On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 01:11:32 GMT, "Figinn"
<ihatespam-Figinn@verizon.net> wrote:
"Maxie P. Diddly" <mepie@do.not.spam.me.com> wrote in message
news:vq3au6bc153k1b@corp.supernews.com...
What one person calls a manifestation of the
spiritual presence of Jesus, I call a paranoid delusion.
I'm sure all the followers of Jesus are all gonna just drop their Bibles and
run because of this too ...
You're talking about yourself again, Figinn. Meanwhile, the evidence
for religion being hardwired in the brain is no different than the
magical thinking one finds in people who shows signs of mental
illness. People like you, for instance.
You're the fool who believes in searching for invisible higher powers
<gUhya.46977$Ur1.41183@nwrddc03.gnilink.net> like an "Ultimate
creator" <YabFa.38237$JW6.15108@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>. You're the
illogical moron who keeps asking non-believers to prove negatives like
"Universal Truth" <tCDnb.15686$%e3.11725@nwrddc03.gnilink.net> and
like God itself <DZxya.28545$Hy3.22562@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>. You
even claimed that searching for God is proof of God's existence
<gUhya.46977$Ur1.41183@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>. And when it is pointed
out to you that invisible evidence doesn't count, you claim that it is
just a wrong /opinion/ that your evidence for God is invisible
<news:ll6Ca.3287$JW6.714@nwrddc02.gnilink.net> because you can see it
quite plainly, much like an alcoholic can see pink elephants, and
schizophrenics like Bob/Snyder/Lewis/Chaddock can see vast, left-wing,
feminist conspiracies to undermine masculinity. What's more, is that
you ADMIT that you believe in invisible evidence that only exists in
your mind <lo6Ca.3289$JW6.2460@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>. (Perhaps you
are an honest liar?) I guess you never took critical thinking in
school, eh Figinn? Let's not forget the time you claimed that we
should do away with logic altogether since logic itself cannot prove
that invisible beings like Gods exist in the first place
<wQzya.28761$Hy3.9487@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>. (Ah, so that's why you
don't use logic, eh Figinn?) Which actually makes sense, since logic
just gets in your way, like the time you decided to move the goalposts
(again) and change your definitions of God at will to subvert those
nasty atheists who asked you to define your arguments
<cTCya.29165$Hy3.23126@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>. Of course while you
busy challenging non-believers to prove a negative, you claim that the
God /can't/ be proved <zrKya.30069$Hy3.7465@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>.
Trying to have it both ways, eh Figinn? What's even worse, is that
you prove my contention that religion is nothing other than mass
delusion by claiming you wish you could share your delusions with
those icky non-believers <z2Dya.29216$Hy3.1431@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>.
(You know, Figinn, your wish to share your mental illness with others
reminds me of Jayne's comments about bottling misogyny up and forcing
those nasty feminists to drink it.) Of course, like the good,
tolerant, fundamentalist Christian that you are, anyone who dares
disagree with your immature, illogical, and child-like view of the
world is automatically labeled a disgruntled atheist and/or satanist
<gUhya.46977$Ur1.41183@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>. The irony of course, is
that you believe atheism and satanism are equivalent belief systems,
and that merely demonstrates how removed from reality you are, and how
seriously you take your fundamentalist Christian beliefs. You put on
the air of /acting/ respectful to other religions, but when it comes
down to it, your God is top dog.
--
"Given for one instant an intelligence which could comprehend all the
forces by which nature is animated and the respective positions of the
things which compose it...nothing would be uncertain, and the future as
the past would be laid out before its eyes."
- Pierre Simon de Laplace
.
|
