Re: The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia



 Religions > Atheism > Re: The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Atheism
User: "bob&carole"
Date: 08 Oct 2006 07:45:20 AM
Object: Re: The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia
bobandcarole wrote:

The truth about 'gay' pedophilia





Liberals are experts at framing debates in their favor. Since the Foley
fiasco hit the news, the emphasis has been on evils lurking within the
Republican Party.

Incredibly, political editor Brian E. Crowley of the Palm Beach Post
opined, "Rumors that Foley is gay have swirled around him for years.
... But on Friday, whether Foley was a homosexual or a heterosexual no
longer seemed to matter."

Really? Why would that be considered inconsequential? Could it be
because the Democrat Party embraces legalizing homosexual marriage and
inserting homosexual material into public school textbooks designed for
children as young as grammar school, as demonstrated in recent efforts
by the California Legislature to indoctrinate students? That is the
real story behind this media blitz that Democrats want Americans to
miss.

While the leftist media focuses on the political ramifications
surrounding Foley in an effort to gain points for liberal candidates in
the upcoming election, the fact that a homosexual rather than a
heterosexual preyed on a young male is being oddly overlooked. Few
people are talking about it. And the question is "Why not?" The answer
is important because to ignore it is to dismiss the real plight of many
homosexuals today and their impact upon our culture, our children and
our political scene.

Foley admits that he is a homosexual. Dare the question be asked
whether homosexuals commit higher rates of molestation than
heterosexuals do? Or are the thought police hard at work silencing the
possible implications?

English professor Karla Jay, Ph.D., and well-educated journalist Allen
Young, both homosexual activists, conducted the first major survey on
homosexuality in America in 1979. Their work is still cited in academic
studies and involved over 5,000 homosexuals from all walks of life.
Titled "The Gay Report," the study published data on underage sex,
disease, gross promiscuity, suicidal tendencies and more.

One cannot help but applaud the honesty of these two homosexuals in
publishing the results of their study, which documented that "23
percent of respondents admitted to having had sex with youths aged
13-15, while 19 percent felt positive about sexual activity within this
age group." Tragically, 50 percent of the males in their survey
experienced their first sexual encounter at age 15 or less.

In spite of the fact that two gay researchers produced "The Gay
Report," radical homosexual activists dismiss it as outdated. This is
ironic considering they so often cite the much older 1948 "10 percent
of society is gay" statistic from the oft-disputed Alfred Kinsey study.


But out of courtesy for their concerns, are there other esteemed elites
drawing the same conclusions? Contrary to the homosexual assertion that
heterosexual molestations outnumber those committed by homosexuals,
Yale and Harvard-connected psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover states that
"careful studies show that pedophilia is far more common among
homosexuals than heterosexuals." Satinover adds, "The greater absolute
number of heterosexual cases reflects the fact that heterosexual males
outnumber homosexual males by approximately 36 to 1. Heterosexual child
molestation cases outnumber homosexual cases by only 11 to 1, implying
that pedophilia is more than three times more common among
homosexuals."

So considering the fact that this type of sexual interest is shown by
studies to occur more often in homosexual populations, is it any
surprise that Mark Foley admitted he himself was molested as a teenager
by a clergyman?

According to a report by Gregory Rogers featured on the website for the
National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, such
issues raise "immediate questions ... should gay priests be allowed
access to Sunday Schools or youth groups?" Instead of asking that
question, however, the liberal cohorts shift the spotlight off the
homosexuals themselves and onto the church as a whole, just as they're
now doing with the Republicans even though they themselves have a
stained record in this regard.

While pointing their fingers at Republicans, who may have overlooked
gross evil while focusing on political gain, liberals overlook a
tremendous evil themselves by ignoring the truth about homosexual
behavior. They fail to speak out for the innocent children caught in
the path of a rabid homosexual agenda fueled by wounded people who
refuse to change.

The truth is that the majority of Republicans oppose same-sex marriage
and the insertion of homosexual dogma into schools, while most
Democrats support it.

As David Kupelian states in his groundbreaking best seller "The
Marketing of Evil," "The end game is not only to bring about the
complete acceptance of homosexuality, including same-sex marriage, but
also to prohibit and even criminalize public criticism of
homosexuality."

And all of this at the expense of our children.


http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52330

.

User: "Living Church of God... work of the DEVIL?"

Title: Re: The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia 08 Oct 2006 12:27:13 PM
On 8 Oct 2006 00:45:20 -0700,
Cowardly-Anonymous Bob [ ? ] "bobandcarole,"
<bobandcarole100@hotmail.com>being exponentially
too ignorant to write anything particularly literate,
himself, PARROTED the following LYING hate-swill:

The truth about 'gay' pedophilia

"Truth." MMMmmmmph. BWAHAHAhahahahaha!

[Social] Liberals...

...a.k.a. sensible, fair-minded, intelligent,compassionate, and
personal-liberty-defending egalitarians who constitute the primary
bulwark against the hateful tyranny that would sweep the nation
if the loathsome agendas of America's own home-grown Taliban,
the (IR)-Religious Radical Right -- the RRR Cult -- were to prevail...

...are experts at framing debates in their favor.

Of course they are! After all, they are *intelligent* enough to
BE social liberals, right? And a person would have to be incredibly
*dumb* to be UNable to frame debates when ALL of the relevant
facts SUPPORT the rights and liberties that they defend. In the
case of both of the RRR Cult's primary hate-agendas:
-- the crusade to FORCE millions of girls and women
to gestate-to-term against their will (a very real,
9-month-long form of RAPE)... and,
-- the crusade to *deny* access to gays of across-
the board EQUAL rights that all heterosexuals can
access with no problem... BASED of the *triviality*
of their sexual orientation. (I.e., on the ABSURD
basis of the way a group of people happen to
enjoy sex in *private*, which is NO one else's
business.)
....NO relevant *facts* even EXIST which can be used to argue
effectively in favor of those ludicrous and heinous stances.
So it's NO WONDER that when it comes to debating, egalitarians
win hands down. Their bigoted and doltish opponents have NOTHING
going for them in their debating arsenal but specious and vacuous
whining, propaganda, outright lies, shrill and dishonest emotional
appeals, and ludicrously empty rhetoric. NOTHING else.
(Want the proof of that? Just look at the postings and response
posts of the RRR Cultist (leaders or lemmings... it makes no diff-
erence) and you'll see that which at *first* glance appears to be
a logical argument, in many (but not most) cases. But those argu-
ments don't stand up to the TRUTH Test. Once assailed by the
bright spotlight of the relevant *facts*, the bigots' arguments, no
matter HOW well-organized they may seem to have been at first
glance, vaporize like early-morning ground fog under a brilliant
sunrise. NOTE: Just about the *only* thing that those bigots are
any good at is constructing and spewing lying propaganda. After
all, that's ALL they've had in their arsenal from Day One, so they've
become adept at it. But when that verbiage is SCRUTINIZED, one
sees very quickly that the arguments are DEVOID of relevant facts,
and thus are vacuous and ludicrous at bottom. So fall apart like a
house of cards in a Category 5 hurricane.)

Since the Foley fiasco hit the news, the emphasis has been
on evils lurking within the Republican Party.

GEE!!! What a... uh... "surprise." Another bright spotlight
being shone squarely on America's bigot-infested Culture of
Corruption.

Incredibly, political editor Brian E. Crowley of the Palm Beach Post
opined, "Rumors that Foley is gay have swirled around him for years.
... But on Friday, whether Foley was a homosexual or a heterosexual
no longer seemed to matter."

Really? Why would that be considered inconsequential?

The ANSWER? Because sexual orientation isn't even *remotely* the
issue in this case. Foley could *just* as easily have been a HETERO-
sexual predator whose attentions were focused upon FEMALE pages.
But just because he happened to be a GAY predator (and predators
are found within BOTH orientations; neither group is free of them),
the homophobic bigots of the RRR Cult dishonestly seized upon Foley's
sexual orientation in yet another LAME attempt to paint homosexuality
as the villain. Honesty is FAR from being the long suit of the RRR
Cult. It missed *that* mark by light-years!
To wit:

Could it be because the Democrat Party...

Correction: The correct name of the party is "the Democratic
Party." Or would you like to be consistent and refer to the
Republican Party as "the Republic Party?" Calling the Democratic
Party the "Democrat Party" sounds stilted and stupid. Which, of
course, is the objective of the bigots employing that terminology.

... embraces legalizing homosexual marriage...

Yes, to the extent that it RECOGNIZES that there is NO good
reason to deny marriage to any couple over such a triviality as its
gender composition. All anyone needs to do is look at the desperate
measures that bigots take to effect that denial. Such as passing
a host of laws entitled, "Defense of Marriage Act." "DEFENSE??
Against *what*?!?
Consider this: There is NO WAY that any opposite-sex couple's
marriage could even begin to be harmed if a same-sex couple in
their community finds that they can be legally married, and then ties
the knot. THAT is the FACT of the matter. The brilliant, spot-
lighting fact under which all of the specious and idiotic "arguments"
against same-sex marriage instantly crumble into dust.
We've seen this before, going back into the dark era when
segregationists (the equally-vapid equivalent of today's RRR cult
lemmings with respect to their mentality, hatefulness, and bigotry)
infested the South, and whined that "miscegenation" laws needed
to be retained lest interracial marriage would be the ruination of
society. In 1967, in "Loving vs. Virginia," the U.S. Supreme Court
very reasonably, logically, and sensibly struck down ALL of the
remaining laws against interracial marriage. And the sky didn't fall.
America is the better for it.
And once this moronic hatefulness toward same-sex marriage
becomes an equally-distant memory, society will be the better for
THAT, too.
<Remaining hate-swill flushed. Nothing worthwhile lost.>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.

User: "Craig Chilton -- Drive the Loathsome Agendas of the RRR Cult into Extinction."

Title: Re: The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia 08 Oct 2006 12:43:38 PM
On 8 Oct 2006 00:45:20 -0700,
Cowardly-Anonymous Bob [ ? ] "bobandcarole,"
<bobandcarole100@hotmail.com>being exponentially
too ignorant to write anything particularly literate,
himself, PARROTED the following LYING hate-swill:

The truth about 'gay' pedophilia

"Truth." MMMmmmmph. BWAHAHAhahahahaha!

[Social] Liberals...

...a.k.a. sensible, fair-minded, intelligent,compassionate, and
personal-liberty-defending egalitarians who constitute the primary
bulwark against the hateful tyranny that would sweep the nation
if the loathsome agendas of America's own home-grown Taliban,
the (IR)-Religious Radical Right -- the RRR Cult -- were to prevail...

...are experts at framing debates in their favor.

Of course they are! After all, they are *intelligent* enough to
BE social liberals, right? And a person would have to be incredibly
*dumb* to be UNable to frame debates when ALL of the relevant
facts SUPPORT the rights and liberties that they defend. In the
case of both of the RRR Cult's primary hate-agendas:
-- the crusade to FORCE millions of girls and women
to gestate-to-term against their will (a very real,
9-month-long form of RAPE)... and,
-- the crusade to *deny* access to gays of across-
the board EQUAL rights that all heterosexuals can
access with no problem... BASED of the *triviality*
of their sexual orientation. (I.e., on the ABSURD
basis of the way a group of people happen to
enjoy sex in *private*, which is NO one else's
business.)
....NO relevant *facts* even EXIST which can be used to argue
effectively in favor of those ludicrous and heinous stances.
So it's NO WONDER that when it comes to debating, egalitarians
win hands down. Their bigoted and doltish opponents have NOTHING
going for them in their debating arsenal but specious and vacuous
whining, propaganda, outright lies, shrill and dishonest emotional
appeals, and ludicrously empty rhetoric. NOTHING else.
(Want the proof of that? Just look at the postings and response
posts of the RRR Cultist (leaders or lemmings... it makes no diff-
erence) and you'll see that which at *first* glance appears to be
a logical argument, in many (but not most) cases. But those argu-
ments don't stand up to the TRUTH Test. Once assailed by the
bright spotlight of the relevant *facts*, the bigots' arguments, no
matter HOW well-organized they may seem to have been at first
glance, vaporize like early-morning ground fog under a brilliant
sunrise. NOTE: Just about the *only* thing that those bigots are
any good at is constructing and spewing lying propaganda. After
all, that's ALL they've had in their arsenal from Day One, so they've
become adept at it. But when that verbiage is SCRUTINIZED, one
sees very quickly that the arguments are DEVOID of relevant facts,
and thus are vacuous and ludicrous at bottom. So fall apart like a
house of cards in a Category 5 hurricane.)

Since the Foley fiasco hit the news, the emphasis has been
on evils lurking within the Republican Party.

GEE!!! What a... uh... "surprise." Another bright spotlight
being shone squarely on America's bigot-infested Culture of
Corruption.

Incredibly, political editor Brian E. Crowley of the Palm Beach Post
opined, "Rumors that Foley is gay have swirled around him for years.
... But on Friday, whether Foley was a homosexual or a heterosexual
no longer seemed to matter."

Really? Why would that be considered inconsequential?

The ANSWER? Because sexual orientation isn't even *remotely* the
issue in this case. Foley could *just* as easily have been a HETERO-
sexual predator whose attentions were focused upon FEMALE pages.
But just because he happened to be a GAY predator (and predators
are found within BOTH orientations; neither group is free of them),
the homophobic bigots of the RRR Cult dishonestly seized upon Foley's
sexual orientation in yet another LAME attempt to paint homosexuality
as the villain. Honesty is FAR from being the long suit of the RRR
Cult. It missed *that* mark by light-years!
To wit:

Could it be because the Democrat Party...

Correction: The correct name of the party is "the Democratic
Party." Or would you like to be consistent and refer to the
Republican Party as "the Republic Party?" Calling the Democratic
Party the "Democrat Party" sounds stilted and stupid. Which, of
course, is the objective of the bigots employing that terminology.

... embraces legalizing homosexual marriage...

Yes, to the extent that it RECOGNIZES that there is NO good
reason to deny marriage to any couple over such a triviality as its
gender composition. All anyone needs to do is look at the desperate
measures that bigots take to effect that denial. Such as passing
a host of laws entitled, "Defense of Marriage Act." "DEFENSE??
Against *what*?!?
Consider this: There is NO WAY that any opposite-sex couple's
marriage could even begin to be harmed if a same-sex couple in
their community finds that they can be legally married, and then ties
the knot. THAT is the FACT of the matter. The brilliant, spot-
lighting fact under which all of the specious and idiotic "arguments"
against same-sex marriage instantly crumble into dust.
We've seen this before, going back into the dark era when
segregationists (the equally-vapid equivalent of today's RRR cult
lemmings with respect to their mentality, hatefulness, and bigotry)
infested the South, and whined that "miscegenation" laws needed
to be retained lest interracial marriage would be the ruination of
society. In 1967, in "Loving vs. Virginia," the U.S. Supreme Court
very reasonably, logically, and sensibly struck down ALL of the
remaining laws against interracial marriage. And the sky didn't fall.
America is the better for it.
And once this moronic hatefulness toward same-sex marriage
becomes an equally-distant memory, society will be the better for
THAT, too.
<Remaining hate-swill flushed. Nothing worthwhile lost.>
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia
Re: The legacy of mark foley....The truth about gay pedophilia
FOLEY SUES CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR $1 BILLION.... Says Church Made Him a Gay Pedophile...
IS IT SIMPLY THE CASE THAT Foley's MOM MIGHT BE GAY?
Foley's problem: He's a gay pedophile
OT: Conor Foley
Timeline for the Earth: 7000 BC - 700 AD, Tod Foley 1991
hi,
Teenage congressional page 'freaked out' by e-mail exchange with Rep. Foley (R-Fla.)
GOPedophile Mark Foley IMs Underage Teen: "Do I Make You Horny?" (GOP=Grand Old Pedophiles)
GOPedophile Tom Foley Wasn't Even the FIRST GOPedophile Apprehended This Week! (GOP=Grand Old Pedophiles)
Bush Stonewalled Requests to Investiagte GOPedophile Tom Foley (GOP, RCC, Those Moral Pedophiles)
More Foley IM Messages for GOP Shill Fred Stone (GOP=Grand Old Pedophiles)
GOPedophiles Knew About Tom Foley... Since 2001 (GOP=Grand Old Pedophiles)
Photo of Bush Prasing Mark Foley's Fight Against "Pedophiles"
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER