun 2004 10:34:05 PM |
|
|
KRP <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
Youjr assw was french fried on
THAT one. Of copurse we can recall how THAT thread started troo wqhen you
Too much time with pedophiles and rapists?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 10:04:53 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, KRP wrote:
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040611195619.6513B-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
cs:> > Those sweeping generalizations included a claim that George
cs:> > Washington was more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian.
cs:> > You have yet to prove that one.
In your most PERVERTED dreams Carol I didn't.
You didn't prove it.
Youjr assw was french fried on THAT one.
Ha.
http://snipurl.com/3xj2
http://snipurl.com/3xj4
Of copurse we can recall how THAT thread started troo wqhen you
claimed that Washington was "NOT" a theist!
Put any statement which I ever made claiming Washington was "NOT" a theist
here----->
You made MANY MANY claims re; Washington NONE if which panned
out into anything but your hysterical drivel.
Just provide the claim, Kenny, then we can talk about it.
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Here it is Carol, once again, Washington attended Episcopalian activities
once a week most weeks but not EVERY week.
We have your word on that.
How does that relate to his being more of a Mason than an Episcopalian?
Washington partyicipated in
Masonic activities at least THREE times a week EVERY WEEK (that he was not
ill or ar war) Carol.
We have only your word on that.
How does that relate to his being more of a Mason than an Episcopalian?
To most people with functioning brain cells, one would say that
when you do something more frequently that makes you more of that
than something that you participate in less frequently.
Kenny reasoning?
What does "Kenny reasoning" prove?
<snip obfuscation--anyone who wants it can go to the archives>
It was funny because I never claimed that Ronald Reagan
was an atheist or a freethinker.
Oh BULLSHI Carol. WHO started this thread?
You.
WHO named it?
Ken Pangborn gave this thread this name: "Reagan a freethinker so sayeth
Carol Smith!" I never started a thread with that name.
YOU!
See above.
ANd now you are doing your TYPICAL trying to LIE you way out of it!
Check the archives and see who first posted: "Reagan a freethinker so
sayeth Carol Smith!"
The archives will prove that you did.
What does the name of a thread prove about anything? Does the name of a
thread contain a theory? A hypothesis?
Is the name of a thread required to be a truism?
What about the name of this thread which YOU STARTED and then accused me
of starting: "Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith!" That is a
lie. I never said any such thing. Nor did I start the thread.
Is there a "subject heading police" to enforce what you apparently think
is a requirement? Have you never heard of irony or parody?
The proof that I suggested Ronald Reagan is an atheist
goes here----->
WHO began the thread CAROL?
This one? You named it. And in doing so lied. "so sayeth" is a claim I
said something which I did not say.
Carol you are pond scum! YOU started the thread claiming Reagan was a
Freethinker (ATheist),.
I started a thread with the subject heading: "Reagan a freethinker." The
message content contained no indication that I held the opinion Reagan was
a freethinker.
Lie your way out of this hole!!!
No need for me to lie. The archives are open to anyone.
And they show that YOU and NOT I started it Carol! YOU started "Reagan a
freethinker!!!!!!!
I never disavowed naming the thread.
However, I never made the claim that Reagan was a freethinker. The
message made it very clear that the claim was made by someone else.
A deliberate calculated LIE!
No. A deliberate, calculated lie is this:
"Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith!"
Because Carol Smith never claimed Reagan was a freethinker.
Here is the message which began the "Reagan a freethinker" thread:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Butler, at 3:45 PM, identified Ronald Reagan as a "freethinker."
I [think] this program may be heard via the archives
at:
http://www.wpr.org/merens/index.cfm?strDirection=Prev&dteShowDate=2004%2D06%2D10%2016%3A00%3A00
The comment may be heard at about 40 minutes into the archived program.
<<For Program On: Thursday, June 10, 2004 at 3:00 PM
After three, Ben Meren's guest wants to honor Ronald Reagan by putting the
former president on the ten-dollar bill. Guest: Chris Butler, executive
director, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project. www.reaganlegacy.org >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 10:14:10 AM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040612094519.26438G-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
cs:> > Those sweeping generalizations included a claim that George
cs:> > Washington was more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian.
cs:> > You have yet to prove that one.
In your most PERVERTED dreams Carol I didn't.
You didn't prove it.
Oh YES I DID, your DENIALS won't make it go awy SNIPETTE!
Of course we can recall how THAT thread started troo when you
claimed that Washington was "NOT" a theist!
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
Doesn't change anything digbat!
Here it is Carol, once again, Washington attended Episcopalian
activities
once a week most weeks but not EVERY week.
We have your word on that.
You have HIS friggin DIARY and the articles written by his FAMILY on that
CAROL! They dare call it HISTORY! Take a course in it somethime!
How does that relate to his being more of a Mason than an Episcopalian?
READ ON BIMBETTE!
Washington participated in Masonic activities at least THREE times a
week EVERY WEEK (that he was not
ill or ar war) Carol.
We have only your word on that.
NO! THE FACTS DOLT! He was a 32nd Degree MASON and that is NOTY on MY word
but PROVEN FACT! You rem,ain a pathetic LIAR!
How does that relate to his being more of a Mason than an Episcopalian?
Oh geee.
To most people with functioning brain cells, one would say that
when you do something more frequently that makes you more of that
than something that you participate in less frequently.
Kenny reasoning?
What does "Kenny reasoning" prove?
<snip obfuscation--anyone who wants it can go to the archives>
SO Carol using the illustration I used...
Joe cleans a chimney once a year.
Joe works as an electrician 60 hours a week 6 days a week.
Carol would ANGRILY claim that Joe was MORE of a chimney sweep than an
electrician.
CAROL LOGIC!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 10:23:51 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, KRP wrote:
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040612094519.26438G-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
cs:> > Those sweeping generalizations included a claim that George
cs:> > Washington was more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian.
cs:> > You have yet to prove that one.
In your most PERVERTED dreams Carol I didn't.
You didn't prove it.
Oh YES I DID, your DENIALS won't make it go awy SNIPETTE!
You may have proved it in your imagination, but you have provided no proof
that Washington was more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian. You made
a sweeping generalization which probably can't be proven.
Just as the "militant theist" claim was a sweeping generalization which
you subsequently retracted after much rhetoric.
Of course we can recall how THAT thread started troo when you
claimed that Washington was "NOT" a theist!
Put statements made by me to which you refer
here----->
<snip countless copies of this statement reproduced by Pangborn. He must
really like it.>
Doesn't change anything digbat!
what has not changed and what will probably never change is that you
insist I claimed Washington was "NOT" a theist when I never made such a
claim.
Of course you could prove me wrong by producing such a statement made by
me.
Here it is Carol, once again, Washington attended Episcopalian
activities once a week most weeks but not EVERY week.
We have your word on that.
You have HIS friggin DIARY and the articles written by his FAMILY on that
CAROL! They dare call it HISTORY! Take a course in it somethime!
Your claim. A reference to something you say exists, but haven't
produced.
How does that relate to his being more of a Mason than an Episcopalian?
READ ON BIMBETTE!
Washington participated in Masonic activities at least THREE times
a week EVERY WEEK (that he was not ill or ar war) Carol.
We have only your word on that.
NO! THE FACTS DOLT! He was a 32nd Degree MASON and that is NOTY on MY word
but PROVEN FACT! You rem,ain a pathetic LIAR!
Your claim is that he participated in Masonic activities at least THREE
times a week. You have provided no referent on behalf of this claim. I
have never said he didn't. I have no opinion because I have seen no
evidence and have absolutely no reason to take anything you say as fact,
based on statements and accusations you have made and which are archived.
How does that relate to his being more of a Mason than an Episcopalian?
Oh geee.
?
To most people with functioning brain cells, one would say that
when you do something more frequently that makes you more of that
than something that you participate in less frequently.
Kenny reasoning?
What does "Kenny reasoning" prove?
<snip obfuscation--anyone who wants it can go to the archives>
<snip chimney obfuscation>
"Without faith we might relapse into scientific or rational thinking,
which leads by a slippery slope toward constitutional democracy."
-- Robert Anton Wilson
.
|
|
|
| User: "KRP" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 01:31:40 PM |
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040612101506.26438I-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Oh YES I DID, your DENIALS won't make it go awy SNIPETTE!
You may have proved it in your imagination, but you have provided no proof
that Washington was more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian. You made
a sweeping generalization which probably can't be proven.
Just as the "militant theist" claim was a sweeping generalization which
you subsequently retracted after much rhetoric.
Remember Carol your edict that a man who spends ON DAY A YEAR cleaning a
chimney is MUCH MORE a chimney sweep than he is an electrician who spends 60
hours a week 6 days a week as an electrician. MUCH MUCH MUCH MORE! Carol
you are one LOPPY woman!
.
|
|
|
| User: "p_j" |
|
| Title: Pangborn confesses - Loppy woman |
12 Jun 2004 10:34:05 PM |
|
|
KRP <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
Remember Carol your edict that a man who spends ON DAY A YEAR cleaning a
chimney is MUCH MORE a chimney sweep than he is an electrician who spends 60
hours a week 6 days a week as an electrician. MUCH MUCH MUCH MORE! Carol
you are one LOPPY woman!
Since that invention was yours, are you calling yourself a LOPPY woman?
Hey, you know what. You forgot to tell me who was the Bush commanding
officer who PROVED that he served honorably while drinking, snorting
coke and riding whores.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Carol Lee Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan a freethinker so sayeth Carol Smith! |
12 Jun 2004 02:03:22 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, KRP wrote:
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.OSF.3.96.1040612101506.26438I-100000@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu...
Oh YES I DID, your DENIALS won't make it go awy SNIPETTE!
You may have proved it in your imagination, but you have provided no proof
that Washington was more of a Mason than he was an Episcopalian. You made
a sweeping generalization which probably can't be proven.
Just as the "militant theist" claim was a sweeping generalization which
you subsequently retracted after much rhetoric.
Remember Carol your edict
I neither created nor endorse any such edict.
that a man who spends ON DAY A YEAR cleaning a
chimney is MUCH MORE a chimney sweep than he is an electrician who spends 60
hours a week 6 days a week as an electrician. MUCH MUCH MUCH MORE! Carol
you are one LOPPY woman!
That any such edict has to do with me is a figment of your imagination,
which is, of late, working overtime.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The PANGBORN (*****) CHALLENGE 2004
cs> > Separation cases have been brought by Catholics, Unitarians,
cs> > Jews, and other assorted folks of faith, more than by atheists.
PANGBORN CHALLENGE: > *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
