"Red Diaper-Doper Babies: The ACLU"
http://www.newsmax.com/articles/print.shtml?a=1999/11/2/50344
Michael Savage
November 2, 1999

Craig Pennington <cpenning@milo.org> wrote:

Scott M. Kozel <kozelsm@attbi.com> wrote:

The ACLU supports individual liberties for those who they consider to be
politically correct; otherwise they won't lift a finger.

Yeah, like Jerry Falwell and Nazi's.

No, like ordinary Christians and Jews.


"Red Diaper-Doper Babies: The ACLU"
http://www.newsmax.com/articles/print.shtml?a=1999/11/2/50344
Michael Savage
November 2, 1999

Unelected, largely invisible, a secret society of lawyer-gangsters has
waged a merciless war against America.

Let us look at what the ACLU, in its devious machinations, has done just
recently.

The police in California enjoyed a unique protection for about 17
years. A law, passed in 1982, allowed them to sue citizens who file
false complaints against them. I like that law because most of the
complaints against the police — most, not all — that I have followed are
by paid activists who work for criminal enterprises and criminal
businesses, seeking to throw out cases against drug dealers and their
ilk. Of course, there are also those on the looney left who sue cops
for a living. But now the ACLU has struck this law down.

At the bidding of the ACLU, the Superior Court of San Francisco ruled
against this law protecting the police from frivolous and malicious
suits. Again we see that the courts in San Francisco are not so
superior after all. In fact, they are more like a clown act. Watching
their antics is like watching the apes at the zoo mimic each other.
There's no mistaking it; this is what the courts of San Francisco have
become.

Some misguided souls think that the ACLU is there to protect freedom of
speech and the Constitution. But I tell you that the only constitution
the ACLU has ever protected is that of the ex-USSR. Anything that falls
outside their leftopathic agenda is, as far as they're concerned, also
outside the protection of "freedom of speech" and the US Constitution.

The founding fathers, in their infinite wisdom, crafted the greatest
document for Mankind's liberation in the history of the world; it's
called the Constitution of the United States of America. The ACLU has
tried to rip this hallowed document to pieces a thousand different ways
and a thousand different times. But, whenever it suits them, they wrap
themselves in the Constitution and the flag.

But does anyone really think it's the ACLU that keeps people like me
from being thrown in jail, as might happen in China, for speaking out
like this? Anyone with any sense knows the ACLU would bring China right
into our very homes if we would let them. And they would jump for joy
to see people like me put away for good. That's how dedicated they are
to liberty and justice.

In California, the people voted via popular initiative to turn back the
invasion from Mexico and China': to stop giving education and medicine
to illegal aliens.

The ACLU shopped this popular state initiative to a radical, left wing
federal judge, Maryann Pfaelzer, and managed to trash the votes of
nearly 6 million Californians, condemning our public schools and health
care systems to a third-world existence.

Mark Rosenbaum, the capo of the ACLU, actually celebrated this blow
against the people!

So who are these ACLU fiends? If we focus on them as individuals, we
find most were brought up in dysfunctional homes, by commie parents, and
attended commie camps in the summer. They're a psychotic bunch of
red-diaper-doper babies who were suckled on Karl Marx. Many are non
compos mentis and survive on medication, yet they are quite affluent due
to the enormous settlements they extort with bogus lawsuits while they
pose as champions of the downtrodden!

The truth is that they are beasts of prey living off the downtrodden,
and are responsible for much of the lack of justice in our society and
for the perpetuation of our social problems.

America cries out for a strong leader to arise, dis-band, de-fund and
de-port these lawyer-gangsters before we all end up in a new,
Rwanda-like reality.

[end of article]

The ACLU supports individual liberties for those who they consider to be
politically correct; otherwise they won't lift a finger.

If you mean that they won't litigate to save the fortunes of some fat

white
guy Evangelist preacher when he gets in a tax jam, you're entirely right.

How about some examples where they have defended Christians?

Which is why the ACLU supported Jerry Falwell
in his court case against the state of Virginia late
in 2001 regarding his proposed expansion of his
church.

On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:06:55 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
<calee@optonline.net> wrote:

The ACLU supports indivual liberties including those of the
religious.

How about some examples where they have defended Christians?