Religions > Atheism > Re: ToBs:The Origin Of Dogs Biogenetic engineering Or evolution?-Manpanzee anyone?
| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"Rey Deletrina" |
| Date: |
16 Dec 2005 09:33:49 PM |
| Object: |
Re: ToBs:The Origin Of Dogs Biogenetic engineering Or evolution?-Manpanzee anyone? |
------=_Part_19732_19222559.1134790429153
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Budikka666 wrote:
If scientist are wrong about dogs initially, what can they say abou=
t
man? The bottom line is, no new evolved species have been seen today.
Another Jabriol lie in a long line of lies:
Example A.
Fossil primate species Pelycodus ralstoni changed into two separate
species, Notharctus nunienus and Notharctus venticolus in an unbroken
fossil transition. The two later became even more distinct, and the
descendants of nunienus are now labeled as genus Smilodectes instead of
genus Notharctus.
The evolution of a new genus is macroevolution proven.
And in what laboratory was done?
Research paper?
It seems that this "special lab" bypassed other steps on the scientific
method.
Example B.
Two species of planktonic foraminifera, Globigerinoides trilobus and
Orbulina universa, shared a common ancestor in the early Miocene. The
first appearance of 0. universa (~15 million years ago) was preceded by
an increase in the morphological variance of the ancestral lineage,
including the origin of several new and short-ranging morphospecies.
Biological speciation (cladogenesis) occurred priorly. Oxygen isotopic
ratios of G. trilobus and 0. universa indicate that the entire
evolutionary transition took place within mixed layer habitats similar
to those occupied by modern G. trilobus. The origin of Orbulina was a
case of sympatric speciation at shallow depths in the open ocean and
can be traced in an unbroken line.
Speciation is macroevolution proven.
Speculation is not proof. Where did you take science? biology from DC
comics?
Example C.
An uninterrupted sequence of freshwater snail fossils in Pliocene
deposits in Yugoslavia show an unbroken sequence where one species
changes into another over a period of seven million years.
Speciation is macroevolution proven.
And you around to observed this event no doubt.
Example D.
Eocoelia is a small brachiopod (this one is commonly known as a "lamp
shell") from the lower Silurian. It can be found all over the world,
including in Britain, Nova Scotia, Pennsylvania USA, Iowa USA, Siberia,
Norway, and South America. In several such places, a succession of 4
species has been found consistently over wide areas (North America and
Europe for example).
Data came from fossils gathered at thirteen different depths covering
about ten million years. There is a smooth transition that starts at
one species and ends at a different species.
Speciation is macroevolution proven.
A man flys around in cape with a S pianted on his chest. Kryptonians are
here, proven.
SNIP____________________+++++++++++++++++++++++____________________________=
_
Now then, get back to us when you when your tour of duty in Narnia is over.
------=_Part_19732_19222559.1134790429153
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
<p>Budikka666 wrote:<br>> <br>> > If scien=
tist are wrong about dogs initially, what can they say about man? The botto=
m line is, no new evolved species have been seen today.<br>> <br>> An=
other Jabriol lie in a long line of lies:
<br>> <br>> Example A.<br>> Fossil primate species Pelycodus ralst=
oni changed into two separate<br>> species, Notharctus nunienus and Noth=
arctus venticolus in an unbroken<br>> fossil transition. The two l=
ater became even more distinct, and the
<br>> descendants of nunienus are now labeled as genus Smilodectes inste=
ad of<br>> genus Notharctus.<br>> <br>> The evolution of a new gen=
us is macroevolution proven.<br>> </p>
<p>And in what laboratory was done?<br>Research paper?</p>
<p>It seems that this "special lab" bypassed other steps on the s=
cientific method.</p>
<p>> <br>> Example B.<br>> Two species of planktonic foraminifera,=
Globigerinoides trilobus and<br>> Orbulina universa, shared a common an=
cestor in the early Miocene. The<br>> first appearance of 0. unive=
rsa (~15 million years ago) was preceded by
<br>> an increase in the morphological variance of the ancestral lineage=
,<br>> including the origin of several new and short-ranging morphospeci=
es.<br>> <br>> Biological speciation (cladogenesis) occurred priorly.=
Oxygen isotopic
<br>> ratios of G. trilobus and 0. universa indicate that the entire<br>=
> evolutionary transition took place within mixed layer habitats similar=
<br>> to those occupied by modern G. trilobus. The origin of Orbul=
ina was a
<br>> case of sympatric speciation at shallow depths in the open ocean a=
nd<br>> can be traced in an unbroken line.<br>> <br>> Speciation i=
s macroevolution proven.<br>> <br>> </p>
<p>Speculation is not proof. Where did you take science? biology from DC co=
mics?</p>
<p>> Example C.<br>> An uninterrupted sequence of freshwater snail fo=
ssils in Pliocene<br>> deposits in Yugoslavia show an unbroken sequence =
where one species<br>> changes into another over a period of seven milli=
on years.
<br>> <br>> Speciation is macroevolution proven.</p>
<p>And you around to observed this event no doubt.</p>
<p>> <br>> <br>> Example D.<br>> Eocoelia is a small brachiopod=
(this one is commonly known as a "lamp<br>> shell") from the =
lower Silurian. It can be found all over the world,<br>> including=
in Britain, Nova Scotia, Pennsylvania USA, Iowa USA, Siberia,
<br>> Norway, and South America. In several such places, a success=
ion of 4<br>> species has been found consistently over wide areas (North=
America and<br>> Europe for example).<br>> <br>> Data came from f=
ossils gathered at thirteen different depths covering
<br>> about ten million years. There is a smooth transition that s=
tarts at<br>> one species and ends at a different species.<br>> <br>&=
gt; Speciation is macroevolution proven.<br>> <br>> </p>
<p>A man flys around in cape with a S pianted on his chest. Kryptonians are=
here, proven.</p>
<p>SNIP____________________+++++++++++++++++++++++_________________________=
____</p>
<p><br>Now then, get back to us when you when your tour of duty in Narnia i=
s over.</p>
------=_Part_19732_19222559.1134790429153--
.
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: ToBs:The Origin Of Dogs Biogenetic engineering Or evolution?-Manpanzee anyone? |
17 Dec 2005 05:58:17 AM |
|
|
Rey Deletrina wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
If scientist are wrong about dogs initially, what can they say about
man? The bottom line is, no new evolved species have been seen today.
Another Jabriol lie in a long line of lies:
Example A.
Fossil primate species Pelycodus ralstoni changed into two separate
species, Notharctus nunienus and Notharctus venticolus in an unbroken
fossil transition. The two later became even more distinct, and the
descendants of nunienus are now labeled as genus Smilodectes instead of
genus Notharctus.
The evolution of a new genus is macroevolution proven.
And in what laboratory was done?
Laboratory? It was in the wild. Evolution is a naturally occurring
phenomenon:
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/creation/pelycodus.html
It seems that this "special lab" bypassed other steps on the scientific
method.
Who said *anything* about a special lab? Get a clue! Like you would
know *anything* about the scientific method! LoL!
Example B.
Two species of planktonic foraminifera, Globigerinoides trilobus and
Orbulina universa, shared a common ancestor in the early Miocene. The
first appearance of 0. universa (~15 million years ago) was preceded by
an increase in the morphological variance of the ancestral lineage,
including the origin of several new and short-ranging morphospecies.
Biological speciation (cladogenesis) occurred priorly. Oxygen isotopic
ratios of G. trilobus and 0. universa indicate that the entire
evolutionary transition took place within mixed layer habitats similar
to those occupied by modern G. trilobus. The origin of Orbulina was a
case of sympatric speciation at shallow depths in the open ocean and
can be traced in an unbroken line.
Speciation is macroevolution proven.
Speculation is not proof.
Speculation? The word is "speciation" and it has been observed
repeatedly in the wild and in the lab. The proof of this is published
in the science journals for anyone with the ability to read:
http://www.geocities.com/earthhistory/sle.htm
Where did you take science? biology from DC
comics?
These are examples form peer-reviewed science papers published in
refereed science journals. Now retreat again and toss out another
straw man. That's what you do best.
Example C.
An uninterrupted sequence of freshwater snail fossils in Pliocene
deposits in Yugoslavia show an unbroken sequence where one species
changes into another over a period of seven million years.
Speciation is macroevolution proven.
And you around to observed this event no doubt.
No, but the fossil record was and records mnay unbroken evolution
lineages.
And what do you have to offer from your fossil brain? I see
unmitigated mindless blather but, as usual, not even the remotest hint
of a shred of scientific refutation. These are scientific facts and
you're impotent before them as your juvenile response demonstrates
beyond contention.
Example D.
Eocoelia is a small brachiopod (this one is commonly known as a "lamp
shell") from the lower Silurian. It can be found all over the world,
including in Britain, Nova Scotia, Pennsylvania USA, Iowa USA, Siberia,
Norway, and South America. In several such places, a succession of 4
species has been found consistently over wide areas (North America and
Europe for example).
Data came from fossils gathered at thirteen different depths covering
about ten million years. There is a smooth transition that starts at
one species and ends at a different species.
Speciation is macroevolution proven.
A man flys around in cape with a S pianted on his chest. Kryptonians are
here, proven.
No, but your fundamental ignorance and impotence is proven. Thanks for
adding to the mountian of evidence that's you;re a Loser, backing a
loser. Now keep running and tossing out your excuses and straw men.
It's what you do best, after all.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
