Hijacked 767s hitting buildings are not a common occurrence, however, 3
buildings disintegrating in one day for whatever reason suggests it is
a common occurrence. Remember WTC7 wasn't hit with anything and it
still collapsed.

Everyday there are bombs, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, missles,
etc causing havoc all over the world. Iraq has been under attack for
2.5 years, where are all the videos of buildings disintegrating in
Iraq? Surely they don't building them better over there do they?

The Fema reports are not supported by any evidence, they are people
theorizing on how the towers "must" have fell based on airplane
impacts, fires, or other damage. There is nothing that proves the
theory is true. There is nothing wrong with a theory, but it should
not be taken as fact until it is proven. However, Professor Jones
makes this statement:

"The official explanation - that fires caused structural damage that
caused the buildings to collapse - can't be backed up by either
testing or history"

From here: http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html

Can't be backed up by either testing or history. Then the official
story is a theory, and you must concede that.

You make the statement "Buildings have been known to collapse". Well,
thats very exciting, however, I want to see a building disintegrate
into a pile of dust and rubble, including all core and supporting beams
at or near free fall speeds. It was a pretty common occurrence in New
York on 9/11, surely it has happened elsewhere, where is the evidence
of this?