Tinas49ers wrote:
From: Andres64
Tinas49ers wrote:
From: Andres64
Tinas49ers wrote:
From: Andres64
Tinas49ers wrote:
From: "Clave
"Tinas49ers" <tinas49ers@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040229182141.03037.00000447@mb-m15.aol.com...
From: "Clave"
"Tinas49ers" <tinas49ers@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040229170101.02929.00000585@mb-m15.aol.com...
From: "Clave"
"mightyjoe" <mightjoe@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:l4n34096q5vhma5d656ije9uqg10m95oqb@4ax.com...
<...>
Gays who want to marry are doing the same thing. They are,
generously, maybe a million and a half. One half of one percent
of
all Americans. And this one half of one percent wants to dictate
how
the other 99.5 live. And the libs think this is great!
Except that it's a complete lie.
The 0.5% don't want the 99.5% to dictate how *they* should live.
They want to dictate what the standard of marriage is.
Apparently, so do you.
I do? What have I said about it?
From your phraseology, I inferred that you're in favor of defining
marriage
as
between different sexes.
Is that not the case?
Jim
I want gays to go through the legal process
...snip...
Answer the question: Are *you* against gays marrying? (yes/no)
Not as long as it has become LEGALLY accepted.
So your only objection is a legal one?
Yeah, imagine that, I want gays to follow the laws, just like everyone
else.
So you were perfectly fine with the idea of gays marrying until it the
CA referendum you mentioned? You're fine with the MA court's ruling?
You don't support the proposed Constitutional Amendment?
Not going to answer?
Don't they want to be like everyone else? Isn't that THEIR point?
Yes. And everyone else *is* allowed to marry.
No comment?
If they want
to be married like us, then they need to follow the laws, like all of us
do.
So you were perfectly fine with the idea of gays marrying until it the
CA referendum you mentioned?
I mentioned a Ca. referendum?
You mentioned Prop. 2. Remember? So, the question(s) are: 1) Did you
support or oppose the proposition (or would you have had you done
either)? 2) You were perfectly fine with a man marrying another man
and/or a woman marrying another woman until Prop. 2? Yes or no?
You're fine with the MA court's ruling?
I dont know the fine print of it.
What does that matter? Either you support the court allowing gays to
marry, or you don't. Which is it?
You don't support the proposed Constitutional Amendment?
I need to see what the wording of it is. I dont think, overall, the The
Constitution should have anything to do with marriage.
So you oppose the proposed Amendment?
--
Andres64
a.a. #1624
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we
fall.
- Confucius
.
