StarDragonNight <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
news:f61e0e1e0512291155x3cdce2afx2589445502517c20@mail.gmail.com:
Al Zenner wrote:
"The universe had a beginning but what scientists can't explain is
why. The answer is God." "I see the Bible as a book of truth and
divinely inspired. There has to be an intelligence behind the
complexity of life."—Ken Tanaka, planetary geologist at the U.S.
Geological Survey.
Attachment decoded: untitled-1.txt
Scientists usually have a good grasp of mathematics these days. The
quote you've provided is an indication that Ken Tanaka does not.
I see, therefore neither does this professor in physics:
"The gap between the various kinds of knowledge (scientific and
religious) is rather artificial. . . . Knowledge about the Creator and
knowledge about creation are closely related."—Enrique Hernández,
researcher and professor at the Department of Physics and Theoretical
Chemistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico
Attachment decoded: untitled-1.txt
Based on the sorts of correlations you've made it is clear to me
that you're not clever enough to understand why your correlations
are nonsense no matter how many times let alone how many ways it
might be explained to you.
Score one for the jackass factor.
.
