Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message

chriskrolczyk@hotmail.com (Chris Krolczyk) wrote in article
:

(Newsgroups snipped for obvious reasons)

"jabriol" wrote in message news:...

#> The charter of s.a.p does explicitly state that crossposting between
#> t.o and s.a.p is to be very restrictive, but it is also permitted.
#>
#> In order to respect the charter of s.a.p I have put in place the
#> limitation that allows crossposting, but only to the two groups.
#>
#> The a.r.j-w crosspost limit was to prevent the abusive crossposting
#> by certain posters. At no time is content affected of any posts
#> in either case.

(the basis of censorship... well let called this abusive posting and
then..wham I can do what I want..

He *can* do what he wants.

what is your point?

That a moderated newsgroup is exactly what
it says it is, moron.

It's a *moderated newsgroup*.

This will continue to be pointed
out to you. The fact that you either
cannot, or choose not, to understand
this is irrelevant.

Hey, you was the one who brought the subject up, and Greig made you the

You posted to t.o by accident after months
of whining about how you had been "banned"
and *I'm* a fool? Please.

beside Jabriol slant of evolruion whaile
truthful, would make us look bad..

Wow. An utter lie wrapped in a barely
readable typo. You must be proud.

sure... ask greig on his defintion of. "abusive poster's"

Don't have to. As moderator - and as somebody
who has an IQ above a single digit, which is
a level of mental faculty you *don't* have,
he can pick and choose who is and isn't one.

so if we restict his posts, he would go
away, in the mean time, I will just up the ban on Jabriol, nobody

nobody would care, I am God of the NG)

Because he's the moderator, you *****.

your point?

That he can control what gets posted to,
and more importantly, *from* t.o.

This is real simple stuff, Jabs.

It's not my problem if you can't
comprehend it.

He has every right to do this until
a RFD/CFV is proposed and/or undertaken
which will remove the moderated status
of t.o. You *could've* done this,
but unsuprisingly, you didn't. I suppose
it would interfere with your self-image
as an oppressed martyr too much.

I can't post to T.O

You. Just. DID.

See news:<d222de3e.0309150308.4f32563@posting.google.com>,
there?

If you didn't post that, then who did?

Your evil twin who *also* goes by the
name of Jabriol, perhaps?

He won't accept a RFD outside from T.O.
now do the math.. a Retard can figure this out.. why can't you?

You posted to t.o recently. Any rhetorical
fluff you might choose to spew about how
you can't do this or can't do that is
beside the point entirely.

Besides, it's obvious that you have no
intention of playing by the rules
concerning the RFD/CFV process, so
who's the "retard" in *that* case?

{which is content moderation and censorship,,, when any publication

writen words has to be restricted, it is called censorship}.

No, it isn't.

yes it is

Baloney. It would be censorship if the government
decided to do it, *not* a moderator of a newsgroup
in which participants in said newsgroup *agree to
abide by the rules the moderator set up*.

If you don't like it, post your masturbatory
fantasies from an *unmoderated* newsgroup. Don't
be surprised at the reaction you get, though.

Is the editor of a newspaper magazine "censoring" a
reporter if he attempts to get an inaccurate or
libelous article published and the editor stops
it from going to print?

different scenario.. change of subject noted.

Your reading comprehension skills are pretty
damn atrophied - or nonexistent.

The same thing applies to moderated newsgroups.

Deal with it, *****.

and beside even T.O members agrees that it is content moderation..

Where, kook?

read your own pathetic content censorship group if you don't belive me.

And what the ***** is this sentence supposed to mean?

You're actually not stating that my choosing to
limit newsgroups is tantamount to censoring you,
is it?

If you are, you're even more of a loon than I
assumed previously.

-Chris Krolczyk

Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message

Hey Chris remember this one:

I guess Greig follow thru eh?

(snip)

Prove that he posted it.

Consensus in that thread says it
was probably you.

And what's the reposting of that
article supposed to prove? That
you're an even bigger moron,
perhaps?

-Chris Krolczyk