Path: border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed101.telia.com!nf02.dk.telia.net!atl-c05.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!postnews.google.com!g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <nospam6@heartmdphd.com>
Newsgroups: alt.support.diabetes,sci.med.cardiology,alt.christnet.public,alt.atheism
Subject: Re: The Secret to Low-Carb Diet Success: Eat Less
Date: 3 Dec 2005 00:33:48 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 97
Message-ID: <1133598828.159730.166100@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <438ddc62$0$76286$4d5ecec7@reader.city-net.com>
<438F45FC.2EA7D262@heartmdphd.com>
<yu4kf.8901$wf.6030@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.19.39.224
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1133598833 32261 127.0.0.1 (3 Dec 2005 08:33:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:

This is a collaborative effort involving many other
physicians since the 2PD-OMER Approach is not to be undertaken without
such supervision especially when there are medications involved as is
often the case.

Jeff wrote:

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <andrew@heartmdphd.com> wrote in message
news:438F45FC.2EA7D262@heartmdphd.com...

(...)

Someday, he will learn about the 2PD-OMER Approach:

Well, I have. The "Approach" is a diet

If that were true, it would not be possible to combine it with a
low-carb diet (in an attempt to bring this back on-topic).

that has very little backing by
science.

Actually there is (even if this backing is presently unpublished and
will remain so per the LORD's will).

There is no good reason, backed by science, to think that 2 pounds
is the correct amount of food for everyone.

Truth is a good reason that is more than backed by science (Indeed,
truth is the underpinnings of science).

(...)

Press release about a larger study (more than 625,550 people for more
than 5 years):

A press release?

Yes.

A larger study?

Yes.

*****.

The manner of your refutation just decreased your credibility to zero,
dear Jeff.

There was no such study.

In truth there is. Your denying it is not going to make it disappear.

The
number comes from the Bible.

You will have to make up your mind about whether you believe in chance
(ie coincidence) or in GOD. You can not have it both ways.

Mr. Chung claims this large number.

This large number is the truth.

With such a
huge number of people, one would explect there to be some peer-review

There has been. This is a collaborative effort involving many other
physicians since the 2PD-OMER Approach is not to be undertaken without
such supervision especially when there are medications involved as is
often the case.

or a
grant.

The 2PD-OMER Approach is free, the participants are unpaid volunteers,
the communications have been via email, the time provided by the
LORD... the costs have been negligible.