<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5ii2jvs1giln5de5iqfjfuikevjvpmur3g@4ax.com...
waging wars because of mass graves
____________________________________________________________________________
_____
It has been argued that if a regime commits mass murder, war is justified
against that regime.
This argument is only acceptable if it is consistent.
Because this argument has been used in the case of Iraq, the American
government is now
morally obliged to wage war against all regimes which commit mass murder.
____________________________________________________________________________
_____
There seems to be a misunderstanding. Mass murder and genocide are not
reasons to go to war against so-called agressor regimes. If anything, mass
murder of other so-called racial groups is considered to be in our national
interest, as it reduces the world population without presumably negatively
affecting the birth rate of so-called whites. The reason these regimes are
ever targeted is that they are perceived to threaten the stability of the
world economic system. The purpose of the world economic system is of
course to help the super-wealthy get more richer. It's a little unclear how
Saddam Hussein threatened that status quo, but someone must have thought
so, or our military propaganda machine would not have put so many
attaractive lies in the moputh of the president as justification. Could oil
have had something to do with it after all?
.
