Religions > Atheism > Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Yang" |
| Date: |
25 Jul 2003 11:34:17 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:16:42 GMT, Omphalos <!> wrote:
On Tue 22 Jul 2003 11:14:59p, "JJ" <jjj@whateverx.org> wrote in
news:T4nTa.172548$8B.68505@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
***** Limbaugh, he's a fat *****, un-educated (never went to college),
uninformed idiot. As well as the ditto dolts that tend to follow.
Studies show that more educated people tend to vote Republican.
Studies show that more PhD's vote against Republican.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Socerey Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balance' budget: -455 billion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -2.5 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq Lie: -230 GIs and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
| User: "Yang" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
27 Jul 2003 12:50:17 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:01:12 GMT, "Roger R."
<jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Yang" < > wrote in message
news:3f221b36.14396015@news.cox.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 05:06:32 GMT, Omphalos <omphalos@wp.pl> wrote:
On Sat 26 Jul 2003 12:34:17a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f2204a6.8619968@news.cox.net:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:16:42 GMT, Omphalos <!> wrote:
On Tue 22 Jul 2003 11:14:59p, "JJ" <jjj@whateverx.org> wrote in
news:T4nTa.172548$8B.68505@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
***** Limbaugh, he's a fat *****, un-educated (never went to college),
uninformed idiot. As well as the ditto dolts that tend to follow.
Studies show that more educated people tend to vote Republican.
Studies show that more PhD's vote against Republican.
That doesn't make sense. If they were smarter, they wouldn't vote for
Democrats.
Let me guess, you don't have a PhD.
It has been true since Nixon ran the Viet Nam war and pushed the southern
strategy that brought in so many anti-intellectual racist southerners. He
also eliminated to position of Presidential Science Advisor. Bush senior
tried to bring them back into the Presidential office, but this was part of
the reason the conserviatives rejected him in 1992 and didn't turn out to
vote.
Currently the Republican support of the anti evolution people and Bushes
decision to ban funding of stem cell research without talking seriously to
any scientists has kept Scientists from having much interest in voting
Republican. This is the most anti-science administration since the 19th
century.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0307.thompson.html
And as a member of AAAS, I can tell you that many PhD's find GOP's
anti-science bent repulsive.
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Socerey Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balance' budget: -455 billion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -2.5 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq Lie: -230 GIs and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lord Calvert" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
27 Jul 2003 11:20:19 AM |
|
|
It has been true since Nixon ran the Viet Nam war and pushed the southern
strategy that brought in so many anti-intellectual racist southerners. He
also eliminated to position of Presidential Science Advisor. Bush senior
tried to bring them back into the Presidential office, but this was part of
the reason the conserviatives rejected him in 1992 and didn't turn out to
vote.
Currently the Republican support of the anti evolution people and Bushes
decision to ban funding of stem cell research without talking seriously to
any scientists has kept Scientists from having much interest in voting
Republican. This is the most anti-science administration since the 19th
century.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0307.thompson.html
And as a member of AAAS, I can tell you that many PhD's find GOP's
anti-science bent repulsive.
So Bush is the personification of President Furbish Lousewart?
Rich Goranson, Amherst, NY, USA (aa#MCMXCIX, a-vet#1)
EAC Ill-Legal Dept. "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here"
"My country, right or wrong; to be defended when right and righted when wrong."
- Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Omphalos" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
27 Jul 2003 10:06:00 AM |
|
|
On Sun 27 Jul 2003 01:50:17a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f2367e1.11548828@news.cox.net:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:01:12 GMT, "Roger R."
<jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Yang" < > wrote in message
news:3f221b36.14396015@news.cox.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 05:06:32 GMT, Omphalos <omphalos@wp.pl> wrote:
On Sat 26 Jul 2003 12:34:17a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f2204a6.8619968@news.cox.net:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:16:42 GMT, Omphalos <!> wrote:
On Tue 22 Jul 2003 11:14:59p, "JJ" <jjj@whateverx.org> wrote in
news:T4nTa.172548$8B.68505@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
***** Limbaugh, he's a fat *****, un-educated (never went to
college), uninformed idiot. As well as the ditto dolts that tend
to follow.
Studies show that more educated people tend to vote Republican.
Studies show that more PhD's vote against Republican.
That doesn't make sense. If they were smarter, they wouldn't vote for
Democrats.
Let me guess, you don't have a PhD.
It has been true since Nixon ran the Viet Nam war and pushed the
southern strategy that brought in so many anti-intellectual racist
southerners. He also eliminated to position of Presidential Science
Advisor. Bush senior tried to bring them back into the Presidential
office, but this was part of the reason the conserviatives rejected him
in 1992 and didn't turn out to vote.
Currently the Republican support of the anti evolution people and
Bushes decision to ban funding of stem cell research without talking
seriously to any scientists has kept Scientists from having much
interest in voting Republican. This is the most anti-science
administration since the 19th century.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0307.thompson.html
And as a member of AAAS, I can tell you that many PhD's find GOP's
anti-science bent repulsive.
Republicans are don't buy into global warming, ozone deterioration,
overpopulation, etc, also know as pseudo-science.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Omphalos" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
28 Jul 2003 08:03:33 AM |
|
|
On Mon 28 Jul 2003 12:15:21a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f24a2b2.2119671@news.cox.net:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 15:06:00 GMT, Omphalos <omphalos@wp.pl> wrote:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0307.thompson.html
And as a member of AAAS, I can tell you that many PhD's find GOP's
anti-science bent repulsive.
Republicans are don't buy into global warming, ozone deterioration,
overpopulation, etc, also know as pseudo-science.
Instead people like you accept 'real' science such as creationism,
faith-healing, and that the universe is less than 10,000 years old.
Creationism is no less scientific than evolution; neither can be observed
because they occured in the past.
Faith healing is only accepted by a few cults in Christianity. Why do you
talk about stuff that only a select few believe in. A few liberals are
communists. Does that make all liberals communists?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Flabusius" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
27 Jul 2003 03:31:49 PM |
|
|
On Sun 27 Jul 2003 04:17:15p, Wbarwell <Wbarwell@munnged.mylinuxisp.com>
wrote in news:3f243367$0$125$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.com:
Omphalos wrote:
On Sun 27 Jul 2003 01:50:17a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f2367e1.11548828@news.cox.net:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:01:12 GMT, "Roger R."
<jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Yang" < > wrote in message
news:3f221b36.14396015@news.cox.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 05:06:32 GMT, Omphalos <omphalos@wp.pl> wrote:
On Sat 26 Jul 2003 12:34:17a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f2204a6.8619968@news.cox.net:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:16:42 GMT, Omphalos <!> wrote:
On Tue 22 Jul 2003 11:14:59p, "JJ" <jjj@whateverx.org> wrote in
news:T4nTa.172548$8B.68505@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
***** Limbaugh, he's a fat *****, un-educated (never went to
college), uninformed idiot. As well as the ditto dolts that
tend to follow.
Studies show that more educated people tend to vote Republican.
Studies show that more PhD's vote against Republican.
That doesn't make sense. If they were smarter, they wouldn't vote
for Democrats.
Let me guess, you don't have a PhD.
It has been true since Nixon ran the Viet Nam war and pushed the
southern strategy that brought in so many anti-intellectual racist
southerners. He also eliminated to position of Presidential Science
Advisor. Bush senior tried to bring them back into the Presidential
office, but this was part of the reason the conserviatives rejected
him in 1992 and didn't turn out to vote.
Currently the Republican support of the anti evolution people and
Bushes decision to ban funding of stem cell research without talking
seriously to any scientists has kept Scientists from having much
interest in voting Republican. This is the most anti-science
administration since the 19th century.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0307.thompson.html
And as a member of AAAS, I can tell you that many PhD's find GOP's
anti-science bent repulsive.
Republicans are don't buy into global warming, ozone deterioration,
overpopulation, etc, also know as pseudo-science.
But it is not pseudoscience. The right simply is science ignorant and
they have made it an ideological shibboleth.
Overpopulation is a myth. Much of the world's land surface is empty, and
many countries with dense populations have a higher standard of living
than less crowded countries. Global warming is a myth. One large volcanic
eruption puts out more polutants than all humans do in one year. Ozone
deteriation is a myth. The ozone hole that appeared over Antarctica and
caused all the panic is a natural and annual phenomena. The annual ozone
hole was first measured in 1956-57, long before the ozonedestroying CFCs
were in common use. The hole appears at the end of the dark, cold
Antarctic winter, lasts about three to five weeks, and then disappears.
There is no overall or permanent depletion of the ozone layer..
More scare tactics to give liberal environmentalists what they want.
Its all about as reasonable as anti-flouride campaigns and using prayer
instead of anti-biotics. Snake handler stuff. Creationsim.
You are talking about a extremely small minority (less than 1%). Because
few liberals want the government to control all industry, does that make
all liberals communists?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yang" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
27 Jul 2003 11:22:47 PM |
|
|
On 27 Jul 2003 20:31:49 GMT, Flabusius <flabusius@aol.com> wrote:
Overpopulation is a myth. Much of the world's land surface is empty.
Once upon a time Atlantic Cods were so numerous that you literally run
into them. Today they are commercially extinct.
and many countries with dense populations have a higher standard of living
than less crowded countries.
You mean countries such as Easter Island or 19th century Ireland,
which became less croded when the population crashed?
Global warming is a myth. One large volcanic
eruption puts out more polutants than all humans do in one year.
So you're saying we should allow human pollution to happen once every
few hundred years, the same frequency as the occurence of large
volcanic eruption?
-----
Yang
a.a. #28
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Socerey Division
Proudly plonked by Lani Girl and Crazyalec
The Bush 'balance' budget: -455 billion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -2.5 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq Lie: -230 GIs and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
.
|
|
|
| User: "Omphalos" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
28 Jul 2003 08:00:02 AM |
|
|
On Mon 28 Jul 2003 12:22:47a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f24a3a8.2366046@news.cox.net:
On 27 Jul 2003 20:31:49 GMT, Flabusius <flabusius@aol.com> wrote:
Overpopulation is a myth. Much of the world's land surface is empty.
Once upon a time Atlantic Cods were so numerous that you literally run
into them. Today they are commercially extinct.
That's what happens when you try to get all your fish from one area.
and many countries with dense populations have a higher standard of
living than less crowded countries.
You mean countries such as Easter Island or 19th century Ireland,
which became less croded when the population crashed?
How about Hong Kong, New York, Japan, Singapore...the list goes on and on.
Global warming is a myth. One large volcanic
eruption puts out more polutants than all humans do in one year.
So you're saying we should allow human pollution to happen once every
few hundred years, the same frequency as the occurence of large
volcanic eruption?
There are hundreds of volcanic eruptions every year. Equivilent to many large
eruptions.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
28 Jul 2003 01:16:40 AM |
|
|
Yang wrote:
On 27 Jul 2003 20:31:49 GMT, Flabusius <flabusius@aol.com> wrote:
Overpopulation is a myth. Much of the world's land surface is empty.
Once upon a time Atlantic Cods were so numerous that you literally run
into them. Today they are commercially extinct.
This is because we keep treating the sea like we can endlessly use it
for hunter/gatherer type activities. Imagine if we tried to feed the
world of six billion people by just hunting and gathering nuts and roots
on the land. Pretty silly. That's how we treat our oceans.
and many countries with dense populations have a higher standard of living
than less crowded countries.
You mean countries such as Easter Island or 19th century Ireland,
which became less croded when the population crashed?
No, how about Hong Kong or Manhattan?
Global warming is a myth. One large volcanic
eruption puts out more polutants than all humans do in one year.
So you're saying we should allow human pollution to happen once every
few hundred years, the same frequency as the occurence of large
volcanic eruption?
Was Mt. St. Helens a large eruption? I thought it was. If it was, large
eruptions happen every few years, not only every hundred.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
27 Jul 2003 03:17:02 PM |
|
|
Yang wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:01:12 GMT, "Roger R."
<jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Yang" < > wrote in message
news:3f221b36.14396015@news.cox.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 05:06:32 GMT, Omphalos <omphalos@wp.pl> wrote:
On Sat 26 Jul 2003 12:34:17a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f2204a6.8619968@news.cox.net:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:16:42 GMT, Omphalos <!> wrote:
On Tue 22 Jul 2003 11:14:59p, "JJ" <jjj@whateverx.org> wrote in
news:T4nTa.172548$8B.68505@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
***** Limbaugh, he's a fat *****, un-educated (never went to college),
uninformed idiot. As well as the ditto dolts that tend to follow.
Studies show that more educated people tend to vote Republican.
Studies show that more PhD's vote against Republican.
That doesn't make sense. If they were smarter, they wouldn't vote for
Democrats.
Let me guess, you don't have a PhD.
It has been true since Nixon ran the Viet Nam war and pushed the southern
strategy that brought in so many anti-intellectual racist southerners. He
also eliminated to position of Presidential Science Advisor. Bush senior
tried to bring them back into the Presidential office, but this was part of
the reason the conserviatives rejected him in 1992 and didn't turn out to
vote.
Currently the Republican support of the anti evolution people and Bushes
decision to ban funding of stem cell research without talking seriously to
any scientists has kept Scientists from having much interest in voting
Republican. This is the most anti-science administration since the 19th
century.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0307.thompson.html
And as a member of AAAS, I can tell you that many PhD's find GOP's
anti-science bent repulsive.
Conservatives are pro-science. Liberals are pro-emotionalism. Look at
global warming as a perfect example. Liberals think that Kyoto is good
because they have good intentions about it. They don't consider that it
allows countries like China to pollute with impunity.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Omphalos" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
27 Jul 2003 03:29:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun 27 Jul 2003 04:17:02p, Bill Bonde <sstderr@backpacker.com> wrote in
news:3F24333E.291FB0E@backpacker.com:
Yang wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:01:12 GMT, "Roger R."
<jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Yang" < > wrote in message
news:3f221b36.14396015@news.cox.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 05:06:32 GMT, Omphalos <omphalos@wp.pl> wrote:
On Sat 26 Jul 2003 12:34:17a, (Yang) wrote in
news:3f2204a6.8619968@news.cox.net:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:16:42 GMT, Omphalos <!> wrote:
On Tue 22 Jul 2003 11:14:59p, "JJ" <jjj@whateverx.org> wrote in
news:T4nTa.172548$8B.68505@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
***** Limbaugh, he's a fat *****, un-educated (never went to
college), uninformed idiot. As well as the ditto dolts that
tend to follow.
Studies show that more educated people tend to vote Republican.
Studies show that more PhD's vote against Republican.
That doesn't make sense. If they were smarter, they wouldn't vote
for Democrats.
Let me guess, you don't have a PhD.
It has been true since Nixon ran the Viet Nam war and pushed the
southern strategy that brought in so many anti-intellectual racist
southerners. He also eliminated to position of Presidential Science
Advisor. Bush senior tried to bring them back into the Presidential
office, but this was part of the reason the conserviatives rejected
him in 1992 and didn't turn out to vote.
Currently the Republican support of the anti evolution people and
Bushes decision to ban funding of stem cell research without talking
seriously to any scientists has kept Scientists from having much
interest in voting Republican. This is the most anti-science
administration since the 19th century.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0307.thompson.html
And as a member of AAAS, I can tell you that many PhD's find GOP's
anti-science bent repulsive.
Conservatives are pro-science. Liberals are pro-emotionalism. Look at
global warming as a perfect example. Liberals think that Kyoto is good
because they have good intentions about it. They don't consider that it
allows countries like China to pollute with impunity.
Liberals have to scare people into voting for them by proposing absurd
ideas such that Republicans are going to take away civil rights to get
minorities to vote for them. Or they will say if you don't vote Democrat
the Republicas will take away social security and all the old people will
starve. Of course both of these scenarios touted by democrats are complete
lies designed to scare people away from Republicans.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Bonde" |
|
| Title: Re: Rush Limbaugh: US War Deaths Not Worth the Ink Printed On Paper |
26 Jul 2003 01:08:54 AM |
|
|
Yang wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:16:42 GMT, Omphalos <!> wrote:
On Tue 22 Jul 2003 11:14:59p, "JJ" <jjj@whateverx.org> wrote in
news:T4nTa.172548$8B.68505@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
***** Limbaugh, he's a fat *****, un-educated (never went to college),
uninformed idiot. As well as the ditto dolts that tend to follow.
Studies show that more educated people tend to vote Republican.
Studies show that more PhD's vote against Republican.
So they are negative folks who vote against people and not for them?
They are smart enough to know that Democrats suck, at least.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
