| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
27 Oct 2005 11:17:48 PM |
| Object: |
Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
RoB WADe wrote:
There is only one word to describe it: Evil
JOE FITZGERALD
Jeffrey Curley's death was so barbaric it hurts to even contemplate it
now, yet that's exactly what we need to do, beginning with a
willingness to call it what it was, which was evil.
That's a word we don't hear much anymore.
It's almost as if it's no longer acceptable. Defense attorneys
certainly don't want to hear it, nor do shrinks who, like lawyers, have
a personal stake in denying its existence.
But evil does exist, as surely as love and goodness do.
Two years ago, at a Mattapan funeral for Jamal Jackson, the basketball
star who was slain, Pastor A.L. Foxworth walked to the pew where
Jamal's mother, Arnette, was seated, and spoke directly to her for all
to hear.
"I not only sympathize," he said. "I empathize. I have a son your son's
age, and every time my son leaves my house, even though I'm a man of
God _ saved, sanctified and filled with His spirit _ there's something
that pulls at me. Even though I walk by faith, I don't lack fear. It
seems as if I can't sleep easily until he comes back home again.
"I know he's a good boy. But that doesn't matter in these evil days.
The Bible says `redeem the time for the days are evil.' Our children
aren't evil, but the days are evil. When they go out into these
streets, no matter how good they are, evil is all around them."
It can't be said any clearer or more accurately than that, and yet
whenever evil makes its presence known here in Massachusetts we are
paralyzed by indecision, permitting apologists and activists to do our
thinking for us, even when we know their rationalizations are wrong.
If Jeffrey Curley's savage killing doesn't shake us to our core,
freeing us from that timidity, nothing ever will.
We're told that at least one of his alleged murderers was drawn to
having sex with kids, and indeed violated the boy's dead body.
Think about that for a moment.
Then remember the outrage of the local gay community a year ago when
its annual Pride March was excoriated here for having among its
contingents one that waved a sign insisting "all censorship is wrong,"
declaring "pedophiles have rights, too."
When the heat got so intense that even the Globe took notice of it, gay
leaders vowed such behavior would not be condoned in the future.
Really?
Four months ago, when that Pride March again polluted city streets, one
contingent calling itself Pansexual Pagans was led by a lowlife in a
polka-dot jock who waved a banner reading, "We are all pedophiles."
No cops stepped in, nor did any onlookers boo, nor did any
self-described gay leader express subsequent regret, much less a
clearly owed apology.
So once more, in broad daylight in downtown Boston, evil triumphed over
common decency, flaunting itself with impunity, secure in the knowledge
that good men and women would continue to stand by and do nothing.
While you're thinking about that, think about this.
Because the heinousness of this particular crime has even the loopiest
liberals running for cover, talk of a death penalty is fashionable
again.
Indeed, Middlesex County DA Tom Reilly says he's considering having
this tried as a federal crime because federal crimes allow for capital
punishment.
Good for him.
But better yet, rather than riding the coattails of this case, here's
hoping, if he runs for attorney general, he will make capital
punishment the major issue. Surely if he feels that strongly about it
this morning, he should feel just as strongly about it on the campaign
trail.
In the name of Jeffrey Curley, this is the kind of leadership we need,
the kind that will call evil what it is, and then have the courage to
act accordingly.
This is simply history repeating itself. Sodom all over again. This
goes back to my earlier post elsewhere referring to original sin.
Understanding original sin and its effects is crucial to understanding
the sacrament of baptism and its effects. Scripture tells us that our
first parents, Adam and Eve, lost their communion with God, *control
over their passions*, immortality, and a host of other good things that
God had originally intended all people to enjoy as part of an unfallen
human nature. By committing their "original sin," Adam and Eve
introduced sin into the world, and with sin came sickness, strife, and
death. Some non-Catholic groups deny the reality of original sin, but
the Bible is clear that it's a sad fact.
To deny the existence of original sin is to walk hand-in-hand with
Satan, though you may not realize it.
.
|
|
| User: "Torch" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 01:01:52 AM |
|
|
<vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1130473068.706956.304250@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
RoB WADe wrote:
There is only one word to describe it: Evil
JOE FITZGERALD
Jeffrey Curley's death was so barbaric it hurts to even contemplate it
now, yet that's exactly what we need to do, beginning with a
willingness to call it what it was, which was evil.
That's a word we don't hear much anymore.
It's almost as if it's no longer acceptable. Defense attorneys
certainly don't want to hear it, nor do shrinks who, like lawyers, have
a personal stake in denying its existence.
But evil does exist, as surely as love and goodness do.
Two years ago, at a Mattapan funeral for Jamal Jackson, the basketball
star who was slain, Pastor A.L. Foxworth walked to the pew where
Jamal's mother, Arnette, was seated, and spoke directly to her for all
to hear.
"I not only sympathize," he said. "I empathize. I have a son your son's
age, and every time my son leaves my house, even though I'm a man of
God _ saved, sanctified and filled with His spirit _ there's something
that pulls at me. Even though I walk by faith, I don't lack fear. It
seems as if I can't sleep easily until he comes back home again.
"I know he's a good boy. But that doesn't matter in these evil days.
The Bible says `redeem the time for the days are evil.' Our children
aren't evil, but the days are evil. When they go out into these
streets, no matter how good they are, evil is all around them."
It can't be said any clearer or more accurately than that, and yet
whenever evil makes its presence known here in Massachusetts we are
paralyzed by indecision, permitting apologists and activists to do our
thinking for us, even when we know their rationalizations are wrong.
If Jeffrey Curley's savage killing doesn't shake us to our core,
freeing us from that timidity, nothing ever will.
We're told that at least one of his alleged murderers was drawn to
having sex with kids, and indeed violated the boy's dead body.
Think about that for a moment.
Then remember the outrage of the local gay community a year ago when
its annual Pride March was excoriated here for having among its
contingents one that waved a sign insisting "all censorship is wrong,"
declaring "pedophiles have rights, too."
When the heat got so intense that even the Globe took notice of it, gay
leaders vowed such behavior would not be condoned in the future.
Really?
Four months ago, when that Pride March again polluted city streets, one
contingent calling itself Pansexual Pagans was led by a lowlife in a
polka-dot jock who waved a banner reading, "We are all pedophiles."
No cops stepped in, nor did any onlookers boo, nor did any
self-described gay leader express subsequent regret, much less a
clearly owed apology.
So once more, in broad daylight in downtown Boston, evil triumphed over
common decency, flaunting itself with impunity, secure in the knowledge
that good men and women would continue to stand by and do nothing.
While you're thinking about that, think about this.
Because the heinousness of this particular crime has even the loopiest
liberals running for cover, talk of a death penalty is fashionable
again.
Indeed, Middlesex County DA Tom Reilly says he's considering having
this tried as a federal crime because federal crimes allow for capital
punishment.
Good for him.
But better yet, rather than riding the coattails of this case, here's
hoping, if he runs for attorney general, he will make capital
punishment the major issue. Surely if he feels that strongly about it
this morning, he should feel just as strongly about it on the campaign
trail.
In the name of Jeffrey Curley, this is the kind of leadership we need,
the kind that will call evil what it is, and then have the courage to
act accordingly.
This is simply history repeating itself. Sodom all over again. This
goes back to my earlier post elsewhere referring to original sin.
Understanding original sin and its effects is crucial to understanding
the sacrament of baptism and its effects. Scripture tells us that our
first parents, Adam and Eve, lost their communion with God, *control
over their passions*, immortality, and a host of other good things that
God had originally intended all people to enjoy as part of an unfallen
human nature. By committing their "original sin," Adam and Eve
introduced sin into the world, and with sin came sickness, strife, and
death.
but your sick evil god new this would happen when he created adam and eve so
they didnt introduce evil into the world, your god did
Some non-Catholic groups deny the reality of original sin,
because they realise that the logic is incoherent
but
the Bible is clear that it's a sad fact.
To deny the existence of original sin is to walk hand-in-hand with
Satan, though you may not realize it.
acording to your irrational scriptures god created satan aswell - also
knowing full well that he would rebel and become evil - so yet again your
god is the first cause of all evil
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual adults.
I would rather leave my children in the care of an open balanced gay person
than with a bunch of twisted, sexually repressed religious types - just look
at the catholic priesthood!.
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 11:13:52 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/pedophilia.htm
"plenty of evidence indicates that homosexuals and bisexuals are
notably relatively overrepresented among pedophiles "
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
.
|
|
|
| User: "Torch" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 11:27:44 AM |
|
|
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 04:11:47 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
.
|
|
|
| User: "michael james" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 05:36:14 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
Well, I don't have any 'research' but I am gay, have been all my life,
and of all the gays that I have met in that time, none were pedophiles.
So I cannot accept any of your propanda which you call research.
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 01:24:25 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:36:14 -0400, michael james
<cadlib@videotron.ca> wrote:
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
Well, I don't have any 'research' but I am gay, have been all my life,
and of all the gays that I have met in that time, none were pedophiles.
So I cannot accept any of your propanda which you call research.
No matter if you have known ***** pedophiles or not and whether or
not you can "accept" the facts is completely irrelevant.
Like it or not facts are facts, of course this is embarrassing to
faggots who seek to destroy the moral fabric of society by *forcing*
humans to tolerate them and accept them as equal and grant them
special rights and privileges.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
.
|
|
|
| User: "michael james" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 03:01:33 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:36:14 -0400, michael james
<cadlib@videotron.ca> wrote:
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
Well, I don't have any 'research' but I am gay, have been all my life,
and of all the gays that I have met in that time, none were pedophiles.
So I cannot accept any of your propanda which you call research.
No matter if you have known ***** pedophiles or not and whether or
not you can "accept" the facts is completely irrelevant.
Like it or not facts are facts, of course this is embarrassing to
faggots who seek to destroy the moral fabric of society by *forcing*
humans to tolerate them and accept them as equal and grant them
special rights and privileges.
no special rights and privileges. the SAME rights and privileges. Dork!
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 02:06:09 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:36:14 -0400, michael james
<cadlib@videotron.ca> wrote:
=20
=20
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message=20
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:=
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows =
that=20
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual=
=20
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal=
with it.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are =
LESS=20
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipath=
y
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do no=
thing."--Edmund Burke
Well, I don't have any 'research' but I am gay, have been all my life, =
and of all the gays that I have met in that time, none were pedophiles.=
So I cannot accept any of your propanda which you call research.
=20
=20
No matter if you have known ***** pedophiles or not and whether or
not you can "accept" the facts is completely irrelevant.
Facts can be accepted, but, you have not provided any. Just hate=20
propaganda from a physical therapist. May as well make it up yourself.
=20
Like it or not facts are facts, of course this is embarrassing to
faggots who seek to destroy the moral fabric of society by *forcing*
humans to tolerate them and accept them as equal and grant them
special rights and privileges.
=20
Facts are embarrassing to you or you would not lie so often.
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 07:57:41 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
=20
=20
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message=20
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows th=
at=20
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual=20
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
=20
=20
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
He said peer reviewed. Did you not understand that? You are a moron=20
and a liar.
=20
=20
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LE=
SS=20
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
=20
=20
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
=20
No in your case, you clearly are a latent homosexual. No doubt about=20
it. You are far to obsessed to be otherwise.
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Secretary of HomInt3rn" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 11:49:50 PM |
|
|
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to BYTE ME!:
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" wrote:
"James Riske" wrote...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
He said peer reviewed. Did you not understand that? You are a moron
and a liar.
Here's some help for Jimmy-boy:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=peer
peer2 Pronunciation Key (pîr)
n.
1. A person who has equal standing with another or others, as in rank,
class, or age: children who are easily influenced by their peers.
2.
1. A nobleman.
2. A man who holds a peerage by descent or appointment.
3. Archaic. A companion; a fellow: ?To stray away into these forests
drear,/Alone, without a peer? (John Keats).
peer
n 1: a person who is of equal standing with another in a group [syn: equal,
match, compeer] 2: a nobleman (duke or marquis or earl or viscount or
baron) who is a member of the British peerage v : look searchingly; "We
peered into the back of the shop to see whether a salesman was around"
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=review
re·view Pronunciation Key (r-vy)
v. re·viewed, re·view·ing, re·views
v. tr.
1. To look over, study, or examine again.
2. To consider retrospectively; look back on.
3. To examine with an eye to criticism or correction: reviewed the
research findings.
4. To write or give a critical report on (a new work or performance, for
example).
5. Law. To reexamine (an action or determination) judicially, especially
in a higher court, in order to correct possible errors.
6. To subject to a formal inspection, especially a military inspection.
v. intr.
1. To go over or restudy material: reviewing for a final exam.
2. To write critical reviews, especially for a newspaper or magazine.
n.
1. A reexamination or reconsideration.
2. A retrospective view or survey.
3.
1. A restudying of subject matter.
2. An exercise for use in restudying material.
4. An inspection or examination for the purpose of evaluation.
5.
1. A report or essay giving a critical estimate of a work or
performance.
2. A periodical devoted to articles and essays on current affairs,
literature, or art.
6.
1. A formal military inspection.
2. A formal military ceremony held in honor of a person or
occasion.
7. Law. A judicial reexamination, especially by a higher court, of an
action or determination.
8. A musical show consisting of often satirical skits, songs, and dances;
a revue.
review
n 1: a new appraisal or evaluation [syn: reappraisal, revaluation,
reassessment] 2: an essay or article that gives a critical evaluation (as
of a book or play) [syn: critique, critical review, review article] 3: a
subsequent examination of a patient for the purpose of monitoring earlier
treatment [syn: follow-up, followup, reexamination] 4: (accounting) a
service (less exhaustive than an audit) that provides some assurance to
interested parties as to the reliability of financial data [syn: limited
review] 5: a variety show with topical sketches and songs and dancing and
comedians [syn: revue] 6: a periodical that publishes critical essays on
current affairs or literature or art 7: a summary at the end that repeats
the substance of a longer discussion [syn: recapitulation, recap] 8: (law)
a judicial reexamination of the proceedings of a court (especially by an
appellate court) 9: practice intended to polish performance or refresh the
memory [syn: brushup] 10: a formal or official examination; "the platoon
stood ready for review"; "we had to wait for the inspection before we could
use the elevator" [syn: inspection] v 1: look at again; examine again;
"let's review your situation" [syn: reexamine] 2: appraise critically; "She
reviews books for the New York Times"; "Please critique this
performance" [syn: critique] 3: hold a review (of troops) [syn: go over,
survey] 4: refresh one's memory; "I reviewed the material before the
test" [syn: brush up, refresh] 5: look back upon (a period of time,
sequence of events, etc.); remember; "she reviewed her achievements with
pride" [syn: look back, retrospect]
Now, there's a risk(e) that you don't understand what this is getting at,
Jimmy, or that you forgot, so I'll reiterate: peer reviewed research has
more credibility than research put up by a physical therapist. Physical
therapists are not psychologists or psychiatrists.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
No in your case, you clearly are a latent homosexual. No doubt about
it. You are far to obsessed to be otherwise.
Classic latent gay. Closet Case of the Month for alt.usenet.kooks, in fact,
I think.
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! "The personal _is_ political."
Bent Depraved N. Deviant *****-Smoker, Esq., Superfaggot
"Stupidity excuses nothing. It's only a reason...." -- Phxbrd
Economic Left/Right: -7.63 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
"The whining has just begun." -- John Wentzky
Killfiled by: directory; Anim8rfsk
"It's not nice to misrepresent Mother Nature."
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 01:33:37 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:49:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomInt3rn
<ý|<®åñ539ô9@\/\/0é|\/|.6®0> wrote:
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Goddess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to BYTE ME!:
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" wrote:
"James Riske" wrote...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
He said peer reviewed. Did you not understand that? You are a moron
and a liar.
Here's some help for Jimmy-boy:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=peer
peer2 Pronunciation Key (pîr)
n.
1. A person who has equal standing with another or others, as in rank,
class, or age: children who are easily influenced by their peers.
2.
1. A nobleman.
2. A man who holds a peerage by descent or appointment.
3. Archaic. A companion; a fellow: ?To stray away into these forests
drear,/Alone, without a peer? (John Keats).
peer
n 1: a person who is of equal standing with another in a group [syn: equal,
match, compeer] 2: a nobleman (duke or marquis or earl or viscount or
baron) who is a member of the British peerage v : look searchingly; "We
peered into the back of the shop to see whether a salesman was around"
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=review
re·view Pronunciation Key (r-vy)
v. re·viewed, re·view·ing, re·views
v. tr.
1. To look over, study, or examine again.
2. To consider retrospectively; look back on.
3. To examine with an eye to criticism or correction: reviewed the
research findings.
4. To write or give a critical report on (a new work or performance, for
example).
5. Law. To reexamine (an action or determination) judicially, especially
in a higher court, in order to correct possible errors.
6. To subject to a formal inspection, especially a military inspection.
v. intr.
1. To go over or restudy material: reviewing for a final exam.
2. To write critical reviews, especially for a newspaper or magazine.
n.
1. A reexamination or reconsideration.
2. A retrospective view or survey.
3.
1. A restudying of subject matter.
2. An exercise for use in restudying material.
4. An inspection or examination for the purpose of evaluation.
5.
1. A report or essay giving a critical estimate of a work or
performance.
2. A periodical devoted to articles and essays on current affairs,
literature, or art.
6.
1. A formal military inspection.
2. A formal military ceremony held in honor of a person or
occasion.
7. Law. A judicial reexamination, especially by a higher court, of an
action or determination.
8. A musical show consisting of often satirical skits, songs, and dances;
a revue.
review
n 1: a new appraisal or evaluation [syn: reappraisal, revaluation,
reassessment] 2: an essay or article that gives a critical evaluation (as
of a book or play) [syn: critique, critical review, review article] 3: a
subsequent examination of a patient for the purpose of monitoring earlier
treatment [syn: follow-up, followup, reexamination] 4: (accounting) a
service (less exhaustive than an audit) that provides some assurance to
interested parties as to the reliability of financial data [syn: limited
review] 5: a variety show with topical sketches and songs and dancing and
comedians [syn: revue] 6: a periodical that publishes critical essays on
current affairs or literature or art 7: a summary at the end that repeats
the substance of a longer discussion [syn: recapitulation, recap] 8: (law)
a judicial reexamination of the proceedings of a court (especially by an
appellate court) 9: practice intended to polish performance or refresh the
memory [syn: brushup] 10: a formal or official examination; "the platoon
stood ready for review"; "we had to wait for the inspection before we could
use the elevator" [syn: inspection] v 1: look at again; examine again;
"let's review your situation" [syn: reexamine] 2: appraise critically; "She
reviews books for the New York Times"; "Please critique this
performance" [syn: critique] 3: hold a review (of troops) [syn: go over,
survey] 4: refresh one's memory; "I reviewed the material before the
test" [syn: brush up, refresh] 5: look back upon (a period of time,
sequence of events, etc.); remember; "she reviewed her achievements with
pride" [syn: look back, retrospect]
Now, there's a risk(e) that you don't understand what this is getting at,
Jimmy, or that you forgot, so I'll reiterate: peer reviewed research has
more credibility than research put up by a physical therapist. Physical
therapists are not psychologists or psychiatrists.
Your opinion is worthless:
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/index.htm
"The great majority of the citations within this site and within the
book are taken from peer-reviewed science and medical journals listed
in the National Library of Medicine Database."
Stay stupid.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
No in your case, you clearly are a latent homosexual. No doubt about
it. You are far to obsessed to be otherwise.
Classic latent gay. Closet Case of the Month for alt.usenet.kooks, in fact,
I think.
People who naturally despise faggots are not really faggots themselves
just as people who naturally despise pedophiles are not really
pedophiles.
Speaking of alt.usenet.kooks why don't you ask your fellow anonymous
***** and documented liar "BYTE ME!" what it is like to post into
that group.
I set my followup to that group a few times just to see how
pathetically stupid "BYTE ME! really is and the depraved *****
complied, it was so humiliated that it sent cancel messages but it was
too late, google has it all documented.
hahahaha
haha
hahahahaha
Ooops!
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
.
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 02:07:33 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 04:49:50 GMT, The Secretary of HomInt3rn
<=FD|<=AE=E5=F1539=F49@\/\/0=E9|\/|.6=AE0> wrote:
=20
=20
I was busily flonking away in alt.politics.homosexuality, when The Godd=
ess
Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to BYTE ME!:
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" wrote:
"James Riske" wrote...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows=
that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexua=
l
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly dea=
l
with it.
He said peer reviewed. Did you not understand that? You are a moron
and a liar.
Here's some help for Jimmy-boy:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=3Dpeer
peer2 Pronunciation Key (p=EEr)
n.
1. A person who has equal standing with another or others, as in rank=
,
class, or age: children who are easily influenced by their peers.
2.
1. A nobleman.
2. A man who holds a peerage by descent or appointment.
3. Archaic. A companion; a fellow: ?To stray away into these forests
drear,/Alone, without a peer? (John Keats).
peer
n 1: a person who is of equal standing with another in a group [syn: eq=
ual,
match, compeer] 2: a nobleman (duke or marquis or earl or viscount or
baron) who is a member of the British peerage v : look searchingly; "We=
peered into the back of the shop to see whether a salesman was around"
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=3Dreview
re=B7view Pronunciation Key (r-vy)
v. re=B7viewed, re=B7view=B7ing, re=B7views
v. tr.
1. To look over, study, or examine again.
2. To consider retrospectively; look back on.
3. To examine with an eye to criticism or correction: reviewed the
research findings.
4. To write or give a critical report on (a new work or performance, =
for
example).
5. Law. To reexamine (an action or determination) judicially, especia=
lly
in a higher court, in order to correct possible errors.
6. To subject to a formal inspection, especially a military inspectio=
n.
v. intr.
1. To go over or restudy material: reviewing for a final exam.
2. To write critical reviews, especially for a newspaper or magazine.=
n.
1. A reexamination or reconsideration.
2. A retrospective view or survey.
3.
1. A restudying of subject matter.
2. An exercise for use in restudying material.
4. An inspection or examination for the purpose of evaluation.
5.
1. A report or essay giving a critical estimate of a work or
performance.
2. A periodical devoted to articles and essays on current affai=
rs,
literature, or art.
6.
1. A formal military inspection.
2. A formal military ceremony held in honor of a person or
occasion.
7. Law. A judicial reexamination, especially by a higher court, of an=
action or determination.
8. A musical show consisting of often satirical skits, songs, and dan=
ces;
a revue.
review
n 1: a new appraisal or evaluation [syn: reappraisal, revaluation,
reassessment] 2: an essay or article that gives a critical evaluation (=
as
of a book or play) [syn: critique, critical review, review article] 3: =
a
subsequent examination of a patient for the purpose of monitoring earli=
er
treatment [syn: follow-up, followup, reexamination] 4: (accounting) a
service (less exhaustive than an audit) that provides some assurance to=
interested parties as to the reliability of financial data [syn: limite=
d
review] 5: a variety show with topical sketches and songs and dancing a=
nd
comedians [syn: revue] 6: a periodical that publishes critical essays o=
n
current affairs or literature or art 7: a summary at the end that repea=
ts
the substance of a longer discussion [syn: recapitulation, recap] 8: (l=
aw)
a judicial reexamination of the proceedings of a court (especially by a=
n
appellate court) 9: practice intended to polish performance or refresh =
the
memory [syn: brushup] 10: a formal or official examination; "the platoo=
n
stood ready for review"; "we had to wait for the inspection before we c=
ould
use the elevator" [syn: inspection] v 1: look at again; examine again;
"let's review your situation" [syn: reexamine] 2: appraise critically; =
"She
reviews books for the New York Times"; "Please critique this
performance" [syn: critique] 3: hold a review (of troops) [syn: go over=
,
survey] 4: refresh one's memory; "I reviewed the material before the
test" [syn: brush up, refresh] 5: look back upon (a period of time,
sequence of events, etc.); remember; "she reviewed her achievements wit=
h
pride" [syn: look back, retrospect]
Now, there's a risk(e) that you don't understand what this is getting a=
t,
Jimmy, or that you forgot, so I'll reiterate: peer reviewed research ha=
s
more credibility than research put up by a physical therapist. Physical=
therapists are not psychologists or psychiatrists.
=20
=20
Your opinion is worthless:
=20
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/index.htm
=20
"The great majority of the citations within this site and within the
book are taken from peer-reviewed science and medical journals listed
in the National Library of Medicine Database."
=20
Stay stupid.
=20
=20
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are=
LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipat=
hy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"=
is clearly flawed.
No in your case, you clearly are a latent homosexual. No doubt about
it. You are far to obsessed to be otherwise.
Classic latent gay. Closet Case of the Month for alt.usenet.kooks, in f=
act,
I think.
=20
=20
People who naturally despise faggots are not really faggots themselves
just as people who naturally despise pedophiles are not really
pedophiles.
=20
You are a closet *****. Just admit it and get on with your life.
Speaking of alt.usenet.kooks why don't you ask your fellow anonymous
***** and documented liar "BYTE ME!" what it is like to post into
that group.
I set my followup to that group a few times just to see how
pathetically stupid "BYTE ME! really is and the depraved *****
complied, it was so humiliated that it sent cancel messages but it was
too late, google has it all documented.
=20
hahahaha
haha
=20
hahahahaha
=20
Ooops!
Your childish game and you fell for it yourself. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA=20
HA HA. What a fucking moron you are.
=20
=20
=20
--
=20
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do not=
hing."--Edmund Burke
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 01:26:54 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:57:41 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal
with it.
He said peer reviewed. Did you not understand that? You are a moron
and a liar.
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/index.htm
"The great majority of the citations within this site and within the
book are taken from peer-reviewed science and medical journals listed
in the National Library of Medicine Database."
Stay stupid.
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are LESS
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipathy
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
No in your case, you clearly are a latent homosexual. No doubt about
it. You are far to obsessed to be otherwise.
People who naturally despise faggots are not really faggots themselves
just as people who naturally despise pedophiles are not really
pedophiles.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
.
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 02:08:02 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:57:41 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
=20
=20
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:27:44 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
"James Riske" <james_riske@h0tmail.com> wrote in message=20
news:u8j4m19uit3ismpid42f1kbndcgg2mvi58@4ax.com...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:=
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows =
that=20
gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual=
=20
adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
Want to provide us with some evidence for that?
Already cited, you snipped it because you were unable to honestly deal=
with it.
He said peer reviewed. Did you not understand that? You are a moron=20
and a liar.
=20
=20
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/index.htm
=20
"The great majority of the citations within this site and within the
book are taken from peer-reviewed science and medical journals listed
in the National Library of Medicine Database."
=20
Stay stupid.
=20
=20
As well peer reviewed research indicating that homosexual people are =
LESS=20
likely to abuse children there is also some very good
peer reviewed research that shows that males who show a deep antipath=
y
towards homosexuality have latent homosexual tendencies.
Want to tell us something about that?
Just as flawed as your claim that faggots are less likely to be a
pedophile.
Lets see the same "research" on people who despise pedophiles, are
they "latent" pedophiles also? until you produce this your "research"
is clearly flawed.
No in your case, you clearly are a latent homosexual. No doubt about=20
it. You are far to obsessed to be otherwise.
=20
=20
=20
People who naturally despise faggots are not really faggots themselves
just as people who naturally despise pedophiles are not really
pedophiles.
=20
=20
Too bad that you are!
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 07:56:06 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
=20
=20
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that=
gay=20
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual adu=
lts.=20
=20
<snip>
=20
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
=20
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/pedophilia.htm
=20
"plenty of evidence indicates that homosexuals and bisexuals are
notably relatively overrepresented among pedophiles "
=20
You know that is lie, yet you keep repeating it. Have you no moral=20
fiber at all?
The physical therapist that runs that scam site has zero credentials and =
you know it.
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Riske" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 01:37:57 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:56:06 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual adults.
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/pedophilia.htm
"plenty of evidence indicates that homosexuals and bisexuals are
notably relatively overrepresented among pedophiles "
You know that is lie
<snip>
Then prove it *****, instead of making false accusation at everything
you don't agree with why don't you show exactly how it is a lie?
Go on *****, you are a documented liar yourself so this should be
easy for you, expose the findings of that site as being based on lies
and I will quit posting it, I am waiting but not holding my breath.
--
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."--Edmund Burke
.
|
|
|
| User: "BYTE ME!" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
29 Oct 2005 02:08:50 PM |
|
|
James Riske wrote:
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:56:06 GMT, "BYTE ME!" <donotreply@nowhere.com>
wrote:
=20
=20
James Riske wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:01:52 +0100, "Torch" <Torch@torch.com> wrote:
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows th=
at gay=20
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual a=
dults.=20
<snip>
A ***** is more likely to be a pedophile.
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/pedophilia.htm
"plenty of evidence indicates that homosexuals and bisexuals are
notably relatively overrepresented among pedophiles "
You know that is lie
=20
<snip>
=20
Then prove it *****, instead of making false accusation at everything
you don't agree with why don't you show exactly how it is a lie?
=20
Go on *****, you are a documented liar yourself so this should be
easy for you, expose the findings of that site as being based on lies
and I will quit posting it, I am waiting but not holding my breath.
=20
=20
=20
Well ***** it has been proven here over and over. Your feeble memory is =
not my problem. Anyway, you already know it is a lie.
--=20
Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none=20
more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant=20
to reason, and more contradictory in itself, than this thing called=20
Christianity. Too absurd for belief, too impossible to convince, and too =
inconsistent for practice, it renders the heart torpid, or produces only =
atheists and fanatics. As an engine of power, it serves the purpose of=20
despotism; and as a means of wealth, the avarice of priests; but so far=20
as respects the good of man in general, it leads to nothing here or=20
hereafter. =96Thomas Paine
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "michael james" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 01:45:35 AM |
|
|
wow...all these words that follow...I guess there is more than one word
to describe evil....besides 'evil' :)
Torch wrote:
<vivapadrepio@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1130473068.706956.304250@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
RoB WADe wrote:
There is only one word to describe it: Evil
JOE FITZGERALD
Jeffrey Curley's death was so barbaric it hurts to even contemplate it
now, yet that's exactly what we need to do, beginning with a
willingness to call it what it was, which was evil.
That's a word we don't hear much anymore.
It's almost as if it's no longer acceptable. Defense attorneys
certainly don't want to hear it, nor do shrinks who, like lawyers, have
a personal stake in denying its existence.
But evil does exist, as surely as love and goodness do.
Two years ago, at a Mattapan funeral for Jamal Jackson, the basketball
star who was slain, Pastor A.L. Foxworth walked to the pew where
Jamal's mother, Arnette, was seated, and spoke directly to her for all
to hear.
"I not only sympathize," he said. "I empathize. I have a son your son's
age, and every time my son leaves my house, even though I'm a man of
God _ saved, sanctified and filled with His spirit _ there's something
that pulls at me. Even though I walk by faith, I don't lack fear. It
seems as if I can't sleep easily until he comes back home again.
"I know he's a good boy. But that doesn't matter in these evil days.
The Bible says `redeem the time for the days are evil.' Our children
aren't evil, but the days are evil. When they go out into these
streets, no matter how good they are, evil is all around them."
It can't be said any clearer or more accurately than that, and yet
whenever evil makes its presence known here in Massachusetts we are
paralyzed by indecision, permitting apologists and activists to do our
thinking for us, even when we know their rationalizations are wrong.
If Jeffrey Curley's savage killing doesn't shake us to our core,
freeing us from that timidity, nothing ever will.
We're told that at least one of his alleged murderers was drawn to
having sex with kids, and indeed violated the boy's dead body.
Think about that for a moment.
Then remember the outrage of the local gay community a year ago when
its annual Pride March was excoriated here for having among its
contingents one that waved a sign insisting "all censorship is wrong,"
declaring "pedophiles have rights, too."
When the heat got so intense that even the Globe took notice of it, gay
leaders vowed such behavior would not be condoned in the future.
Really?
Four months ago, when that Pride March again polluted city streets, one
contingent calling itself Pansexual Pagans was led by a lowlife in a
polka-dot jock who waved a banner reading, "We are all pedophiles."
No cops stepped in, nor did any onlookers boo, nor did any
self-described gay leader express subsequent regret, much less a
clearly owed apology.
So once more, in broad daylight in downtown Boston, evil triumphed over
common decency, flaunting itself with impunity, secure in the knowledge
that good men and women would continue to stand by and do nothing.
While you're thinking about that, think about this.
Because the heinousness of this particular crime has even the loopiest
liberals running for cover, talk of a death penalty is fashionable
again.
Indeed, Middlesex County DA Tom Reilly says he's considering having
this tried as a federal crime because federal crimes allow for capital
punishment.
Good for him.
But better yet, rather than riding the coattails of this case, here's
hoping, if he runs for attorney general, he will make capital
punishment the major issue. Surely if he feels that strongly about it
this morning, he should feel just as strongly about it on the campaign
trail.
In the name of Jeffrey Curley, this is the kind of leadership we need,
the kind that will call evil what it is, and then have the courage to
act accordingly.
This is simply history repeating itself. Sodom all over again. This
goes back to my earlier post elsewhere referring to original sin.
Understanding original sin and its effects is crucial to understanding
the sacrament of baptism and its effects. Scripture tells us that our
first parents, Adam and Eve, lost their communion with God, *control
over their passions*, immortality, and a host of other good things that
God had originally intended all people to enjoy as part of an unfallen
human nature. By committing their "original sin," Adam and Eve
introduced sin into the world, and with sin came sickness, strife, and
death.
but your sick evil god new this would happen when he created adam and eve so
they didnt introduce evil into the world, your god did
Some non-Catholic groups deny the reality of original sin,
because they realise that the logic is incoherent
but
the Bible is clear that it's a sad fact.
To deny the existence of original sin is to walk hand-in-hand with
Satan, though you may not realize it.
acording to your irrational scriptures god created satan aswell - also
knowing full well that he would rebel and become evil - so yet again your
god is the first cause of all evil
Child abuse is a sick heinous crime - but at least one study shows that gay
people are actually LESS likely to abuse children than heterosexual adults.
I would rather leave my children in the care of an open balanced gay person
than with a bunch of twisted, sexually repressed religious types - just look
at the catholic priesthood!.
.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "michael james" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 01:44:31 AM |
|
|
wrote:
RoB WADe wrote:
There is only one word to describe it: Evil
JOE FITZGERALD
Jeffrey Curley's death was so barbaric it hurts to even contemplate it
now, yet that's exactly what we need to do, beginning with a
willingness to call it what it was, which was evil.
That's a word we don't hear much anymore.
It's almost as if it's no longer acceptable. Defense attorneys
certainly don't want to hear it, nor do shrinks who, like lawyers, have
a personal stake in denying its existence.
But evil does exist, as surely as love and goodness do.
Two years ago, at a Mattapan funeral for Jamal Jackson, the basketball
star who was slain, Pastor A.L. Foxworth walked to the pew where
Jamal's mother, Arnette, was seated, and spoke directly to her for all
to hear.
"I not only sympathize," he said. "I empathize. I have a son your son's
age, and every time my son leaves my house, even though I'm a man of
God _ saved, sanctified and filled with His spirit _ there's something
that pulls at me. Even though I walk by faith, I don't lack fear. It
seems as if I can't sleep easily until he comes back home again.
"I know he's a good boy. But that doesn't matter in these evil days.
The Bible says `redeem the time for the days are evil.' Our children
aren't evil, but the days are evil. When they go out into these
streets, no matter how good they are, evil is all around them."
It can't be said any clearer or more accurately than that, and yet
whenever evil makes its presence known here in Massachusetts we are
paralyzed by indecision, permitting apologists and activists to do our
thinking for us, even when we know their rationalizations are wrong.
If Jeffrey Curley's savage killing doesn't shake us to our core,
freeing us from that timidity, nothing ever will.
We're told that at least one of his alleged murderers was drawn to
having sex with kids, and indeed violated the boy's dead body.
Think about that for a moment.
Then remember the outrage of the local gay community a year ago when
its annual Pride March was excoriated here for having among its
contingents one that waved a sign insisting "all censorship is wrong,"
declaring "pedophiles have rights, too."
When the heat got so intense that even the Globe took notice of it, gay
leaders vowed such behavior would not be condoned in the future.
Really?
Four months ago, when that Pride March again polluted city streets, one
contingent calling itself Pansexual Pagans was led by a lowlife in a
polka-dot jock who waved a banner reading, "We are all pedophiles."
No cops stepped in, nor did any onlookers boo, nor did any
self-described gay leader express subsequent regret, much less a
clearly owed apology.
So once more, in broad daylight in downtown Boston, evil triumphed over
common decency, flaunting itself with impunity, secure in the knowledge
that good men and women would continue to stand by and do nothing.
While you're thinking about that, think about this.
Because the heinousness of this particular crime has even the loopiest
liberals running for cover, talk of a death penalty is fashionable
again.
Indeed, Middlesex County DA Tom Reilly says he's considering having
this tried as a federal crime because federal crimes allow for capital
punishment.
Good for him.
But better yet, rather than riding the coattails of this case, here's
hoping, if he runs for attorney general, he will make capital
punishment the major issue. Surely if he feels that strongly about it
this morning, he should feel just as strongly about it on the campaign
trail.
In the name of Jeffrey Curley, this is the kind of leadership we need,
the kind that will call evil what it is, and then have the courage to
act accordingly.
This is simply history repeating itself. Sodom all over again. This
goes back to my earlier post elsewhere referring to original sin.
Understanding original sin and its effects is crucial to understanding
the sacrament of baptism and its effects. Scripture tells us that our
first parents, Adam and Eve, lost their communion with God, *control
over their passions*, immortality, and a host of other good things that
God had originally intended all people to enjoy as part of an unfallen
human nature. By committing their "original sin," Adam and Eve
introduced sin into the world, and with sin came sickness, strife, and
death. Some non-Catholic groups deny the reality of original sin, but
the Bible is clear that it's a sad fact.
To deny the existence of original sin is to walk hand-in-hand with
Satan, though you may not realize it.
From what you say, I deduce that you see all people who 'deny the
existence of original
sin' as people who are walking hand-in-hand with Satan.
I am guessing that you believe that is a bad thing, and
that you are not walking with Satan, which is a good thing.
God good, Satan bad.
You good, non-believers bad.
Well if your view turns out to be correct then good for you and sad for
others.
However, if your view is not correct, then you might be wasting your
time worrying about something which is just some theological fantasy.
.
|
|
|
| User: "lkjahds7yu3q4" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 03:08:13 AM |
|
|
"michael james" <cadlib_@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:4361C8CF.4070906@videotron.ca...
God good, Satan bad.
You good, non-believers bad.
no! you got it wrong, atheist.
its:
god bad, satan bad
theists bad, atheists good.
lol^3
.
|
|
|
| User: "øéòéï áøúåïý/Riain Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 09:36:48 AM |
|
|
No you have wrong.
God is neither good nor bad.
satan does not exist.
Theists are both good and bad.
Atheists are both good and bad.
"lkjahds7yu3q4" <lkjahds7yu3q4@reality.gov> wrote in message
news:4361dc20$1_2@x-privat.org...
|
| "michael james" <cadlib_@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:4361C8CF.4070906@videotron.ca...
|
| > God good, Satan bad.
| > You good, non-believers bad.
|
| no! you got it wrong, atheist.
|
| its:
|
| god bad, satan bad
| theists bad, atheists good.
|
| lol^3
|
|
.
|
|
|
| User: "lkjahds7yu3q4" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 12:12:13 PM |
|
|
"øéòéï áøúåïý/Riain Barton" <riain@zion.org.il> wrote in message
news:ACq8f.20252$x6.7457@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
No you have wrong.
God is neither good nor bad.
satan does not exist.
Theists are both good and bad.
Atheists are both good and bad.
no, theists are not good. they are only bad.
i have learned that here, on this ng. sorry.
talk to your friends on this ng riain. not me.
ps.
how come god is neither good or bad, but
satan doesnt exist? lol^3
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 12:27:42 PM |
|
|
lkjahds7yu3q4 wrote:
"=F8=E9=F2=E9=EF =E1=F8=FA=E5=EF=FD/Riain Barton" <riain@zion.org.il> wro=
te in message
news:ACq8f.20252$x6.7457@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
No you have wrong.
God is neither good nor bad.
satan does not exist.
Theists are both good and bad.
Atheists are both good and bad.
no, theists are not good. they are only bad.
i have learned that here, on this ng. sorry.
You generally see a rather odd selection of
theists in alt.atheism. Most of the people
I know are theists of one sort or another,
and with few exceptions they're decent people.
Decent people with imaginary friends, mind
you, but decent people nonetheless.
--=20
Walt Smith
Firelock on DALNet
.
|
|
|
| User: "michael james" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 12:51:26 PM |
|
|
wrote:
lkjahds7yu3q4 wrote:
"øéòéï áøúåïý/Riain Barton" <riain@zion.org.il> wrote in message
news:ACq8f.20252$x6.7457@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
No you have wrong.
God is neither good nor bad.
satan does not exist.
Theists are both good and bad.
Atheists are both good and bad.
no, theists are not good. they are only bad.
i have learned that here, on this ng. sorry.
You generally see a rather odd selection of
theists in alt.atheism. Most of the people
I know are theists of one sort or another,
and with few exceptions they're decent people.
Decent people with imaginary friends, mind
you, but decent people nonetheless.
it would seem to me that anyone who masturbates has an imaginary friend.
Think about that the next time you jerkoff. :)_
.
|
|
|
| User: "øéòéï áøúåïý/Riain Barton" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 02:41:02 PM |
|
|
ROTFLMAO!!!
"michael james" <cadlib@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:4362651E.4060202@videotron.ca...
|
| it would seem to me that anyone who masturbates has an imaginary
friend.
| Think about that the next time you jerkoff. :)_
|
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 02:43:02 PM |
|
|
on 28 Oct 2005 in alt.atheism, dear sweet michael james
(cadlib@videotron.ca) made the light shine upon us with this:
it would seem to me that anyone who masturbates has an imaginary friend.
Think about that the next time you jerkoff. :)_
It's not imaginary if you can touch it.
--
Uncle Vic
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
----
"The world is only 5-6 thousand years old does not mean the planet
earth is only 5-6 thousand years old. There have been many worlds
created and destroyed on this planet. The creation of the planet is
described in Genesis 1. The creation of the world is described in
Genesis 2. Two different kind of creations." --Eric Brze
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andrealphus" |
|
| Title: Re: There is only one word to describe it: Evil |
28 Oct 2005 12:35:49 PM |
|
|
In News 1130520462.337866.237330@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com,,
firelock_ny@hotmail.com at firelock_ny@hotmail.com, typed this:
lkjahds7yu3q4 wrote:
"øéòéï áøúåïý/Riain Barton" <riain@zion.org.il> wrote in message
news:ACq8f.20252$x6.7457@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
No you have wrong.
God is neither good nor bad.
satan does not exist.
Theists are both good and bad.
Atheists are both good and bad.
no, theists are not good. they are only bad.
i have learned that here, on this ng. sorry.
You generally see a rather odd selection of
theists in alt.atheism. Most of the people
I know are theists of one sort or another,
and with few exceptions they're decent people.
Decent people with imaginary friends, mind
you, but decent people nonetheless.
A five year old with an imaginary bunny is one thing, a 30 year old with an
imaginary, vengful, diety that tells them to go out and convert or kill
people is an entirely different matter.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
|
|
| | | | | | |
