Adrian wrote:
Whether or not I am begging the question is a statement that
we all assume is objectively either true or false. Why do you
assume this for some statements like this one and not others
such as moral statements?
Because 'begging the question' is something that can be true or false
by definition.
When are you going to answer my challenge about showing just
ONE example of how you can make an objective determination of
a moral issue? Just one example. Let's have it...
I have done so before in other threads (and not just teh most
recent one I have brought this up in) -- the principle of
universalizability.
How can 'universalizability' be objective if it is based on subjective
concepts such as 'rights'?
.
