| Topic: |
Religions > Atheism |
| User: |
"StarDragonNight" |
| Date: |
29 Dec 2005 08:08:42 AM |
| Object: |
Re: TOE requires faith and amoral values. |
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
StarDragonNight <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
news:f61e0e1e0512290541k45ac68b1ueb5697fa0baa663c@mail.gmail.com:
Scientists' theories often seem to rely on premises that require their
own kind of faith. For example, when it comes to the origin of life,
most evolutionists adhere to ideas that require faith in certain
"doctrines." Facts are mixed with theories. And when scientists use
the weight of their authority to impose blind belief in evolution,
they are in reality implying: 'You are not responsible for your
morality because you are merely the product of biology, chemistry, and
physics.' Biologist Richard Dawkins says that in the universe 'there
is no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but pointless
indifference.'
And your point is what?
A good attorney can justify rape using TOE
.
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: TOE requires faith and amoral values. |
30 Dec 2005 09:25:07 AM |
|
|
In <f61e0e1e0512290608l608ffe59p47d06fe542d0bf4f@mail.gmail.com>,
StarDragonNight <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
StarDragonNight <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
news:f61e0e1e0512290541k45ac68b1ueb5697fa0baa663c@mail.gmail.com:
Scientists' theories often seem to rely on premises that require their
own kind of faith. For example, when it comes to the origin of life,
most evolutionists adhere to ideas that require faith in certain
"doctrines." Facts are mixed with theories. And when scientists use
the weight of their authority to impose blind belief in evolution,
they are in reality implying: 'You are not responsible for your
morality because you are merely the product of biology, chemistry, and
physics.' Biologist Richard Dawkins says that in the universe 'there
is no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but pointless
indifference.'
And your point is what?
A good attorney can justify rape using TOE
If they tried, society can respond that removing a rapist from the general
population is an evolutionary necessity.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
--------------------------------------------------
So much for that "storm of the century" excuse
http://makeashorterlink.com/?A3992495C
NO held hostage by oil corporations,
ANWR demanded as ransom
http://makeashorterlink.com/?J5C92195C
White House balks at spending on US citizens,
needs more billions for Iraq!
http://makeashorterlink.com/?G1D93595C
(Tell me again how much we spent bailing out the S&Ls?)
http://www.nola.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: TOE requires faith and amoral values. |
29 Dec 2005 01:47:29 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:08:42 -0500, in alt.atheism , StarDragonNight
<Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> in
<f61e0e1e0512290608l608ffe59p47d06fe542d0bf4f@mail.gmail.com> wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
StarDragonNight <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
news:f61e0e1e0512290541k45ac68b1ueb5697fa0baa663c@mail.gmail.com:
Scientists' theories often seem to rely on premises that require their
own kind of faith. For example, when it comes to the origin of life,
most evolutionists adhere to ideas that require faith in certain
"doctrines." Facts are mixed with theories. And when scientists use
the weight of their authority to impose blind belief in evolution,
they are in reality implying: 'You are not responsible for your
morality because you are merely the product of biology, chemistry, and
physics.' Biologist Richard Dawkins says that in the universe 'there
is no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but pointless
indifference.'
And your point is what?
A good attorney can justify rape using TOE
No, you are not a good attorney and trying and succeeding are not the
same.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ash" |
|
| Title: Re: TOE requires faith and amoral values. |
30 Dec 2005 09:06:09 AM |
|
|
StarDragonNight wrote:
R. Pierce Butler wrote:
StarDragonNight <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
news:f61e0e1e0512290541k45ac68b1ueb5697fa0baa663c@mail.gmail.com:
Scientists' theories often seem to rely on premises that require their
own kind of faith. For example, when it comes to the origin of life,
most evolutionists adhere to ideas that require faith in certain
"doctrines." Facts are mixed with theories. And when scientists use
the weight of their authority to impose blind belief in evolution,
they are in reality implying: 'You are not responsible for your
morality because you are merely the product of biology, chemistry, and
physics.' Biologist Richard Dawkins says that in the universe 'there
is no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but pointless
indifference.'
And your point is what?
A good attorney can justify rape using TOE
Jabbers, you could have at least made an effort to stay in disguise
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
